Asset Forfeiture

Philadelphia Drops Two Asset Forfeiture Cases Amid Legal Battle

|

Fighting the good fight
Credit: Institute for Justice

Chalk up yet another win for the Institute for Justice (IJ), or at least the beginnings of a win. They filed a federal class-action lawsuit earlier in the year to try to block Philadelphia's abusive civil forfeiture program. They argue it's one of the worst in the country, using a complex, obtuse bureaucratic process to snatch homes, cars and other properties from residents without ever even charging them with crimes.

Today Philadelphia's district attorney's office has dropped the civil forfeiture proceedings against two families IJ is representing. Philadelphia will no longer seek to take the homes of Christos Sourovelis and Doila Welch. IJ is celebrating, but will still be pressing forward with its federal suit:

"After months of uncertainty, my family can finally rest easy knowing that our home is our home again," said Christos. "I've lived in Philadelphia for over 30 years. I never thought it was possible for the police to just show up at my doorstep without notice and take my house when I've done nothing wrong. But that's exactly what happened to me and my family—and we're not alone. That's why we're going to keep fighting for everyone still trapped in Philadelphia's civil forfeiture nightmare."

"We are pleased that Christos and Doila's families will be able to enjoy their homes for the holidays," said Darpana Sheth, an attorney with the Institute for Justice, which is representing the plaintiffs in their challenge to Philadelphia's program. "Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for many other Philadelphia families. Philadelphia law enforcement continues to use its system of robo-forfeitures to pad its budgets with millions in unaccountable funds by stripping innocent people of their rights and property."

Sourovelis ended up a target when his son was charged with dealing heroin. Read more on his case here. Welch's home was threatened when her estranged husband was caught dealing small amounts of marijuana. Read more about that case here.

This has been a year for asset forfeiture abuse to really get some national attention. It's the focus of an ongoing Washington Post series and has been highlighted on both The Daily Show and Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, the two shows that currently (whether we like it or not) serve as our cultural barometer to determine whether a news topic has sticking power.  

Below, watch the video from IJ explaining exactly how brutal Philadelphia's civil forfeiture process actually is:

NEXT: Vermont Kills Single-Payer Health Care Plan After Tax Hikes Prove Too Hefty

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. In other words, they’re making a “sacrifice” so the plaintiffs lose standing, so they can continue to do this in the future?

    1. IJ is celebrating, but will still be pressing forward with its federal suit

      IJ is still pursuing the suit anyway.

  2. As if just living in Filthadelphia isn’t nightmare enough.

  3. “I’ve lived in Philadelphia for over 30 years. I never thought it was possible for the police to just show up at my doorstep without notice and take my house when I’ve done nothing wrong. ”

    No one does. Especially not law-abiding citizens. In any district in America.

    That’s why these laws will continue.

    1. Try explaining the crime of structuring. A friend kept thinking that making cash deposits below the reporting threshold (like the restaurant owner in Iowa)was suspicious or evidence of a crime. No, it IS the crime. He just couldn’t believe that depositing your own money in your own bank account IS ILLEGAL. I mean, he literally could not believe it.

      1. Clearly tinfoil nuttery from you racist teafucking ratbaggers!!1! /shrieky

  4. ” has been highlighted on both The Daily Show and Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, the two shows that currently (whether we like it or not) serve as our cultural barometer to determine whether a news topic has sticking power”

    God, what a sad statement. That is, like, Holocaust-sad or Russian-novel sad…

    1. “Last Week Tonight” – is that real? Never heard of it.

      1. On HBO.

  5. Good video, too.

  6. IJ just refuses to lose. I fucking love them so much.

    1. Tough for me to get behind trial lawyers, but in this case I’ll give a long, lean, wet one for their service!

      1. I love litigators, depending on which side they’re on. IJ has probably the best litigators in the country, which is awesome for liberty purposes.

    2. I donate to the Innocence Project, but the IJ kicks so much ass, I am going to have to put them on my list of charitable organizations to donate to.

  7. Valerie `s posting is shocking… on saturday I bought a great new Jaguar XJ after I been earnin $6211 this last four weeks an would you believe 10k this past month . it’s by-far my favourite-work I’ve ever done . I started this eight months/ago and immediately startad bringin home over $71… per hour .
    am impresses but join this site and earn money easily.
    _________________ http://www.jobsfish.com

  8. Finally some good news on the personal liberty front.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.