Minimum Wage

L.A.'s Higher Minimum Wage for Hotel Workers Really a Tax on Non-Union Labor

|

And you think room service prices are crazy now.
Credit: LA Wad / photo on flickr

Two hotel industry groups are suing in federal court of the massive wage hike Los Angeles is putting into place for workers at large hotels. The Los Angeles City Council is mandating a $15.37 minimum wage for hotel workers for hotels with at least 300 workers.

Actually, a correction: The jacked up minimum wage applies unless the workers are unionized and agree through collective bargaining to lower wages. From the Los Angeles Times:

Under the ordinance, hotels with a unionized workforce can be exempted from paying the $15.37 hourly wage, if workers agree in their contract to relinquish that opportunity. Hotels that face severe financial hardships also can be exempted.

The two groups bringing the lawsuit note that it gives unions a "powerful economic wedge" against hotel management, which is obviously what the intent is. It's a penalty for non-unionization. Similar exceptions can be found in other piecemeal efforts to jack up minimum wages in selected locations and industries.

So the goal of these minimum wage increases is not to actually mandate "living wages" for low-skilled workers, but rather to essentially coerce hotels in accepting unionization with the promise of collectively bargained cost controls. And when those hotels accept unionization, that means a payday for unions via new dues, even though it means the actual union employees will make less. Here's some analysis of how unions cash in from this loophole from Maxford Nelsen of the Freedom Foundation.

We also know that a previous increase in minimum wages for hotels by the Los Angeles International Airport has cost jobs. An analyst hired by the city (and then ignored) prior to this last vote to expand the minimum wage increase to other hotels determined that there was a 12 percent increase in hotel jobs in Los Angeles County compared to 2007, but hotels by the airport have seen a 10 percent loss in jobs over that same timeframe.

And that's the point, isn't it? What better way to get workers to accept unionization than to force a situation where they could be laid off unless their employers agree to unionized collective bargaining to keep wages down? But the unions will claim they're the ones looking out for the workers. And they'll blame corporate greed for any layoffs while counting their union dues off in the corner.

NEXT: Legal Abortion Would Require Man's Permission Under New Missouri Bill

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. This is really fucked up. Hope the hotels win.

    1. Don’t count on it.

      And yes, it is fucked up. But this fucking city is going all-in on unions. I see union agitation regularly these days.

  2. Unions, of course, are merely free associations of workers and have no special advantages granted by a government, right?

  3. Isn’t this a flagrant violation of equal protection?

    1. It flew in Seattle’s minimum wage initiative.

  4. Smart hotels will reduce their workforce to get below the threshold and contract out whatever additional labor they may need.

  5. “What better way to get workers to accept unionization than to force a situation where they could be laid off unless their employers agree to unionized collective bargaining to keep wages down?”

    ooooh ! I know!!! Point out that without unionization and unionized collective bargaining, they ALREADY can get laid off at any time, for any reason, or lack of reason, or lack of time.

    Seriously. A tax on non-union workers? LOL. Try harder. Try again.

  6. “An analyst hired by the city (and then ignored) prior to this last vote to expand the minimum wage increase to other hotels determined that there was a 12 percent increase in hotel jobs in Los Angeles County compared to 2007, but hotels by the airport have seen a 10 percent loss in jobs over that same timeframe.”

    LOL. Right Wingers love Efficiency Movements, unless its labor unions that mandate them.

  7. How can it be constitutional to have a MW law that’s not for everyone. For this business, but not that one. For this area, but not that one?

  8. I have worked in the service industry and have been a member (in another industry) of 2 Teamster Locals

    I’ll take my chances with a union over an employer EVERYTIME.

    Employers see workers as costs and drag on their bottom line.

    Unions – even if only to get the dues – offer workers a level of protection and dignity in the workplace.

  9. A GOOD HOTEL CAN MAKE or break a trip. The worst hotel in the best place is still going to make retiring after a long day an unfortunate experience. The best hotel in the worst place, on the other hand, can be something of an oasis. Take the best hotels and put them in the best places, and you’ve got a private slice of the vacation you’ve always dreamed of.

    Here are 24 absolutely epic dream hotels.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.