Holder's Claim He Will End Federal Racial Profiling 'Once and for All' a Great Big Lie


Outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder stood up in a church in Atlanta last week and lied right in the faces of everybody there. He said in a speech he would be introducing "rigorous new standards — and robust safeguards — to help end racial profiling, once and for all. This new guidance will codify our commitment to the very highest standards of fair and effective policing."
He is doing no such thing. The Associated Press got sources to tell them what the Department of Justice is planning. They are, indeed, introducing new standards to stop racial profiling, but not in any of the agencies where Americans are mostly likely to be exposed to racial profiling on a regular basis. The Department of Homeland Security will not be affected by the new guidelines:
The official said Friday night that the new guidelines banning racial profiling exempt the Transportation Security Administration and also do not cover inspections at ports of entry and interdictions at border crossings. The official was not authorized to discuss the guidelines by name and spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of a formal announcement expected within the coming days.
The new guidelines apply to federal law enforcement agencies but aren't binding on local police departments that are more likely to have day-to-day contact with community members. Their formulation also long predates high-profile cases, such as the August police shooting in Ferguson, Missouri, that have placed police treatment of minorities in the spotlight.
The guidelines would apply to the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. According to the Associated Press, federal law enforcement agencies are already banned from racial profiling except in cases of national security (and everything is a matter of national security now, so whatever). The new policy bans religion, gender, national origin and sexual orientation.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So someone in the Obama Administration is writing checks he can't cash.
You know who else stood up in front of crowds making promises about race?
Pheidippides?
Lance Armstrong?
I realized after posting that I should have pluralized race to give people more options.
Marcus Garvey?
Race Bannion?
"There is a second Eric Garner video. It shows not the now-infamous scene that ultimately led to his death ? the confrontation with New York Police Department officers, one grabbing Garner around his neck, Garner's body thrown to the ground ? but the aftermath. For seven minutes, a disgusted bystander continues to film as Garner lies, unmoving, on the sidewalk, police officers involved in the incident milling around him.
The video was originally posted on Facebook over the summer but has received renewed attention after a grand jury decided not to indict an officer involved in the altercation. "
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....the-first/
So the Playoff Committee got Ohio State in there after all. Equal parts disappointing and predictable.
a case could be made for putting in any of the five once-beatens. It is much more difficult to make such a case for any being left out. TCU scores 55 and drops. If anyone wondered what was worse than the BCS, the answer is this.
It is apparent that the whatever metric they judging different teams by is not something obvious to the public. TCU mobing ahesd of FSU last week and out of the picture this week makes little sense. The rankings for a partucular week seems mezningless.
Easy way out of the TCU vs Baylor argument, plus Ohio St did beat the hell out of Wisconsin when it mattered most, so not a horrible call.
For entertainment value, I was hoping Baylor would make it. Plus I'd love to bet on the over in a Baylor vs FSU/Oregon game.
"The new policy bans religion, gender, national origin and sexual orientation."
So, law enforcement consider all people spherical chickens?
"must consider"
"There's been a robbery at the corner store. Look for a human being wearing shoes. I repeat: shoes."
why would Holder lying in people's faces be a surprise? If anything, the news would be if this administration's actions ever matched its rhetoric.
the new guidelines banning racial profiling exempt the Transportation Security Administration
So, white grannies are now safe?
Also.
What amazes me is that After a tiring 6 year slog as AG, and just before retirement, Holder is still able to get his dander up when some egregious trend suddenly starts....right out of nowhere and he is right on the case.
It's not "out of nowhere." There's a need to rev up the base after the disastrous midterms. The IRS scandal is getting more urgent, with evidence that the White House and IRS coordinated, so they're sitting on emails because it would be a "privacy violation" to release them. Obamacare is still in slow-motion crash-and-burn mode. So why not stir things up with some "racial profiling" nonsense?
*Sigh*
Really?
I thought he was deeply concerned about 'his people'.
Oh, I see..... I get it, he is.
On July 1, Maria Treme woke up with no memory of the previous night. Her thighs were bruised, her car was missing, and there was lubricant she didn't recognize by her bed. She returned to the Country Club, where she'd been tanning and drinking with girlfriends before she blacked out. Two female employees helped fill in the rest?security footage and eyewitnesses indicated Treme had sex with two different men on club premises and went home with a third, wearing nothing but a towel?and helped call the police. In August, Treme told her story on the local news to raise awareness about date rape drugs; she hadn't known to get tested for them until they were out of her system.
If she can't remember the previous night how does she know she didn't voluntarily take the drugs that there is no evidence of ever being in her system?
it happened because she said so. Isn't that what the feminists tell us? It's not like one would make up such a story.
"Date rape drugs" include Mojito pitchers.
(That said, I'm willing to consider Ms. Treme's version.)
PARIETAL RULES
Other possible version:
She had drunken sex with 3 guys, went back to the country club the next day and heard that the whole thing was witnessed and caught on video. Embarrassed, she accuses the guys of drugging and raping her.
Racial profiling is a hoax; here is the proof.
http://fox5sandiego.com/2014/0.....nt-page-1/
"Local law enforcement must be able to use their discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon," [California Attorney General] Harris said.
If racial profiling actually existed, we would not be able to trust local law enforcement to use their discretion "to determine who can carry a concealed weapon", because they would end up discriminating against unpopular, powerless minorities. Instead, we would have to require local law enforcement to allow persons to carry concealed weapons. But Attorney General harris does trust local law enforcement with such discretion. QED.
".., officials throughout the state could be required to issue concealed-carry permits based on nothing more than the applicant's assertion that they wish to carry a gun for self-defense, according to Harris."
No, they will be required to issue permits (which is also unconstitutional requirement) based on the person being a law abiding citizen, i.e. not a danger to others, and their desire to exercise their natural right to defend themselves.
"In the San Diego area, concealed-carry permit applicants previously had been required to demonstrate "a set of circumstances that distinguish the applicant from the mainstream and causes him or her to be placed in harm's way."
Because proles are never in harm's way. Besides, they are protected by cops. Right Harris? Don't they have a constitutional duty to protect the citizenry?
Oh wait, they don't, and Harris is a mendacious cunt who should resign the office she abuses.
In your opinion, is racial profiling prevalent in law enforcement?
I didn't read the article, just the title, but I applaud Holder for speaking out against Affirmative Action and other racial preference policies.
Holder and Obama are interested in nationalizing local police and will use recent crises to accomplish this.
It is impossible to get rid of racial profiling, but like other progressive pipe dreams, we get to hear promises that the next law will make it happen.
Regardless of how real it is or isn't, laws against it simply can't be enforced.
Holder controlled like a fake magic show.
He;s a cute black guy who hasn't realized his entire life has been spent with massive power and has used NONE of it to make 'Merica better.
He Just spits crap on TV all the time like a stupid moron fuckin dummy.