iPad Pain
Billion dollar bust
In 2013, Los Angeles Unified Schools went all-in for a $1 billion program to promote online learning by putting iPads in the hands of every kid in the district. During the test run, dozens of the devices were lost, stolen, or compromised. Now the initiative has completely unraveled amidst allegations of corruption among the officials who inked the deal with Apple.
The iPad program was the brainchild of District Superintendent John Deasy, who thought kids and teachers would benefit from the devices. But in the limited number of classrooms where the program was tried, teachers had difficulty figuring out how to work them into their lesson plans.
Administrators at most schools refused to allow use of the iPads when kids were outside school supervision, which limited their functionality as a homework resource. When the devices inevitably turned up broken or missing, parents wondered who was on the hook for replacing them. The district had no clear answer.
Forced to admit the idea was a costly fiasco, Deasy cancelled the order for more iPads. That's when evidence surfaced that the superintendent and his deputy, Jaime Aquino, were overly friendly with executives at Apple and Pearson, the company supplying curriculum for the devices. Aquino may have improperly advised Pearson representatives on how to guarantee that they landed the contract, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Deasy now wants the district to try giving kids laptops instead. Note to taxpayers: These things cost even more than iPads.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?