Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Obama to Shield Immigrants from Deportation, Pelosi Denies Any Knowledge of This Gruber Character, Planned NSA Reforms Applauded: P.M. Links

J.D. Tuccille | 11.13.2014 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • Jonathan Gruber
    MIT

    President Obama will get right to work cooperating with the new Republican majority—right after he issues an executive order shielding up to five million immigrants from deportation.

  • Who is this Jonathan Gruber? asks House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). He certainly had nothing to do with Obamacare! Ummm….Don't you remember citing him over, and over, and over again on the issue in the past?
  • The White House is concerned about potential violence after a grand jury releases its decision on whether or not to indict Officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown, but local officials want the feds to keep their distance.
  • ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi released an audiotape in which he basically flips the bird to President Obama and the United States over airstrikes.
  • Outgoing Gov. Mike Beebe (D) of Arkansas has a parting gift for his son: a pardon for a decade-old marijuana conviction. That's touching, but share the love, governor.
  • Digital rights groups are encouraged by a Senate push to rein in the National Security Agency.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: D.C. Reasonoids: Join Us November 18 for a Supreme Court Book Party with Damon Root

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (171)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    ...right after he issues an executive order shielding up to five million immigrants from deportation.

    Free at last, free at last?

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Hello.

      What do (illegal) immigrants need shielding from?

      1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

        Not from welfare, apparently.

      2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

        What do (illegal) immigrants need shielding from?

        Come down here and find out!

    2. Florida Man   11 years ago

      Shika haz a sploosh.

      1. SusanM   11 years ago

        Shikia's screaming because now her domos are now subject to occupational health and safety, wage and overtime laws. Although I'm not sure what news you hear when you're living in a crawlspace so the she's safe for now 😉

    3. The Laconic   11 years ago

      Good. There, I said it.

      Now if he could crank up a pardon mill for up to five million drug offenders, we'd be in business.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Who is this Jonathan Gruber? asks House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

    Reason made Drudge with that, and SF got the first comment without being disgusting. Good job all around.

    1. waffles   11 years ago

      Smelling salts disgust me.

    2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

      Without being disgusting in the comment, you mean, right?

      Because, c'mon, it's SF we're talking about.

      1. Tonio   11 years ago

        But he more than made up for it downthread...

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          I'm not certain if I want to read those comments.

          1. Warren's Strapon   11 years ago

            It's hilarious. And vomit inducing.

          2. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

            You do. Trust me. Priceless.

            1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

              Do a search for insect wings

              1. Ska   11 years ago

                Best line I've read in a while. I'm jealous of people who can come up with such creative descriptions.

    3. Ted S.   11 years ago

      You'll note that Tuccille didn't link to Suderman.

      1. JEP   11 years ago

        What'd you think Reason is? Some kind of circle jerk?

    4. flye   11 years ago

      We can't hold Pelosi accountable for simply reading out loud what her aides wrote. Especially when she added, "go fuck yourself, San Diego."

  3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    ...but local officials want the feds to keep their distance.

    Not too distant to issue another no-fly zone around the city, though.

    1. CE   11 years ago

      You know what other local officials wanted the Feds to keep their distance?

      1. Terc   11 years ago

        Waco?

      2. creech   11 years ago

        South Carolina secessionists?

      3. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

        John Brown?

  4. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Outgoing Gov. Mike Beebe (D) of Arkansas has a parting gift for his son: a pardon for a decade-old marijuana conviction.

    Having stoner kids making Dem politicians rethink things just like having gay kids makes GOP politicians rethink things? Nah.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Of course, the GOP needs to rethink marijuana too.

    2. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

      To bad Nativists will never have mexican kids.

    3. John Thacker   11 years ago

      To be fair, Beebe actually was one of the most pardon-friendly judges in the country. The complaints are a tiny bit unfair; he's not Gov. Walker or O'Malley.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi released an audiotape in which he basically flips the bird to President Obama and the United States over airstrikes.

    He's like the Pele of bird-flipping.

    1. Riven   11 years ago

      Artist's depiction

  6. Los Doyers   11 years ago

    Okay, I'm here. I own this thread.

    1. Steve G   11 years ago

      but did you build it?

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        If you build it, Los Doyers will come.

        1. Los Doyers   11 years ago

          Phrasing?

          1. Ted S.   11 years ago

            What is, "If you build it, Los Doyers will come"?

            Thanks a lot, Alex.

            1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

              Leave it to the Canadians, Ted.

              1. Ted S.   11 years ago

                At least Alex has stopped lecturing contestants on the need to know more about Canada.

                1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

                  I'll take 'You got a problem with that?' for $200.

                  1. BigT   11 years ago

                    Canadda, isn't that in upstate NY somewhere?

                2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

                  Always easy to know everything when you have the answer cards in your hand.

              2. Riven   11 years ago

                See, he's fine. What were you even worried about?

                1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                  He's not even pretending to be relentlessly polite now. This can only get worse.

      2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

        If you like your thread, you can keep it?

    2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      Maybe if you create a time machine and go back in time nine minutes.

      1. CE   11 years ago

        And just like, Fist pounded the table and Los Doyers' house of cards collapsed.

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Where have you been?

      1. Los Doyers   11 years ago

        Sneaking into Fist's log shack to steal his time machine blueprints. I've been staking out the place for months, he never leaves.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

          What an idiot. Those were my doomsday machine blueprints.

  7. Doghouse Riley Jr.   11 years ago

    Your tax dollars at work: USAF sent C-17 to a Chinese air show (despite concerns about the Chinese gaining intel from it) for only $350,000!

    "The decision to send the C-17 to the air show, which begins Tuesday, appeared to originate from U.S. Pacific Air Forces, or PACAF, as a way to engage the Chinese and strengthen the relationship between the two militaries. The idea was said to have been the brainchild of senior Air Force leaders in Washington and Hawaii, but few government officials in Washington knew about it until just weeks ago. One defense official joked that the event was a "GOBI" ? a "General Officer Bright Idea" ? because it went forward despite the mounting concerns with the plan."

    1. OldMexican   11 years ago

      Look at the big airplane! It is yours?

      1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

        Is that a u-boat?

        No, Guido, it belongs to the government.

    2. SusanM   11 years ago

      What the hell, it was probably made there anyway.

      1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   11 years ago

        Look, all those congresscritters didn't appropriate that money to all those defense contractors all over the US for you to snarkily suggest it was made in China.

  8. Carl ?s the level   11 years ago

    Amazon and Hachette Resolve Dispute

    B-b-but, how could this happen without the government intervening?

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      We need single-payer e-book!

    2. JWatts   11 years ago

      Well obviously it's collusion, and we need immediate Congressional hearings on the matter. /derp

    3. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

      The authority of Krugman's Nobel Prize settled matters, of course!

  9. Andrew S.   11 years ago

    The awesome 90-year-old man in Fort Lauderdale was arrested (excuse me, "cited") again yesterday for feeding the homeless

    Protests at the mayor's house too.

    1. Florida Man   11 years ago

      Go man, go!

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      I keep waiting for that 'tipping point.'

      I'm glad people are hitting back here and in Massachusetts. There's still a pulse for liberty.

  10. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    "Michigan-bred Vatican astronomer and Jesuit Brother Guy Consolmagno will become the first clergyman awarded one of planetary science's most prestigious awards, when on Thursday in Arizona he receives the Carl Sagan Medal....

    "[Consolmagno] has authored or co-authored several books, such as "Would You Baptize an Extraterrestrial?" and "Turn Left at Orion," has lectured around the world and even has an asteroid named after him.

    "The American Astronomical Society Division for Planetary Sciences annually honors individuals whose work has made scientific learning understandable and accessible to the public. The medal is named after astronomer Carl Sagan, who explained the heavens via the popular 1980s public TV series "Cosmos.""

    http://www.freep.com/story/new...../18774213/

    1. flye   11 years ago

      I'm not your Brother Guy

      1. The Laconic   11 years ago

        I'm not your guy, pal.

        1. Riven   11 years ago

          I'm not your pal, buddy

          1. Ted S.   11 years ago

            I'm not your buddy, chum.

            1. Florida Man   11 years ago

              I'm not your chum, amigo!

              1. The Laconic   11 years ago

                I'm not your amigo, friendo.

                1. seguin   11 years ago

                  I'm not your friendo, homie.

            2. Rich   11 years ago

              I'm not your chum, shark.

      2. SusanM   11 years ago

        Oh man, dude, I'm not your brother, Guy.

    2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

      I wonder if Guy Consolmagno is any relation to Guy Incognito?

      1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

        How about Guy Caballero?

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Guy Smiley.

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Interesting. Good for him. He looks like a character right out of 'Rocket Robin Hood.'

    4. John Titor   11 years ago

      "The medal is named after astronomer Carl Sagan, who explained the heavens via the popular 1980s public TV series "Cosmos."

      I get that Cosmos is what he's most known for, but come on, Sagan did a lot more awesome stuff in his life. He argued against nuking the moon. He made terrible pornography for aliens and stuck it on a probe.

      1. The Laconic   11 years ago

        Sagan did a lot more awesome stuff in his life despite the fact that he argued against nuking the moon.

        1. John Titor   11 years ago

          Nuking the moon is unnecessary when we still have whales to nuke.

          1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

            Gotta nuke somethin'.

    5. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

      "Still, it moves!"

  11. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Don't worry, we'll fill in the blanks later

    These two provisions, part of a 900-page statute that was cobbled together without going through the usual House-Senate conference committee in which it might have been cleaned up, are the source of the confusion. The answer to the problem, as the Fourth Circuit panel found unanimously in the King case, is obvious. It's a basic principle of administrative law that when a federal statute is ambiguous, courts defer to the agency's interpretation ? here, the I.R.S. regulation that makes the tax credits available without regard to whether the exchange is state or federal.

    The 1984 decision that established this deference principle, Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., is so central to the modern understanding of how the government works that it is among the most often invoked Supreme Court decisions of all time, cited in some 13,000 judicial decisions so far, a number that grows at the rate of about 1,000 a year. The tax provisions of the Affordable Care Act fall so naturally onto the "Chevron deference" landscape that it would take an agenda-driven act of judicial will to keep them out and to conclude that Congress enacted a law that contained the seeds of its own destruction.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      What ambiguity?

      1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

        The ambiguity between the words of the law and what the law's supporters wished were the words of the law.

    2. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      If Chevron applies, so much the worse for Chevron, but as this guy admits, the Chevron decision comes into play only where the statute is ambiguous.

      What, exactly, is ambiguous about this part of the statute?

    3. Doghouse Riley Jr.   11 years ago

      I guess it's a good thing the Congress hasn't yet just passed a budget bill that says "Here's some money. Do whatever."

      1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

        As someone once said, why bother with all these laws? Just have one law making all crimes illegal.

    4. Rich   11 years ago

      It's a basic principle of administrative law that when a federal statute is ambiguous, courts defer to the agency's interpretation

      I think we found the problem ?.

    5. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

      The 1984 decision that established this deference principleis so central to the modern understanding of how the government works...

      Yeah, because the country is only 30 years old. It's a like a millennial living in mom's basement.

      1. Riven   11 years ago

        Oh god... don't touch anything until you wipe it down first.

  12. Aloysious   11 years ago

    Put that picture of that fool Gruber right at the top of the list of pictures that make me throw up in my mouth.

    1. Andrew S.   11 years ago

      Better than the pic for the AM links. :shudder:

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        You didn't like the photoshopping of Gruber's ass?

      2. Aloysious   11 years ago

        Gruber, Pelosi, Obama, Boehner, Reid, McCain...

        Kardashian Butt...

        All these things traumatize my eye holes.

        1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

          Kardashian butt isn't all that special. What's special is the difference between her waist and her butt.

          1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

            Hobbits are built that way.

            1. flye   11 years ago

              Hobbits are less naturally hairy

            2. PapayaSF   11 years ago

              "That's not a Hobbit. That's a Hobo and a Rabbit. But they're making a Hobbit."

          2. JEP   11 years ago

            I can't believe I'm saying this, but I wasn't impressed. It's so large it's almost like it's not even a butt anymore.

            Is there such a thing as peak ass?

      3. Every Cop is a Criminal   11 years ago

        The Elephant Butt

        At least, that's what it looks like to me.

  13. Riesen   11 years ago

    Cop dressed as Donald Duck fucks with citizens

    1. Riven   11 years ago

      Thin blue line!

      Seriously, this is a perfect example of how cops waste their time generating revenue when they could actually be out shooting do--I mean, helping someone.

    2. Doghouse Riley Jr.   11 years ago

      Guess it was a good thing it wasn't duck season.

    3. Ted S.   11 years ago

      I hope Disney sue the shit out of the town for copyright infringement.

    4. Carl ?s the level   11 years ago

      But it scared me. I'm a woman. This huge duck scared me.

      What?/giggles

      1. Wasteland Wanderer   11 years ago

        To be fair, ducks do have a legit rape culture...

        1. Banjos   11 years ago

          This is very true. When sloop and I had a farm, we named one of our ducks Mr. Rapey. He harassed one of our females so much that she was completely missing feathers in the back of her head from where he held her down with his beak. We eventually ate him.

    5. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

      Reminded of a joke:

      Walt - Mickey, you can't leave Minnie because you think she's crazy. This is a family joint.

      Mickey - I didn't say I wanted to leave her cause she's crazy, I wanna leave he cause she's fuckin' Goofy!

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        Ha. Remember that one.

      2. Riven   11 years ago

        Theory: I've heard that women either lose it or start to lose it when they turn 30.

        Any anecdotal evidence to support?

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          You're not yet 30?

          1. Riven   11 years ago

            Nope. I'm only 26.

            I have high hopes for 30, though; might go see a donkey show in Mexico or something. I'll just take a few shots of tequila and see where the night takes me.

            1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

              Yeah.

              Um.

              After 30 just make sure you stick to your choices of either being in the game with a mortgage or out.

              1. Riven   11 years ago

                Heavy sarc on that second paragraph, by the way. ._.

                1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

                  I don't understand that emoticon.

                  I'm essentially retarded that way.

                  1. Riven   11 years ago

                    It's sort of like a "Oh jeeze, I hope you don't think I was serious, and now I kind of feel like a jackass" emoticon.

                    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

                      Ah. I thought you meant my second paragraph.

                      Whatever.

                      I find it's best to always feel like a jackass when you post here.

                    2. Riven   11 years ago

                      I'll try to remember that!

                2. paranoid android   11 years ago

                  Well, you do have a lot of time between now and 30 to go crazy...

                  1. Riven   11 years ago

                    Four more years!

                3. seguin   11 years ago

                  Sure there is. Just like SF's stories about Warty are fictional.

                  *narrows eyes*

        2. Aloysious   11 years ago

          Depends on what you mean by 'lose it'.

          1. Riven   11 years ago

            It's not my theory, so I can't extrapolate on what that exactly means. Any time I asked the guy to be more specific, he'd just insist that women go crazy when they turn 30.

            1. JEP   11 years ago

              I've always heard that around 30, women realize that their dream of marrying a European soccer star isn't going to come true and they aren't going to stay hot forever, so they lower their expectations.

              1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

                29/31.

            2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

              IIRC that was the age my wife changed personalities from "sometimes fun" to "mostly bitchy".

            3. Aloysious   11 years ago

              ...women go crazy...

              Anecdotally speaking, having a wide range of female acquaintances and co-workers, haven't noticed a difference in crazy due to age.

              There is a specific subset of ladies that seemingly get more intelligent [or maybe I'm wising up 😉 ]and more beautiful the older they get. I absolutely adore them.

            4. lap83   11 years ago

              "so I can't extrapolate on what that exactly means."

              It means he's been with every woman who has ever turned 30 and has objectively observed the pattern using rigorous scientific methods

              1. Riven   11 years ago

                I'm surprised he had time with his busy raiding schedule on WoW!

                I didn't put much stock in it because he was basically just a pile, but I was curious if anyone here had experienced something like it.

                1. lap83   11 years ago

                  On a serious note, I did read a study that said that women who were unattached in their 30s were more likely to have emotional problems and commitment issues. (can't recall the link) So maybe most of the non-crazy 30 year old women are already taken and not encountered by guys who are just dating.

                  1. Riven   11 years ago

                    Interesting!

                    I had always assumed his theory was a result of his ex-wife, but I suppose it could just as easily have been the females he was dating after the divorce.

  14. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    The White House is concerned about potential violence after a grand jury releases its decision on whether or not to indict Officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown

    1) Whip up outrage.
    2) Discover position is untenable and dangerous once the evidence shows there's no justification for the outrage.
    3) ...?
    4) Profit.

    1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   11 years ago

      Man, I'm so glad there's nothing else going on in the world for the White House to be concerned about. Has the President given his opinion of Kim K's ass yet?

      1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

        The White House feels the need to protect the rights of black men who attack Asian shopkeepers and cops. And I wonder if that didn't help increase the Asian vote for the GOP this time. Wasn't the last time Asians went GOP after the Rodney King riots? Maybe it's not coincidental.

        1. Every Cop is a Criminal   11 years ago

          I'm sure it doesn't help that in college admissions, asians are screwed over so black and brown folk can take their places.

    2. lap83   11 years ago

      They may not whip up outrage if there aren't presently any scandals to distract the media from. I mean there are plenty, but they've sort of all reached an equilibrium and turned into white noise and static.

  15. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Catholic priest in Central African Republic sticks his neck out to save Muslims threatened by murderous sectarian violence.

    http://www.theguardian.com/glo.....nard-kinvi

    1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      The Muslims will show their gratitude by killing him last.

      1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

        The Seleka terrorised the country's majority Christian population, killing men, women and children until they were forced from power in January. Their fall was swiftly followed by the rise of the predominantly Christian anti-balaka (anti-machete) militia, whose campaign of vengeance has resulted in the murder of thousands of Muslims and forced hundreds of thousands to seek refuge in neighbouring countries.

        That'll be after the Christians stop slaughtering them in retaliation, no?

        1. John Titor   11 years ago

          Two religions enter, one religion leaves!

  16. OldMexican   11 years ago

    ISIS unveils their gold and silver-backed coinage to remove itself from the "Oppressor's money system"

    The Islamic State is set to become the only 'state' to back its currency with gold (silver and copper) . ISIS says the new currency will take the group out of "the oppressors' money system."

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Libertopia!!!11!!!

    2. Aloysious   11 years ago

      From the comments:

      BretigneNovember 13, 2014 at 3:15 PM
      Wow. Now anyone advocating for sound currency can almost credibly be lined to terrorism. How very convenient

      1. Riven   11 years ago

        Oh, so that's how that works.

      2. John Titor   11 years ago

        Dammit, conspiracy theorists beat me to the punch!

      3. OldMexican   11 years ago

        Also from the comments:

        Now they have guaranteed a 2nd U.S. Invasion of Iraq.

        WH: We're way ahead of you.

    3. John Titor   11 years ago

      Cue any attempts at pushing a gold standard being linked with terrorism.

      1. DK   11 years ago

        And the resultant asset forfeiture.

    4. Anonymous Coward   11 years ago

      Goldbugs = TERRORISTS!

      Just remember that Reason called it first.

      1. Aloysious   11 years ago

        If only there was someone, someone who regularly posts here, who was extremely knowledgeable on the subject of gold...

        1. Every Cop is a Criminal   11 years ago

          Maybe Shrike is Glen Beck, who just came out saying he was not right in the hread.

    5. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

      The good part is when ISIS starts chiseling.

    6. Free Society   11 years ago

      Twas a simpler time when rulers had to directly extort their subjects to finance their 'charitable' largess and foreign excursions. But if ISIS could have a central bank issuing fiat, they certainly would.

    7. Paul.   11 years ago

      Ok NOW we must bomb them!

  17. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    The 1984 decision that established this deference principle, Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., is so central to the modern understanding of how the government works that it is among the most often invoked Supreme Court decisions of all time

    aka Fuck You, That's Why v. the American People?

  18. Rich   11 years ago

    "The USA Freedom Act ... offers greater transparency"

    By golly, that sounds like a swell bill!

    1. Free Society   11 years ago

      The American Applepie Liberty Act

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        Just a doggone sec, there. Exactly what does *that* offer?

  19. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Nancy: I don't remember you!

    Gruber: Bend over. Remember me now?

    Bends over.

    Nancy (Edith Bunker impression): Oh. Oh.

  20. Anonymous Coward   11 years ago

    A Heartwarming Story of How a Small-Town Sheriff Learned to Love Ransomeware

    The Dickson County Sheriff's Office in Middle Tennessee ended up paying a ransom after a malicious computer program blocked access to their files.

    Detective Jeff McCliss told WTVF-TV that malware on a computer locked the agency's case files, which included autopsy reports, witness statements and crime scene photos. He says the malware, called "Cryptowall," doesn't tamper with files on a computer, but keeps them locked until a ransom is paid.

    After consulting with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and the FBI, McCliss said the agency determined the only way to get their files back was to pay the asking price: $500 in bitcoins.

    Officials think the malware came from an ad someone in the department clicked on. McCliss says it doesn't appear that the office was targeted.

    1. John Titor   11 years ago

      Bitcoin now linked to terrorist activity.

      1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

        Dickson County Sheriff's Office now linked to terrorist activity.

        1. Riven   11 years ago

          This is opposed to the Lord's work they were doing before?

      2. OldMexican   11 years ago

        Re: John,

        Bitcoin now linked to terrorist activity.

        What today is not linked to terrorism?

        1. John Titor   11 years ago

          Judging by recent speeches, radical Islam?

          1. Free Society   11 years ago

            Just call it Islam. All of it is extremist. But then again, maybe we should argue that it's unfair to castigate Nazism because there do exist "moderate" Nazis.

            A Muslim is only as moderate as he is un-Islamic.

            1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

              Wow, that totally isn't a wrongheaded and dangerous idea!

              So you're in agreement with the fanatics who say *true* Muslims have to kill Americans?

              1. Free Society   11 years ago

                Wow, that totally isn't a wrongheaded and dangerous idea!

                So you're in agreement with the fanatics who say *true* Muslims have to kill Americans?

                Islam is wrongheaded and dangerous and not worth defending. I didn't say true Muslims have to kill Americans. Last I checked, the Koran and Hadiths had precisely nothing to say about Americans. But true Muslims honor kill their wives and daughters, own women like chattel, execute blasphemers, oppress the non-Muslims and all around shit on individual liberty. Fuck Islam and as for it's adherants... fuck them insofar as they are faithful to Islamic beliefs.

                As for it's Western defenders, fuck them too.

            2. JEP   11 years ago

              Isn't it possible for someone to be a Nazi and an advocate for fascism, but against genocide?

              In other words, was the Holocaust an unavoidable result of nationalistic socialism? I don't remember the fascists in Spain being anti-semitic, but I could be wrong.

              1. GILMORE   11 years ago

                "was the Holocaust an unavoidable result of nationalistic socialism?"

                That's an interesting question.

                I think as time passes people will better understand that the holocaust - the genocide of european jews - is better understood as part of a series of European/Russian/Turkish efforts to exterminate minority groups in their respective spheres of control, rather than a unique instance specific to Nazism only.

                (despite the fact that their particular 'industrial' perpetration of it will forever be remembered for its scientific barbarism)

                I'm just thinking that the treatment of the jews was not necessarily historically unprecedented at the time. And i don't think genocide has any particular necessary connection to 'national socialism'. I think it was something someone like Sam Huntington would have ascribed to intra-cultural conflict rather than political/ideological conflict.

              2. Free Society   11 years ago

                Isn't it possible for someone to be a Nazi and an advocate for fascism, but against genocide?

                Thus the difference between Italian fascists and their ideological cousins from Germany, the Nazis. Racialism was a central tenet of German Nazism.

                In other words, was the Holocaust an unavoidable result of nationalistic socialism?

                Absolutely not. The Holocaust was an irrational policy of last resort. They'd first tried to deport the Jews en masse as well as resettle them outside of Europe, but the war imposed limitations upon those more moderate criminal goals.

                I don't remember the fascists in Spain being anti-semitic, but I could be wrong.

                Nazism is a species of fascism, fascism is not a species of Nazism. The Nazis added a racial component to fascism that was lacking elsewhere.

        2. JEP   11 years ago

          U.S. Foreign Policy?

  21. Paul.   11 years ago

    Many have pointed out since then that Pelosi's office has cited Gruber's work in the past. That's notable, but it's very unlikely Pelosi herself wrote those press releases herself or even participated in their drafting.

    Well then *bowing and scraping backwards, out of room* then all is well. Pelosi can hardly be expected to get her hands dirty with such trivia as a press release out of her own office.

  22. Paul.   11 years ago

    Make sure you watch the linked video in the WaPo article:

    Washington Post reporter helpfully explains Gruber's comments as a wise, broader commentary about the political process.

    Thanks, WaPo, without your helpful editorial fill, I would have thought that Gruber is just a mendacious sack of shit.

    1. BigT   11 years ago

      Here Gruber says Obama was in the room when the Cadillac tax was hatched, and asked for them to obfuscate it.

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_e00NjQvFM

  23. Trouser-Pod   11 years ago

    And here I thought that Cookie Monster only wanted to run a train on Mrs. Fields*...

    *as I have been lead to believe, she'd be up for it.

  24. JEP   11 years ago

    Mr. Fields is always at work.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's 'Giant Win' Does Not Validate His Unconstitutional Birthright Citizenship Order

Jacob Sullum | 7.2.2025 12:01 AM

Trump Says the Courts Have No Business Questioning His Dubious Definition of 'Alien Enemies'

Jacob Sullum | 7.1.2025 5:40 PM

Medicaid Work Requirements Are a Short-Term Fix to a Long-Term Problem

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 4:18 PM

The U.S. Is Closing Every Door on Afghan Allies

Beth Bailey | 7.1.2025 4:00 PM

Trump's Travel Ban Will Not Make Americans Safer

Benjamin Powell | 7.1.2025 3:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!