What's a Federal Agency for If Not to Pad the Payroll With Relatives?

Last week, senior officials of the Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) were quietly busted for using a student hiring scheme as a jobs program for their relatives. The Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General report (PDF) notes that nepotism has become widespread at the agency, with 16 percent of hires in the student program consisting of relatives of existing employees.
The investigation was sparked by "the hiring of four students who were relatives of the three most senior officials in the organization—EOIR Director Juan Osuna, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) David Neal, and Chief Immigration Judge Brian O'Leary."
Specifically, Osuna put his niece on the payroll—twice. Neal made sure that both his son and daughter were hired, and O'Leary pulled strings for his daughter.
This seems to have set a tone for the agency, since "32 of the 200 students hired into STEP positions had relatives working at EOIR."
Honestly, getting your kids or your niece part-time jobs where you work isn't the worst offense. It's certainly common enough in the private sector. But large private sector companies tend to have nepotism policies of their own to avoid favoritism and ensure that at least some employees are hired for their ability to do the job. Hiring decisions in the private sector, by large and small firms, ultimately involve companies' own money—they can piss it away and create an opening for the competition if they want.
But government agencies don't have competitors to impose consequences for stupid decisions. When the disposal of taxpayer money (remember, these are paid positions) becomes a way to reward family members, with competence getting nudged down the decision-making food chain, accountability comes in the form of the occasional inspector general's report, if at all. Performance certainly suffers from bumping merit in favor of a seat at grandma's dinner table, and agencies risk becoming familial fiefdoms.
We really don't need more reason for government bodies to be inbred, unaccountable, and inefficient.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You would think they could hire from the pool of immigrants.
Fixed, maybe?
Banana Republic.
Not the retailer.
my best friend's half-sister makes $81 hourly on the internet . She has been out of work for nine months but last month her paycheck was $19645 just working on the internet for a few hours. this link.....
????? http://www.payinsider.com
Chronic nepotism throughout the public sector is something I witnessed first hand at pretty much every level of government from the cushy little highly sought after jobs in our smallest cities right up to the jackpot winning super jobs at the federal level.
These guys are bush league. At my DoD facility, 30-50% of student interns are kids of employees.
It doesn't bother me much when people hire their kids. It's natural. What's galling is the hypocrisy exhibited by the same folks who insist they hire based on pure merit. Such a crock.
Coming from DC, I can tell you firsthand this has been going on at least for the past half century, and that when we had a draft sons of military personnel were also privileged.