Stephanie Slade: Polls Did Better at Predicting Support for Libertarians Than Democrats
One of the big questions going in to Tuesday night was whether public opinion polls would prove accurate at predicting the vote share received by third-party candidates like Virginia Libertarian Rob Sarvis. Most of the votes have now been tabulated, so how did pollsters do?
In fact, they missed by far larger margins when it came to predicting Democratic support than support for third parties, explains Reason's Stephanie Slade. Sure, polls overstated support for candidates like Sarvis and Florida gubernatorial hopeful Adrian Wyllie, but the errors were relatively small. Yet in state after state, polls significantly overstated Democratic support.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?