Third Parties in Senate Races: Still Not Their Year
Just a quick spotlight on non-Democrat/Republican Senate candidates who have managed to pull substantially more than one percent, so far, using RealClearPolitics' numbers:
•For the Libertarian Party, the controversial Sean Haugh of South North Carolina is now pulling 3.6, substantially more than the current very narrow spread between currently in-the-lead Republican Thom Tillis and Democrat Kay Hagen.
•But! A L.P. Senate candidate I had not been following at all is doing even better, Kansas' Randall Batson, currently with 4.3 percent, in a race where the number two is also an Independent, Greg Orman. Batson's current numbers beat the spread between Orman and currently in-the-lead Republican incumbent Pat Roberts.
•In Virginia, Robert Sarvis is failing to carry over the momentum of his over 6 percent governor results last year, currently at just 2.7, still a substantial spread-beat between winning Republican Ed Gillespie and losing Democrat Mark Warner. [UPDATE: In ten minutes since posting the race has reversed, with Warner now slightly ahead. All the "winning/losing" declarations in this post are as of the timestamp.]
•Gaylon Kent, L.P. Senate candidate in Colorado, now at 2.4, nowhere near the spread between winning Republican Cory Gardner and losing Democrat Mark Udall.
•In South Carolina, reality TV star of Bravo's Southern Charm, former Republican state treasurer with a checkered past Thomas Ravenel is pulling 7.1 percent as an Independent.
That's all the Senate races in which RealClearPolitics is showing a non-major-party candidate with over 2 percent. And while RealClearPolitics is currently missing it, L.P. Senate candidate in Illinois Sharon Hensen is at 3.64, and L.P. Senate candidate from Kentucky David Patterson is at 3.07 (neither are beating the major party spread).
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If Haugh can run as an L, so can 'the rent's too high' guy.
The latter endorsed the L for governor of NY, McDermott, whom you mightn't recognize as libertarian from his campaign video.
Please don't confuse SC with NC.
NC is at least 10 times better, and has better beer
Yipes, of course. It's been corrected.
My rule of thumb is that if the race is close I vote the one I'd rather win. If it's not close I vote for the one I'd want the most.
Third Parties in Senate Races: Still Not Their Year
This is like waiting for the Year of the Linux Desktop.
DC's top Libertarian vote getter was Martin Moulton, for Shadow Representative to Congress, with over 9000 votes.
In Michigan's Senate race, Libertarian Jim Fulner is showing just a hair over 2%. It's all pretty pathetic. People consistently say they are unhappy with Congress and then vote the same way every time, expecting different results.