Maddow Calls Marijuana Legalization a 'Clear Partisan Issue'
Democrats good, Republicans bad.


MSNBC talking head and relentless Democratic partisan Rachel Maddow just suggested marijuana legalization as one issue with a clear partisan breakdown. Did you know Democrats are pro-pot and would surely legalize it if only those pesky Republicans would let them?
To be fair, it is true that more Democrats support marijuana legalization than Republicans. But long-time readers of Reason know that it's quite a bit more complicated than that. Younger voters by-and-large support legal weed, regardles of their party affiliation. Medical marijuana is increasingly supported by Republicans; those in the conservative fold are also more and more likely to favor letting states set their own drug policies rather than be bound by federal government mandates. And while rank-and-file Democrats are indeed more enlightened on pot than their Republican counterparts, national Democratic leaders—including the one currently occupying the White House—have done very little to honor their base's desire for less restrictive drug laws.
In fact, there is little doubt that Sen. Rand Paul, a frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, supports a more sane approach to drug policy than does Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic presidential nominee. Just today, Paul said that if D.C. voters wanted to legalize marijuana they were welcome to do so.
Bottom line: Support for drug decriminalization is rising on the right, and some Republican leaders are taking initiative on the issue. To be sure, many Republicans remain hopeless drug warriors, but so do many Democrats. If Maddow wants to recast the growing left-right consensus on the insanity of marijuana prohibition as some kind of partisan thing… well, maybe her viewers like that sort of analysis, but it's cynical and dubious.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Did you know Democrats are pro-pot and would surely legalize it if only those pesky Republicans would let them?
I did not know that. I don't think they do, either.
Of course they want to legalize - another enterprise to tax...
Rachel's been so irrelevant for so long, she's not sure how to use the "carnival barker" shtick to get people to watch her ever-more-ridiculous "show" she has on that network that seems to be on and no one's watching...
agree. shouldn't even bother refuting her dumbass points. just ignore her.
Did you know Democrats are pro-pot and would surely legalize it if only those pesky Republicans would let them?
DAMN!!! I didn't realize Obama and Holder are Republicans!
Damn your fast fingies!
So Obo's an R?
I honestly scrolled past the text of the article three or four times while wondering "Why do they have an unrelated picture of some douchey-looking hipster dude?" before I realized it was Maddow.
Why did they not legalize it, when Dems had super majority?
They hadn't gotten the memo from Maddow.
If they had legalized pot and overturned DOMA when they had the super majority, there would be two fewer reasons to vote Democrat. And, we need to vote for Democrats so they can finally legalize pot and overturn DOMA.