Supreme Court Allows Texas Voter ID Law
Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan dissent
The Supreme Court said Saturday that Texas can use its controversial new voter identification law for the November election.
A majority of the justices rejected an emergency request from the Justice Department and civil rights groups to prohibit the state from requiring voters to produce certain forms of photo identification in order to cast ballots. Three justices dissented.
The law was struck down by a federal judge last week, but a federal appeals court had put that ruling on hold. The judge found that roughly 600,000 voters, many of them black or Latino, could be turned away at the polls because they lack acceptable identification. Early voting in Texas begins Monday.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Suck it lefties!
It's not just lefties. Reason "libertarians" are against voter ID laws too. Makes you wonder.
Chapman: http://reason.com/archives/201.....r-voter-id
(and at least 4 other articles)
Shackford: http://reason.com/blog/2012/07.....blem-wrong
Sullum: http://reason.com/archives/201.....d-other-ph
Welch: http://reason.com/blog/2012/03.....how-matt-w
A Barton Hinkle: http://reason.com/archives/201.....les-set-by
The law was passed last year, so they had more than a year to try to get a state approved ID.
And they'll have more than 3 years left to get an ID for the next presidential election. That's what interests those 600 thou "disenfranchised" voters anyways.
I would love to know who's ass the 600,000 figure came out of.
Voters without ID can still vote in this election.
They have 7 ddays after the election to get an ID.
If the no ID crowd put 10% of the energy they spend complaining into helping those without ID this couldn't be an issue any longer.
That's probably why they don't do it.
According to 2013 census data, Texas has 19,412,979 persons over 18; so their voter registration drives must be killer if 600,000 people represent 4.5% of registered voters who were estimated/alleged to have no ID according to the SCOTUS testimony!
According to the Census Bureau, registration rates are about 71% of 18+'s nationwide, so that's not unreasonable.
my friend's mother makes $69 /hour on the laptop . She has been laid off for nine months but last month her paycheck was $21013 just working on the laptop for a few hours. look at here now.............
http://www.Works6.com
As I understand it, the Supremes upheld the law for this election only, because you can't change election law at the last minute. After this election, the lower courts' decisions overturning the law go into effect. Texas will have to write a new law from scratch along the lines of other states' voter ID laws that federal courts have upheld.
They'll probably allow college IDs as acceptable form of identification.