Watch This Pittsburgh Detective Steal a Man's Money at 7-Eleven

Another day, another American whose personal dealings with local police zap him of all faith in "the system". Pittsburgh resident Robert Simpson was "the kind of guy who believes in the system" until a recent run-in with a greedy detective and a department uninterested in punishing him.
Last summer, Simpson accidently left an envelope containing $220 on a 7-Eleven counter after setting it there while he paid, according to CBS Pittsburgh.
When he returned, it was gone. He was sure he left it on the counter and talked to a clerk. "She told me at that point that if that's the case, I can tell you exactly who took it because the cameras will show you," he said. The surveillance video was reviewed and it showed that a few minutes earlier, city detective Michael Reddy allegedly took it.
Simpson said Detective Reddy was still in the 7-Eleven when he came back looking for his money not long later:
"I came back in the store and both occasions he was standing less than 15 feet from me when I asked for my money. And he never responded. And he's standing there with it in his pocket. Anybody who knows me knows that if I'm talking you can hear me a block away."
Reddy didn't tell his partner or anyone else about the money until he was questioned about it by superiors later, after Simpson got in touch with the department. But Reddy testified at a hearing this week that he certainly intended all along to turn the money over, and District Judge James Hanley dropped the theft charges that had been brought against him.
Simpson told CBS he's shocked by the decision. "Here they're showing me that the system doesn't work, at least it doesn't work in Allegheny County," he said. But, but … this detective certainly looks like he made all good-faith efforts to find out who the money belongs to, no?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Reddy testified at a hearing this week that he certainly intended all along to turn the money over, and District Judge James Hanley dropped the theft charges that had been brought against him.
Nope, no double standard here at all.
Try stealing a neighbors car (or bicycle), and when you get up in front of the judge, tell it that you were going to give it back, honest.
See how it works if you aren't a member, even a low-ranking member, of the Master Class.
"It's called 'Borrowing', your Honor."
*mic drop*
To which you'll hear the following response from the bench:
"Bailiff..."
"...whack his pee pee" ?
You bigorati just don't understand there are certain procedures involved and you can't as an officer just hand back stolen found money must go through proper channels, investigate totality of the circs, etc.
hth
smooches
You forgot "process based analysis". That's new-fake-dunphy's schtick.
Plus is was probably drug money anyway
/ thedoucheformerlyknownasdumphy
Professional courtesy.
Here they're showing me that the system doesn't work,
I was thinking the other day. The cops pull a lot of shit considering how many people in this country grew up reading Punisher comics.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....empty.html
I'm wondering if this guy some specific issues with the cops, like they killed his dog or something. Not that you would ever find out from the media.
Supposedly he thought some cop was having an affair with his sister in law. Though law enforcement has denied that any of their officers are even capable of doing such a thing.
If that's the reason, then fuck that guy. Sure, it's lame to have an affair with someone who is married, but it's the sister in law who is breaking her promises.
A sister-in-law isn't necessarily married. My wife has two sisters that are single.
Though law enforcement has denied that any of their officers are even capable of doing such a thing.
Obligatory.
I'm in that video!
Good for him.
Have they actually said how they zeroed in on him as the suspect?
Do they need to?
OMG - cops running through dense woods in green clothing. How long before one of them clips one of them?
No non-cop murder victim would get this much investigation by the po-po.
I know you bigorati don't care, but there's no double standard here. It's clear that any person who stole an envelope of money from somebody and then said when called on it that "I totally planned to turn that in later!" wouldn't be charged.
h2h. smooches.
Did you even watch the video, kisser? You know where Simpson walks back into the store loudly proclaiming he's lost his money with Reddy still in the store?
Give me some more of that hairy love, big boy.
Either your name reading skills or your sarcasm detection skills are failing, good cyborg. Or maybe mine are.
I failed agilely. My apologies.
twas sarcasm and mockery of dunphy.
"Aht cowp stowl my disabiwhuty check! I wuz gunna take 'at dahn'a Pants n' At!"
+1 long sleeve and one short
Reddy didn't tell his partner or anyone else about the money until he was questioned about it by superiors later...
The KDKA story makes it appear that he told supervisors about the money before they questioned him. I wonder if this is true and, if so, whether he knew the questioning was coming. I'm surprised any charges were filed against him to be dropped in the first place.
According to Simpson Reddy was in the store when he returned to find out what happened to his money. And, according to him, Simpson speaks so loud the entire block can hear his mouth.
Yeah I saw that.
A 'good' detective always waits until the end of his shift to make sure it is absolutely necessary to do the right thing.
A bit early in the week for the nut punches, eh?
...the pilfered yambags you mean?
Making libertarians.
In that sense, incidents like these are a positive since we need more people disillusioned with cops.
Having your money stolen and then returned is probably better than having your dog shot or your house raided.
Go figure.
What's pathetic is that this creature took the paltry sum of $220.
How does that old joke go? "We've established that you are a whore, now we're just negotiating a price."
We now know he is a thief, and now we know just how little money it takes for him to get sticky fingers.
To be fair, he didn't know how much money was in the envelope when he stole it.
Simpson ought to send the cop a bill for interest on the funds.
Can he take all of the cop's money and make him prove he earned it honestly, as sort of a reverse-civil-forfeiture? Because that would be awesome.
It's the 'Sharing Economy' you neck-beared bigorati!
I'm surprised he didn't make up.some bullshit story about how.he suspected the envelope full of cash left lying around was part of a drug deal and so took it and hung around looking for who was trying to puck it up.
Now see, that would be good police work. A creative lie that involves teh drugz. Could even have been some young person involved. He was actually saving children from drugs. For the children.
Yup. He could have then arrested Simpson when he came back in for the money (as a suspected drug dealer), and the way is clear to seize his house, cars, and bank account.
This cop is a real slacker. I'd get rid of him, if I was running the PD.
FTA:
So he got a long paid vacation to boot.
Well, at least THIS restores my faith in "the system".
It's as fucked up as it was before. WHEW!
I can't believe Reddy missed a chance to shut down the entire block due to a "suspicious package".
+1 white powdery substance
But Reddy testified at a hearing this week that he certainly intended all along to turn the money over, and District Judge James Hanley dropped the theft charges that had been brought against him.
The system worked!
I'm surprised Simpson wasn't arrested for littering or brought up on charges of terrorism for leaving a suspicious looking package in a public place.
Given the attention he's getting now, I'm sure some charges can be trumped up. Three Felonies a Day means they'll get him for something.
Now that I think about it, I'm surprised the cop didn't claim he "field tested" the bills for drug residue and arrest the guy for trafficking.
Thanks to the internet, I imagine the cop and maybe even the judge will soon be looking for work. Is there any way we can shut it down?
Sure. Leave it unattended in a 7-eleven.
Tar and feather the judge.
Don't worry officer, everything will be just Frein.
Reddy didn't tell his partner...
The highly trained senses of a police officer; able to spot a dime bag where none exists, but if his partner came into an envelope full of money right in front of him... he didn't see anything.
I'd say the cashier at the 7-eleven is more worthy of a badge than either of the officers.
The cashier didn't see it either, he just knew there was video.
Charges dropped? Noooooooooo. There must be some mistake in this story.
Dunphy seems to have conveniently crawled back up his own ass.
It wasn't the real Dunphy anyway.
It wasn't? Sure sounded like the real one.
We'll see. Jury's still out.
Maybe Detective Reddy needed the $220 for gas and tolls so he could come home to his family safely at the end of his shift.
"He says he intended to turn the money in at the end of his shift." Turn it in WHERE, exactly? If I found anything of value on the counter of a convenience store, I'd hand it to the clerk, end of story. I wouldn't stuff it in my pocket, leave the store and "turn it in" somewhere else.
Oh please, do people review what they write before publishing?
How can the surveillance video show him "allegedly" taking it? If the video shows it, please do not use "allegedly" in the sentence!
Charges were dropped, therefore he allegedly didn't take it.
A better way to put it, I guess, would be "The video shows what the alleger says is Reddy taking the money." You know what these allegers are like.
What a turd! What a complete and utter turd!
But then, so is every other cop.