Obama Administration

Dear Barack Obama: You Suck. Love, The Voters

|

Barack Obama
White House

Americans with their eyes on national politics are more likely to intend their midterm votes as messages of opposition to President Barack Obama than as support, according to Gallup. Almost a third of voters, at 32 percent, are using their ballots as a Bronx cheer for the White House, compared to the 20 percent sending love letters.

That telegram of derision earned by the current chief executive is slightly higher even than the 31 percent who used their 2006 midterm votes as nastygrams to President George W. Bush. For those reading the political tea leaves, it's a hint that the president's party could get a whupping in the elections, as the Republicans did during that election, handing the Democrats six Senate seats and 31 seats in the House. "The similarities between the 2006 and 2014 midterms are striking," notes the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza.

Adds Gallup's Jeffrey M. Jones:

The president is always a major factor in midterm elections, with his party typically losing seats in Congress. And it is clear, based on his lower approval ratings and that more voters say they will be voting as a means of showing opposition rather than support for the president, that Obama is more of a liability than an asset to Democratic candidates this year.

Nastygram

To be sure, a plurality of voters (46 percent) intend no message to the president of any sort, either because they're focused on local issues, or because they accidentally wandered into a polling place while looking for a public pisser.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

127 responses to “Dear Barack Obama: You Suck. Love, The Voters

  1. Looking at that chart I look back and see Clinton and think maybe things weren’t so bad when compared to the ass weasels that followed him.

    1. Funny, I have the same conclusion. Largely agreed with Clinton on domestic policies (although SLDs apply) – kinda thought he sucked on foreign policy, but his successors have been MUCH worse.

      So, overall – I’d take that fuckstick Willy the Lying Philanderer over BOOOOOOOOSH or – certainly – Dear Leader.

      /lowered expectations

      1. I tell progressives all the time that JFK could in no way be nominated much less elected as a D today. I suspect the same will be for Slick Willy in another decade.

        1. The democrat left has become so mentally uderanged now that Slicky is basically forced to disavow his own legacy when he talks to these whack-jobs.

          1. In Iowa recently, he introduced his wife as a “true Progressive”.

            So not only is he still willing to lie about his politics in order to appease the audience he is speaking to that day (“It may surprise you to hear that I think I raised your taxed by too much, too”), but he is still willing to lie about his wife’s as well.

            But Progressives will still line up to vote for her, because it is Her Turn. That policy has worked so well for Republicans….

          2. Like the Democrats who voted for deficit reduction (Simpson-Bowles) when the GOP would not?

            Really, quit the redneck AM radio please. It is rotting your mind.

            1. Are you quitting on me? Well, are you? Then quit, you slimy fucking walrus-looking piece of shit! Get the fuck off of my obstacle! Get the fuck down off of my obstacle! NOW! MOVE IT! Or I’m going to rip your balls off, so you cannot contaminate the rest of the world! I will motivate you, IF IT SHORT-DICKS EVERY CANNIBAL ON THE CONGO!

            2. Whatever, turd.

            3. Palin’s Buttplug – “My team is better than your team. Na na na na!”

              Grow the eff up.

        2. “I tell progressives all the time that JFK could in no way be nominated much less elected as a D today.”

          Yes, his stance for human rights, american greatness, public service, etc. would put him at terrible odds with we lefties….

          The only reason JFK or RFK would not get elected today is because of how many women they each screwed.

          1. You are a sad individual headinass.

          2. You wouldn’t bite for them because you wouldn’t have a chance with them. Whereas if you find yourself alone with Barack in an elevator, you will probably get to channel your inner Chris Matthews.

          3. Goddammit! It’s a knife in my guts to admit this, but i agree with Craig-head up his ass.”Yes, his stance for human rights, american greatness, public service, etc. would put him at terrible odds with we lefties….” Jesus Christ! He DOES have a functioning brain cell! But at least he does condemn JFK and RFK for having sex with lots of women. Thank God he is still willing to castrate himself before Stalinist Feminists. The “men” of the left are such dickless monkeys.

        3. no past republican president in
          modern history could get the
          republican nomination now, they’d
          be too far left, goober

          1. joshrendell|10.6.14 @ 4:01PM|#
            “goober”

            Thank you, shitstain.

    2. Looking at that chart I look back and see Clinton and think maybe things weren’t so bad when compared to the ass weasels that followed him.

      My theory is that the difference is that Clinton was comfortable in his own skin, or at least got that way after a few years in office. Obama and Bush need everybody around them to tell them how great they are. With Bush it was that he was unsure of himself and gave too much weight to what his advisers were telling him. With Obama it is delusion, he really does believe that he knows all the answers and anybody who disagrees with him is unenlightened. Clinton understood that while he was a smart guy, he also had a bunch of other smart guys working for him and he was comfortable enough in his own skin that he allowed his ideas to be challenged.

      1. he also had a bunch of other smart guys working for him

        Janet Reno
        Robert Reich
        Madeline Albright
        Warren Christopher
        Donna E. Shalala
        Norm Minetta
        Bruce Babbit
        Hazel R. O’Leary
        Togo West
        Henry Cisneros

        Yeah, a murders row of brainiacs.

        1. I still recall Albright defending sanctions against Iraq that resulted in no tangible change in Hussein’s rule but caused the deaths of about half a million Iraqi children.

      2. I always thought of Bill Clinton as someone who was too lazy because he was just smart enough and glib enough that he could get away with coasting through life. It was much easier to go with the flow, and he didn’t have any real political convictions like Obama.

        BOOSH the Second, on the other hand, sort of drifted into the job, no one expected much, he would followup on Clinton’s budgets and never have to think, and then 9-11 happened and everything went to hell.

    3. We were lucky with Clinton’s second term, as he was hobbled by the sex scandal and really couldn’t do anything even if he wanted to. If only every president could come into office with a debilitating sex scandal we’d be better off.

      1. He managed to get us into a war just after that sex scandal broke. Remember Kosovo?

        1. that wasn’t a war, that was a
          training exercise for bomber pilots

          1. joshrendell|10.6.14 @ 4:03PM|#
            “that wasn’t a war, that was a
            training exercise for bomber pilots”

            Gee, Josh, try a new lie. That one is worn out.

          2. Tell that to the 7,000 unarmed Bosniak men that the Serbs murdered in Srebrenica while Dutch UN troops watched.

            1. Well, to shitstains like josh, those people living in eastern Europe aren’t really people. They’re pawns to be used by socialist governments as they please.

  2. Does he suck more of less than the Congress? Than Boehner?

    I think that would be a much more accurate measurement.

    1. I’m not a fan of JB either, but must admit-the Senate has almost 200 bills sent up by the House that they have done nothing on. No debate, no vote, zip. I’m a lot more frustrated with them than the House.

      1. A “do-nothing” Congress is a good Congress. Nothing they do is ever any good.

      2. “lmost 200 bills sent up by the House”

        How many are to get rid of the ACA, to give more tax cuts to billionaires and to send Obama back to Kenya or impeach him?

        🙂

        1. Yeah Craig, how many? Citation please.

      3. another goober posting a fox news fiction

        1. joshrendell|10.6.14 @ 4:03PM|#
          “another goober posting a fox news fiction”

          Another brain-dead lefty who really is pissed that Fox News draws more than the Gore’s waste of time.

    2. Everyone sucks, so he can too!

    3. craiginmass|10.6.14 @ 9:36AM|#
      “Does he suck more of less than the Congress? Than Boehner?”

      Asshole says LOOK OVER THERE!
      Way to go, asshole!

    4. Your right. The senate under Reid sucks far worse than Obama. Reid has done more to destroy the integrity of the senate than Dan Rostenkowski ever did to the house. And is a race of suck between Boner and Obama? Photo finish with Obama winning by nose.

    5. craiginmass|10.6.14 @ 9:36AM|#
      “Does he suck more of less than the Congress? Than Boehner?
      I think that would be a much more accurate measurement.”

      Of course you would, asshole. Unfortunately he really needs to be compared to other POTUS and he’s worse than Bush.

  3. Stop being so mean to Obama! I am so sad.

    1. I know what you mean. The fake libertarians who post here make me sad too. Obama can never accomplish anything in this caostic environment with morons like john boner or lush windbag running free and given millions every week to peddle the koch led lies about the administration. how can the federal government and true progressives try to counteract the UNfree speech aka money against them? its not a level playing field. rich old white guys like mitch mcgonad have all the money so they get all the speech. he even found an asian woman who swallowed her pride and married him. that must be the affirmative action they are always talking about, e.g. a woman of color for every rich old white man. they probably have binders full of them hahah right mitteny?

      1. Neurotic obsession with Fox news and the Koch Brothers? CHECK

        It’s a real-life leftoid, I’ve never heard these ideas* before! And two in the same thread, to boot!

      2. craiginass|10.6.14 @ 4:08PM|#
        “I know what you mean. The fake libertarians who post here make me sad too.”

        The true lefty assholes make me sad, too.

      3. If you could only “purge” us the way your hero Mao did when he murdered 75 million Chinese that didn’t agree with him.

        1. Most of the references I have put it over 100M for Mao. 75M was the result of the amateurs in the USSR.

        2. Yes of course you would say that because conservatives or so called fake libertarians love to talk about all the fake horrors of communism when 99.9% of all the horrible things in history were caused by dead white males. christians and capitalism killed more people than communism by 10x over. Just look at Hitler. He killed the communists so oh big suprise they fought back. Or look at Mccarthy he pursecuted the communists in america and oh big suprise they wanted to fight back too. you can’t keep kicking people when they are down and not expect them to fight back. i know you so called libertarians think that you can keep kicking the poor and middle class to the curb with your social darwinist ideology but trust me it will backfire. then you will find yourself selling out more and more of your so called ideals just to buy off or distract the majority of people who want to attack you with pitchforks. all because money and greed is so important to you that you couldn’t even agree that roads should be cpublically shared and buildings should be fireproof and that certain voters are emerging like jimm webb republicans.

          god your idiots! You make me laugh before i cry. i feel sorry for you. you will never understand what its like to not be rich white males having to live without white priviledge or someone paying you to spread the same lies over and over. its sad.

          1. Guess we are hitting a little close to home when we criticize the mass murderer, who happens to be your hero (god?), eh Craig? While you blather on about “the fiction writer” you continue to worship the non-fiction mass murderer. Maybe you should change your login from “craiginmass” to “craigformassmurder”.

            Mao murdered more than Hitler and Stalin combined. I’m not exonerating them. Just stating a fact. Not that facts are ever much use to your cognitive dissonant paradigm.

            Murdering 75M+ people is a fake horror and not wanting to support the lifestyle of healthy people through wealth confiscation is bad? I used to think you were a sociopath. Now I know you are.

            Regarding most of your rant, please reference the NAP. It is the core if libertarianism. Every time I post about it you seem to ignore it.

            If I don’t use a product or service, in not interested I paying for it. I’m fine with paying for my market share of the roads I drive on. I’m not fine with that same process taking more than my share to be used for foreign wars, crony capitalism, the police state and the educational industrial complex. When was the last time you picked up the grocery tab for someone living in Poland?

            As I have told you before, I have been homeless. So please check your “check your white privilege” BS at the door.

            1. No sorry i don’t have gods unlike all of the religious deluded people here who are either neocon fundamentalists or ayn rand worhsippers. so epic fail for you at guessing that i am religious.

              I seriously doubt that your lies are fooling anyone about how many people communism supposedly killed. those facts have been seriously debunked and your attempt at revisionist history is almost like a holocaust denier’s history of WW2. Sorry hitler killed all those people, its a FACT. and he was a white man, FACT. If Mao or other communists had to kill people, its probably because they had no choice but to kill there enemies before the capitalists killed them to keep their stranglehold on the economy. you’ve got to keep the peasants working some how!

              1. Your gushing for Chairman Mao was not dissimilar when USA Today and PBS contributor Evan Thomas referred to Obama as “sort of a god.” So it led to my comment. Which is accurate. I like the attempt at deflection.

                So what is it? Mai didn’t kill 75M+ people or they would have eventually turned a profit under his political and economic system so, preemptively, he was justified in his mass murders? I’m not denying the Nazis killed millions. I use it as a prime example why statism is inherently evil. Please cite where I represented something other than this.

                And regarding your assertion that Mao’s murders never occurred, was this information gotten from an official PRC search engine? Did the Tieneman Square massacre not happen? I adore how you assert that by standing by the truth that your hero murdered tens of millions of people I’m somehow likened to a holocaust denier. I will at least award points for creativity. Somewhere out there, possibly at Stormfront, you have a kindred spirit that claims Jews and Poles were killing Nazis in the mid and late 1930s.

        3. Who cares about the NAP or any other fake libertarian organization that wants to enact some social darwinist legislation. i dont even know why you bring it up except you think i am so gullible that i would join it and then fall in line with your way of thinking! Is that where you brainwash people to support the koch agenda? haha oh sorry i thought that was called the lush windbag program.

          And yeah right you were homeless i am sure. if homeless means that you had to stay in the guest house when your parents were mad at you and you probably couldn’t ride the horses or play polo for like 5 seconds. i know actual homeless who would love to be homeless like you, with white privilege and controlling everything and rape culture. i know REAL homeless people who live in the kind of buildings that arent fireproof that you conserlitarians favor. you know the kind they have in Somalia. Nice try no thanks go home.

          1. I now see you are a fake Craig troll.

      4. Fake Craig.

  4. It only makes sense that when you’re the same president you will have the same results in your second term midterm elections. Maybe we should elect a different dude next time.

  5. “Everybody Chill Out – I Got This!”

    I remember the t-shirts and screen savers and posters. Obama in his cool sunglasses, reassuring everybody that, finally, a competent President was ready to sweep in and fix everything. Why, his track record of success was above reproach! Faith in him wasn’t just based on a cult of personality and White Liberal guilt. It was based on a firm foundation of Unicorn Dust and Good Intentions.

    Every generation needs to learn that politicians are sociopathic scum looking to exploit them. The sooner this eternal truth is internalized, the better.

    1. get back to us when you graduate from school, goober

      1. Get back to us when you have an argument.

      2. I agree Josh. These people posting here hate anything that Obama does even if he didn’t do it, like being born in kenya or nigeria or wherever they say he was or wasn’t born. Its like he is a terrorist because he is black and has a muslim name. they are just jealous that a black man was able to be president and they aren’t, therefore he is a criminal, e,g, like in the other article on the front page here comparing Obama to a murderer and saying that the south should have won. these people will never understand basic economics or building codes for fireproof buildings or facts about emerging voters. so many times i have thought i might just not post here any more but then i stayed and once in a while i see some good posts by you or american socialist and i know i was right to stay because there is hope for the future of america despite these fake neocons doing everything they can to opporess others.

        1. Haven’t been by in a while. New sockpuppets, I see.

        2. craiginass|10.6.14 @ 4:28PM|#
          “I agree Josh.”

          Asshole like GOOOBER!

        3. When you are done constructing your straw man, consider hanging it outside and placing some pumpkins and dried corn around it. Would make for festive fall scenery.

          1. Oh you are so smart. Yeah i would consider it maybe if i had some land to grow it myself and didn’t have to pay rent to some rich guy or mega corporation who owns 99.999% of all the land available and wont let anyone else use it unless they agree to be exploited. but you are of course the exploiter or trying to gain favors with him so of course you would say to pay him because you think you might be able to grab some of the change that falls out of his overflowing pockets.

            1. Fake Craig.

    2. but, but “this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.”

  6. “they accidentally wandered into a polling place while looking for a public pisser.”

    I’m with you J.D. Why vote in this bought and paid for political system where gazillionaires and corporations can buy an election? Poor people that vote for tax breaks for rich people because one day they think they are going to be rich too sure are smart. Maybe they should have to take a quiz, as david harsanyi suggests, to see how unlikely that is to occur?

    I’m going to hang my American flag out the window today because this country (with an infant mortality rate higher than evil castroland) is so super special.

    1. american socialist|10.6.14 @ 10:09AM|#
      …”Why vote in this bought and paid for political system where gazillionaires and corporations can buy an election?”…

      Commie-kid’s here with a heapin’ helpin’ of lefty lies!

      1. you must be a fox news kid
        none of them knows what socialism
        is either

        1. Yeah, because his comment is totally based on his name alone, right?

          You must be a Fox News MSDNC kid, none of them knows what socialism an argument is, either.

        2. Collectivism isn’t hard to figure out, kid. That’s why they push it in government skoolz–they know that idiots like you will never have a red pill moment with the left.

        3. joshrendell|10.6.14 @ 4:10PM|#
          “you must be a fox news kid
          none of them knows what socialism
          is either”

          You must be a lefty asshole. None of them has a brain cell.

          1. @ Sevo that’s really funny too. Most professors are lefty and there some of the smartest people on the planet. i guess you probably are one of those people who flunked out and then blamed it on the professor. like ‘oh this professor failed me because all i could do was repeat koch lies, he must not recognize how smart i am!’ that’s hilarious. that’s a new one!

            No lefty has a brain cell. all the smart people are fake libertarians who post on this site and repeat what the koch’s pay them to say or repeat the talking poihnts they heard on the lush windbag or sean hannity show. yeah that’s what all the people with braincells do. LOL

            1. Fake Craig. I think you are josh.

    2. Hey dumbass. The “infant mortality rate” figure has been debunked hundreds of times. The US has the best infant care in the world. The only reason our “mortality rate” is higher is because other countries count kids that we try and sometimes do save as miscarriages and we count them as live births and thus when they don’t make it against our infant mortality rate.

      At some point a lie gets debunked so many times that those who tell it are no longer mistaken or even lying. They are delusional. The infant mortality figure has long since reached that point. Take your delusions elsewhere.

      Moreover, take your racism elsewhere. Every President has problems and doesn’t do as well in their second terms. Democrats defended white Presidents like Clinton and FDR and Wilson who had bad second terms. Yet, they are now trying to drop the first black President like 3rd period French. That is just racism straight up. Learn how to handle there being a black President better and stand up for him like you would a white Democratic President. Obama did a lot for your side. You should be thanking him like you would any white President.

      1. Thanks, I’ve been debunking the same thing for years and finally just tired of doing so.

      2. John|10.6.14 @ 10:18AM|#
        “Hey dumbass. The “infant mortality rate” figure has been debunked hundreds of times”…

        What do you expect? This slimeball loves him some mass-murderers. If commie-kid can’t post lies, he’s got nothing to post.

      3. Yeah, those World Health Organization standards that all industrialized countries report under are a commie plot. This country is sooper awesome with its shoot outs, awesome health care system, and sooper-de-dooper military spending.

        Did I tell you I’m immigrating to Denmark. I’ve told those guys how awesome it is in the U.S., but I can’t continue because of the laughter and spit-up drinks. They just don’t know the glories of shit hole Red states and crumbling infrastructure.

        1. That would be emigrating.

        2. Yes, WHO measures differently than the US does. And the US does its own reporting.

          The facts are what they are and any google search would show you what they are. It doesn’t fit your narrative. You don’t yourself or your cause any good by pretending facts are something different than what they are. It just makes you profoundly ignorant and causes people who are not to stop paying attention to you.

        3. american socialist|10.6.14 @ 11:03AM|#
          “Yeah, those World Health Organization standards that all industrialized countries report under are a commie plot.”

          Hey, look there! More lefty lies from the slimy commie!

        4. Did I tell you I’m immigrating to Denmark.

          Don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out. BTW, the welfare state has been shrinking all across scandanavia lately. Looks like they’re running out of other peoples money. Hope you enjoy only heating one room of your home at a time.

          1. And they’re not so much the happy monoculture that they used to be; give it a couple years – when Europeans want to be nasty they get really nasty.

            1. That’s not fair. There hasn’t been a genocide in Europe in at least 15 years!

          2. …”Hope you enjoy only heating one room of your home at a time.”

            Hey, at least everybody’s equally cold!

            1. Once,there were two peasants, Ivan and Mikhail, both equally poor. Then one day, Ivan somehow acquires a cow. His life immediately improves. Instead of the wife, the cow pulls the plow; the cow gives milk; it produces calves for meat and the market.

              One night, starving and miserable, Mikhail drops to his knees and prays. “Oh, God,” he implores, “Ivan and I were always equal. And now look at him ? he is so much better off than I am. So God, please, make us equal once more.” There’s a sudden thunderclap and suddenly Mikhail hears the Voice of God. “Your prayers will be answered,” says the Lord. “You shall be equal again.”

              “Great!” Mikhail exclaims. “You’re going to kill Ivan’s cow!”

          3. He wouldn’t have a home. He would default on his mortgage like here.

        5. “Did I tell you I’m immigrating to Denmark.”

          Buh-bye.

        6. Either the country sucks and its your teams fault, because they have been in charge for 6 years…

          Or this country is great because your team is so awesome. Which is it?

        7. This country is sooper awesome with its shoot outs, awesome health care system, and sooper-de-dooper military spending.

          Yeah, the country’s health care system is really terrible. That’s why that Duncan guy wouldn’t fly here as soon as he could after being exposed to Ebola – he had to be dragged onto the plane kicking and screaming.

        8. This country is sooper awesome with its shoot outs, awesome health care system, and sooper-de-dooper military spending.

          You exhibit far too much self-parody to be taken seriously. Kindly, leave and never return.

      4. “Hey dumbass. The “infant mortality rate” figure has been debunked hundreds of times. The US has the best infant care in the world.”

        Yep, and I’m sure you debunked the “double the price health care” and “less life spans” while you were at it!

        In fact, you probably debunked climate change, physics, secularism and many other subjects – all while you were taking your morning dump!

        It’s always best for ideologues to summarily dismiss any and all ideas or metrics which run counter to their already decided “facts”.

        1. craiginmass|10.6.14 @ 1:40PM|#

          Asshole:
          Hey look over there!

        2. When you take into account the higher smoking rates, disparity in vehicular deaths (most Danes can’t afford a coal-powered Tesla motors car) and the greater number of deaths per population caused by the greater amount of overweight and obese Americans, then we really are getting a good value.

          I’d like to find out if the +/- one million abortions per year in this country are included in our mortality figures.

          1. “I’d like to find out if the +/- one million abortions per year in this country are included in our mortality figures.”

            I’d also like an accounting of those who come here for decent medical care and cosmetic surgery. And an accounting of the pharm R&D. How about the costs driven by malpractice insurance (including ‘defensive’ practices)which socialized meds don’t require in that if the doc screws up, you die and who cares?
            How much of the claimed ‘excess’ US costs are just BS? But the left really doesn’t care about facts; the propaganda is so much better.
            I’m sure craig agrees, right asshole?

  7. Related:
    “Why Democrats aren’t getting credit for the economy”
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..ml?hpid=z2

    (warning; dionne alert!)
    Well, mostly because the Ds know the voters aren’t as dumb as lefty cheer-leaders.

    1. At some point people believe their lying eyes. It is like the unemployment rate bullshit. People know how bad the job market is and thus understand that the rate the government gives doesn’t reflect reality no matter how much the Dem Op media tells them otherwise.

      1. Where is the media (or even Reason) on ACA? I just received my new rates after being told my policy was cancelled – 300% increase (no preexisting conditions, and zero claims). This policy will wipe-out small businesses.

        1. The ACA is doing unimaginable amounts of harm. The full extent of that harm is not even known the the government won’t release the numbers. The numbers that do get released are horrible. One can only imagine how bad the real numbers much be.

          1. You are imaginating plenty.

            1. Don’t lock eyes with ’em, don’t do it. Puts ’em on edge. They might go into berzerker mode; come at you like a whirling dervish, all fists and elbows. You might be screaming “No, no, no” and all they hear is “Who wants cake?” Let me tell you something: They all do. They all want cake.

            2. Whatever, turd.

        2. The fact that the general media and the lefty media both act as if ACA never happened tells you all you need to know about how well it is working.

          As many predicted, it is failing but not in a spectacular enough way to keep people upset. So it becomes another permanent part of our landscape.

          1. No. It is doing huge harm. They are hoping that by not giving real numbers, people will not realize the harm they see is occurring to everyone else as well. I don’t think that will happen, but that is the plan.

            The other thing they are doing is just telling the country to fuck off it can’t be undone. If you get people to feel that there is no way to fix it, they will stop worrying about it.

            That seems to be the plan for 2016. Admit upfront that Obama totally fucked up and did a ton of harm but them just say it is the law now and it was too late and I guess we won’t nominate Obama again. When you see how retarded people like American Socialist and shreek are, you can understand why they figure it might work.

            1. The worst part is anytime there is bad news being reported about the ACA in the news, the media gives plenty of air time to lefties to spew their lies.

              One example was when all those cancellation notices were sent out. How was this covered in the media? “These subpar plans are being replaced with better plans!” “These terrible ripoff insurance plans are finally gone!” and other sickening bullshit.

              I just happened to see a ‘debate’ on CNN between a bunch of scumbags who work on congressional campaigns. It ended with a Rachel Maddow wannabe saying that Republicans are scared because they know the American people like the ACA and want the minimum wage increased. A news anchor agreed with ‘it’ and the segment ended. Very fair coverage.

            2. The other thing they are doing is just telling the country to fuck off it can’t be undone. If you get people to feel that there is no way to fix it, they will stop worrying about it.

              That seems to be their plan for now, and in a few years they’ll start screaching about “MARKIT FALEYURE!!!1!!11!!!! SINGUL PAYER NOW!!!1!111!!!!! DERP!!!!1!!” The sad thing is, it just might work. Never underestimate the stupidity of the average voter.

          2. Because a majority of Americans obtain coverage via employers, they aren’t seeing real numbers at this point – although this may change when open enrollment season hits.

            1. We who receive employer coverage have not been spared in this fiasco, either. The leftoids are just hoping that few of us bother to look at the skyrocketing withholding on our paystubs and connect the dots.

        3. 300% increase (no preexisting conditions, and zero claims)

          As a healthy man in the USSA, you must be required to subsidize the healthcare of the less fortunate. IT’S FOR TEH CHILDRUNZ!.

  8. Dear Barack Obama: You Suck. Love, The Voters

    But… we’d give you a third term if we could. SadFace!

    1. #BringbackourChocolateNixon

    2. We just always wanted to vote for a black man for President three times.

      Signed/

      Select members of the Reason staff.

      1. I wanted to vote for the “Rent’s too damned high” guy. Does that count?

        1. No. That guy was a scary black man. You have to vote for a cuddly half white one like Obama.

        2. “I wanted to vote for the “Rent’s too damned high” guy. Does that count?”

          Actually, Cain would have been the right guy. He could have had swordfights with Justice Thomas with his “long john silver”.

          1. craiginmass|10.6.14 @ 1:42PM|#
            “Actually, Cain would have been the right guy. He could have had swordfights with Justice Thomas with his “long john silver”.”

            Yeah, asshole, as opposed to your fave lying piece of shit who would just bomb anyone near.

      2. Perhaps I am forgetting something, but did anyone at Reason have anything remotely positive to say about voting for Obama in 2012?

  9. The Emo-Progs despise Obama for his corporate friendly “Wall Street” ways thus tilting his numbers downward. Their latest whine is about the free trade agreement being negotiated with the Pacific Rim countries.

    1. I bet you’re the kind of guy who would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I’ll be watching you.

  10. What’s the message in the Kansas senate race? Just how bad is Pat Roberts that Kansas voters are ready to send another Obama supporter to Washington?

    1. Hey he is an independent. So independent he will caucus with the Dems and vote exactly how Harry Reid tells him to.

      And the message in the KS Senate race is that perhaps GOP voters would rather take a six year ass raping from a prog than continue the 30 year ass raping from the GOP establishment. The GOP has only themselves to blame for that. All they had to do was tell the old bastard it was time to retire and Kansas would be a safe seat. But NOOOOO they couldn’t do that. God forbid any old bastard ever voluntarily leave power. Never!!

    2. Like Bruce Braley here in Iowa, they don’t purport to be an Obama supporter. Just anti-Koch and Big Oil!

  11. or because they accidentally wandered into a polling place while looking for a public pisser.

    Probably a more common mistake than anyone realizes.

  12. joshrendell|10.6.14 @ 4:03PM|#
    Palin’s Buttplug|10.6.14 @ 10:37AM|#
    craiginmass|10.6.14 @ 1:42PM|#
    american socialist|10.6.14 @ 10:09AM|#

    The fact is that Obo is a lying bastard who is finally getting judged on his actions.
    So what do we get? Four of five piles of lefty shit trying like hell to claim he’s better than the random cockroach, ’cause Fox News and stuff!
    Yep, real argument there, guys! Or should I say goobers…

    1. Because of talk radio!

  13. And for the edification of the lefty shit piles (1):

    Lies about O-care: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKIZV0wIsS0
    Lies about war: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_RWHiC7K3k

  14. (4)
    And just lies in general: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kg9m1F8B2_c

    Have fun kids! Add to the list all you please!

  15. An educated electorate is. . . . . Not really extant!

  16. Okay, so is this where Reason.com turns into StupidBlog.com? I haven’t been on this site long enough to know J.D. Tuccille’s story, but I bet 46% of voters would think this was a waste of time. And as for Gallup’s own biases and ability to accurately survey the electorate you only need to go to their eval of Romney v. Obama here http://www.gallup.com/poll/158…..urvey.aspx

    A “Reason”able person might actually look at all of the data and not project so much bias.

  17. Looks like the percentage sending a message really hasn’t changed since the 2006 election. This article makes it seem like voters are turning against Obama, but it’s basically the same as when he was elected.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.