Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Jim Webb for President?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 9.30.2014 11:52 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Jim Webb/Facebook

Jim Webb, an eccentric, anti-war, Ronald Reagan–quoting ex-senator from Virginia, is garnering attention as a possible presidential contender on the Democrat side. Because I'm still desperatley/delusionally clinging to the hope that someone less contemptible than Hillary Clinton could earn the Democratic nomination, I enjoyed The Washington Post's profile of Webb, who is seriously considering a 2016 White House bid despite the fact that most experts don't think he has a chance. 

Webb's experience in the Senate is sparse—he served one term after defeating Republican George Allen in 2006—but he's also a Vietnam War vet who served as assistant secretary of defense and Navy secretary during the Reagan administration and was tossed about as a vice-presidential pick in 2008. "We want to see if there's a support base from people who would support the programs that we're interested in pursuing," said Webb, 68, announcing potential presidential aspirations at a National Press Club speech last week.

And what programs would those be? One of the things Webb is most well-known for is his anti-war stance, and this may be where he's "uniquely positioned as a disruptive force on issues where many Democrats consider Clinton compromised," the Post notes. 

"Remember, one of the reasons Obama did so well in Iowa was because he said he would end the wars," said Marcos Rubinstein, who directed antiwar Democrat Dennis Kucinich's 2008 presidential campaign in Iowa. "That is why he was able to beat Clinton, and Iowa remains full of Democrats who are looking for a peaceful message."

In his speech last week, Webb attacked the Obama administration's Middle East policy, citing it as one of the main reasons for his return to political life:

"If you go back and look at the remarks I was making from the time this administration got involved in the Arab Spring, I said it was an unprecedented use of presidential power—no treaties, no Americans attacked, no imminent threat of attack, no Americans to be rescued," Webb said. "Secretary Clinton and I have worked well together, but the Arab Spring is a different question. .?.?. This administration, collectively, made some very bad decisions, and they now have to climb out of a deep hole."

Critiques of presidential power from a Democrat? Be still my heart! This "redneck regal" liberal is also an advocate of gun rights and a supporter of criminal justice reform. In the Senate in 2009, he introduced a bill calling for a serious re-evaluation of our nation's drug and criminal justice policies. (Irrelevant but interesting: He's also a fiction author and wrote the story for the 2000 film Rules of Engagement.) 

Webb is still a Democrat, of course—"economic fairness" is among his causes—but he seems to actually have principles, too, which is so much more than we can say for Clinton and, at least anymore, President Obama. If nothing else, it would be nice to see Webb widening the scope of primary-season discourse and taking Clinton to task for her war-hawk ways. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: High Stakes for China in Hong Kong Protests

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PoliticsElection 2016Hillary ClintonVirginiaJim WebbCampaigns/ElectionsDemocratic Party
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (59)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. WTF   11 years ago

    Yeah, let’s ignore his economic policies and vote for the anti-war Democrat, it worked out so well with Obama.

    1. perlhaqr   11 years ago

      I fully recognize that I would almost certainly be saying the opposite if this had come to pass, but after nearly six years of Obama, I start to wonder if Field Marshal Rodham wouldn’t have been a less shitty president.

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        What difference at this point does it make?

      2. Brett L   11 years ago

        No. Just as bad but in different ways. For instance, she would probably actually attend her intel briefings, but implement horribly Byzantine strategies that turn into complete clusterfucks.

  2. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

    Webb’s experience in the Senate is sparce…

    Sparce? Is that pronounced “spar-kay”? Or “spar-see”?

    1. Bam!   11 years ago

      I think it’s spelled “sparse.”

  3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    You know what other candidate looked good on paper and was terrible in practice?

    1. The Other Kevin   11 years ago

      All of them?

      1. John   11 years ago

        Which ones looked good on paper?

        1. creech   11 years ago

          James Buchannan.

        2. robc   11 years ago

          James K Polk.

        3. Brett L   11 years ago

          Who is on the largest bill the Treasury prints?

    2. Swiss Servator, Grundgesetz!   11 years ago

      Egon Krenz?

  4. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    “economic fairness” is among his causes

    Economic fairness translates to institutionalized injustice.

  5. Episiarch   11 years ago

    So basically, all politicians are scum. It’s best we all remember that.

  6. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

    It’s one thing when a bad candidate and human being makes it through and gets nominated. Shit like that happens in our system for a variety of reasons. It’s another thing altogether to anoint and urge on a bad candidate and human being before the primaries even get started.

    If nothing demonstrates the uselessness and moral vacuum that is the Democratic Party, the fact that they’re just lying supine (or is that prone?) while a venal, proven-incompetent, and totally amoral old lady walks on their heads shows that in living color.

  7. Warty   11 years ago

    Economic fairness. We’re supposed to get excited over Elizabeth Warren with a cock? Fuck that and fuck him.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Hey now, I am told Elizabeth has a fine cock. Its almost as big as Hilary’s or so I am told.

      1. Episiarch   11 years ago

        Look, an extremely large clitoris is not a penis. Just ask NutraSweet.

        1. Swiss Servator, Grundgesetz!   11 years ago

          Gah! DO NOT! Can you imagine what he would pen…

          1. SugarFree   11 years ago

            No, he’s referring to a rather distressing situation a friend of mine found himself in during high school.

    2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      I just don’t see any reason at all to vote for any Democrats right now, unless they’ve already proven that they aren’t statist fucks. How many of those are in office today? Two?

      I despise most Republicans, but at least limited government proponents have some voice within the party, however limited and however despised by the old guard. And that voice has grown somewhat while the GOP walks in the wilderness, eating wild honey and locusts.

      But, by all means, vote based on identity politics or some other single issue that is more important than all of our other freedoms, our mega-economy, and avoiding tyranny.

      1. Scarecrow Repair   11 years ago

        The point is not to vote for Webb, but to liven up the Democrat race so Hillary doesn’t get a stroll down memory lane with all her lies and obfuscations intact. More power to Webb for that.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          I’m confident that her primary opponents, which are nowhere near as few as the media wants the world to think, will rape and pillage her. Perhaps literally, in this day of rape-sex, perhaps not.

        2. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   11 years ago

          YES. This.

          1. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   11 years ago

            (uh, that was directed at Scarecrow Repair’s comment)

            1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

              Oh, I see how this works.

              1. Scarecrow Repair   11 years ago

                Ha! I knew how it worked.

    3. Brett L   11 years ago

      Eh. I’m with ENB. I’m not going to vote for any major candidate with Rand Paul maybe being the exception, but Jim Webb appears to be an adult human being who took his office seriously. This would be a huge step in the right direction and away from Biden or Clinton.

      1. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   11 years ago

        Exactly. It’s not like I would necessarily vote for Webb, or like I really plan to even vote at all, but I will cheer politicians on either side who seem marginally less terrible than most.

      2. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

        He was Sec of the Navy when I was an enlisted man in the Corps. He seemed like a decent sort to me back then.

  8. John   11 years ago

    What is more important Elizabeth, the fact that the country is turning lawless and downright fascist or that we are bombing Syria? It seems to me the first problem is a lot bigger than the second. For that reason I fail to see why Webb’s being “anti-war” means very much without some indication that he plans to do something about the first problem.

    1. WTF   11 years ago

      Oh, he’ll do something about the first problem, all right. He’ll make it worse, in the name of “economic fairness”.

  9. Mike M.   11 years ago

    Jim Webb, the guy who wrote that “Women Can’t Fight” article? Is this April Fools Day or something? The left went apeshit back when someone floated the idea of him being Obama’s running mate.

    1. Raston Bot   11 years ago

      Webb also wrote that affirmative action is fine as long as it’s also provided to poor white folk from appalachia.

      I’m having a hard time remembering what he did in Congress other than increasing the GI bill tuition limit.

      And he beat Allen in the macaca election when everyone saw what a dumbass Allen is.

    2. CE   11 years ago

      In fairness, Webb had never met Brienne of Tarth when he wrote that.

  10. GILMORE   11 years ago

    “I’m still desperatley/delusionally clinging to the hope that someone less contemptible than Hillary Clinton could earn the Democratic nomination,”

    *why*?

    Because you think the Democrat party has such great *ideals*, and just coincidentally happens to attract such ungodly shitty people*?

    (*note: almost all politicians are ungodly shitty people)

    I personally think its perfect that the Hilinator be the default candidate for America following Obama. it is a bald admission we are voting for TEAM UBER ALLES and that voters are far more driven by identity politics than issues. No one will care what an evil gasbag she is, and will say, “Tits more important than ideas”.

    Dont even get me started on this ‘anti-war’ bullshit. candidates say *anything*. When people are in the drivers seat, they become mere rubber stamps to what is perceived as ‘political necessity’ lest they show ‘weakness’.
    i al

    1. SugarFree   11 years ago

      “I’m still desperatley/delusionally clinging to the hope that someone less contemptible than Hillary Clinton could earn the Democratic nomination,”

      *why*?

      Because if the GOP fields a shit-show candidate, the Dems will win. Elizabeth is just hoping for anyone but Hillary at this point.

      1. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   11 years ago

        Yeah, I don’t see why it’s so awful to suggest that I hope both Democrats and Republicans put forth the best possible candidates.

        1. John   11 years ago

          Its not. Everyone on here is always trying to “fix the Republicans” and “teach the Republicans a lesson”. That is all well and good but it is not good enough just to fix the Republicans. You have to fix both sides. You will never fix the Republicans if the alternative is a batshit insane Democratic Party.

          The a group of hard core fascists have taken over the Democratic Party and now run it. Since Democrats are bound to take power at some point, that is a big fucking problem that no amount of “fixing the Republicans” is going to solve.

        2. Warty   11 years ago

          Don’t get me wrong, it’s good that this guy is less horrible than Hilary. Still, fuck him.

        3. GILMORE   11 years ago

          by “the best possible” do we mean, “the least awful?”

          Because that’s what Obama was, last i checked. And a lot of people in this magazine tooted his horn for similar reasons. I nearly voted for the guy (i live in NYC and it would have been meaningless in any case)

          I’m not voting “for” any people this time around. I’m voting against the expansion of the “free shit” state, and ending the tradeoffs of Liberty for ‘Security’. I don’t care if the Democrat is a cross between Jesus and Chuck Norris – he/she will simply be a more-attractive salesperson for horrible ideas. Fuck em.

          1. GILMORE   11 years ago

            FWIW – “Jesus Norris” reminds me of rapper, Action Bronson

    2. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

      The reason that you want someone to knock off Hillary is the same reason you want someone to beat the Cowboys in the wild card playoff game; you don’t want to take the chance that with some lucky breaks evil* wins it all. Better the contest is between two entities you don’t care about.

      * I know that there is no debate about Clinton being evil, but some delusional folks even to this day who deny that the Cowboys are evil. To them I point out that until they atone for Drew Pearson’s push off of Nate Wright in 1975’s “Hail Mary” play they will be the most loathsome team in the NFL.

      1. PRX   11 years ago

        I asked Drew about that at a 7-11 in the 80’s. He said Nate fell down. Suck it orange throwing Vikings fans.

      2. Brett L   11 years ago

        You don’t need all that. They’re from Dallas, Americans from every shitty town that doesn’t have their own team (and far too many people from those that do hail from football towns) love them. The Cowboys are obviously evil.

        1. Brett L   11 years ago

          (and far too many people from those that do hail from football towns)

          I have no clue what this actually means.

        2. Raven Nation   11 years ago

          Still? I’d say there’s some evidence that the Packers are taking over some of that group.

    3. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      Tits more important than ideas

      Yes, but surely quality has to count for something.

  11. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    You know who else had principles?

    1. Raston Bot   11 years ago

      Financial Accounting Standards Board?

  12. CE   11 years ago

    The primaries aren’t a contest — they’re a coronation. Please let the experts pick the front-runner, and stick to the script! But yeah, Hillary has no chance of winning the nomination, so don’t sweat it.

  13. Paul.   11 years ago

    “Remember, one of the reasons Obama did so well in Iowa was because he said he would end the wars,”

    No he didn’t. I seem to recall he never said any such thing, but his supporters painted him with that.

    1. Acosmist   11 years ago

      He said Afghanistan was the real war and we needed to focus on that. So yeah, total BS.

  14. Paul.   11 years ago

    “Secretary Clinton and I have worked well together, but the Arab Spring is a different question. .?.?. This administration, collectively, made some very bad decisions, and they now have to climb out of a deep hole.”

    So, Webb might be a Clinton VP pick?

  15. jmomls   11 years ago

    Oh great, another tax & spend, isolationist surrender monkey. Just what the country needs.

    1. kbolino   11 years ago

      To anybody who says there don’t exist some Republicans who would sooner vote for Hillary Clinton than Rand Paul, I submit this as evidence to the contrary.

  16. Underzog   11 years ago

    Perhaps the most attractive feature for you chaps at “Hit and Run” is Jim Webb’s antisemitic/National socialist campaign he ran against George Allen (as detailed by Ann Coulter). This, along with your silence on the Muslim decapitator in OK and the Muslim just 20 miles away who threatened to decapitate someone else, is perfectly in keeping with your consistent antisemitism. Jim Webb is both your candidate and your fellow antisemite, Pat Buchanan at the misnamed “American Conservative.”

    1. Skip   11 years ago

      If Reason is anti-semitic, Lefty sites like Daily Kos must be downright genocidal Nazis because I’m pretty sure they are saying anyone who criticizes Muslims for anything is evil.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Police Blew Up This Innocent Woman's House and Left Her With the Bill. A Judge Says She's Owed $60,000.

Billy Binion | 6.6.2025 1:51 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!