FDA Backtracks on Plan to Stop Small Breweries From Sharing Spent Grain With Farmers


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is backtracking on a proposed rule regulating the sharing of "spent grains" between beer makers and farmers. At present, many donate grains leftover from the brewing process to farms, providing brewers with an efficient and sustainable way to dispose of waste and farmers a cheap way to feed their livestock.
This has been going on absent FDA regulation for a long time (and with no major catastrophes), but in March the agency announced a proposed rule change that may have effectively ended the practice. Under the new rule, brewers sharing with farmers would have to process and package spent grain in such a way that it would no longer be cost-efficient to do so. The proposal was met with ample outcry from brewers, farmers, lawmakers, and food-freedom advocates.
"Based on valuable input from farmers, consumers, the food-industry and academic experts," the FDA has now revised its proposed rule on spent grains. Under the new rule, processing and packaging requirements will only apply to brewers with annual sales of $2.5 million or more. The FDA hasn't yet specified what particular processing regulations will apply to these larger brewers.
Not a perfect solution, nor a terribly sensible one (more beer sales mean more spent grains for brewers, but they do not make those grains somehow suddenly more dangerous for local pigs to nosh on). But it's something.
Jim McGreevy, president and CEO of the Beer Institute, said his association is "gratified that the Food and Drug Administration listened to our concerns about their proposed rule (and) made the changes necessary for U.S. brewers to continue to market our spent grains as we always have—safely, with industry-best standards for testing, monitoring and management of the grains from the start of the brewing process."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I give my spent grain to friends with chickens. They love that shit.
Friends with chickens is cooler than "friends with benefits".
To me, anyway.
Why not both?
Because I don't want to take any diseases home to my wife.
License and registration, chicken-fucker!
He only needs a license if he fucks more than 2 chickens a week and/or the value of the chickens is over $1000.
This is necessary to protect the health of both the chickens and the fucker.
Doesn't make sense? Good. That's how we like it.
Friends w/ Chicken plus Cleveland Steamer=?
Does spent grain have any nutritional value for livestock?
It's a filler. Most livestock nutrients come from alfalfa, soy, or processed feed pellets.
Hmm, alfalfa and soy are cover crops, or "green manure".
Yep.
protein and fiber stays behind.
They love it. Cows eat better with spent grain mixed in.
Because making too much money is TEH EVUL.
Because safety rules should be based on the amount of muny U makez.
It's not a safety rule. There have been exactly zero problems from this practice and they've been doing it literally for thousands of years.
It's a matter of big companies that already package the stuff wanting to force that expense onto the competition.
"OK, OK, so the rule is stupid, unnecessary, and expensive to implement. How about if we exempt really small businesses?"
It is an artificial price barrier for gong from a small sale operation to a large scale operation. A wee bit of protectionism for large brewers.
If its not okay, its not okay. Asshats. Thanks for capping new beer company sales at $2.5M until they can afford to be a $5M company.
Once the threshold is on the books, it can be changed at a whim by every successive bureaucrat to sit at the FDA.
Nah, once you get to $2.5M you just throw it away.
I'd like to try that.
Jim McGreevy, president and CEO of the Beer Institute...
Please tell me it's not that Jim McGreevy.
Nope. That Jim McGreevy is Jim McGreevey.
AKA the luckiest man in the world.
Nothing to cut.
Looks like ENB had a bit too much beer before she got to the alt-text.
Go get your hate on, people.
It's "Two Minutes Hate"
/pedant
"Based on valuable input from farmers, consumers, the food-industry and academic experts," the FDA has now revised its proposed rule on spent grains. "
I am guessing the majority of that valuable input was angry people saying "Fuck you" and waving a pitchfork.
OT: I just turned on the news and there was Obumbles Clown Shoes at the U.N. giving a speech on climate change. TV was on about fifteen seconds and he said "Our climate is changing faster...".
Really? I think the data shows no change whatsoever....at least nothing statistically out of the norm.
Bald. Faced. Liar.
If I find a genie bottle and get three wishes one of them will definitely be to endow him with a Pinocchio nose. Hmmm...no, I am revising that. It will be to endow anyone who occupies elected office with a Pinocchio nose.
There's gonna be a lot of missing eyes in congress.
A pinocchio erection would be better.
Then as long as they are lying, they cannot urinate. They either learn to be honest, die of a ruptured bladder or die of dehydration.
In all of those cases, we are left better off.
I like Geiko commercials.
Mildly funny....but why choose a motivational speaker when the most obvious choice is politician?
Oh...Government Employees Insurance Company.
Never mind.
No one seems to care that he's lying anyway.
Once you get used to it it's mildly entertaining -- and you don't have to worry that part of it will suddenly come true.
Yay!
And just yesterday a troll ( I forget which one) was saying how libertarians would let businesses kill their customers, so we need to FDA to make sure that's not happening.
Sadly, it is a very common belief that, without the FDA, every single product on the market would contain poison.
If only we had some type of statutory law that prevented one person from killing another. Or maybe 2 laws, one for intentionally killing and another for accidents or negligence. Maybe another law for premeditated killing. No, that's crazy talk. It'd never work.
Ambrose Bierce divided homicide into four classes: felonious, accidental, justifiable and praiseworthy.
"But it's something."
Yeah, lighter fetters, rather than heavy chains.
Fuck off, FDA slavers.
He new rule is still bad, just not as bad. Brewers Association is still fighting it.
+1 for the Soulfly shirt.