Biden Gets Another Free Pass
There is simply no way a Republican could get away with the buffoonery Biden peddles almost daily.


Remember when the media freaked out for three days over Sarah Palin's completely innocuous use of the term "blood libel"? Nearly every major media outlet took a deep dive on this critical outrage. Millions of Americans learned more about how Jews in the Middle Ages were sometimes falsely accused of kidnapping and murdering Christian children so they could use the blood for ritualistic baking. But more significantly: What did Palin mean? Was she sending a veiled message to evangelical voters? Was it just anti-Semitism rearing its ugly head again?
There will be no such national conversation over Vice President Joe Biden's recent comments. While extolling the virtues of his son Beau at a speech at Legal Services Corp., our Clouseau-esque vice president launched into one of his folksy populist rants.
"When he was over there in Iraq for a year," Biden explained, "people would come to him and talk about what was happening to them at home in terms of foreclosures, in terms of bad loans that were being—I mean these Shylocks who took advantage of these women and men while overseas."
Immediately, the voice of America's aggrieved Jewish community, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), jumped into action with this rather mild condemnation from its national director, Abraham Foxman:
When someone as friendly to the Jewish community and open and tolerant an individual as is Vice President Joe Biden uses the term 'Shylocked' to describe unscrupulous moneylenders dealing with service (members), we see once again how deeply embedded this stereotype about Jews is in society.
There's no need to overreact. It's not as if Biden said, "You cannot go to a bagel store unless you have a slight Yiddish accent." He certainly didn't say, "You Jews are so productive. I don't think you're smarter than anybody else, but you've convinced a lot of us you are." Was he intending to insult bankers as moneylending Jews? Is it an insult? Is there anything wicked about usury? I find it unlikely. I find it improbable he even knew Shylock had anything to do with Jews.
Anyway, Biden apologized. They almost always do. "Abe Foxman," he said in a statement, "has been a friend and adviser of mine for a long time." If only we all had advisers to help steer us from saying stupid things. (It is worth pointing out that as often as the ADL gets overexcited about minor slights, it is equally fawning for no reason. What on earth has Biden done to make himself a "friend" of the Jewish community? Wear a yarmulke once a year? Sign on to work for the least Israel-friendly administration ever?)
When William Shakespeare wrote The Merchant of Venice and created the character Shylock, there hadn't been any Jews in England for hundreds of years, not since they were expelled in 1290—and they wouldn't really return to full rights until the mid-1800s. Shakespeare knew nothing about Jews. There's no need to be offended. Shakespeare is long dead. The Jews are still alive. (Not to mention, I'm strongly pro-Shylock; he was a legitimate businessman screwed over by a technicality.)
So it's not a big deal. Or, I should say, it's as big a deal as the dozens of stories we've had to endure about GOP gaffes. Is there any question that the repercussions for these sorts of mistakes are meted out asymmetrically? There is simply no way a Republican could get away with the buffoonery Biden peddles almost daily. Is the lack of genuine scrutiny over Biden's mistakes a reflection of the media's handling him like an unserious person? If that's the case, then shouldn't the president be open to far more criticism for putting the country in such a precarious position? Or is it that Biden finds himself in the right party?. Either way, it reflects poorly on the media.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I was mildly impressed that Biden used an actual literary reference, rather than some lame pop culture reference that so many politicians seem to use to position themselves as hip and personable.
He heard somebody else use the term and thought it sounded cool and scholarly. I don't get why "Shylock" should be considered an offensive term -- that's like saying that calling someone a Romeo is offensive to Italians.
"he was a legitimate businessman screwed over by a technicality."
Well, he should have known he couldn't spill the blood of a Christian so asking for a pound of flesh was pretty stupid.
Nope. What good is controlling the media if you can't protect your friends and kick those damn teathuglican racists in the balls?
The last time I made the mistake of watching a full Red Eye episode, Jedediah Bila basically said that Uncle Joe was cute and funny.
The reason why the so-called right loses the pop-culture battle is because it views its opponents as dumb, whereas the so-called left views its opponents as evil.
I'd be tempted to make a "They'd told me if I voted for McCain we'd have an idiot for a Vice President...", except there was no way in hell I was voting* for McCain.
*voted for Barr.
there hadn't been any Jews in England for hundreds of years, not since they were expelled in 1290
And who were they expelled by? The same king who subjugated Scotland, Edward Longshanks.
It's all interconnected.
He's also the king who conquered Wales. Unlike his subjugation of Scotland, the conquest of Wales was permanent.
(According to legend, he also promised to appoint a native-born Prince of Wales, who didn't speak English, after which he appointed his son, who'd just been born while the royal family was in Wales. The heir to the throne has traditionally been named as Prince of Wales ever since.)
If that legend is true, then that was some truly Magnificent Bastardy.
I'm just hoping he'll run. Maybe Hillary can run as his VP.
Joe Biden as Vice President makes Secret Service protection of the President superfluous