Assistant Inspector General Concedes That VA Shenanigans 'Contributed' to Patient Deaths
Last month, the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General insisted, after a close look at manipulated and secret waiting lists at the Phoenix Veterans Health Administration facility, "we are unable to conclusively assert that the absence of timely quality care caused the deaths of these veterans." Yesterday, a hearing before the House Committee on Veterans Affairs got a bit heated as lawmakers pushed Inspector General Richard Griffin and Assistant Inspector General John Daigh to concede that confining sick veterans in bureaucratic limbo while they wait for care "contributed" to the untimely deaths of some. Chairman Jeff Miller (R-Fla.) says he got the concession, and in Daigh's case he clearly did.
Rep. David Jolly (R-Fla.): Did the wait lists contribute to the deaths of veterans?
Daigh: Yes. Yes, no problem with that. The issue is cause, or a direct relationship.
Griffin probably thinks he hedged his way out of a tight corner, though he seems none too happy with his subordinate. Decide for yourself from the exchange embedded below.
Katherine L. Mitchell, M.D. Medical Director, Iraq and Afghanistan Post-Deployment Center, Phoenix VA Health Care System, and retired VA doctor Samuel Foote directly linked the gamed waiting lists to patient deaths in their testimony.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
FAIKE SCANDUL
Daigh: Yes. Yes, no problem with that. The issue is cause, or a direct relationship.
Translation: Yes our actions did result in people dying but no, no one should be held significantly responsible for it.
"Have you stopped causing the deaths of veterans yet, yes or no? It's a simple question!"
"Since 'cause' means 'make happen' we obviously don't cause their deaths! Those people would die anyway!"
It's a bunch of lawyers arguing about what the meaning of "is" is.
If you "contributed to the death", there is a direct relationship, you fucking mendacious half wit.
Well a lot of veterans are way over medicated. Obviously they need medication but they are giving them excessive amounts of narcotics.
Did they actively kill them? Why no, of course not! It was the untreated illness that killed them. /eyeroll
my co-worker's sister-in-law makes $71 /hr on the internet . She has been fired from work for nine months but last month her payment was $21498 just working on the internet for a few hours. why not find out more....
???????? http://www.netjob70.com
Top Man!