Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Policy

Sex-Selective Abortion Legislation With a Twist in San Francisco

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 9.10.2014 12:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum/Facebook
(National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum/Facebook)
David Chiu/Twitter

In the past few years, eight states have enacted bans on "sex-selective abortion," i.e., choosing to terminate a pregnancy because the fetus isn't the parents' desired sex. Now San Francisco is addressing the practice, but from a radically different perspective. If Board of Supervisors President David Chiu gets his way, the city will become the first in America to officially oppose bans on sex-selective abortion. 

Chiu's resolution, announced yesterday, notes "lawmakers across the country have successfully advocated for sex-selective abortion bans by perpetuating false and harmful racial stereotypes that such laws are necessary to stop an influx of Asian immigrants from spreading this practice, and that Asian American communities do not value the lives of women." 

Such stereotypes have been the rallying cry of state lawmakers pushing sex-selective abortion bans, despite a) precisely no evidence that the practice is actually prevalent in Asian-American communities, and b) absolutely no way to enforce the bans, considering that women here aren't required to state a reason for seeking to terminate a pregnancy. In the face of this utter lack of (non-political) purpose, sex-selective abortion bans have still managed to pass in Arizona, Illinois, Kansas, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Oklahoma. 

San Francisco's proposed action against these bans may seem similarly pointless—if the city doesn't want such a ban, it could simply not impose one. But Chiu's resolution is aimed at sending a message to the state legislature, where a ban on sex-selective abortion was introduced in May. The resolution states that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors "urges the California State Legislature to reject any future attempts to pass a state sex-selective abortion ban" and "calls upon other cities, states and the federal government to likewise reject these discriminatory measures." 

According to the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum, sex-selective abortion bans have been introduced in 21 states and were the second-most proposed abortion restriction in the country last year. "This is to educate the public and states around the country about how pernicious this policy would be," Chiu said. "And how this policy could lead to the denial of health care services to women and really stigmatize immigrant women in particular."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: John Stossel on Not Taking the Terrorists' Bait

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PolicyNanny StateAbortionReproductive FreedomSan FranciscoImmigration
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (210)

Latest

A Trump-Appointed Judge Quashes a Subpoena Aimed at Validating the President's Stolen-Election Fantasy

Jacob Sullum | 7.8.2026 3:25 PM

The Supreme Court's 'Reasonable Expectation of Privacy' Test Defies Expectations

Jacob Sullum | 7.8.2026 12:10 PM

Trump Tries To Take Credit for a Walmart July 4 Grocery Sale

Joe Lancaster | 7.8.2026 11:55 AM

New Homeland Security Task Forces Target Immigrants Over Sex Work

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 7.8.2026 11:06 AM

Warren's Plan To 'Fix' Social Security Would Be Largest Tax Increase in Over 40 Years

Eric Boehm | 7.8.2026 10:10 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason