Philly Slouching Toward Decriminalizing Marijuana, Will Continue Fining People Despite "Poverty Pipeline" Talk
In 2010, Philadelphia's district attorney, Seth Williams, announced he would be easing prosecution of small-time marijuana offenders, moving to summonses instead. By 2011 the policy had saved Philadelphia taxpayers about 2 million dollars. Nevertheless marijuana remained criminalized and police continued to target suspected marijuana possessors in their policing.
In June of this year, the Philadelphia city council voted to legalize marijuana. Michael Nutter, the term-limited mayor of Philadelphia, didn't address the bill all summer. Now he says he'll sign it, if it's changed. Nutter wants a separate offense for public use of marijuana, something the DA dismissed as ineffective back in 2010. "We can't declare a war on drugs by going after the kid who's smoking a joint on 55th Street," Williams said then. "We have to go after the large traffickers."
The new penalties for possession of an up to an ounce of marijuana would be a court appearance and a $25 fine but no criminal record. Public use would be punished with a $100 fine or community service.
Councilman Jim Kenney (D), who sponsored the bill, says it's necessary because of the number of people the government is "putting in the prison pipeline, and the poverty pipeline." Removing the criminal offense may close some segments of the prison pipeline, but a $25 or $100 fine means the poverty (and government revenue) pipeline remains open. Petty law enforcement, even of the "non-criminal" variety, can trap people, especially the poor, in a cycle of escalating fines and court appearances, a lesson not everyone's been able to draw from events in Ferguson and the subsequent scrutiny of St. Louis area law enforcement "fiefdom" like approach to petty law enforcement.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
{predicting what Williams really wanted to say}
Williams said then. “We have to go after the large traffickers for the next several years by ruining their lives permanently [because we badass muthafukas] until around 2020 when we can then give them a license to operate under our thumbs legally while taxing them supra-heavily. It all takes time, bitches. Until then- GO PRISONS!”
Even whilst wearing a hoodie in solidarity with the Martins, R. Seth Williams fails to enter the semantic field of neither “baddass” nor “muthafuka”.
*either/or
Fat Eddie Murphy?