Sen. Wyden Calls for Surveillance Policy Shift
"If you would defend a society built on the principle of individual liberty, you need to recognize that you can no longer rely on the fact that mass surveillance is hard - folks, in the 21st century, mass surveillance is easy,"
Americans are guaranteed the right to be secure in their paper correspondence, but online communication enjoys no such protection.
That's because the Fourth Amendment requires police to obtain warrants to search houses, papers, property and your pockets. But information sent and received online goes through a third party, and anyone with a compelling government interest has a much easier time getting their hands on it.
In a speech Friday at a Portland tech conference, U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden will call for that to change. The Oregon Democrat wants to update the rules by which intelligence agencies operate. He says he also plans new legislation aimed at ending bulk electronic surveillance.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wyden:Paul :: civil liberties:natural rights
http://www.livestreamings4u.com
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects..."
Granted I'm not a lawyer, but wouldn't "effects" cover all other property and information?
I ask people in favor of this shit why if a letter is mailed to my house and transmitted there by a third party it is protected but if something is e-mailed to my house and transmitted there by a third party it is not. I've never gotten a good response.