Media

Bad Things Happen in an Instant, But Good News Takes Time

Journalists do a bad job telling you about what's really changing in the world because we miss the stories that happen slowly.

|

doviende/Flickr

Wars, plane crashes, mass murder—it's easy to report news that happens suddenly. Reporters do a good job covering that. But we do a bad job telling you about what's really changing in the world, because we miss the stories that happen slowly. These are usually the more important stories.

Recently, President Barack Obama was mocked for saying: "The world is less violent than it has ever been. It is healthier than it has ever been. It is more tolerant than it has ever been. It is better fed than it's ever been. It is more educated than it's ever been."

Although these comments received criticism, he was absolutely right. Despite the current violence in the Middle East, the world today is actually less violent than it used to be. In the 21st century, about 50,000 people a year died from war—about a third the number who died each year during the Cold War and half the number during the 1990s, a decade thought of as a time of peace and prosperity.

People today are healthier. Death rates from nearly all diseases are down so much that we now live, on average, nearly twice as long as people did just over a century ago.

People are also better fed and better educated. (Also, thanks to free markets and capitalism, people are richer. Millions lifted themselves out of poverty. Of course, Obama left that improvement out; it doesn't fit his big-government vision.)

Let's consider the other improvement the president cited: The world is "more tolerant than it has ever been." Tolerance is harder to measure than changes in poverty or deaths from war, but there is little doubt that, in America at least, people are much more tolerant.

In just a few decades, life has improved dramatically for blacks, gays, and women. When I started reporting, women still had to get a husband's or father's permission to get a credit card. Gays were ostracized. Interracial marriage was still illegal in 16 states. Anti-sodomy laws were on the books until 2003.

Early last century, wife beating was routine. A North Carolina newspaper from 1913 carried a front-page story titled, "For and Against Wife Beating." Most "expert" commentary was in favor of it. One doctor argued, "Beat her, she needs it," and a female advice columnist declared, "It's well known that women love most the men who are cruel." 

Today, no newspaper would do a feature story on "whether to beat your wife." Attitudes changed dramatically. But how would a reporter cover that? I suppose one might say, "Today in Pittsburgh, six people changed their opinion about wife beating." But no reporter would write that. He wouldn't know who those people were. Even if he did, such gradual change is not what people consider news. 

A car crash that kills a family is terrible news. But gradual improvements in driver behavior, car and road safety, and attitudes about drunk driving should be even bigger news. Driving remains one of the riskiest things we do, but far fewer people die now. 

Science that lengthens lives, innovation that enhances them, increased tolerance, and fewer deaths in wars are great news. But, day by day, reporters barely cover that. Where would we point our cameras?

The news is biased not just because reporters are politically biased but because most good news happens gradually. We instinctively perk up and take notice if someone says, "The White House made an important announcement today," even if that announcement is trivial compared to slower social changes.

We use the phrase "slow news day" almost as an insult, as though important things aren't happening. This, in turn, affects the way we think about politics. While life incrementally improves, activists promoting almost any cause angrily chant: "When do we want it? Now!" 

Bad things happen in an instant. The good news usually takes time. Reporters are usually clueless about it.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

23 responses to “Bad Things Happen in an Instant, But Good News Takes Time

  1. Before they went totally to shit, Time and Newsweek would attempt to cover these kinds of trends. Sometimes the WSJ and Forbes have decent stories.

  2. Have I mentioned I like Stossel?

    1. Seconded.

    2. After watching his show for the first time the other night, I am a fan too.

    3. I mentioned to someone else here back in 1994, after I first became a libertarian, how depressing it was to never see anything from a libertarian angle in mass media. Then one night on TV, Stossel’s special Are We Scaring Ourselves to Death? was on. That was nice for me.

      Then, a couple years later, I read one of Sullum’s Creators Syndicate columns and realized not everyone was a moron about drugs. That was also nice to know.

    4. It’s impossible not to like Stossel, unless you are a communist or Bill O’Reilly.

      Or Chris Christie. Or any number of Republico-Commie douchebags.

    1. But is NO a “chocolate” city once again.

    2. In other totally unrelated news:
      Politician who didn’t pay off apparachiks gets 10 years in prison.

    3. and a Life Achievement award?.

  3. People today are healthier…and better educated.

    Ehhhhhh

    1. President Barack Obama…people are… better educated

      Ehhhhhh

    2. No Ehhhhh. An average, people are better educated. Yes, segments of the American Public School system are in the toilet. On the other hand, whole swathes of people in Africa and Asia are being taught to read who 50 years ago didn’t even have a written language.

      1. I know he’s right in general, but especially after the derpfest last week over Hobby Lobby, it can seem hard to believe.

        1. Like the European Aristocracy, or the Planter Aristocracy, the Liberal Would-Be Aristocracy are actually quite well educated, by historical standards. They are also delusional, obtuse, wilfully ignorant, and dumb as a sack of foam hammers. Also like tge Aristocracies that came before. So their education doesn’t have much to stick to.

      2. I would say the public is more edumacated than ever before.

      3. Education in what terms? Having an ability to us a ruler to measure something without having any idea of what you’re trying to build doesn’t help. I think people are more erudite than they ever have been but, without rationality to apply along with it, it is worthless. What good does all this education have when we have a tens of trillions accrual basis debt, an ongoing war on drugs, troops scattered around the globe, and yet a scant few are alarmed by it all?

        Being concisely irrational isn’t a feather in the educational cap.

  4. I used to have a rule of thumb that the most important news in any newspaper was likely to be not on the front page, but in the back of section A.

  5. I know the feeling dude, I seriously like it.

    http://www.AnonToolz.tk

  6. A North Carolina newspaper from 1913 carried a front-page story titled, “For and Against Wife Beating.”

    Welcome home Honey! Tonight we’re gonna party like it’s 1913!

  7. John Stossel. Boringly accurate as ever!

  8. If journalists would keep busting people & corporations for scams and then SHUT UP, they would be remarkably useful.

    But most of them call for government action. And the economic illiterate masses listen.

  9. Today, no newspaper would do a feature story on “whether to beat your wife.”
    Well, bullshit on that on! Just about every day, my boss at work or my co-workers or the edumacated media effectively asks me, “Have you stopped beating yer wife / husband / boyfriend / gerbil / inflatable doll yet??!?! Yes or NO??! Yes or No???!” Channeling Billary Clinton, Ah yams… Live in the REAL world, ya BAHSTAHDS!!!! Do Ah needs ta record it on mah Gurgle Glasses fer ya?!?!?!

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.