Google May Soon Ban Ads for Toy Guns for Being Too Dangerous


Here's a breathless headline from Breitbart: Google to Block Firearm, Ammunition, Gun Accessory Ads. Regarding a recently proposed company policy change, the site suggested on Friday that "beginning in September" the Internet giant will make these changes. Sort of. The report overlooks some important details, and perhaps the silliest aspect of the new policy: It would target toy guns.
First, as pro-gun blog The Truth About Guns points out, "they're proposed plans." That's it. Nothing set in stone yet. And, "the policy only affects Google AdWords." Although the advertising service is large – it draws in billions of dollars and is the company's main source of revenue – it simply amounts to the sponsored links at the top of the page. You will still be able to search "firearms" and find links to sites for businesses that are advertising and selling these beautiful, Second Amendment-fulfilling tools.
Furthermore, Google AdWords already blocks ads for guns, gun parts and hardware, and ammunition. They've done so for a few years. So, the Breitbart report tells us nothing new.
The great silliness that was overlooked is that Google's proposed change would broaden its ban to include any
functional devices that appear to discharge a projectile at high velocity, whether for sport, self-defense, or combat (Note that we err on the side of caution and apply this policy to sporting or recreational guns that can cause serious harm if misused, or that appear to be real guns.)
Examples: Handguns, rifles, shotguns, hunting guns, functioning antique guns, airsoft guns, paintball guns, bb guns. (emphasis added in bold)
That's right. In an effort to "help keep people safe both online and offline," the world's largest search engine wants to shield your eyes from seeing online billboards for things "that cause damage, harm, or injury" or even just look like they might pop out a plastic pellet. The number of serious injuries that faux guns inflict seems to be so low that they're more a testament to human stupidity than product unsafety. The only airsoft-related death in recent memory happened last year, when cops filled a 13-year-old California boy with seven real bullets because they mistook his airsoft weapon for a real one.
Of course, Google is a private company and it can institute whatever absurd policies it wants to alienate millions of American gun enthusiasts and protect everyone else from seeing fake firearms for sale. However, users can hit (or, dare I say, discharge a digital projectile at) Google's moneymaker by installing AdBlocker to their browser so they don't have to see any AdWord advertisements.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you want an accurate take on a story what are you doing at Breitbart?
Judge the source, not the content.
Still...Google and the other social media/leftist tech companies are choking that chicken and keep trying to push their values (anti-2A) on us since the govt is loosing that war.
OT:
Funny, Cracked has a better understanding of unintended consequences than the mainstream media...
http://www.cracked.com/article.....se_p1.html
You'll shoot your eye out.
As I've oft said, "If you get killed by a BB gun, God wanted you dead."
First, as pro-gun blog The Truth About Guns points out, "they're proposed plans."
All plans are proposed plans. Or they would be policies. Or history.
Google is a private institution, they can decide what they display as part of their service.
There's no story here, move on.