Cochran Victory Proves Once Again That Incumbents Generally Triumph
The outcomes in Mississippi and elsewhere show that ousters of incumbents are the exception that proves the rule.
It was a disappointing Tuesday for people who hoped some of their least favorite Congressional incumbents would be ousted. Six-term Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran triumphed over state Sen. Chris McDaniel in the Mississippi Republican primary runoff, making it likely that the incumbent will return to the Senate in November. According to Real Clear Politics:
The exhaustive Mississippi Senate primary ended in an upset Tuesday night -- but not the kind where the longtime incumbent loses to a fiery insurgent.
Instead, 36-year veteran Thad Cochran, who campaigned on his Washington credentials and broadened the electorate by appealing to Democratic-leaning voters in the state, prevailed over Tea Party-backed Chris McDaniel in a runoff election.
But a bitter McDaniel refused to concede, and lashed out at the Cochran camp for courting Democratic voters in a Republican primary. Mississippi law doesn't allow for a recount, but McDaniel hinted at some kind of challenge. "We'll see you soon," he said at the end of an angry speech just before midnight.
Cochran's win provides a good example of all the unseen advantages that incumbents maintain:
The GOP establishment also rallied ardently behind him, moving to protect one of their own but also animated by a concern that the firebrand style of McDaniel -- and other Tea Party candidates elsewhere -- could endanger Republican chances in November. Democratic nominee Travis Childers hoped a McDaniel win would give him an opening, but Cochran's triumph virtually guarantees the seat will stay Republican, a result national party officials believed was essential to their hopes for wresting the Senate from Democratic control.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and the National Republican Senatorial Committee recently hosted a fundraiser for Cochran in Washington. John McCain traveled to Mississippi on Monday to campaign for him. Gov. Phil Bryant appeared in ads touting Cochran's service in the Navy, a push for support from veterans in a state that is home to four military bases. And popular former two-term Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour ran a super PAC backing the incumbent, focusing on expanding the electorate and playing up McDaniel's past opposition to federal funding for education.
After the stunning defeat of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) at the hands of Tea Party challenger David Brat two weeks ago, grassroots conservatives were hopeful about their odds of taking out a few more incumbents. However, the outcomes in Mississippi and elsewhere show that ousters of incumbents are the exception that proves the rule.
Tea Party challengers also suffered defeat in New York and Oklahoma. In Oklahoma, Rep. James Lankford defeated T.W. Shannon for the Republican nomination in the upcoming Senate race. Shannon had garnered significant Tea Party support—including endorsements from Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, and Mike Lee—but Lankford won easily.
Elsewhere, Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) seems to have narrowly defeated his challenger, state Sen. Adriano Espaillat. Rangel is a long-serving and controversial figure: Ethics violations cost him chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee in 2010. According to The Washington Post:
With 99 percent of the vote reported, Rangel was ahead of Espaillat 47.5 percent to 43.5 percent, while two other challengers, Michael Walrond, and Yolanda Garcia had 8 percent and 1 percent, respectively.
Rangel had lobbed sharp attacks at Espaillat, and called in many favors from friends in Washington.
In recent weeks, he secured endorsements and campaign appearances from former president Bill Clinton, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, among others.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Black democrat voters saved an elderly white republican from defeat and the reason shows what is wrong with the "Old Guard Republicans" and what is wrong with open primaries. Cochran didn't build any bridges into the black community. Cochran didn't convert any black democrats into republicans. And chances are, only a very very few, if any, of these black democrats will vote for Cochran in the main election. Cochran was able to pull this off because he is just as much a democrat as he is a republican and that is the problem with the "Old Guard Republicans". He, along with his Old Guard cohorts, love BIG Government, Love ear-marks and pork, love intervention in foreign countries and in peoples lives. The Old Guard Loves POWER and they aim to keep it even if it means resorting to clever shenanigans and underhanded schemes. There's nothing illegal about what Cochran did to win but, it was a move which disenfranchised every republican voter who voted for change. This tactic wasn't illegal but, IMO, it should be. Primaries are for party members to pick the candidates that they want to represent them. Primaries are not intended to allow the opposition to pick the candidate for the party they oppose. Cochran's tricky little maneuver will allow this old man to "gum' off the taxpayer's teat for another six years but at the cost of denying republican voters a voice in who represents them.
An "up" arrow on this site that doesn't have the ability to make that simple gesture of approval.
Approval for Congress is dipping into the MID SINGLE DIGITS but incumbents win. Anyone who votes for an incumbent should lose their right to complain about the Government.
They are part of the problem they would be complaining about. The disjunction between what people do, and the general dissatisfaction expressed should create a cognitive dissonance too great for most people to handle. Some damping mechanism must be at work...
I will always vote against the incumbent-new blood is needed.
People like their representative. You know, the guy who brings tax dollars back to the people who paid them in the form of subsidies to local industry.
People hate other people's representatives. You know, the guys who take tax dollars away from this community and give them to other communities in the form of subsidies to out-of-district industry.
I blame politicians.
If Cochran had the slightest bit of patriotism,he would withdraw & concede that McDaniel is who the people really want.
I think you mean "if he had the slightest bit of character and integrity". Obviously, he has none, just like most Dems and establishment Republicans.
When corrupt scum like Rangel and Cochran are reelected you know the system is seriously broken.