Sheldon Richman on U.S. Intervention in Libya

All has not been well in Libya since the U.S. military led NATO forces in an air campaign to overthrow former ruler Muammar Gaddafi. American officials assured us that "moderates" would succeed the cruel and unpredictable dictator, who had become a U.S. ally during the Iraq war. However, it turns out that the moderate victors were not so moderate; in fact they resembled al-Qaeda.
The overthrow of Gaddafi should stand as a lesson in the dangers of interfering with other countries, writes Sheldon Richman. Gaddafi was a brutal dictator, of course, and the people would have been justified in kicking him out. But outsiders can never know what will follow their intervention. And if the first rule governments should follow is, "Do no harm," the second rule is: Assume that intervention will do far more harm than good.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?