Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Women With Feminine Features Win More Votes, Especially Among Conservatives

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.15.2014 12:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Library of Congress/Wikimedia
(Library of Congress/Wikimedia)
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress

A new Dartmouth College–led study found that voters favor female politicians who have more feminine features, especially in conservative states. Gendered facial cues—eye shape, eyebrow shape, cheekbones, jawline, the presence of makeup—unconsciously influence voter perceptions and "may translate into real-world political outcomes," the researchers say. 

In a computerized survey administered in person and over the Internet, about 300 participants were shown facial photos of the winners and runners-up in U.S. Senate and gubernatorial elections between 1998 and 2010. Respondents were asked to immediately categorize the faces as male or female and, without being given any background information, asked whether they would vote for them.

The more participants were drawn to categorize a female politician's face as male, the less likely they were to say they would vote for her. This corresponded to voting behavior in reality, with more masculine-looking women less likely to have won their elections.

U.S. House of Representatives History, Art & Archives

"These cues are processed within only milliseconds after seeing another's face," said senior study author Jon Freeman, director of Dartmouth's Social Cognitive & Neural Sciences Lab at Dartmouth. "It's important to examine how facial cues could inadvertently affect female politicians' electoral success, especially given the possibility of a female U.S. president in the near future and the rising number of women in Congress."

I'm not convinced it's "important"—that appearance in general affects public perception of politicians is no secret. It might be interesting. There have been a bevy of studies looking at how looks play a role in the politicians's success (see here, here, here, here, here, and here). 

Freeman's study—published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science—echoes a UCLA study published in 2012. In that study, researchers (including two who also collaborated on this recent study) looked at the facial features of women in the U.S. House of Representatives. Those with more stereotypically feminine features were more likely to be Republican, and the correlation increased the more conservative the lawmaker's voting record. Lady legislators with less traditionally feminine facial features were more likely to be Democrats, fitting with the Dartmouth study finding that feminine faces offer a greater electoral advantage in conservative states. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Steve Chapman on the Misinformed Case for Voter ID

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PoliticsCultureWomenPsychology/PsychiatryVoting
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (85)

Latest

'Now We're the Hottest Country Anywhere in the World': Trump's Blessedly Pointless National Address

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.17.2025 9:41 PM

Bernie Sanders Wants To Pause New Data Centers To Stop the Economy From Growing Too Much

Christian Britschgi | 12.17.2025 4:50 PM

Trump Said His Tariffs Would Reduce the Trade Deficit and Bring Back Manufacturing. Here's What the Data Show.

Jack Nicastro | 12.17.2025 4:25 PM

Guan Heng Exposed China's Uyghur Camps. ICE Wants To Deport Him.

Robby Soave | 12.17.2025 3:56 PM

Hegseth Won't Let Us See a Video That Might Undermine Support for Trump's Bloodthirsty Anti-Drug Strategy

Jacob Sullum | 12.17.2025 3:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks