The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Grapples With Love, Death, and CGI
Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone return in an overwrought arachnid adventure.


The Amazing Spider-Man 2 has an uncommon emotional warmth, but it muffs the CGI spectacle designed to suck up bucks at the worldwide omniplex. I don't think this is the way superhero blockbusters are supposed to work.
Sony's decision to "reboot" this franchise two years ago—just five years after Sam Raimi's Spider-Man series whimpered to a close—was a brazen snarl of corporate calculation. Hiring indie director Marc Webb to replace Raimi was a smart move (and no doubt lightened the budget), but then Webb was lumbered with having to rehash Spider-Man's origin story yet again. The resulting movie, with over-qualified Andrew Garfield squeezing into the supersuit, triggered instant Spidey fatigue (and was a huge hit, so buzz off).
Now, freed to take the story in a more interesting direction, and assisted by a new team of writers (including Star Trek vets Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci), Webb delivers a tale of thwarted love and father-son melancholy that verges on heartfelt, but is squashed by out-of-control computer effects, in CGI setpiece scenes that seem to go on forever.
Garfield returns as Peter Parker, the nice guy with a sideline in superheroics. He and his love interest, Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone again), are just graduating from high school, and Peter is rethinking the promise he made to Gwen's late father to stay away from his daughter so as not to draw her into his dangerous superhero doings. Garfield and Stone, who've been a real-life item for a couple of years now, bring a nice romantic rhythm to their characters' relationship, Stone dispensing wry quippage and Garfield aw-shucksing in return. It would seem difficult not to like these two, although there will surely be those who find a way.
Peter is also preoccupied with the mystery of why his parents (Campbell Scott and Embeth Davidtz, seen in flashbacks) suddenly abandoned him as a little boy, leaving him to be raised by his Aunt May (Sally Field) and Uncle Ben (unseen because dead). Peter's research into the folks' disappearance indicates a connection with his dad's biogenetic work at the Osborn Corporation, which involved–yes–spiders.
And then there are the supervillains. The previous movie had one bad guy, a mad scientist who turned into a big digital lizard–a creature of dull retro-cheesiness. Now there are three villains (and several others lurking unidentified among the subsidiary characters). Chief among them is a timid OsCorp engineer named Max Dillon (Jamie Foxx), who falls into a vat of electric eels (pretty cool) and emerges as the fearsome Electro, a sort of human battery who makes his way around New York via the city's power grid. This character, with sparks of energy crackling beneath his ashen skin, is apparently a fan fave from the Marvel comics; but for movie purposes, his superpower lacks visual grip. Shooting lightning bolts out of his hands? Whatever. He's no Doc Ock.
Then there's Harry Osborn, tartly played by Dane DeHaan, who suggests Leonardo DiCaprio in a sour mood. Harry is Peter's childhood friend and the son of OsCorp owner Norman Osborn (a dimly lit Chris Cooper). Harry is estranged from his cold-hearted father, who is now dying. Paying a farewell visit, Harry is informed by Norman that the mysterious disease currently ending his life is hereditary—that Harry has it, too, and its effects will soon become apparent. There's one possible cure, which also relates to that long-ago spider research. This sounds like a job for Spider-Man, so Harry approaches his old buddy Peter, who moonlights as a news photographer for The Daily Bugle and specializes in Spidey shots. Peter arranges a meeting, but it doesn't go well. Harry becomes enraged and…well, if you remember the Raimi movies, you'll know what happens next.
There's no denying the inventive construction of the vehicular crash-and-bash that kicks the movie into gear. This involves a Russian thug (Paul Giamatti) who has hijacked a truckload of OsCorp plutonium, and Spider-Man, who zooms in to stop him. There's much clever juggling of deadly plutonium canisters, and a lot of mile-a-minute wisecrackery that suggests yet another career for our hero in Vegas standup. It's pretty entertaining.
But the first big face-off between Spider-Man and Electro, staged in Times Square, with the villain's face glaring down from huge video screens all around, goes on so long you wonder when Electro's battery will start running down. A similar please-make-it-stop feeling is prompted by their later confrontation atop an ornate clock tower. All of this is expensively well-done, in a familiar manner, but there's way too much of it.
As you may have heard, one major character dies in this movie. Fans with no Internet connection may be startled by this event, but even those who remember it from the comics, where it happened 40 years ago, might be touched by the actors' performances. Heartless trolls can avert their eyes.
The movie ends with another character returning in full costume to tease the next sequel (or maybe The Sinister Six, a multi-villain jamboree scheduled to go into production early next year). The millions of fans of this never-ending story will be happy to know there's more on the way, and why should they be mocked? More jaded observers, however, still wondering why this franchise had to be re-launched in the first place, may find that it's still hard to get excited all over again.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So he caught her again in his sticky white web?
I love it when movies don't have any subtext.
Why does he risk it? the aftermath tends to go very poorly for the male spider.
That tingly feeling I get in my leg when I see you...it's my spidey sense.
http://cdn.smosh.com/sites/def.....-boner.jpg
I am not clicking on that - not at work, anyway.
it's safe - just a 1960s Spiderman cartoon meme
Clicking on that at work would be pulling a real boner.
I clicked, b/c I needed the lulz. And it's safe.
It's safe for work.. the worse thing in it is the word boner.
Ha - it's blocked anyway. Dodged THAT bullet.
I love it when movies don't have any subtext.
Yeah, he's had Kirsten Dunst and Emma Stone both throwing it at him, but he sprays his goo all over buildings, cranes and bad men? What's wrong with this boy?
5th Spiderman movie in a decade? People are going to pay to see it?
Uh, who doesn't love Spider-Man?
I don't.
So you're a DC Comics guy, eh? Have fun with Aquaman and Green Lantern.
NTTAWWT
Odd leap... oh wait, you're talking movies. Who watches movies?
How ahout those of us who are just sick and tired of having movie after movie after movie based on comic book characters?
Really. We want more comic books based on movies!
How about a book?
Is that when the pictures are drawn to look like words?
A comic based on a Book? A book based on a movie based on a comic?
Hmmmm. Might work!
I am a marvel guy...
Spiderman does suck.
The last good Spiderman comic i read was like Spiderman 2099 which isn't even Spiderman really.
Spiderman sucks.
Man of Steel sucked. Defend it or admit defeat!
Why? I didn't watch it.
Man of Steel sucked. Defend it or admit defeat!
Henry Cavill. That is all
I actually did like Man of Steel. I embrace the hate.
What do you mean? It was a wonderful story about a man with two dads growing up to let millions of people die so he could look like a badass in front of his love interest.
I kinda liked Man of Steel, but that part with Lois falling out of the plane near the end just might have been the stupidest thing ever put to film.
Would you rather Lois be *in* the plane while it's falling out of the sky after a botched shuttle launch?
Oh wait, that's been done too.
I am more attracted to the actress who plays Lois Lane then Emma Stone who plays Mary Jane or whatever...
Just because Superman sucks more does not mean spiderman does not suck.
They have to try to recover *some* of the musical money.
Spider Links, Spider Links, ....
goes wherever a spider links. Are they missing? Listen, bud, they have radioactive blood! Hey there, where are spider links?
Can he swing, from a thread
Take a look overhead
Hey, there
There goes the spidey links.
*applause*
You just forced the worst pun into my mind:
"Well, it is the world wide web."
*narrows gaze, pulls out pen and pad, slowly writes down "UnCivilServant"*
a spider WEB falls apart without anything LINKing it together, reason.
The villainous Professor Subtle, we meet at last.
Does that make you Captain Obvious then?
I got promoted to Commodore.
64?
64, 65, whatever it takes.
no love for the Vic-20?
I never owned one, so I can't judge. I did however, have a Commodore 64.
I was a C-64 owner too... with a shoe box full of 5 1/4" disks - notched, of course, so both sides could be used. Good times.
Amiga or get the fuck out!!
That's a demotion.
"Help, Spidey! Electro has captured the Reason intern!"
Lucy!!!!!!
"Dude, the links should have been posted like twelve minutes ago!"
This is starting to feel like an overly entitled commentariat... wait... I paid money to reason for their services - I expect said services to be provided on time.
I think it is to get Kurt's piece some action. They usually post AM links at one minute before Loder's review...which sucks up all the air in the room leaving Loder's post the scraps. This is compensation.
Hey, Kurt -- How do you like your action?
I can't believe this hasn't turned into a surrogate AM links yet.
we are holding out...
Okay, I'll start
You know how I like to pick on our Canukistani neighbors 'oop North'. Some might even know that I like to laugh at eco-cultists. Well, I got the best of both worlds here. Canukistani Eco-cultist fail.
Or an argument?
Well, I've certainly been trying there.
You have *not*!
Socon!
How ahout those of us who are just sick and tired of having movie after movie after movie based on comic book characters?
I suppose you think Hollywood is going to go back to making movies with plots and witty dialog.
You poor, deluded fool.
Yeah? Well, the next Transformers movie is going to have Dinobots.
FUCKING DINOBOTS.
Your argument is invalid.
Get up at the crack of dawn, and this is what I get?
Rosy fingers?
Perhaps THIS will refresh Reason's memory!
Did they forget Yahoo existed, too?
This is just a plot to have a Kurt Loder article actually get some comments.
^This (bread and butter for upthread)
Must be performance review time.
Aaah, screw the Morning Links! They were always stupid and overrated, anyway!
I already did the one thing I have to do at work today. So I can gambol about and go home now anyway, and let whatever happens on the fruited plain happen.
Thomas Piketty Wants Income Equality -- And the Hell With Growth
...The Manhattan Institute's Scott Winship points out that relying, as Piketty does, on tax returns for the U.S. statistics means omitting income from Social Security, food stamps, public housing, Medicare and Medicaid.
Tax returns count roommates and unmarried partners as separate units when they are part of a larger household.
They don't include employer-paid health insurance -- an increasing share of employee compensation in recent decades....
..."In perhaps the most revealing line of the book," Cowen writes, "the 42-year-old Piketty writes that since the age of 25, he has not left Paris, 'except for brief trips.'"
France, where a cozy elite runs government and large corporations, has a 75 percent top income tax rate and essentially zero economic growth. Is that the future American liberals want?
I thought this was kind of an interesting read.
The heavy hand of the IRS seizes innocent Americans' assets
...The Internal Revenue Service, a tentacle of a government that spent $3.5 trillion in 2013, tried to steal more than $35,000 from Terry and Sandy that year....
...Because 35 percent of Schott's Supermarket's receipts are in cash, Terry and Sandy make frequent trips to the bank to avoid tempting actual criminals by having large sums at the store. Besides, their insurance policy covers no cash loss in excess of $10,000.
In 2010 and 2012, IRS agents visited the store and examined Terry's and Sandy's conduct. In 2012, the IRS notified them that it identified "no violations" of banking laws. But on Jan. 22, 2013, Terry and Sandy discovered that the IRS had obtained a secret warrant and emptied the store's bank account. Sandy says that if the IRS had acted "the day before, there would have been only about $2,000 in the account." Should we trust that today's IRS was just lucky in its timing?...
This is kind of nice chatting amiably with all of you without the hassle of reading a bunch of- OMG LINKS ARE UP!
We have discovered what pet the cops won't shoot.
So it sounds like they're just gonna skip right over Norman Osborn as the Green Goblin? That really doesn't make any sense at all.
I'm fucking sick of Marvel and massive invading lizards, robots, and apes. Hollywood is a cesspool of boring, lengthy, repetitive, and brain-numbing visual drivel.
I genuinely am not taking issue with people who love their comics but can't you people at least demand that these studios to create super-duper stuff with better goddamn plots? Christ, how many civilizations do these fuckers have to save before boredom sets in?
Ima be honest here: I'll watch anything with Emma Stone in it, because ... Emma Stone.
That is all.
Sony is ruining spiderman!!!
Just look at the comics!!
*looks at comics
Oh wait...never mind. I guess Spiderman was pre-ruined a long long time ago.
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is absolutely an amazing action movie. Peter Parker has a great job to go with his superhero status. I have watched this movie just few days ago and I thing I expect something more amazing.
ZentaiHero offers the best quality new fashion superhero costumes, such as superman costumes,spiderman costumes or deadpool costumes. Please click http://www.zentaihero.com to search all the best costumes.