Obamacare Sign-ups Pass 6 Million

Sebelius said last year that 7 million is what "success looks like."


Yesterday President Obama announced that over 6 million people have signed up for health coverage through the Obamacare exchanges ahead of the March 31 deadline. The news came shortly after it was reported that those who begin the enrollment sign-up process before the deadline but don't finish in time because of technical difficulties will be allowed to apply for an extension.

From CNN:

President Obama announced the milestone Thursday in a call with enrollment counselors and outreach volunteers, who are undertaking an intense marketing drive in the final days of open enrollment. There were more than 1.5 million visits to HealthCare.gov and more than 430,000 calls to the call centers on Wednesday.

Those who've started the application by next Monday but are unable to finish because of technical issues will receive more time to complete the process, officials have said.

Reaction, Analysis, and Commentary:

Politico notes that a year ago, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius said that having 7 million people enrolled through the exchanges is what "success looks like." The CBO made the 7 million prediction in May. In February Sebelius said, "I'm not sure where they even got their numbers," and Vice President Joe Biden said "we may not get to 7 million, but if we get to 5 or 6 million that's a hell of a start."

From Politico:

A year ago, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was calling 7 million enrollees what "success looks like." Thursday, administration officials went wild announcing they'd hit 6 million, with four days still to go before the deadline.

The argument seems to be: it wasn't a disaster. Enrollment didn't live down to Republicans' apocalyptic predictions. Bad as the website was, people wanted so much to sign up that they kept coming back until they had.

"Important to remember that back in October and November, everyone thought getting to 6 million was impossible," tweeted White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer, traveling with President Barack Obama in Rome. "Amazing comeback story."

What looks like a comeback to Pfeiffer comes across more like a convenient readjustment of expectations to opponents of the law.

Yesterday Vox Senior Editor Sarah Kliff tweeted the following chart, which shows the projected and the actual enrollment numbers by month:

Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar of the AP notes that because each state has a different insurance market, it is the state enrollment numbers that really matter:

Although the national number is important, what really counts is state-by-state enrollment. That's because each state is a separate insurance market. To help keep premium increases in check, each state market must have a balance between young and old, healthy and sick.

"The national number only gets us so far," said Caroline Pearson, who is tracking the rollout for the market analysis firm Avalere Health. "The fair measure of success is whether you have set up a market that is sustainable into the future. So you can then go out and find the rest of the uninsured people, and bring them in over the next couple of years."

As of just a couple of few weeks ago, it seemed like it would take a miracle of sorts for the administration to hit the 6 million mark. Enrollment in February was lackluster. But this week especially has seen a resurgence of consumer interest with the enrollment deadline approaching. The administration said HealthCare.gov got 1.5 million visits on Wednesday.

Reason's Peter Suderman wrote yesterday about how the administration's sign-up totals don't provide the full picture when it comes to the actual number of people enrolled:

The problem, as always, is that the administration's sign-up totals don't give us a firm hold on how many people have actually enrolled, because many of the people who are counted as signing up have only selected a plan using the online system; not everyone who has selected a plan has gone on to pay the first month's premium. Nor do the administration's numbers give us any sense of how many people who end up paid and covered stay that way in subsequent months.

Right now, however, our understanding of how many people who have selected a plan and then completed the enrollment process is somewhat weak. Multiple reports from January and February suggest that about 20 percent of sign-ups never submit a payment and don't end up covered.

But that's a rough approximation based on early reporting from a handful of insurers. It's not systematic. We don't know if payment rates have increased or decreased over the last month, or if people who select a plan in the final surge are more or less likely to make a payment. We don't have hard data from every insurer or state. Mostly, what we've got are solid but scattered news reports relying largely on insurance industry insiders.

At Kaiser Health News Mary Agnes Carey outlined the significance of the 6 million figure:

The Congressional Budget Office originally estimated that 7 million people would sign up for the exchanges by the end of the enrollment period. After computer problems botched the Oct. 1 rollout, the CBO revised that estimate down to 6 million. Federal officials have said they do not yet know how many people who have enrolled have paid their first month's premium.Insurance industry officials have reported that about 70 to 80 percent of enrollees have paid.

Reaching 6 million has both practical and political significance. The more enrollees there are, the more likely the risk pool will be balanced between sick and healthy individuals. That calculus will be based on enrollments at the state and local levels where premiums are set, say experts. Republicans have expressed skepticism that the law would provide affordable coverage for millions of Americans and called for its repeal.

Read more from Reason on Obamacare here

NEXT: Anthony Weiner: When It Comes to Regulations, Tesla and Other Tech Companies Should Shut Up and Take It

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “Sebelius said that having 7 million people enrolled through the exchanges is what “success looks like.””

    1) How many ‘sign ups’ are enrolled?
    2) How many ‘sign ups’ are people replacing the insurance canceled by O-care?
    Until we get answers to those questions, this is shreeky bullshit.

  2. What also isn’t in these stats are how many young healthy versus old and sick? More then expected are the old and sick and less then expected are the young and healthy.

    1. …”More then expected are the old and sick and less then expected are the young and healthy.”…

      Unless people have become the New Soviet Man, that’s a good bet.

  3. These numbers mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING without some more information…and it’s insane that our own government won’t give out these numbers, the taxpayers deserve more clarity.

    1. How many of these people have enrolled in Medicaid or State-Run Low Income Care like MNCare in Minnesota? (example, in Minnesota they are touting 140K signups when less than 40K are in private insurance, the rest are Medicaid and MNCare and paid for by taxpayers)

    2. How many of the Private Insurance “sign-ups” have actually paid?

    3. How many of the Private Insurance “sign-ups” are free from a subsidy? I believe there are numbers out there of 50% of the private insurance people getting subsidies…this is just more a burden on taxpayers.

    4. How many of these sign-ups in any plan would have happened any way (what was the prior run rate?)

    5. How many of these sign-ups are people that lost their health coverage due to this stupid law?

    My prediction is only 1/4 of the sign-ups nation wide will be actual private insurance (the rest will be medicaid and state-care) Of that 1/4 (or 1.5 M) only 33% will be free from a subsidy and will have actually paid their first month…so a grand total 500,000 people will have actually signed up for full pay private insurance (or less).

  4. Tell me how any of this matters? Why do we care about sign up numbers when people are compelled to sign up by law? It’s like everybody getting really excited that everyone follows the speed limit.

  5. Meh, given they had to come up with a million sign ups in two weeks, it’s obvious they just made the numbers up. In a couple months, they’ll “adjust” the totals. I was reading on another site, and I didn’t find anyone who wasn’t treating this number with skepticism. Amusing that the dishonesty of this administration has lead people to understand what we’ve been saying all along, government will lie to you.

  6. Matthew, does that include the roughly 3 million prisoners and institutional patients they are enrolling in ACA? If so that would be a reason the count is going so well. It is a fact they are doing this!

  7. So now we have a net gain in signups of 1.3 million policies since the estimated policy cancellations through December were 4.7 million.

    Also important is how many of the 6 million who signed up actually sent premiums to insurance carriers – that is the mystery number that the government refuses to report.

  8. Here is the question the almighty Progressive doesn’t want to answer. Is ACA based on one man paying for another? And the answer is yes. One man pays a higher rate if he is more successful so another man can pay less for being less successful.

    “Well what about the progressive income tax? Is that also Marxist.” Yes. It should have never been implemented. It is not up for one man to pay more so another may pay less?or not at all.

    “Well what about Australia, England and most of Europe? They have the same type systems? Are they Marxist?” Of course they are. They are the epitome of one man pays so another may not. That’s why you cannot be a raging success in Europe. They tax you to death to pay for others, many on welfare.

    “Well the insurance monopolies?.” Stop right there. You’re right. Monopolies need to be ceased. And so do conglomerate monopoly healthcare organizations. And that has nothing to do with implementing Marxism. Don’t bother arguing with that one Mr. Progressive. You don’t have the years of experience in the field. I do. I was a provider.

    If we continue ACA we will collapse economically?which as my fiction predicts may be the end goal of these Marxists in our government. And the one thing we will all share equally then is misery and oppression.

    Charles Hurst. Author of THE SECOND FALL. An offbeat story of Armageddon. And creator of THE RUNNINGWOLF EZINE

  9. my friend’s step-mother makes $81 every hour on the computer . She has been unemployed for 5 months but last month her income was $17791 just working on the computer for a few hours. read review…….

  10. money is very important for every person.I earn a lot lo money through online jobs.I earn at least 90$ per hour,I work at least 5 to 6 hours a day and fulfill my all necessities.if you also can get an online job. visit the site given below.. http://goo.gl/ZC87k7

  11. Let’s all sing Imagine.

    Would you like to sing Imagine with me?

  12. Michelle must push Barack to keep in excellent physical condition. Because this windbag never seems to get winded.

  13. my friend’s mom makes $62 hourly on the laptop . She has been laid off for nine months but last month her paycheck was $18955 just working on the laptop for a few hours. learn the facts here now………..

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.