Chris Christie Worried About "Profit Motive" of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries


At a town hall in South River, New Jersey, yesterday, Gov. Chris Christie (R) was asked by a mother about the the lack of availability of edible medical marijuana for her child. "The medical marijuana program that exists in New Jersey right now isn't really helpful," the mother told Christie, blaming a lack of communication on the program not working the way it should. Christie finally signed a law last summer permitting edible medical marijuana only after spending several months mulling it over and then conditionally vetoing it.
In the course of a long and winding answer, Christie indirectly addressed the recent bill submitted in the state legislature to legalize possession of marijuana of up to an ounce. While insisting he was willing to make changes to the state medical marijuana law, he said:
"What I'm not willing to do is legalize it or permit recreational use or things that will lead to that, and so that's the line that I've drawn in the sand that I'm not willing to do."
As for the supply of edible medical marijuana not meeting the demand, it's largely due to the regulatory burdens imposed by the state. But Christie doesn't see it that way:
"Part of the problem with this is what I originally proposed with the medical marijuana program…was that it be a hospital-based program, that way the profit motive is drained out a lot from it."
Christie said the Democrat-controlled legislature wasn't interested in his idea. "What I want in this state is a medically-based program," the governor told the town hall. "If we're going to have a medical marijuana program, that's what it should be." He noted places like Colorado and California—where medical marijuana programs have been increasingly broadened—and said he didn't want to go there.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hospitals don't seek profits?
Government operates at a loss, why shouldn't everything else?
Government operates at a loss, why shouldn't everything else?
Not if Obama can help it.
Part of the "problem" with a profit based business is that it is more likely to meet the needs of its customers. This is one of the rare cases that I believe a politician is actually aware of that and is deliberately trying to prevent it.
Ya know, if you're trying to rebuild bridges to the Repubs by opposing legalization, attacking it for creating businesses probably isn't the right track. That's more Elizabeth Warren than Ronald Reagan.
It's creating the wrong kind of businesses, duh!
The idea that this guy had any hope of securing the nomination before the scandal was a bad one. And he just makes it worse with each passing day.
Well, if you're not willing to do that, I guess that settles it. It's good to be the king.
Fortunately for libertarian-minded voters, Palin and Cruz are hardly the only fishes in the sea. As the recent report on young voters from the College Republican National Committee pointed out, the GOP is flush with next-generation leaders, among them Chris Christie, Rubio, and Bobby Jindal.
I'm more of a TOS guy. Gimme Rand. I guess I could live with Cruz, maybe, though he's not exactly a libertarian.
Your obsession is creepy beyond belief. I guess the wages of retardation are...you.
So this is how you become governor of New Jersey. Problem solved.
And I see the goddamned squirrels are still running the asylum.
I just looked up RINO in the Encyclopedia Galactica, and fatso's picture was there.
Those pix are becoming dated. Look above and you see he's lost a lot of wt. That procedure really works; a friend of mine (also in NJ) had it too.
Now even Republicans handwring over profit. What's the difference between the two parties again? I can't hear you over my peals of laughter.
Gays and abortions. That's about it.
Don't forget guns and public displays of religious affiliation, unless you're a Muslim.
Repubs aren't always so great on GUNZ
Spending priorities.
BTW, h/t to Ed for the Alt text. Awesome.
Makes sense. I'm pretty sure he'd be happy if the local salumeria stopped having a profit motive and he could stuff his maw for free.
The fact that this hypocrite had to "mull over" whether or not children who are suffering from debilitating diseases should be able to get the medicine that is most effective in treating their symptoms says all you need to know.
Christie had a long shot at the nomination before, but this pretty much guarantees that he will lose any support from the libertarian side of the GOP.
He doesn't really fit in either party though, he's a straight up statist. Of course so are most of them.
Besides sporting a bigger rack, how is Chris Christie different than Hillary?