A.M. Links: Satellite Images Don't Show Debris From Missing Malaysia Flight, Pulitzer Prize Board May Not Reward Reporting on Snowden Leaks, Obama Administration To Endorse Reduction of Drug Sentences


- According to Malaysia's transport minister the satellite images released by China's State Administration of Science that some thought may have shown debris from missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 were released by mistake and "did not show any debris from MH370."
- The Obama administration is expected to endorse a plan that would reduce the average sentence for a federal drug defendant by almost a year.
- The Pulitzer Prize Board may play it safe and not reward The Washington Post and The Guardian for their reporting on the information leaked by NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden. The Board did reward The New York Times for its reporting on Daniel Ellsberg's Pentagon Papers.
- President Obama is expected to use his executive authority to update regulations on overtime pay. Currently, employers are not required to pay managerial workers overtime pay if they earn at least $455 a week.
- Ukraine has created a 60,000-strong national guard ahead of Sunday's referendum in Crimea on whether the peninsula, which is currently part of Ukraine, will join Russia.
- Republican pro-life senators are urging the GOP to focus on social issues in this year's midterms and in the 2016 presidential election.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Feeney knows how to keep the links running on time.
But didn't give us Alt-Text!
All I see is a pen. Is that how Obama makes it rain?
What's he drawing there, a cartoon cock/balls?
Hey, not on topic!
Worth giving up a true first to make my point.
It's not worth losing the alt-text to have them 1 minute earlier.
The secret definitely is Twitter. They have them before the real site does.
Your president appears to be drawing a sort of ballsack.
He's asking Condi if he can go take a leak.
***cough***Valerie***cough***
crap...
our president is a ballsack so he's in familiar territory.
Hello.
Hey, Obama shut up!
Though someone should explain to her donkey's are Republicans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtFeoup7p74
Surprised no one has dedicated this song to Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFacWGBJ_cs
AN APOSTROPHE IN A PLURAL!
He's in Quebec. He uses extraneous apostrophes to piss of the francophones.
Did you know there's a law here where apostrophes are not allowed?
Back in the day the department store Eaton's had to drop the apos. to please the mental cases in the PQ.
I remembered reading about Eaton's, which is why I made the comment I did.
Seriously? Fuck them and their poutine too
LEAVE POUTINE ALONE!
*waves fork and napkin whilst sobbing*
oops. sorry.
Calling someone a donkey in arabic is really, really insulting.
Fighting words insulting.
So where does it fit in with old Irish immigrants?
I think the thing was that you'd send an irishman in to do dangerous work instead of your donkey because the donkey was worth more.
You know who else made things run on time?
The Phillips Lady?
John Callen?
Timex?
William Tockman.
The makers of Ex-lax?
The Clock king?
This stick figure?
Kennedy gets up on wrong side of bed: declines to block enforcement of magazine ban pending appeals
It took me a few seconds to figure out which Kennedy you were talking about - Patrick, erstwhile MTV VJ, or Justice.
I have never heard of Patrick Kennedy, so it didn't cross my mind to make a distinction.
He's been featured here on reason quite a bit the last couple months.
Not saying it was aliens...but it was definitively aliens.
The reporting has been so inaccurate on this I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out the plane landed safely at its destination and is still ferrying passengers on schedule.
It changed it's paint scheme and has been assisting with the search.
+1
Errant apostrophes all over the place today.
Guess I'd better return my degree to Big Shanty School of Book Learnin' and HVAC Repair.
According to Malaysia's transport minister the satellite images released by China's State Administration of Science that some thought may have shown debris from missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 were released by mistake and "did not show any debris from MH370."
And yet we can easily spot drunks being rolled in back alleys on Street View.
To be fair, the Google car is usually closer than the satellites are.
To be fair, shut your pie hole.
Morning...done for the week of JD. Will still have to report next week, probably for about 3 days.
So, you didn't make the cut?
Everything settled on Wed and Thurs and Fri are light days. Most jury selection is done on Tues and Wed.
For a second, I thought you were proposing a week to remember and honor J sub D.
Im okay with that.
It would be about this time of year too, wouldnt it?
What happens if you stage a prank robbery at an ATM? This
Gee, I wonder why.
I wonder if bystanders would've done anything had it been New York, Detroit, etc.
Two victims of the PATRIARCHY try to fight back, but are found out and arrested. One charged as an adult.
Stupid girls. A lot of rich dudes would pay serious money for that treatment.
Yeah, but it's not as fun if you have a willing participant.
Nice picture. A few more generations of inbreeding and members of that family will just have one big eye.
Is everything a Preacher reference with you? 🙂
Just about.
"Oh mah GAWD! BILLY BOB!"
Add in purple hair and future generations will fit right in down in the sewers of New New York.
Oh man Episiarch I don't want to steal your thunder here...
He won't be awake for hours. I say swing away.
"sex with animals? There's no time man!"
Fucking kids. What the fuck is so hard to understand about not taking pictures of illegal acts BECAUSE IT IS EVIDENCE. If my kid learns one thing from me, it will be this.
So dumb, as a practical matter do we really even need surveillance cameras anymore? It might take a little longer to catch some people but eventually they will do something stupid like post pictures of themselves doing something illegal.
Heh. I can see the FB posts now: "Me and Haji with our suicide vests for next week."
A couple of years ago some high school kids broke into a drug dealer's house, stole a bunch of marijuana and some guns and beat the dealer. Nobody knew who they were until they posted the pictures of themselves with the stolen good on facebook.
Seriously?
there was a drug dealer here who was caught because he posted pictures of himself with drugs and money on Facebook
"Prosecutors charged the 17-year-old, Lauren A. Bush, as an adult. The 15-year-old was charged as a juvenile. Police didn't release her name."
See everything is Bush's fault
The 15-year-old was charged as a juvenile. Police didn't release her name.
The 15-year-old must be a police officer.
She wouldn't have been charged at all.
The Pulitzer Prize Board may play it safe and not reward The Washington Post and The Guardian for their reporting on the information leaked by NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
If Snowden can just stay relevant until a Republican is in the White House, he's going to win so many awards.
So glad I wasn't eating when I read this
If Snowden can just stay relevant until a Republican is in the White House, he's going to win so many awards.
+1 Posthumous Pulitzer.
Oh, look! It's the stupid party!
I'd say the Republican party is shooting itself in the foot again, but realistically, there can't be any foot left at this point, can there be?
It's not a foot, it's a tentacle of the Kochtopus.
They really are.
Although, I would argue that the ACA is a social issue.
And all economics are social issues (I dont see a clear distinguishing split), but, yeah, that isnt what he meant.
They should just drop the pretense. Call abortion and gay marriage what they are: Religious issues. The number of non-religious or non-Christians who are Republican (or Republican-inclined) and vote pretty much solely on these two issue are vanishingly small.
What is Secular Pro-Life, chopped liver?
http://www.secularprolife.org/
The exception that highlights the rule. Which is why you tout them all the time.
What's the matter? Afraid to call a spade a spade?
I'm not 100% sure what spade you're talking about. Religion?
Yes. Religion. You vote on your religious beliefs. Why be coy about it? Are you ashamed of them?
Protecting human life is one of those issues where you don't have to be religious. There's a moral intuition in favor of protecting life, no matter how much people may try to suppress that intuition.
As for the rest of your comments, it boils down to "you're a poopy-head, neener neener!" I'm not sure how to rebut with reason a comment which isn't based on reason.
OK, I see you are just going to play dumb. Have fun with that.
Have a nice day, Dr. Doomcock!
I do not have a doctorate, nor have I ever claimed to have one.
"I do not have a doctorate, nor have I ever claimed to have one."
*facepalm*
You see, Dr. Doom is a character in...and you have a story called...oh, never mind 🙂
I just want to interject here that I think Doomcock of Doom is a damn fine phrase.
What's religious about biology?
Abortion isn't a religious issue to me.
Me either.
Me either. And I'm religious. (And pro-choice.)
I'm the opposite on both counts.
Good for you. You are in a very small minority. Which was all I'm getting at.
oh ok.
lol, you know who else is a small minority?
Libertarian women?
Libertarians in general are. Just saying, dismissing people's opinions on the grounds that they're a small minority is kinda what I hear all the freaking time from the statists.
This makes me think that pro-life gop senators are actually dnc operatives.
They were called "Reagan Democrats" at one time, but damn, that is a long con.
If I learned anything from The X-Files there is actually a group of TOP MEN in charge and this would be something they would do. Also related: Flight MH370.
+1 colonization
I swear this comment wasn't here when I started typing mine!
You know what might explain this? If you, me and Auric were all Tulpa.
Tulpa would never have gotten the phone numbers for three girls. Maybe if Auric claimed to have three rape whistles blown in his face, I might believe your theory.
Would Tulpa claim to have gotten numbers?
Tulpa would create a sock which would claim to have given him her number, just to offer a different perspective.
"Rolla"
Any contact with a female of any species is a chance for bragging rights for Tulpa. He speed-dates at petting zoos.
Zing!
Damn it, that's almost exactly what I was about to write.
(Democrat Rep) Rahall: I supported Bush more than Obama
What traitorous scum. Is he up for reelection?
A congressman putting his district ahead of party?
If his voting record actually backs up his statements, this guy is a rare bird indeed.
Dumbya pushed immigration reform (amnesty) and his AG supported torture among other abuses. The white trash voter in WV is the GOP base, Rahall.
Immigration reform only had 8% support.
I read that as "I supported more bush..."
Yes, yes I did in my single days
Republican pro-life senators are urging the GOP to focus on social issues in this year's midterms and in the 2016 presidential election.
God love 'em.
Should they stand up?!
/Biden
"We want to lose instead of hammering the Dem's weak spots for massive damage!"
It isn't sporting to ground swat a bird. True sportsmen allow the bird to get up and fly a bit to make things more fair.
The Pulitzer Prize Board
Pulitzer? I barely know her, save for this heavily redacted 100 page document I got through a FOIA request.
Obama is threatening to veto a law that would allow Congress to sue him in federal courts for arbitrarily changing or refusing to enforce federal laws
"Ha-ha, suckers! I have THE PEN!"
Don't blame me, I didn't vote for the pen.
Do they need a law to do this?
I thought they would have standing already.
No. Usually the courts don't consider cases like that justiciable because they're inherently political in nature.
I'm not sure Congress really wants to open the box of getting sued for doing something that isn't in the Constitution.
Congress has standing (or so they think); the plebs don't.
There sure seem to be a lot of First Amendment cases in which a pleb has standing. I think the question is one of finding the right pleb.
Isn't this what a writ of mandamus is for anyway?
We must not allow this Walnut Gap!
Walnut Headbutting Record Cracked In Pakistan
Why?
We grow most of those in the US, he probably bought them from us.
Wait till he gets older, then it will be better
Next on ESPN's Outside the Lines "Will concussion fears end walnut headbutting for good?..."
The Obama administration is expected to endorse a plan that would reduce the average sentence for a federal drug defendant by almost a year.
To make room for more incarcerations as the DEA prepares to kick in Colorado and Washington pot store doors.
NSA pretended to be Facebook in order to infect millions of computers with malware
Fourth Amendment... how does it work?
It's the Fuck You That's Why Amendment.
The Facebook trick was called QUANTUMHAND by the NSA
Facebook, NSA, and caps-lock. It's the annoyance trifecta.
Republican pro-life senators are urging the GOP to focus on social issues in this year's midterms and in the 2016 presidential election.
Oh, goody.
Republican pro-life senators are urging the GOP to focus on social issues in this year's midterms and in the 2016 presidential election.
There's a reason the GOP is called the Stupid Party.
I think this was suggested by Senators Atkins (MO) and Mourdock (IN).
Because all prolife politicians are equally stupid and unpopular, whether they're talking about real rape or trying to restrict late-term abortions.
Eddie, as I noted below pro-life politicians are very popular, for instance, in the South. The problem is that in many cases what is popular in the South is a lot less so elsewhere, so a party dominated by politicians from there is in a tough position nationally. The kind of things that get them elected where they are turn off people elsewhere.
I doubt late-term abortion is popular even in Yankeeland.
Keith Richards to Write a Children's Book
Next, the story of my dealer and my first set of works
The children have to learn about groupies sometime.
Ukraine has created a 60,000-strong national guard ahead of Sunday's referendum in Crimea on whether the peninsula, which is currently part of Ukraine, will join Russia.
I'm going to quote a friend of mine who is living in Kiev:
Only criminals in the government, and now that fucking asshole Obama is negotiating with them!
Wow! JUST like the US! They must be so proud...
What seats is he referring to? Because Klitschko himself has a seat in Parliament and the party he belongs to has 40 in total. The Ukrainian Parliament hasn't been dissolved that I've heard.
What happened to the commenter here who is a doctor, went to Ukraine to practice medicine, and got himself a hot Ukrainian girlfriend?
I'm honestly worried that something bad didn't happen there.
Good question. Perhaps new seats? I'll have to ask.
Maybe he's referring to this:
http://www.theguardian.com/wor.....-turchynov
If it's accurate then it's kind weird to complain about not being at the party after you said you didn't want to go.
His response:
Republican pro-life senators are urging the GOP to focus on social issues in this year's midterms and in the 2016 presidential election.
Aim for the head, not the foot!
Dianne Feinstein is the Worst Congressperson, Exhibit A
She was the main Democratic sponsor of the failed 2006 constitutional Flag Desecration Amendment.
http://www.feinstein.senate.go.....035af0bbda
Just on general principle, I would argue that the worst is always a member of the House.
Senators, due to state size, are neither the best nor the worst.
Although, if you score by badness*power, a senator could come out on top.
Well, over the next days I am going to make my case for Feinstein, I am actually going to take a break from reporting on SoCon lunacy and/or liberty violations to detail how terrible Feinstein is. She epitomizes everything I dislike about Democrats in particular and politicians in general.
Some of the evidence for her awfulness will surprise some people, some will be familiar, but I do not think you can ever dislike that woman enough.
Short of, as I said, the extra power she has, Im not sure that your posts cant be trumped 1 by 1 with Sheila Jackson Lee posts.
And Im not sure she is the worst of the lot.
Well, as you were instructed for jury duty, wait until you see all the evidence before you judge!
As I havent seen the inside of a courtroom yet, I have been instructed nothing.
"As I havent seen the inside of a courtroom yet"
Come on, you did not even peek?
I sat in a chair and played with my phone for 3 mornings.
The courtrooms are way over in the other building, I would have had to cross the pedwalk and everything.
At least ol' Di didn't declare on the House floor that the U.S. Constitution is 400 years old.
SJL is the dumbest Congressperson. DiFi is the worst (though my vote for worst would be Debbie Wasserman-Schultz).
(Something something misogyny something something)
My old boss was pretty dumb. Once, when some diplomats from Egypt stopped by the office his first comment was "You know, I rode a camel once..."
How did that play out?
It went okay until the camel reached top speed and he fell off.
*I keed, I keed, I have no idea who RBS' old boss was.
Well played.
Awkwardly.
And by 'rode' he meant 'banged'.
SJL didn't wonder if Guam was going to tip over. She's going to have to fight for that title.
And Schumer and Reid aren't going to concede to DW-S anytime soon, either.
Moobs is the worst. Even in that wretched hive of villainy, I don't know how there can even be any debate over it.
Despicable and awful are not necessarily stupid (though I think Feinstein has healthy amounts of the latter).
I almost broke my tv back in the 90s when some anonymous (he had a name, but I had never heard of him before or after this moment) rep made a comment about "when Jefferson wrote the Constitution."
Anyone want to guess the party affiliation?
"The Rent is Too Damn High"?
The Obama team quietly gives up on making ObamaCare work
So they postponed the individual mandate?
only for 8% of the population
+8%
Sort of. You'll be able to fill out a form to say that you couldn't afford it and they'll believe you.
let Hillary fix it, hopefully with the help of a Democratic Congress
Not going to happen.
Republican pro-life senators
That would be all of them.
Not Arnie Vinick.
Just 8% of them
I know the Republican party isn't called the Stupid Party for nothing, but seriously. In what world does anybody think it's a successful strategy for Team Red to focus on SoCon issues?
It's probably successful in certain states... but those are the states they would win anyway, and it will damage their colleagues in the swing states.
"In what world does anybody think it's a successful strategy for Team Red to focus on SoCon issues?"
Does the South count as a world?
Indiana and Missouri arent in any definition of the south I would accept.
Right, those two lost in those states.
But that is where the strategy was tried.
Its a yankee strategy, apparently.
Running on social issues goes on all the time here in the South, it's losing on social issues that goes on elsewhere.
The question was where do they "think" it will work.
Indiana and Missouri is still the answer. They thought it would work there. They were wrong.
Although, to be fair, it wasnt a focus on social issues that got them beat, but stupid statements in those areas.
The question was in what world does one think a focus on social issues works? The answer is the South, they think it works there and they are right. It clearly does not work elsewhere.
What Ive seen is no need to run on them in the south, as the dem opponent often has the same views on them.
The senate campaign HQ that was next to my office 12 years ago (wow, I guess it has been that long, but she was running against McConnell, so it had to be) was fun to watch. Her son worked in that office and there was a DC consultant in helping out.
The two would get into long and loud arguments...especially over guns. The consultant wanted her to take at least a moderate gun control position while the son thought that was insanity. He was a good ole boy huntin and fishin democrat.
Is not your current Democratic governor pro-choice?
Probably.
Honestly, I dont remember it coming up in the race at all. Although I bet if we parsed down his position, it wouldnt be entirely pro-choice, somewhere in the middle, I bet.
Louisville was represented for years by a STRONGLY pro-life democrat. He RAN on it, it was a central aspect of his campaigns. Since he retired, its been pro-choice democrats or the queen of pork representing me.
I seriously dont remember the last governor's race, I paid it no attention at all.
There was a Libertarian on the ballot, IIRC. I voted for him.
"He RAN on it, it was a central aspect of his campaigns."
cf.
"What Ive seen is no need to run on them in the south"
1. He retired in 1992.
2. I was talking about the GOP.
He didnt NEED to run on it, it was a pet issue of his. That and opposition to the death penalty.
Those are the only two things I remember about him. That and he voted the Democrat party line on economic issues.
And you seem to be assuming KY is in the south. When I lived in GA, they didnt think so.
And most KYians think Louisville is in the north.
We'll include you in the South, though not Prime Membership.
Like I said, I live in the South and social issues are forefront all the time, and the Democrats being conservative on these issues does not negate that. A recent flap broke out over our likely Democrat gubernatorial candidate, who is ostensibly pro-life, having a campaign event at a pro-choice person's house.
"In what world does anybody think it's a successful strategy for Team Red to focus on SoCon issues?"
Well, let's see...there's gun rights. That's a SoCon issue and it seems to work well for them.
There's restrictions on late-term abortions. That polls well with the public.
Or are "SoCon issues" simply an undifferentiated blob of ickiness?
I have seen you taking this angle for the past few days, and it is not an unreasonable one. "God, guns and gays" and all that.
Having said that I think for a lot of people when they talk about 'SoCons' they are thinking of people who push for 'morals' legislation usually motivated by religious convictions. So guns would be out, abortion, pornography, divorce, marriage, would be in.
Sorry, that's a result-oriented definition.
And on marriage, the latest "SoCon" issue was religious freedom for business owners. The SoLibs were the ones forcing their views on others.
Haha, that is only the 'latest' because they lost just recently on the bigger push. Well, maybe not, considering more states still have SSM recognition bans in effect than do not.
And I am not sure it is so results oriented. One big reason why many people want to avoid what they call SoCon issues is that they feel that religious matters are not conducive to debate and pushing them is just spinning wheels, so to speak.
Every try arguing with a progressive?
I am sure a progressive would think the same about arguing with a libertarian, or a conservative. But there is this idea that religious opinion really is impervious to change based on some provable fact. I am not sure that is necessarily a 'bug' about religion btw, but it does make it politically problematic in some people's eyes.
Where do strip clubs and liquor laws fall?
Because it seems the liberals are the ones shutting or dumbing down the strip clubs.
And liquor and gambling seems to get a protestant/catholic split, so isnt soconishly universal.
I honestly dont thing socon can be defined.
Also, smoking bans, which used to be associated with religious opposition, but now is pushed by liberals.
That is the distinction though, the motivation or reason. If you support a smoking ban because of health reasons, then the debate is at least partly going to hinge on what those risks actually are. If on the other hand it is that smoking is sinful behavior, then how are you going to argue with that?
Well, I don't think the liberal campaign against vaping is based on the most rigorous science. Jerry Falwell would be like, "uh, this isn't justified by the research."
Again, I think it is the motivation. If your opposition to liquor sales is health or crime that is different than if you find it sinful because the body is a temple or what not.
As far as defining socon, it can be done about as easily as, say, a 'progressive.'
Are those goalposts heavy?
Pilings. Trolls try to move bridge pilings.
Sebelius vs. Accuracy
The HHS chief confirms her secret waiver of the individual mandate.
Gel Protects Monkeys From H.I.V. After Sex
But does it work on *sheep*?
If it works in humans, such a gel would be particularly useful in countries where women have little protection against domestic violence or rape, because they could apply it surreptitiously after a partner fell asleep
As opposed to killing the abusive partner after he fell asleep.
Apparently a woman can own anti-HIV gel or she can own a knife, but she can't own both.
Kickstarter for a knife that dispenses anti-HIV gel?
A lot of people, even victims of violence, have a strong desire not t kill anyone. And I suspect that in a society where there is little protection against rape and domestic violence, a woman who kills her husband will not fare too well.
The Un-American Anti-Koch Campaign
Ive decided that the reason they are hated so much is BECAUSE they donate to the arts and public tv and etc.
If they left well enough alone and just funded politics, they wouldnt be as hated.
It causes a glitch in the self-image of progressives who view themselves as the only kulturny people.
That and it shows that government support isnt necessary. Every dollar the Koch's spend on the arts is a dollar of funding that doesnt have to come from the Feds.
And five dollars that don't need to be raised as taxes due to government inefficiencies.
Yes. It's why they hate libertarians more than anyone.
Ukraine has created a 60,000-strong national guard ahead of Sunday's referendum in Crimea on whether the peninsula, which is currently part of Ukraine, will join Russia.
Ukraine didn't have military defense before this?
In Ukraine, defense militarizes YOU!
It defected to the localities, I think.
Their Army is a shabby 100K +. Left over Soviet crap and a very little Western stuff.
They are figuring they need to up their numbers as the neighborhood has gone to pot.
Boise Fire official: Inebriated tenant rescued after fireworks set living room chair on fire
Congress: This Time It's Personal
Senator Feinstein has finally been goaded into noticing executive-branch arrogations of power.
So the CIA redacted the Bush/Cheney torture records off the Senate computers and the Obama team stood by and let them.
I know the far left is angry at Obama for not pursuing war crimes charges against the previous administration but it was never going to happen anyway.
so only 8%?
So my wife and I celebrated the conception anniversary of our child (and our six month wedding anniversary) by buying a pregnancy test and a couple bottles of wine. My wife is happy to report that he will not have an Irish twin.
Congratulations! On, um....ALL counts! 🙂
Congratulations! That last sentence did confuse me a bit, what with the pronoun and me not having any idea what Irish twins are.
Is it same calendar year or any 12 month period?
I would assume the latter, as that means they are the same age for a short while.
I've always assumed the latter. I never even considered it might be the former.
I thought it was strictly 9 months apart.
I was using it to mean less than 12 months apart.
I hope the wine was conditional...
Well, I was going to be drinking regardless.
I don't know whether you want more kids or not, but if not, IUDs are a marvelous thing.
I think people are way too worried about drinking while pregnant.
Heavy duty alcoholics will often have children with developmental problems, but the occasional drink, or even the occasional getting a bit tipsy isn't going to hurt anything.
Nothing like a pragmatic romantic to open a girl's heart and legs
The grievence industry tells me I'm supposed to be insulted by your comments about the irish community.
I can't get past a 'meh'.
And if the test had been positive, would the wine have been such a good idea?
If it had been positive, he would have needed 2 bottles himself.
You must not have sex very often if you know exactly when the conception anniversary is. 😉
We were mostly careful about protection before the pregnancy. Mostly.
How is your baby sleeping?
At 8 1/2 months, my second is finally sleeping through (with minimal brief night terrors) until about 6AM. We used the techniques preached in The Sleep Easy Solution if you're not there yet.
My daughter NEVER slept as a baby. She'd stay up the night. It was a nightmare. She's still a bad sleeper.
She's now nine.
even with the gin-soaked rag in her mouth?
My first slept solid nearly right out of the womb. If he didn't, he'd probably be an only child.
Ditto here. My only started sleeping through the night at two months...at the latest.
Mine slept through night from about 2 months to 19 months. His 20th month has been pretty rough so far.
At about six weeks old he would wake up once to eat but sleep more or less from 8:30pm to 6:30am. At about 10 weeks he just slept through the night. Even when he wakes up earlier than that, we can just feed him and dump him in the swing and he's good until 6:30 or 7:00 in the morning. We swaddled and scheduled from day one, but I suspect we just got lucky.
We have Irish twins. It sucked for about two years, but they're nine and 10 now and it's great.
I see a lot of upside. There's no logic to her position, just feeling that she'd rather not be pregnant until 2015.
Yeah, that'll learn 'em.
Meh. I never considered Russia a legit G8 country anyway.
http://blog.heritage.org/2014/.....t-theater/
If Italy's in there, Russia can be too.
Blogger Unwittingly Becomes Diet Poster Girl. Now She's Fighting Back
That's vicious. I'm on fatty's side on this one. There is definitely a poetry to this story.
Her name is Cat Eyes?
Also, you post a pic on Facebook, you run the risk of being someone's before pic, sorry.
The Obama administration is expected to endorse a plan that would reduce the average sentence fora federal drug defendantby almost a year.
Another meaningless half-gesture from President Empty Suit.
THIS
If only there were a power our government grants to the Executive where he could easily and immediately shorten any sentences he thought unfair...
Nah, let's 'endorse' a plan and send it to committee instead!
This.
Also 1 year reduction seems pretty minimal.
Insteada 20 I got 19!
Obama goes on and on about all the things he would like to do but Congress is blocking him, how he wants to find ways to exercise the powers granted to him to directly address his concerns.
Meanwhile at the same time that he opines and publicly laments what the drug war has done to black American males he has granted record low numbers of pardons and clemency. It is truly upsetting.
OK, you nerds. Sick and tired of all the crap? Don't just smash your monitor --
CRASH SOME GALAXIES!
So the WSJ is reporting that Malaysian Airlines flight 370 was airborne for 4 hours after contact was lost. How do they know? The engines were relaying data to the manufacturer throughout the flight.
(link to Reuters report)
http://news.yahoo.com/u-invest.....ector.html
It's probably sitting on a runway somewhere near Tehran waiting for the first nuclear bomb to be loaded on board.
"Hey Tel Aviv, say hello to our little friend."
Heard some speculation that the plane may have landed at Malikussaleh Airport in Indonesia. I would think it would be fairly hard to hide there from satellites, but who knows.
Does anyone know why it should ever be possible to turn off a transponder on a commercial civilian aircraft?
Boxes fail. There has to be a way to kill power to any piece of equipment installed on the aircraft. Only the flight crew have access to the circuit breakers to kill the transponders.
If in fact the aircraft is in the hands of the bloodthirsty Islamic maniacs somewhere, they've had more than enough time at this point to alter it's outer markings and appearance. There's almost no chance that a satellite is going to be able to identify it now.
I really hope that the thing is at the bottom of the ocean instead.
Someone on the news this morning said they need to be able to turn it off on the ground. Interferes with other systems while on the ground.
Last night was a pretty great night to be a Boston sports fan. Revis, Bruins beat Montreal, and the Celtics lost! Plus, personally, I set up dates with 3 separate girls.
Plus, personally, I set up dates with 3 separate girls.
Same night? Because that would be impressive.
And if sitcoms have taught me anything, you can probably schedule them at the same time.
Doesn't that usually go badly for the triple timer?
Nah, it all works out by the end of the episode.
I went stag to my senior prom and ended up with three girls in my prom photo. 🙂
As long as the restaurants all connect through the same kitchen, I don't see a problem.
why it's a hilarious romantic comedy!
I know a couple places around that have 2 bars sharing a kitchen, but none that have 3. I'll have to research some more.
I was planning on tonight, tomorrow, and Wednesday, but I suppose I could try to reschedule...
I loved the sports trifecta. And I am now beginning to believe you're sockpuppeting for Virginian, mister Alpha.
I actually can't associate any particular qualities with Virginian. From context, I'm going to assume he's the one who supports that PU"A" douchy crap?
oh yeah I forgot about that. Didn't Virginian brag about slapping a girl in the face once?
If so, he's even more of a prick (oh no, I'm being gender biased or something!) than the usual pick up jackass.
He definitely did. He said it was a "Gibbs slap", whatever the hell that means.
A slap to the back of the head, a la Gibbs of NCIS.
I guess you need to change your name to Playa Demonocles.
Wait until you find that the three girls are in cahoots with each other and show up together.
That depends, are they angry?
I'm betting it's one girl with three personalities, who'll all turn up and give each other a beatdown for messing with their man
Why would the Celtics losing be cause for a good night for a Boston sports fan?
Draft status.
(Which is why the NBA sucks).
As opposed to every other sport with a draft?
At least the NBA lottery system makes tanking for #1 unguaranteed.
I'm hoping the Knicks win the lottery, since their #1 this year is going to Denver.
Anything that screws the folks at MSG is good.
But other sports don't rely as much one 1 individual player as basketball.
Tanking in the NFL is mostly impossible except for very slight jockeying between #1, #2, and #3 (the Suck for Luck campaign comes to mind). This is because of the small number of games and the low likelihood that one player can turn your team around. And that as long as you make the playoffs the nature of the game/playoff scheme is such that you have a reasonably decent chance of winning the championship.
Tanking in baseball is useless because the draft outcomes are so random.
Tanking in hockey is useless because even the best draftees take a few years to come into their own, for the most part.
Basketball is so sensitive to one player driving the entire team - for a decade or more - that unless you think you're in the top 4 your best strategy is to be in the bottom 4, imho.
Tanking in hockey is useless because even the best draftees take a few years to come into their own, for the most part.
We missed the epic tankfest that Crosby would have inspired because of the lockout, but we'll see it in spades next year.
ONE of the reasons. The main one is the never ending stream of time-outs each team gets. Watching the last two minutes of a close NBA game is excruciating.
You would think that Bo Knows Sports might be a thing, but I guess not.
Maybe he should participate in random sports subthreads instead of whining about them.
robc, not every fan wants to see their team lose to get a better draft status (though I acknowledge it is not uncommon).
I dont want it for my teams either, but I understand it.
Of course, the only American pro sport I really care about is baseball, and draft position matters less there than elsewhere.
No one tanks to move up from a 30% chance of getting a MLBer to a 35% chance (numbers made up, but you get the idea).
"I dont want it for my teams either"
Same here, so do not assume ignorance when I wonder why someone else would.
If draft picks alone could turn a team around the Cleveland Cavaliers would be coming off their Threepeat.
The 91-93 Bulls would like a word.
do not assume ignorance when I wonder why someone else would.
Isnt that the exact definition of ignorance? When you dont know something, you are ignorant about it.
And even though I dont wish it, if I see some fan of team X happy that team X loses, I understand why he feels that way, even if he is clearly wrong.
I want the team to win championships. Why is wanting the route most likely to achieve that wrong?
Its a bit too utilitarian for my tastes, plus I do not think it is the most likely route. Look at the New England Patriots, they are the closest thing we have recently in the NFL as a dynasty, repeatedly making the playoffs year in and year out with poor draft positioning nearly every one of those years. Or look at the flip side, the Cleveland Cavaliers, usually in good draft position, usually terrible.
We aren't talking about tanking in football, and we aren't talking about having a team who is already good and has their star player tanking, and we're assuming that you're not going to end up getting an arguable G.O.A.T. in the 6th round (which doesn't even exist in basketball) so you should really avoid trying to use the Patriots as an argument.
Stick with the NBA then. Look at the Heat, or the Rockets today. Having a top draft spot is not as important as wise trades and free agency.
You mean the Heat, who have Dwayne Wade because they had a top-5 pick, and have LeBron James and Chris Bosh (both also top-5 picks) because they had Wade? Or the Rockets, who have 2 top-3 picks leading them?
Yes, the Heat, who did not get James or Bosh in the draft, and the Rockets, who did not get their 'top picks' that way either. You prove my point: the Cavs got James and the Raptors got Bosh. Boy, that saved those teams!
Yes, I'm sure the Cavs would hate to get back to the Finals. And the Heat started building the current team with the draft pick. If they didn't have Wade they wouldn't have James and Bosh (or the championship he got them by himself).
The Raptors failing to capitalize doesn't disprove my point at all, since I never claimed that getting a high draft pick guarantees you success.
Wondering why someone would take a position you think is incorrect is not being ignorant of it.
If you don't know why they would (even if you don't agree with it), then yes, you are ignorant.
My point is that when someone says "Why would you want or think X" they can mean "X clearly is wrong, why would you want that" rather than "I have no idea why you would want X, can you inform me?"
Rhetorically speaking it is common to "wonder aloud" about someone's motivations when you know what they are already.
Apparently Bo has learned the law school lesson to never ask a question that you dont know the answer to.
Like his writing style, he think it applies outside the courtroom.
It took me a while to realize that you really have to separate those two facets of your life or you're not going to have a very good time.
Ive seen this other places. 2Ls seem to be the worst, law school is all consuming or something.
The 40+ year old lawyers on here dont write the same way as law students or new lawyers.
Because they have learned that lesson.
robc, I guess you were not here the day I explained my writing style a bit. I was homeschooled and my parents are members of a very old school religion (and my mother foreign born), they use a lot of phrasing that is a bit antiquated and overly formal, so my writing and even speaking style have been said by friends to be 'stiff.'
I am sure law school does not help, but legal writing is 'freshening up' a bit lately, see Kagan's or Robert's writing style for example.
Maybe you write like a law student anyway, but I had you pegged as one before you ever said it.
There is another (non-political) site that I used to post at a lot that has a number of lawyers. You can separate the long timers from the law students by writing style.
For example, I would never have known that Pro Lib was a lawyer from his writing style. Or John. But it was obvious with you. The first time you used "supra" I had you pegged.
I probably write like an engineer, so its a two way street.
I will agree with you on this: I would not peg John as a lawyer either 😉
Meh, I have plenty of good times, you must be doing something wrong.
Really, Neoliberal? So, for example, you would never say "why would you want that" if someone said something you thought was easily wrong, though common?
I try not to, because that's just creating a drag on the debate. You're circling back instead of moving forward.
I will try to follow your shining example, if I can avoid being blinded by your righteousness.
Chump don't want da help chump don't get da help.
You really a 2L Bo? Where?
I've got a son who's a 2L at Indiana.
Wait. You're not my son, are you?
oh god please let it be so.
Join me, Bo, and together we can rule the galaxy!
Dad?
OK, I see.
Lottery pick - the luck of the Irish.
Extra tickets in the draft lottery? I don't know, I pay zero attention to pro basketball.
Wow. Refresh fail. Ted is going to be pissed.
But BU lost HARD to my Iggles! Suck it!
Why do I care about BU?
Florida loss exposes Democrats' disarray on Obamacare
If a (D) runs against Obamacare and wins are they then obligated to do something to repeal, replace, or generally unfuck us?
Because politicians never break promises.
Until they're asked the obvious question: Why did you vote for it, or why didn't you at least vote to repeal it with your Republicans colleagues when you had the chance?
"Law of the Land, bitches!" - famous last words.
How is it that "lobbyist" is such a pejorative, but "career politician" isn't? Seriously, what's the difference?
I noticed that little dig too...
I see the distinction as one of patina, not quality. For example, an Amoeba and a Protozoa are both single-celled organisms, and are less pejorative than "career politician" or "lobbist" when used to describe a multicellular lifeform.
Proximity to the taxpayers' rectums.
related:
Mickey Kaus: Show Us Your Fixes!
Obamacare is definitely NOT as cheap as your cellphone bill
I hope the average civilian is getting pissed off at government assholes telling them how to prioritize their personal expenses. Particularly after they lied about the thing for a couple of years.
Dude. It's like 3-4 times a fucking paltry cell phone bill.
Every dollar the Koch's spend on the arts is a dollar of funding that doesnt have to come from the Feds.
But if the money isn't taken by force, the contributors will have an expectation of qualitative input in the programs they fund.
NOT FAIR.
I could care less about 'fair,' but it is reasonable for someone to be concerned about big donors influencing an organization to the point where its mission is threatened. I know I objected when the Kochs tried to turn Cato into a wing of the RNC (I imagine that did not bother you much though Brooks).
P Brooks, valiant defender of the RNC.
You see it too, Snarks? Of course its easier for you, sharing the view and all.
You're so cute when you try and get all ad hommy and stuff.
Ad hommy? I would be surprised that you think calling someone a Republican would be an insult.
I'm surprised you consider yourself an expert on my politics. Actually, I'm surprised you consider yourself an expert on anything.
He's definitely an expert on acting like a 2L.
"He's definitely an expert on acting like a 2L"
Tarnation, those fancy law talkin' rascals!
RBS is an attorney, whippersnapper. And so am I. And yeah, "talking like a 2L" is code for "obnoxious"
Respect your elders!
Respect your elders!
Especially when you get repeatedly pwned.
Whatever makes you feel better about yourself and your beliefs Snark.
Whatever makes you feel better about yourself and your beliefs Snark.
I'll admit I find you making a running retreat with your tail between your legs amusing.
Snark, there has to be a contest for one to retreat...
Snark, there has to be a contest for one to retreat...
Keep running little Bo. Never admit defeat, never, little Internet warrior.
How about, "try listening when 10 people tell you're being annoying because maybe that's a clue you're being annoying"
Bo, in divorce law there is a saying: after three or four marriages, maybe the problem is *you*.
Look, Neoliberal, how sad would it be for someone to think they have to change to 'fit in' to a political internet community? Maybe as sad as someone trying to 'help' that other person do so.
If, in the 'real world', I found myself short of friends or what not you would have a point. But internet communities, especially political ones, tend to be insular places with pretty petty team-oriented cliques. Being 'unpopular' with a subset of posters on one is nothing to worry about, in fact wanting to be would be.
oh so you're doing it because we all need to be shaken up a bit by your wisdom? Jesus Christ you are a mini-Tulpa. You can just call us the Axis of Glib and get it over with, you mendacious twerp.
Goodness, your projection. When I refuse your charitable wise advice it is me that is self-important.
"You can just call us "
And look, did I hurt your actual feelings by insulting a group you consider yourself to be a member of? Your 'internet community?' Holy smokes, that is sad. I am thinking it was not your law talking that was getting in your way of having a good time...
believe whatever you want, Bo. you're fucking annoying and I regret ever engaging you on anything.
But, how will I live without your mighty wing to protect me and your sage advice to guide me?
But, how will I live without your mighty wing to protect me and your sage advice to guide me?
When you gloat in sarcasm you show how truly clever you are. That was hilarious!
Not an expert, also not blind.
In the land of the blind Republicans, the one-eyed Bo is king.
Threading is just a scheme of the DNC.
And yet, if you think federally subsized student loans leading to the government trying to get rid of due process in sexual assault cases at private universities is a bad thing, you're considered unreasonable.
concerned about big donors influencing an organization to the point where its mission is threatened
So I guess saying "no" is just not an option, eh?
Well, that is what libertarians like myself urged Cato to do in that situation if need be.
Where a libertarian like me would have them take the money and just continue doing what they were doing in the first place.
It is a bit more complicated than that when the donor is on the board.
If that's the case their donation doesn't really matter anyway.
How do you think they got on the board?
Then we're back to following Dances-With-Trolls.
It's only fair that we're paid a fair wage. It's all or nothing! Either we get the pay, or we're permanently unemployed, but we should never relent in our fight against the Law of Supply!
Immigration Doesn't Have the Votes Yet, Ryan Says
I was hoping Rich Peverley was going to be allowed to do some crazy hockey-tough level thing like return to the ice a week after (literally) dying on the bench last Friday, but it appears that will not be the case. He's done for the season and will need heart surgery.
Yeah, I was actually expecting this outcome. Heart conditions and high impact sports like hockey don't mix.
Sometimes there's a problem in low-impact sports, too.
He may have heart, but hockey is no match for THE heart.
I heard that the first thing he said when he woke up was "How much time is left in the period?"
I foresee a bright future for you in the field of legal representation for by the mentally challenged, Bo Peep.
Oh, his style will really endear him with the judiciary (assuming he passes the bar and actually finds his way into litigation). I suppose a name change, hair dye and moving to a new jurisdiction will always be available as an option.
Litigation? Why do you hate me so much. I hope to be in house counsel, entirely owned by some big, nameless corporation.
What Was the Point of ObamaCare?
The problem for them is that the roll-out was such a disaster, the huge thing just blowing in their faces, that now it will be exceedingly difficult to convince the population that the debacle was somehow the fault of the insurance companies. People now know that the law itself is seriously flawed and that it was sold to them under totally false assurances.
Emanuel has tried to shift the blame to insurance companies many times, be it in the many times he was on Megyn Kelly's show or the Sunday morning news shows, but the problem for him is that there's very little credibility left in the Dems side to draw from. It's like trying to blame the cat for the broken vase when there's a nanny-cam video of you doing it.
Never underestimate the healing power of doublethink come election time.
When we get to make lots of choices, you see, it's more expensive.
Ummm...huh?
The point of Obamacare was to use competition to improve healthcare offerings... by mandating exactly what offerings were acceptable and where they could be sold.
My alma mater is in on the March Madness, y'all!
Go Iggles!
So is mine. Third time in 5 years, pretty impressive for one of the smaller D-1 schools.
I was confused for a second, because around here "March Madness" is the time when the agencies realize that the fiscal year is about to end, and if they haven't spent their budgets, they'll be cut, so a lot of insane purchases can be slipped through.
Mine choked pretty hard in the conference playoffs. 15-1 in the conference, and they didn't even make it to the conference finals. Not that they would have gone very far in MM, but they still should have been able to make it in and try to steal another first round win.
How is it that "lobbyist" is such a pejorative, but "career politician" isn't? Seriously, what's the difference?
Lobbyists are evil profiteering capitalist stooges. Career politicians are noble selfless ascetics, sacrificing their lives to the betterment of humanity.
The next politician I see sacrificing their life will be the first.
Bud Dwyer
Iowans would prefer a president Hillary over a GOP president
Is it really her popularity or just evidence of some very serious buyer's remorse?
Looks like Paul is the strongest opponent.
Time to strip their corn and soybean subsidies and let that state die in the field.
So that's the goal of ObamaCare: to allow bureaucrats like Emanuel to redesign the health care system in a way that flatters their pretensions of being super-geniuses who know what's best for the rest of us?while shifting responsibility onto others for the actual results.
Vast, centralized monolithic health care bureaucracies give Zeke a boner.
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, Houston's embarrassing daughter, thinks Constitution is 400 years old
Bo is going to have a tough time topping that.
SJL would win the stupid award in a blow-out. I thought this was a outright fucking evil competition?
He said "worst".
I would go with the product of evil and stupid.
Hoyer?
Durbin.
I would go with the product of evil and stupid.
Schumer.
SJL is so stupid she doesn't even under the concept of evil. She just acts purely on instinct and feelz.
All good answers, this is really tough.
If in fact the aircraft is in the hands of the bloodthirsty Islamic maniacs somewhere, they've had more than enough time at this point to alter it's outer markings and appearance. There's almost no chance that a satellite is going to be able to identify it now.
I really hope that the thing is at the bottom of the ocean instead.
You are a sick, sick little doggie.
Bug or feature?
How so?
Heard about this one on the radio: Man arrested for stealing from a construction site while wearing a cookie monster onsie.
I wonder how long he'll last in jail wearing that?
Steal some "rebar pipes and hurricane fencing" and get your name and picture in the paper.
Shoot a schoolgirl with a taser and you get to maintain your anonymity.
Currently, employers are not required to pay managerial workers overtime pay if they earn at least $455 a week.
How can anyone live on that?
The federal prison population would fall by about 6,550 inmates over five years, the department said.
That's an impressive 3%, in only five years!
http://www.bop.gov/about/stati.....istics.jsp