Brickbat: Fair Use

The Spanish government has proposed a new law that would require search engines to pay to display even brief fragments of copyrighted material. The government did not say how much will be charged.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Gox files for bankruptcy
I suppose search engines could block results from European news outlets. That should take care of that.
I gotta critique the page image. The halberd was a foot soldier's weapon - for anti-cavalry work. Anyone one a horse with that much armor should be armed with either a lance or a sword. Also - leg armor on a horse? They wouldn't put up with it and it would cause too many crippling injuries even if you could get it on.
Well, since we're going full pedant here, you'll notice that he is tilting at windmills, so it is a representation of Don Quixote, who didn't really have a massive charger with full plate armor, so this is actually a representation of how he imagined himself to be.
If it was what he imagined himself to be - why are they still windmills and not giants?
Because the artist had to convey that the knight in shining armor is in fact Don Quixote.
The same thing can be accomplished without screwing up the man of la mancha's panoply.
But since Don Quixote was not a real knight and only imagined himself as a fantasy, idealized one as existed only in his mind, it makes sense that his panoply was not historically accurate.
I still think the artist screwed up.
Actually, you're probably right.
cool story, bro
The government did not say how it would be determined which fragments must be paid for and how amounts would be calculated.
A Google search would probably turn up an appropriate proprietary algorithm.