California Considers Mandatory Warning Labels for Sugary Drinks
Because people just don't know.
A bill introduced in the state Legislature yesterday sets up the latest tactic in the battle over soda and other sweetened drinks -- a proposal that would require a health-risk warning label on sugary drinks.
"Sugar-sweetened beverages are the single largest reason for the obesity epidemic in California," said Sen. Bill Monning (D-Carmel), author of SB 1000.
"For this reason, we need this bill to establish the Safety Warning Act, to provide consumers with the information they need to make informed decisions about what they're drinking."
The bill would require warning labels on cans and bottles of soda, energy drinks and sweetened teas -- any drinks that contain 75 or more calories in 12 ounces.
The warning would say: "STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY WARNING: Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, diabetes and tooth decay."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is there any evidence that this kind of warning labels has any effect whatever on consumption of the products being stigmatized?
Warning *label* (singular).
EVIDENCE??? We aint got no EVIDENCE! We don't need no EVIDENCE! I aint got to show you no stinking EVIDENCE!