Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

Whose Fake Outrage Are We Faking Being Outraged About Today?

It's enough to make you angry

Scott Shackford | 2.3.2014 10:45 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | haven't the slightest / Foter / CC BY-ND
(haven't the slightest / Foter / CC BY-ND)
Not quite as boring as the game, but close.
Coca-Cola

Last night, during the annual televised Department of the Interior round-up and execution of wild horses (which took place in New Jersey this year for some odd reason), Coca-Cola premiered a new commercial that included: 1) part of "America the Beautiful" being sung in a language other than English; and 2) a family with two dads.

People being outraged about everything under the sun has been a theme on Twitter for a while. Media outlets hunting down the outrage and publicizing it as a relatively cheap way to score hits from people who like to be outraged about the outrage of other people followed not long after. For the Coca-Cola commercial, reaction tweets were posted at USA Today, E! Online, the Daily Mail, Talking Points Memo, Mediaite, and likely others.

In each case, a handful of tweets are intended to serve as evidence as some sort of widespread attitude among a certain demographic, which will then subsequently be used to judge a much larger group of people. Thus, we had the infamous MSNBC Cheerios tweet that assumed right-wingers would hate an advertisement that featured a biracial family.

But is there any substantive evidence that this outrage actually existed to a degree large enough to justify multiple media reports? It certainly doesn't seem like it, but man, aren't those easy stories to put together? Toss a few search terms on Twitter and you can find all sorts of opinions! Reporters can put together "man on the street" stories without ever even leaving their desks or actually interacting with any other human beings at all!

"Man on the Street" pieces were never all that interesting or useful to begin with, but at least it involved an actual person in an actual place who chose to share his or her opinions to a reporter for our evaluation. This nearly contextless sharing of random angry tweets illuminates even less. But it's good for stirring up a round of counteroutrage, isn't it? And that counteroutrage at some anonymous, undefined number of people behaving badly on the Internet makes some others feel more superior, doesn't it?

Below, the ad:

I am outraged by how utterly pedestrian it is. This could have been a Levi's ad five years ago. It could be advertising anything.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Feds To Announce Whether Cars Will Be Required To Be Equipped With Car-To-Car Communication Technology

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

CultureTwitterSuper BowlSocial MediaMediaAdvertisingFree SpeechTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (148)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

    The Manhattan Beach Pier was in that commercial too. That was pretty offensive.

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Oddly your comment is the one that got me to watch it.

      1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

        I didn't catch it right away because of the delivery truck. It altered the silhouette just enough that I thought I was looking at Huntington or Oceanside.

        1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          I definitely wouldn't have noticed had you not pointed it out, but then again I don't think I would've noticed the gay dads either had people not been outraged over them. The ad was milquetoast enough that I wouldn't be surprised if Coke is delighted by the outrage just to make people care about it.

          1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

            They had to do something. Pepsi had naming rights for the halftime show.

    2. kinnath   12 years ago

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g9wXBkdWEg

      Best Superbowl commercial that wasn't run during the Superbowl.

      1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

        That was pretty clever, but I don't see how it's going to help them sell beer.

        1. kinnath   12 years ago

          http://www.ifwemadeit.com/

          1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

            "Even party sharks in a conga line!"

        2. kinnath   12 years ago

          A web campaign is just about generating hits . . eventually to the company website.

      2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        I may love that girl.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          I don't think I've seen her before, but yes.

        2. datcv   12 years ago

          You're gonna miss her when she's gone!

  2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    I'm outraged at your apathy. . .and mine.

    1. R C Dean   12 years ago

      That's cool, because I'm apathetic about your outrage.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        I'm too nihilist to respond or even complete

  3. Rich   12 years ago

    "[Wikipedia is] aesthetically very masculine in its design."

    Despite accounting for half the world's population, women comprise just 9 percent of all Wikipedia editors.

    Outrageous!

    1. WTF   12 years ago

      Rape culture! Patriarchy! Male Gaze! Only 77 cents on the dollar!!11!!!

    2. Dweebston   12 years ago

      Engaging in textual bickering and edit wars over minutia like the probable punctuation of the yet-to-be-released Star Trek film or the veracity of death toll claims for the Battle of Hastings, or defending original research for optimal Pokemon deckbuildings strategies, sounds like the sort of thing women on average enjoy. Just like publishing spreadsheets of DnD arcana or cataloging space debris over rural New Hampshire at two in the morning with a telescope.

      There's a difference between gender disparities and nerd disparities, and moderating Wikipedia pages isvery much a nerdy thing to do.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        defending original research for optimal Pokemon deckbuildings strategies, sounds like the sort of thing women on average enjoy.

        Really?

        1. R C Dean   12 years ago

          Well, redheads, anyway. I'll leave it to the more, umm, experienced members of the commentariat to discuss whether female gingers, who may or may not technically be people, are actually "women".

          1. WTF   12 years ago

            Well, they have no souls, so yeah, women.

            1. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

              I will be more then happy to take all of your red headed women.

              1. Free Society   12 years ago

                The only sperm banks in the world now accepting ginger jizz are in Ireland. The rest of the world has had enough, the red headed step children are consuming our hospital ICUs with all of the beatings they (justifiably) receive.

        2. Dweebston   12 years ago

          I should have amped up the sarcasm.

          Women just aren't on average going to take an interest in the particulars of a given subject the way men on average tend to take their interests: much too far. I think it's a forest-for-the-trees issue between the sexes, but in any event it's just dumb to expect perfect equitability when countervailing evidence (e.g. the relative paucity of women doing bizarre, pointless things in their spare time) is so handy. Then blaming the inevitable disparities on baked-in sexism in one of the most progressive media available just takes the cake.

          1. RBS   12 years ago

            e.g. the relative paucity of women doing bizarre, pointless things in their spare time)

            Are you married, to a woman?

          2. Rich   12 years ago

            the relative paucity of women doing bizarre, pointless things in their spare time

            Really?

            1. Dweebston   12 years ago

              Relative. Relative. Relative.

              Expecting perfect uniformity is what I'm getting at. It's a silly nonsense standard, especially given how little nerdy behavior actually accomplishes given the effort and investments involved.

              1. Almanian!   12 years ago

                THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! I AM OUTRAGED! YOU'RE OUTRAGEOUS!

          3. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

            Let's talk about the war on men. Women are responsible for 90% of shoe, candle, picture frame, drape, doily, throw pillow, and tampon purchases. WHY ARE MEN BEING EXCLUDED?!!1111!

            1. Dweebston   12 years ago

              Look, all I'm saying as a man with no arches and certain needs is that it's next to impossible to find a pair of size-14 strappy heels at Payless, and I don't think it's accidental.

              1. Zombie Jimbo   12 years ago

                Nordstrom"s Rack. More stylish too.

          4. lap83   12 years ago

            have you never heard of pinterest?

      2. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

        the veracity of death toll claims for the Battle of Hastings

        Considering the losses at Stamford Bridge it simply isn't.... Oh, you are implying that this isn't a good thing.

      3. Zeb   12 years ago

        And you will find lots of women who thing that women are superior because they don't engage in silly stuff like that as much as men do. But then they will still be outraged that men dominate in places where pedantic nerd wars are common and useful.

    3. Fluffy   12 years ago

      Wikipedia needs to rebrand and convince women that it's really a big exercise in internet scrapbooking.

  4. Hawk Spitui   12 years ago

    Speaking of outraged...

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      they have even discussed selling all of the animals in the zoo.

      RACIST!

      1. Geoff Nathan   12 years ago

        Actually they haven't, because Detroit does not own the Zoo, nor is it located in Detroit. And it's supported (of course) by a regional tax. Not that the (truly) racist folks who write stuff like you linked agree--they call it 'our' zoo and really believe it's being looted. Live in the region for a while and you hear this stuff all the time.

  5. RBS   12 years ago

    So that's the commercial my cousin made a preemptive ant-offensive finger wagging facebook post about.

  6. Ken at Popehat   12 years ago

    Is the dipshittish outrage of a former Congressman, Fox news contributor, and darling of some segments of the right enough to make it noteworthy?

    http://allenwestrepublic.com/2.....f-america/

    What about a popular conservative blog empire?

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-G.....-Offensive

    I have no problem with the project of calling out attempts to use truly marginal Twitter-twits to suggest a larger social movement. I'm just not sure that the views you are talking about here are as unusual or marginal in American political discourse as you are suggesting here.

    1. Scott S.   12 years ago

      The Breitbart sharing/response is only a fraction of the response I got from a piece I posted on there defending gay marriage using conservative arguments.

      1. Ken at Popehat   12 years ago

        I just want to say that I don't think the government should interfere with your masochism.

  7. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

    Boy that football game sucked. I think my interest in the NFL is over.

    1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

      Until next season.

    2. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      That game ended exactly the way it was supposed. In Fire and Blood.

  8. WTF   12 years ago

    Despite accounting for half the world's population, women comprise just 9 percent of all Wikipedia editors job-related deaths.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      Nice.

  9. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

    It did get ugly:

    http://publicshaming.tumblr.co.....airs#notes

    1. WTF   12 years ago

      When no one is looking.

  10. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

    Whoa - I'm OFFENDED by stuff.
    http://robotfromthefuture.com/.....tivity.jpg

  11. Geoff Nathan   12 years ago

    There's a lot of it going around. The President of the University of Illinois (Champana/Urbain) caught hell for not closing last week. And some of the tweets were racist/sexist (they actually were, incidentally).

    The national university community went nuts, as if a few random tweets meant that Bull Connor or George Wallace had returned and was about to take over Illinois. Or perhaps the whole country:
    http://chicagoist.com/2014/01/.....ts_res.php

    I'm not saying that the comments weren't inappropriate, but to treat this as if it was the coming of the Antichrist seems to give it more attention than it's worth.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    If someone from my collective is outraged, then I stand by that person in outrageous solidarity. Maybe count me amongst those whose ears bleed at the sound of foreigner gibberish on U.S. soil, which will necessarily translate into tax dollars being spent on multilingual signage and free healthcare.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      tax dollars being spent on multilingual signage

      The TSA has been putting the loose change left at checkpoints into its "aviation security fund" to translate airport signs into different languages

      Better?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Only if it's Esperanto.

        1. Rich   12 years ago

          Yep. World peace requires it.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      This is exactly what FB looks like for me. I can guarantee that if something hits both HuffPo and the Daily Show within 48 hours of each other, there will be sudden outrage on issues I've been aware of for a week to 10 days.

      1. Dweebston   12 years ago

        Facebook Outrage: from the people who brought you KONY 2012 and countless other long-forgotten indignant slacktivist "likes" and "shares."

  13. Acosmist   12 years ago

    The Coca-Cola ad was just fucking stupid.

    1. WTF   12 years ago

      That's what I thought. Saccharine touchy-feely pseudo-patriotic bullshit that somehow relates to drinking soda.

      1. PD Scott   12 years ago

        HFCS touchy-feely pseudo patriotic bullshit.

        1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          +1 obese rat.

      2. Juice   12 years ago

        What football has to do with the military and its foreign occupations is beyond me, but they made it integral part of the Super Bowl anyway.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          The soldiers all seemed excited about coming home. Why not bring them all home?

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      The lack of subtitles was outrageous!

    3. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      I thought the ads in general were stupid this year.

      1. WTF   12 years ago

        Yeah, they were fairly consistent in their general suckitude.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          They said something similar about you. Personally, I gave Radio Shack a thumbs-up for self awareness. And you can never go wrong with interspecies bromance. Also, Tebow still exists.

          1. WTF   12 years ago

            Tebow is a myth, you fool. That commercial was all CGI.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Let Tebow into your heart.

              1. RBS   12 years ago

                He Lives!

              2. WTF   12 years ago

                Thanks, now "Hey Jude" is running in my head.

              3. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

                Tebow 19:11 And I saw the locker room opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it is called Tebow, and in righteousness He judges and wages offensive drives.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  His divine wrath was most telling last night. Most telling.

            2. R C Dean   12 years ago

              I thought the "no contracct" T-Mobile ad with no-contract" Tebow was inspired. Especially for the audience, which will get the insiderey joke.

              1. db   12 years ago

                It is the only commercial i watch3d all the way through.

              2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                My reaction, too. While the ad wasn't perfectly executed, the message was delivered pretty well. And, of course, implicit is His Timmieness' blessing of the phone service.

              3. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

                I thought the "no contracct" T-Mobile ad with no-contract" Tebow was inspired.

                My reaction was: Tebow has no contract because he sucks. Doesn't that mean T-Mobile sucks?

                1. CE   12 years ago

                  No, when Tebow is your quarterback you pray for poor coverage.

                  When T-Mobile is your phone company you pray for good coverage.

      2. RBS   12 years ago

        I missed the Seinfeld one because these two non-fans would not STFU.

      3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Everything is declining. I'd be outraged, but my outrage, too, is declining. The universe is decaying, and entropy is to blame. Why isn't our government doing something about that?

      4. Acosmist   12 years ago

        They seemed really lame and tame. I was happy to get food or beer during the commercial breaks.

  14. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

    Well, if people are drinking less soda, this can only be a good thing for waistlines all across the US.

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      finally, the true outrage - Big Soda's continued existence.

      /sarc

      1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

        A 512 ounce soda advertised as a child's size?

        Well, that is the volume of a liquefied two year old child.

  15. db   12 years ago

    I'm offended.by people who.make.fun of me.pkstng prom.myphone.

    1. WTF   12 years ago

      "pkstng prom.myphone."?

      Clearly you are making fun of Filipino accents, you racist!

      1. db   12 years ago

        Some of my best. Friends are Filipino.

        1. a better weapon   12 years ago

          Some of my best. Priends are Pilipino

          FTFY

          1. WTF   12 years ago

            Exactly.

        2. Almanian!   12 years ago

          My doctor is firipino. Been here about 40 years - STILL can't understand 1/2 of what he says. But he's a damned good doc...so...

    2. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

      Do you start candle circles and sing "We Shall Overcome"? Because if you don't, then you are not truly offended.

  16. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

    I didn't see it, AND THIS OUTRAGES ME.

  17. waffles   12 years ago

    I'm so outraged that I'm not going to watch any football until September, maybe August! Boycott the nfl for 7 months!

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Does the draft count as watching football?

      1. waffles   12 years ago

        debatable. I usually don't watch the draft anyway. Plenty of people who do watch it buzz in my ear about it that I don't need to waste my time.

      2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

        From a Lions fan. Yes.

  18. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    All I know is, I'm outraged by your lack of outrage about the things I'm perpetually outraged about.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

      We finally know what the Big P looks like.

  19. waffles   12 years ago

    I found that many of the ads had this shallow patriotism that did very little to sell the product. I'm not sure which market research suggested that stars and stripes can sell anything under the sun but it seems like a deeply flawed strategy.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      I got the same vibe. Maybe it has something to do with the game being in NYC post 9/11...

  20. John   12 years ago

    I wonder if some of the constant "outrage" over stupid and insignificant stuff like television commercials is to some degree the public engaging in displacement. There government is bankrupting the country and no one seems to be able to do anything about it. The elites on both sides actively loath their supporters and view the American people as a nuisance to be dealt with primarily by lying so that they can get down to stealing. The media and our political class has managed to divide the country so much that both sides will refuse to see the outrages of their own side no matter how obvious. This makes both sides feel completely powerless to do anything about what they see as horrible corruption. In short, everyone has real things to be outraged about but feels completely powerless to do anything about it and in some way is overlooking something appalling on their own side in the name of sticking it to the other side.

    Since they can't be outraged about real things, they get outraged about fake things as a wake of coping with the resulting cognitive dissonance and anxiety.

    1. WTF   12 years ago

      But what do you think the train going into the tunnel means, Dr. Freud?

      1. Mainer2   12 years ago

        I think the train represents a penis and the tunnel...oh, you were making a joke. Sorry.

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      "And don't get me started about the crazy *weather*!"

      Good observation, John.

    3. db   12 years ago

      Yep. It is analagous to how third world shithole dictators will intenti9nally hlame outsiders, typically the USA, to deflect internal dissent.

      In our case it is less intentional deflection than it is complete political inertia.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        But occasionally the truth leaks out, like with that Iranian newspaper report on how our rulers actually lizard people aliens.

  21. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I saw that ad, and attempted to come up with a suitably mocking parody of anti-immigrant outrage, but I couldn't concoct anything dumb enough to be believable.

  22. MP   12 years ago

    It could be advertising anything.

    There was a lot of that shit last night. Ads which you had no idea what they were pitching until the last few seconds. That's supposed to be effective?

    The Maserati ad was probably the worst offender. FFS, just show a picture of the car for 30 seconds. It sells itself.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   12 years ago

      Selling feelings. It makes me want to barf.

      1. db   12 years ago

        Feelings,
        I get queasy when they're sold
        Sticky vomit-crusted feelings
        Freezing solid in the cold

    2. R C Dean   12 years ago

      Somehow, though, the Jaguar ad which didn't mention Jaguar until the very end still worked. The tag line is tres bien for Jag:

      "Its good to be bad."

      Awesome.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        But is that really a wise tagline for a company with a history of great designs badly put together?

        1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

          They were put together OK, but when you install Lucas electrics in your car the chances of catastrophic failure increase to 100%. You know why the British drink warm beer? Lucas made the refrigerators too.

  23. kinnath   12 years ago

    It's been all down hill since the dot.bomb collapse pulled the rug out from under the Monster.com ads.

  24. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I am outraged by how utterly pedestrian it is. This could have been a Levi's ad five years ago. It could be advertising anything.

    No kidding. I had no clue what that ad was, until I noticed the subtly embedded Coke bottles. It was like that goddam "farmer" ad last year. I, no shit, thought it was an ADM ad until the last few seconds.

  25. Warty   12 years ago

    There was nothing like the Fiat ad from last year, or whenever it was. That's the real outrage.

  26. db   12 years ago

    I am offended that Bob Dylan continues to be sufficiently relevant to warrant a SuperbBolw commerc8al.

    1. MP   12 years ago

      The irony he's relevant to the people who would be most offended by him selling out.

      1. Square   12 years ago

        Those people forgot that they gave a shit about selling out several decades ago.

      2. Zeb   12 years ago

        Oh, Bob's alright. His music sucks now and he sings worse than ever, but I have to appreciate his continued refusal to be what people expect him to be.

  27. RightofCenter   12 years ago

    Speaking of fake outrage, I got a kick out of one of my guests who was so outraged by the treatment of "Our National Anthem." I pointed out twice that America the Beautiful is not our national anthem, but it fell on outrage-deafened ears.

    1. db   12 years ago

      Throw him out. It's your house.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        I'm getting grumpy in my old age. I made a point to sit down for the actual National Anthem. Also, were my ears broken or did that opera singer hit a couple of flat notes? (Or did she hit them right and I've been listening to people who do it wrong?)

        1. playa manhattan   12 years ago

          "Please rise for the National Anthem!" (Except for Brett)

          1. Brett L   12 years ago

            I don't know. Its not worth the hassle in public. I don't feel like dumping all of my utter disdain on some poor parent at a Little League game. But it does annoy the shit out of me. Luckily, my in-laws, with whom I was watching were far more worried about more wine and queso.

            1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

              I stopped bowing my head during group prayers at family gatherings, luckily everyone who cares has their head down. At most I get a raised eyebrow from a cousin or my nephew.

              1. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

                Or you could always use the opportunity to take a short nap:)

        2. Zeb   12 years ago

          I just don't understand why a sporting event calls for the national anthem to be sung at all. If it is an international competition, maybe it makes sense.

          I don't go to many events which involve the national anthem, but I usually don't stand when I do. So far no one has given me any shit.

          1. RBS   12 years ago

            Try that shit at a NASCAR race. At the Darlington race last year some douchebag threatened to kick so old guys ass because he didn't take his hat off. The old man was probably in his late 80's and his hat was one of those that all the WW2 vets wear.

            1. Zeb   12 years ago

              Try that shit at a NASCAR race.

              No.

    2. CE   12 years ago

      I'm surprised they weren't offended by the aerial shots of the Statue of Liberty, what with her welcoming immigrants and all.

  28. Jon Lester   12 years ago

    Yes, people from all walks of life in multicultural America can damage their health with Coca-Cola, freely and equally.

  29. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

    I'm outraged that Twitter messages are being passed off as news.

  30. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

    I was outraged by the Puppy Bowl. If God wanted puppies to play professional sports He would have made them less intelligent.

    1. Almanian!   12 years ago

      I am outraged that you would be outraged at the one decent event that was televised all day.

      Not surprised, but outraged.

      PUPPY BOWL! SQUEEEEEE!!!

      1. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

        I'm going to count to ten and then the puppy is going to get it.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLNUIU7AzTg

    2. lap83   12 years ago

      I'm outraged that those puppies probably make more money than our hardworking unionized public school teachers.

  31. Almanian!   12 years ago

    THIS WHOLE COURT IS AN OUTRAGE!

    1. Mainer2   12 years ago

      You're out of order.

      1. GILMORE   12 years ago

        YOU'RE out of order!.

  32. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

    Related, no really. Just wait for it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=066BFGk6QvA

  33. Mainer2   12 years ago

    The VW ad where the German engineers get their wings was clever.

    1. GILMORE   12 years ago

      I thought ads were clever when they made you think positive thoughts about the product they sell?

      or is it just to amuse pre-teen girls? I forget.

  34. GILMORE   12 years ago

    the only thing that offended me was the idea of a KIA being a luxury vehicle, and the quality of the Bronco's offense. That is all.

  35. Mr. Weebles   12 years ago

    That commercial was outrageous.

    This is 'Murica and we speak 'Murican here.

  36. kathykattenburg   12 years ago

    Scott, how many Twitter news feeds soiled with hateful condemnations of the Coca-Cola ad and articles by Allen West & his ilk do you need before judging the hatred to be real and not "fake"?

  37. F. Stupidity, Jr.   12 years ago

    Jeez, go party with Phillip Seymour Hoffman already.

  38. Fluffy   12 years ago

    We tend to be outraged about extant, or planned, conspiracies to put people in prison or seize their property for undertaking actions that should not be so punishable.

    Our opponents tend to be outraged because feelings.

  39. Brett L   12 years ago

    Fisty has a stalker. Just back away slow and don't make eye contact.

  40. playa manhattan   12 years ago

    She's been waiting around for Epi since last night.

  41. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

    I thought you were supposed to make yourself look bigger and intimidating...

  42. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Let's face it, you're all stalking me, in your own way.

  43. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

    Fist, these comments are coming from INSIDE YOUR HOUSE!

  44. CE   12 years ago

    Too soon. Way too soon.

  45. CE   12 years ago

    No, they've just hacked his wireless router.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Glories of Mexican Dentistry

Brian Doherty | From the August/September 2025 issue

Georgia: The Possible Birthplace of Wine and Definite Birthplace of Stalin

Hunt Beaty | From the August/September 2025 issue

$500 Million To Paint the Border Wall? 5 of Trump's Strangest, Most Expensive Vanity Projects

Jeff Luse | 8.22.2025 5:28 PM

Cracker Barrel Didn't 'Go Woke.' It Just Went Broke.

Billy Binion | 8.22.2025 5:09 PM

What If TikTok Therapists Are Making People Less Happy?

Emma Camp | 8.22.2025 3:26 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300