Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Nanny State

Nebraska Toddler in Profanity-Laced Video Taken Into Child Protective Custody

Video was shared by local pd on Facebook

Reason Staff | 1.9.2014 12:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A Nebraska toddler who repeated a slew of profanities in an online video has been taken into child protective custody, Omaha police said Wednesday.

While authorities found nothing criminal in the video, officials from the Omaha police's Child Victim Unit and the Nebraska Child Protective Services took the infant and three other children into custody on Wednesday, the police department said on its Facebook page.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Peter Suderman on Obamacare Questions the White House Won't Answer

Reason Staff
Nanny StateChildrenGovernmentNebraska
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (2)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ann N   13 years ago

    How does govt kidnap children without a rights violation? Govt has no claim over citizens if they respect others rights.

    It seems to me if parental rights are a REAL THING then interferences would require a criminal, not civil, infringement. And not just allegation, it would need a jury verdict.

    In what case can you deprive ppl of rights? crime, martial law, or gender bigotry (VAWA). All other behavior falls outside govt discrimination. If govt does act then it violates equal protection.

    What we have now is a superstate with executive appointees that have legally binding expert opinion.

    When opinion is elevated to law noone is 'innocent until proven guilty'.

    "For the children", this is how the child was removed without any criminal charges being filed.

    If the offense isnt a crime than parental rights preside over the situation, that is unless an expert decrees your rights void. Nice 'due process' by jury of peers. Meanwhile real civil rights of parents are trampled.

  2. D. M. Michell   13 years ago

    This is just another example of the fascist police state that we are allowing to be built around us. A toddler repeating words that most of us would find offensive is not a crime. It may be morally repugnant, but that a religious issue. Many of the laws in the U.S. are based on religion or personal moral beliefs (the equivalent of religion), America's version of Sharia Laws.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Pipeline Company Seized Their Land and Left Them With a $383,000 Bill. What Will the Supreme Court Say?

Billy Binion | 7.17.2026 4:30 PM

Video Shows Fort Worth Cop Ticketing a Preacher for 'Offensive' Speech at Pride Event

Autumn Billings | 7.17.2026 3:55 PM

This Biotech Company Has Spent Nearly 3 Years in FDA Limbo

Eric Boehm | 7.17.2026 2:25 PM

Trump Threatens To Revoke ABC and NBC Licenses for Not Broadcasting His Election Speech

Joe Lancaster | 7.17.2026 1:05 PM

One Federal Agency's Unused Office Space Costs 'Hundreds of Millions of Dollars' Per Year

Joe Lancaster | 7.17.2026 10:55 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason