Supreme Court May Back EPA Rules over Cross-State Air Pollution
Giving feds the authority to impose solutions on states
States in the Midwest and South whose polluted air infects those in the Northeast and Middle Atlantic may have to abide by a federally imposed solution, a slim majority of Supreme Court justices appeared to indicate Tuesday.
While the court was divided over the method and timing behind the Environmental Protection Agency's rule on cross-state air pollution, more support was voiced for federal authority than the demands of "upwind" states and industries.
At issue is whether the EPA acted before states could come up with their own emissions control plans, and whether its emphasis on minimizing costs would cause some states to do more and others less, regardless of their share of the offending pollution.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
until I saw the bank draft for $7998, I be certain that...my... best friend woz like realy bringing home money part-time on their laptop.. there neighbour haz done this for under fourteen months and just took care of the morgage on their condo and purchased a new Mazda MX-5. visit this web-site
=============================
http://www.fb49.com
=============================