Peter Suderman Reviews The Last Days on Mars

Senior Editor Peter Suderman reviews the new zombies-on-Mars movie, The Last Days on Mars:
Zombies, once the exclusive province of low-budget horror, seem to be just about everywhere in pop-culture these days — on popular TV shows, in big budget movies and teen-targeted comedies and interspersed with classic literature. I suppose it was only a matter of time until they made it to Mars.
No one ever says the word "zombie" in "The Last Days on Mars," but there's no question that it is a zombie movie. And aside from the extraterrestrial location, it's really a rather conventional one, in which a small group of people in a remote area must fight for their lives when a viral outbreak starts turning them into power-tool-wielding undead menaces.
The future undead and their victims are near-future astronauts on an early, six-month manned mission to the Red Planet. It's a lonely gig in an inhospitable world, but they've got only 19 hours left (really, the movie could have been called "The Last Day on Mars") in their inflated Martian living habitat. Mission specialist Vincent Campbell (Liev Shreiber) longs for the blue sky and green grass of Earth, and wants to start the six-month commute home as fast as possible.
But some of the team wants to work until the very end. One of the scientists (played by Goran Kostic) gets special permission from mission leader Charles Brunel (Elias Koteas) to make a last minute run to fix a sensor. Or so he says. He's actually off to collect a specimen he believes could prove the existence of microbial life on Mars.
Life on Mars! Do undead zombie astronauts count? The movie lumbers forward in standard zombie-pic fashion, pitting man against walking dead in a familiar array of sterile corridors, pitch-black exteriors and strobe-lit hallways. It's paint-by-numbers sci-fi monster movie stuff, and it borrows a lot from both the original "Alien" and John Carpenter's 1982 remake of "The Thing."
Read the whole review in The Washington Times.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You had me at zombies on Mars.
That was my thought verbatim.
But are there vampires? To capture the female demo vamps are needed.
Enough with the zombie shit, already.
When will zombies jump the shark?
Pish. They won't jump the shark, they'll eat the shark's braaaains.
Zombie Sharks
astronaut zombies would solve a lot of space travel problems.
But not John Carpenter's "Ghosts of Mars"?
I've long thought Escape from Mars should be the next Snake Plissken film.
At one time it was supposed to be Escape From Earth. It still could be.
Mars is a no-smoking planet. No smoking, no drinking, no drugs. No women - unless of course you're married. No guns, no foul language... no red meat.
ohhhhhhhh so close. I was hoping he said it borrowed the child-actor's elements from Aliens and 1951's Thing from Another World with the giant walking carrot.
"But not John Carpenter's "Ghosts of Mars"?"
That's what I was thinking too.
I guess just about every movie is some sort of remake or retread these days.
Oh well, at least it's not Rocky XXX on Mars fighting the reigning zombie heavweight champ.
Speaking of zombies, 2Chilli tweeted this this morning.
Here's Why "The Walking Dead" Doesn't Make Any Damn Sense
Too bad the first comment nuked his logic.
Two things: I'm utterly weary of zombies, and I'm also tired of so many space films being more horror film than anything else.
Didn't John Carpenter do it first? Ghosts of Mars?
And as much as I am tired of zombies, it does demonstrate how a lack of copyright can spur business and the economy. If Night of the Living Dead had been properly copyrighted at the time, it wouldn't have become public domain, and likely wouldn't have been such a phenomenon (not to mention, the owners could probably sue later zombie films as being derivative works, as up to then, zombies were of the Voodoo kind...)