Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Obama Attempting to Reverse Insurance Cancellations, Student Debt Passes $1 Trillion, Another City Considers Bankruptcy: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 11.14.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | 401(K) 2013 / Foter.com / CC BY-SA
(401(K) 2013 / Foter.com / CC BY-SA)
  • Today's P.M. links brought to you by Benjamin Franklin
    Credit: 401(K) 2013 / Foter.com / CC BY-SA

    President Barack Obama's solution to the disaster of the rollout of his signature Affordable Care Act is to allow insurers to uncancel customers' policies for a year. Insurance industry representatives worry this will make the problem even worse.

  • As of the third fiscal quarter, total student debt has surpassed $1 trillion. Good luck getting them to pay for your health care!
  • Desert Hot Springs in California may be the next city to declare bankruptcy, though they're trying hard to resist it.
  • School security spending is predicted to double to $5 billion by 2017 in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary shootings.
  • Toronto Mayor Rob Ford is threatening legal action against aides who told police about his drug use and drunken-driving. Snitches get stiches, guys!
  • Murderous Boston ganster Whitey Bulger has officially been sentenced to two life terms (plus five years).

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: China Tries to Ease Citizens' Fears of GMO Food

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (334)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    As of the third fiscal quarter, total student debt has surpassed $1 trillion.

    That bubble is so close to popping you can feel it in the air.

    1. PD Scott   11 years ago

      Fall enrollment in the University System of Georgia is down compared to Fall 2012 but not by very much. (1.6%)

      "As we have noted to the Board of Regents and the institutional presidents, this enrollment decline reflects a national trend in higher education that has a number of contributing factors, including demographics, the economy and, frankly some price sensitivity," said Chancellor Hank Huckaby.

      1. Lady Bertrum   11 years ago

        My guess is the less prestigious 4 year liberal arts colleges will see the biggest enrollment decline. State schools are somewhat more affordable and might attract students who would otherwise consider a private school.

        1. PD Scott   11 years ago

          I would guess that you are correct.

        2. John   11 years ago

          Yes. My neighbor's daughter goes to Gettysburg. That place costs $50K a year. I can't see how anyone would find that worth it.

          1. Restoras   11 years ago

            I went to a school like that 25 years ago that now costs that amount. I would never send my kids there.

          2. CE   11 years ago

            My neighbor's daughter's cousin works a few hours a week on the computer. And now she can afford college.

    2. DJF   11 years ago

      Hopefully there won't be another bailout, I missed out on getting a really cheap house at the end of the housing bubble, I still have hopes of getting a really cheap co-ed at the end of the education bubble.

      1. CE   11 years ago

        Not without the house you won't. They need someplace to stay.

        1. DJF   11 years ago

          Damm you Ben Bernanke !!!!!!!!

      2. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

        They won't but if they do just as I'm done responsibly paying my loans off I may go on a rampage.

      3. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Cheap at first means lots of alimony later.

      4. mr lizard   11 years ago

        They're already out there. Go search around the more commuter schools, lots of young chicks still stuck at their parent's house. All you need is a decent apartment, a decent car, a decent career, and a penchant for drinking. I recommend Tampa, although the native chicks average between kinda crazy, and Event Horizon crAzy.

        1. CE   11 years ago

          Ah, Tampa.... to be 23 again.

    3. hamilton   11 years ago

      There must be a way to make money from this inevitable collapse. The problem is I can't quite figure out what to invest in. Should I short basket-weaving robots?

      1. Redmanfms   11 years ago

        There must be a way to make money from this inevitable collapse. The problem is I can't quite figure out what to invest in. Should I short basket-weaving robots?

        Go back to school and run up a shit-ton of student loan debt.

        I'm considering going back, but I still have nearly ten years of eligibility left on my post-9/11 GI Bill so I wouldn't need loans anyway.

    4. playa manhattan   11 years ago

      Question: Under a student debt "forgiveness" scheme, who pays? Are the banks out money, or will it be covered by the taxpayer (or the taxpayer's great-grandchildren)?

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Either the last one, or by another round of quantitative easing. (It really should be called qualitative easing, but that's another story.)

      2. Raven Nation   11 years ago

        I'm assuming there will be "forgiveness" or a bailout around August next year in time for the elections.

  2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    School security spending is predicted to double to $5 billion by 2017 in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary shootings.

    The children, it is for.

    1. db   11 years ago

      Well, the children of security gadget company executives, at least.

  3. Episiarch   11 years ago

    Insurance industry representatives worry this will make the problem even worse.

    We can only hope so.

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      It's worse problems all the way down!

    2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      It really has to, doesn't it? I mean, the mandate is still there, but the insurance it's supposed to be forcing people who don't need insurance to buy won't be purchased. So what funds all the freebies?

      I don't pretend to know jack about this law, nor do I want to, but these likely illegal pronouncements by his Deceptiveness aren't going to work.

      1. Episiarch   11 years ago

        We can only hope so.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Like I've been saying, Schadenfreudenalia is coming.

          1. Episiarch   11 years ago

            We can only hope so.

            1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

              I dunno, didn't "hope" get this country into country recently?

              1. PD Scott   11 years ago

                It's because we didn't hope hard enough.

              2. Libertymike   11 years ago

                Don't forget change.

                1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                  To be fair, things have changed. What Obama neglected to mention is that his change was change for the worse. Next time, maybe the media will ask about what kind of change is intended by the empty suit who runs on something like this next time.

                  1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                    Next next time.

                  2. db   11 years ago

                    When "hope" is your plan, "change" is inevitable.

                  3. PD Scott   11 years ago

                    "Maybe the media will ask..."

                    If the answer won't fit into a 10 second soundbite the media isn't really interested.

                  4. Boisfeuras   11 years ago

                    Next time, maybe the media will ask about what kind of change is intended by the empty suit who runs on something like this next time.

                    Like Terry McAuliffe? Maybe next next time.

                2. Lady Bertrum   11 years ago

                  From hope and change to dope and mange.

              3. Ted S.   11 years ago

                I don't think hope got this country into country.

                1. Libertymike   11 years ago

                  But the Mayflower did.

                2. Rich   11 years ago

                  Well, change obviously didn't!

      2. SweatingGin   11 years ago

        The treasury? Until it becomes so hideously obvious that it has to be killed?

      3. gaijin   11 years ago

        It all just seems so arbitrary, ad hoc and day to day.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Rule by diktat often seems that way.

          1. db   11 years ago

            Sounds like a song.

        2. playa manhattan   11 years ago

          seems or is?

  4. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    School security spending is predicted to double to $5 billion by 2017 in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary shootings.

    And nothing fortifies schools like funding teacher pensions.

  5. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Murderous Boston ganster Whitey Bulger has officially been sentenced to two life terms (plus five years).

    Convicted of murder, extortion, robbery, tax evasion, and two moving violations.

    1. John   11 years ago

      True story. When the federal judge sentenced John Gotti he sentenced him to three life terms or something with no chance of parole and something called a "$50 special assessment fee". I have no idea what that is. But after the hearing as Gotti is talking to his lawyer he says something to the effect of "boy they really get you with that special assessment fee".

      1. Restoras   11 years ago

        True story. John Gotti's lawyer lived in the same building as I did when I lived in Manhattan. Nice guy. Scarey looking, but nice.

        1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

          Why are his kids such dickheads?

  6. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

    Sorry, Barry, you've got to suspend the mandate, too, or this won't work. If you were smart--which you aren't--you'd push for the repeal of the whole law, calling out the GOP to help fix the healthcare problems in the U.S.

    1. Tim   11 years ago

      He's washing his hands of this. Blame insurance companies, republicans, even other democrats.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Not going to work. He couldn't be more in the bulls-eye on this law. It's not called Pelosicare, fucker.

        1. Rich   11 years ago

          Are you serious?

    2. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      The GOP to fix something? The gang who can't shoot straight? I know you are retarded now.

      The Dems are stumbling bumbling clowns but they do eventually get some things right. But never does the GOP get anything right.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        I'm not saying they would fix it. I meant that if he were even slightly politically astute, he's thrown out this law but put the GOP on the hook, too, for solving the problems with healthcare. Since the government largely is the problem, they'll all naturally fail.

      2. Restoras   11 years ago

        Spin faster, troll! HAHAHAHAA!!

      3. playa manhattan   11 years ago

        How was your meeting?

        1. Weigel's Cock Ring   11 years ago

          See my comment below.

      4. FYTW   11 years ago

        they do eventually get some things right.

        Citation needed.

      5. Lord Peter Wimsey   11 years ago

        Hee, hee. The retarded guy called you retarded. Funny.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    President Barack Obama's solution to the disaster of the rollout of his signature Affordable Care Act is to allow insurers to uncancel customers' policies for a year.

    Just like he allowed you to use medical marijuana.

  8. Brett L   11 years ago

    Florida Man impersonates cop for donut discount.

    1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

      He's certainly overweight enough to pass as a cop.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      The donut clerk was suspicious because the man wasn't out of shape enough.

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

        He also walked past a dog without shooting it.

    3. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

      That's the first reasonable thing Florida Man has ever done.

      1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

        My brother (who was and is also Florida man) used to work the third shift at a 7-11 when he was younger. Bored beat cops would often stop in. He always comped their coffee & donuts, and shot the shit with them, because he knew the place wasn't going to get robbed.

        1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

          because he knew the place wasn't going to get robbed.

          What exactly did he think was happening?

          1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

            He paid for the stuff. $1.89 is pretty cheap for an armed security guard hanging around for 30 or 45 minutes.

        2. BigT   11 years ago

          Comping the cops is a tried-and-true strategy going back at least 120 years. Even brothels have played that game.

    4. playa manhattan   11 years ago

      "managers became concerned that Barry was abusing the discount by stopping by the store on weekends with his family."

      Police accepting a law enforcement discount at all IS abusing it.

  9. Rich   11 years ago

    Obama's solution to the disaster of the rollout of his signature Affordable Care Act is to allow insurers to uncancel customers' policies

    "All the King's horses and all the King's men ...."

    1. Corning   11 years ago

      "I am allowing you to break the law...why are you evil shits not breaking the law to save my presidency?!?!"

      1. Swiss Servator, Original Gnome   11 years ago

        I swear I could actual see him saying that - oh for a "hot mic" if he did...

  10. Brett L   11 years ago

    Is Urban Meyer looking to hook up with his man crush in 2014?

    A graduate assistant position at OSU could get Tebow's second career in football started, and the Buckeyes would be the perfect fit for him. OSU is coached by Urban Meyer, who was Tebow's head coach during his college days with the Florida Gators, and Meyer has always held Tebow in very high regard. Meyer would probably be on board with having the most successful signal-caller he's ever coached around to mentor Ohio State's quarterbacks.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Meyer's just setting somebody else up to take the fall when the inevitable NCAA sanctions are declared.

    2. CE   11 years ago

      Tim Tebow, quarterback coach? Somehow that sounds worse than Tim Tebow, quarterback. (And I think he could still be a top 25 QB in the NFL.)

      1. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

        From what I understand, the word around the NFL is that no one on the Jets or the Patriots could put up with Tebow. Despite his competitive nature and his commitment to the game, he has zero amount of self-criticism and had know time for constructive criticism from his coaches.

        1. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

          Oops, "had no time for constructive criticism from his coaches."

        2. John   11 years ago

          That makes sense. There are quarterbacks who are much worse than Tebow who have jobs. There has to be something about Tebow, beyond his fan base, that makes teams not want to sign him.

    3. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

      Great. He could rise up in the ranks to become tOSU's QB coach, teaching the young signal-callers all they need to know about throwing mechanics and reading complex defensive coverages.

      1. Libertymike   11 years ago

        Coach Urban would be better off contacting Tom House, the ex-MLB pitcher and pitching guru who has made a name for himself working with NFL QBs, including the likes of Tom Brady.

      2. CE   11 years ago

        Exactly. At least as a QB, Tebow can overcome his throwing and coverage reading deficiencies by scrambling for tough yards and maybe inspiring his teammates. As a QB coach, what's he going to do?

  11. db   11 years ago

    The good news is that It's possible Andy Kaufman is still alive

    1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

      Of course he's alive. He's occupying the White House today and running the government with hilarious results!

    2. Episiarch   11 years ago

      I doubt it, but that would be amazing. However, it's most likely his brother pulling a prank, Andy-style. Maybe Andy even asked him to do it at some point after his death (it's been a while, though).

      1. db   11 years ago

        The brother explains away Andy's failure to appear in 1999 by saying Andy had a change.of heart and enjoyed living quietly with no public presence by then.

        It would be so awesome.if.it's true. The purported daughter wouldn't give a stright answer when asked.if Andy planned to reveal himself at all.

        1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

          She could have offered a DNA sample; she was born after he "supposedly" died. I like the Epi explanation, it's probably in his will.

    3. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Of course he is. He's living in the White House under an assumed name.

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

        Too slow.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          I've been saying this for quite some time, you know.

  12. Tim   11 years ago

    President Barack Obama's solution to the plague of rats is to import thousands of hungry tigers. Sources close to White House see no downsides.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      The monkeys will freeze when winter comes.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        It was gorillas.

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          They're all fucking primates.

      2. Hillary's Clitdong   11 years ago

        RACIST

    2. Redmanfms   11 years ago

      President Barack Obama's solution to the plague of rats is to import thousands of hungry tigers. Sources close to White House see no downsides.

      Hey, I've got my rock, I'm not worried.

      1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

        I would like to buy your magic rock. How much?

  13. Brett L   11 years ago

    I can't wait until my kid is old enough to mess with like this.

    Every year, my wife and I devote the month of November to convincing our children their plastic dinosaur figures come to life while they sleep.

    1. db   11 years ago

      I was a devotee of Dr. Suess when I started reading at the age of three. My parents took my love of "The Pale Green Pants" as an excuse to fuck with.me by having an actual pair of pale green pants follow me around the house. I can't believe they managed to keep straight faces for as long as they did when I would frequently discover that the.pants had relocated to a room nearby, only to strangely be.missing when I grabbed one of them to show them. They for some reason were always folded up.in.a drawer when I tried to show Mom or Dad that they had followed.me around.

      1. Brett L   11 years ago

        We have received 5 or 6 baby books so far. I had to laugh because my reaction to "Goodnight, Moon" was literally right out of "Despicable Me". "This is a children's book? This is terrible! I could write better than this."

        1. hamilton   11 years ago

          I recommend "Go the Fuck to Sleep". There was also a nice picture book identifying how to make classic cocktails. I'll see if I can find it.

          1. hamilton   11 years ago

            Here we go: Baby, Mix Me a Drink.

            1. SweatingGin   11 years ago

              holy crap, how did I never see that before? I've been wanting to teach the Ginlettes to mix cocktails.

              1. hamilton   11 years ago

                Awesome book. Illustrations are perfect; you can easily determine the brand of spirit from the picture (e.g. Makers' Mark bourbon on the Manhattan page).

                On a related note, my (now)15-year old learned how to mix a martini at least 5 years ago and since then every now and then asks for permission to try to mix up something new he thinks I'd like.

        2. SweatingGin   11 years ago

          Use Good Night, Keith Moon instead.

          1. CE   11 years ago

            Or Good Night, Warren Moon:

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxNuAcL2H74

            1. Swiss Servator, Original Gnome   11 years ago

              Or Good Night Dune:

              http://www.bspcn.com/2010/12/11/good-night-dune/

        3. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          I very much enjoyed that scene from Despicable Me. A lot of books for children are great, but some are. . .less so.

        4. playa manhattan   11 years ago

          Good night moon isn't really a baby book, it's more of an infant book. My kids just pointed at the pictures.

          One thing that bothers me is that in toddler age + books, that dad is always portrayed as a Homer Simpson like idiot. I get accused of stealing cookies from the cookie jar all the time, and it's bullshit.

  14. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Dear Prudence

    My husband achieved professional success and wealth early in life. His work involved lots of stress, and by his 30s he decided that he wanted out. His accumulated wealth could easily support our lifestyle indefinitely, so he retired about 18 months ago, shortly after the birth of our first child. He has not found anything to do in that time! We have an excellent nanny 40 hours a week, and outside those hours my husband is an extremely involved father. We split the domestic duties roughly 50?50, as before, but now I am the only one working and he says he shouldn't be "penalized" by having extra domestic responsibilities. So he spends the week dicking around (gym, squash, books, movies, etc.). It's making me crazy with resentment, especially when I come home from a hard day at work. He tells me I should just quit if I don't like it. But I also think it sets a bad example for our son to see a father who doesn't have some productive purpose in life. My husband disagrees and says he will be "an excellent corrective to the productionist propaganda schools inflict on kids to make them the unquestioning worker bees the economy demands." He says he doesn't care if our son grows up to work hard and that work is a lamentable necessity and it is only "false consciousness" to think otherwise. How can we resolve this?

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Fire the nanny.

      1. Bobarian   11 years ago

        Fire the wife and bang the Nanny?

        1. Restoras   11 years ago

          ^Yeah, this. Stupid bitch is set for life and is STILL not satisfied?? This is why I am not going to get married again.

          1. Libertymike   11 years ago

            Pardon my intrusiveness, but, was your former wife as bad as this ungrateful bitch?

            1. Restoras   11 years ago

              No, but she was most definately never satisfied with anything and my (still) married friends complain about the same thing. There is a strong sense of entitlement these days, and God help you if you can't navigate it.

              1. Sudden   11 years ago

                This.

                Happily a member of the divorced club as of (officially) one month ago

    2. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

      How can we resolve this?

      I just love it when one person considers their personal problem to be everyone's problem.

      1. Metazoan   11 years ago

        I think the "we" means she and her husband, and if they have this disagreement, that would be correct.

        1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

          I get that "we" refers to her and her husband, but she's the only one who's irritated. "We" don't have a problem, she has a problem.

    3. Brett L   11 years ago

      "He's right, you're stupid. Fire the nanny and get a housekeeper."

    4. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      Is the nanny hot?

      1. hamilton   11 years ago

        By definition no, since the guy is independently wealthy, retired, and yet still married.

        1. gaijin   11 years ago

          By definition no, since the guy is independently wealthy, retired, and yet still married.

          Exhibit 1-Arnold Schwarzenegger's Nanny

          1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

            Now, to be fair, do we know what she looked like back when Arnold was getting her to the chopper?

            1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

              Probably worse than all of Bill Clinton's indiscretions (some of which were pretty bad).

    5. John   11 years ago

      I was with the husband right up until he said "false consciousness".

      1. Brett L   11 years ago

        He was just using words she could understand.

      2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

        If there's no pre-nup she needs to do us all a favor and divorce him and take half of his wealth.

        The husband's wealth combined with his boredom could lead him to decide he's just the kind of man to run for office and lord over other people, ie Michael Bloomberg.

      3. Metazoan   11 years ago

        Yep, me too, John. Work per se isn't worth much of anything--the creation of value is. It's obviously great when you're doing something you love, and I'm not sure I could ever just pass all of my days doing nothing creative, but he had that point. Until the "false consciousness." Wtf...

      4. Corning   11 years ago

        Why the fuck do the left have to ruin everything?!?!

        He worked he earned he did his time...but noooooo...he has to use left wing moon bat crap to justify it.

    6. Redmanfms   11 years ago

      How can we resolve this?

      Go back in time and marry a guy who isn't retarded.

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

        Why is it retarded to stop working if you can live off your accumulated wealth?

        I do think it is retarded to have a nanny though.

        1. paranoid android   11 years ago

          Well, not retarded from his personal standpoint, however I do think it raises the odds that his kids will grow up to be total assholes to something like 95%.

          1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

            Eh, or the kid learns to find meaningful work instead of chasing the money.

    7. CE   11 years ago

      So why keep working?

    8. Damned Fool   11 years ago

      Get rid of the nanny, get him to raise the child, and soon he'll go back to work.

    9. db   11 years ago

      Have the nanny read Atlas Shrugged and realize it's time she went Galt instead of working for these assholez.

  15. Rich   11 years ago

    Annual spending on school security systems is projected to jump to $4.9 billion in 2017 from $2.7 billion last year, in part because of mass killings like the one in Newtown

    Does this "security spending" include demolishing and reconstructing perfectly good buildings?

  16. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Toronto man busted for running worldwide child pornography ring

    It was an extensive investigation that spanned the globe and resulted in charges against a Toronto man who detectives allege was at the centre of one of the largest child pornography rings they say they have ever seen.
    Hundreds of thousand of the images found featured "horrific acts of sexual abuse ? some of the worst (officers) have seen," said Inspector Joanna Beaven-Desjardins, who heads the Toronto police's sex crimes unit.
    Those images ? filling 45 terabytes or a stack of paper reaching as tall as 1,500 CN Towers ? have, to date, triggered 341 arrests across the globe and led to the rescue of 386 children, police allege.
    Officers from around the word involved in the case call it one of the largest and most geographically vast child pornography investigations in the world. About 30 of them from police forces across Ontario, Canada, the U.S., Spain, Mexico and Australia were at Toronto police headquarters for the announcement Thursday morning.

    Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair called its investigation ? named Project Spade ? an "extraordinary example of international cooperation from law enforcement."

    1. Bobarian   11 years ago

      Was he the mayor?

    2. Hillary's Clitdong   11 years ago

      I'm trying to get my head around the concept of having 45 Terabytes of porn.

      1. Matrix   11 years ago

        well, it involves kids, so don't get your mind too worked up on it.

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        GIFs substituting for video.

      3. SweatingGin   11 years ago

        "...And in here, is my porn SAN. It's five 3U, 12 drive units. 60 Drives in all, RAID6. Takes up almost half a cabinet, with another 4U for a UPS (need porn even if the power is out). 1TB drives to keep the spindle count up, always low latency. I'm thinking about adding a tray of SSD to really speed it up."

      4. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

        Especially since the subjects are so small!

        1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

          BOOOO! BOOOOOO!

          1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

            Look, if I can't make heinous, utterly distasteful jokes here, where can I make them?

            Answer me that, playa.

            1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

              Well......

              *crickets*

    3. Juice   11 years ago

      45 terabytes

      Holy shit!

    4. playa manhattan   11 years ago

      If it really led to the recuse of 386 children, then job well done. I'm pretty skeptical though, given the way that law enforcement likes to exaggerate child porn busts. They called operation candy and the biggest bust in history, and it turned out to be a single yahoo! group...

  17. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

    US Staging Ivory Crush to Battle Illegal Trade

    Today near Denver, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will do something it says it has never done before: destroy six tons of ivory to highlight a booming illegal trade contributing to the slaughter of tens of thousands of elephants every year.

    "We're trying to tell organized syndicates and cartels who are now involved in the illegal ivory trade that we're going to do whatever we can to take the value out of ivory and do whatever we can to put them in jail," said Edward Grace, deputy chief with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement.

    I'm not economist, just a simple office drone, but destroying tons of a product seems counter productive to "take the value out of" something.

    "Ivory crush" band name, drug name, or blacks-seeking-whites dating website name?

    1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

      "Oh, please," begged Briar Rabbit, "please don't throw me in the briar patch!"

    2. Redmanfms   11 years ago

      U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

      Elephant poaching is a problem these guys have to deal with???

      1. paranoid android   11 years ago

        And in Denver! We should see a resurgance of that Rocky Mountain Elephant population in no time.

    3. PD Scott   11 years ago

      In our glorious genetically engineered future to come, if we can make lab grown meat, why not flood the market with lab grown ivory and rhino horn?

      As for the latter, I've wondered if a viral ad campaign in China depicting young women giggling at and mocking men who use rhino horn might be an effective way to aid conservation efforts.

    4. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

      REM second-choice song name.

  18. Alton Knutson   11 years ago

    While listening to Obama's noon speech today I am pretty sure I could hear faintly from Hayek's grave "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      While listening to Obama's noon speech today

      Why subject yourself to such torture?

  19. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    MLB owners unanimously approve instant replay for next season

    Major League Baseball's proposed expanded instant replay challenge system still needs to be approved by the MLB Players Association and the World Umpires Association, but the 30 club owners unanimously approved the proposal at the GM meetings in Orlando, Fla., MLB announced Thursday.

    The original plan was for each manager to have one challenge in the first six innings of each game with two more available per team from the seventh inning until the end of the game. That has been tweaked, though, because now the system calls for two challenges per team, per game with no regulations on when the challenges are used.

    This could be negotiated down to one challenge per team, per game in order to get this measure approved by either the players or umpires.

    Also, if a manager wins his challenge, he'll get to retain it. From that light, there's really no limit on challenges, so long as they are used to correct incorrect calls. And, really, there wouldn't be much harm in limiting managers to one challenge. If he wins, he'd get to keep it.

    Great, now those Yankee-Red Sox games will take 5 hours instead of 4 and a half.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      And how dare you complain about it!

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

        I only complain that every Red Sox-Yankee game gets nationally televised, implying that the rest of the country should give a shit about New York and Boston sports.

        1. Restoras   11 years ago

          Well there are a lot of people that care and you never know when there will be a Varitek/A-Rod moment, and no one is going to watch Royals/Astros...

          1. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

            The royals had a winning season. Our Lastros are not in the same league of suckiness.

            On top of that they entirely fucked up their new channel and couldn't get any of the big providers to carry the channel. They had one game with a Nielsen rating of 0.

          2. BigT   11 years ago

            A Pedro Martinez - Don Zimmer moment. THAT was priceless.

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      They should have approved instant replay instead.

      1. Bobarian   11 years ago

        -1

        That was inhumane.

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          Then let's do it again. 😉

          1. Bobarian   11 years ago

            +1 Much better music!

    3. paranoid android   11 years ago

      The resulting increase in the number of commercial breaks during a game was totally not a factor in this decision, I'm sure.

    4. CE   11 years ago

      MLB had the best officials of any sports league in the world. Baseball games already take too long. They didn't need replay. No sport does. It's okay in football, because they have 15 minutes of action spread out over 4 hours.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Lasers. Thousands of lasers. That's the solution.

        1. PD Scott   11 years ago

          Giant disco balls in domed stadiums would make the game harder and therefore more interesting.

          1. Ted S.   11 years ago

            Play under strobe lights.

            1. PD Scott   11 years ago

              Exactly! Midnight bowling is awesome, why not try midnight baseball? Especially if you have a crappy team and need to fill seats.

        2. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

          This would make the game more interesting.

          162 5 hour games? People want to watch this?

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            Why would lasers add to the length of the game? They'd instantly provide information to the central intelligence calling the game, which would instantly issue a ruling. And robots would eject players and otherwise handle all on-field problems.

            1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

              No, I agree with you. I support the laser idea, not the current format.

            2. fish   11 years ago

              And robots would eject players...

              Physically? If a robot umpire chucks Yasiel Puig over a fence and out of the game....well that's must see TV!

              1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                Of course physically. With robot catapults. I predict brawls would end abruptly after the first such ejection.

              2. CE   11 years ago

                You wouldn't even need a robot. Just crank up the wattage on the laser, and redirect its aim.

        3. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

          It's not lasers but the goal line technology that they've implemented in the Premier League this year is entirely automated and signals almost instantly to the ref without wasting time. There is no reason for every league that can afford it not to implement that system. That includes you FIFA you corrupt fucks.

      2. DJF   11 years ago

        MLB has 14 minutes of action in four hours. Action being defined as something other then baseball players scratching themselves and spitting.

      3. John   11 years ago

        Now we can stop a 10-2 game in the middle of August between two also ran teams for ten minutes trying to figure out if the second baseman really touched the bag on that double play.

        Yeah, that will help the game so much.

    5. Restoras   11 years ago

      No one is making you watch the Red Sox/Skankee games...

      1. Winston   11 years ago

        Don't you mean Red Sux?

        1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

          Too bad for you they don't suck.

          GO SAHX!

          1. Restoras   11 years ago

            Well to be fair they might suck now but we won't know until after...the Red Sox get their 2013 World Series rings!!! That season will keep me me warm all winter.

  20. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    Guess what the Norwegian government will try to regulate?

    Remember - I'm not foreskin you to click this link. So before you get angry, here's a tip: don't get all snippy with me, or make cutting remarks. I'm just trying to pour some mohel on troubled waters.

    http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-Wo.....ion-331634

    1. Archduke von Pantsfan   11 years ago

      it's about deep dish pizza, isn't it?

    2. hamilton   11 years ago

      Government is always looking to take its cut.

    3. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      It's worth clicking on the link just to see the baby with his hands up by his head in a "oh fuck, this is gonna suck" pose.

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

        Or after further thought, I feel bad for the kid.

    4. Juice   11 years ago

      Good on them.

  21. Archduke von Pantsfan   11 years ago

    and my axe!

  22. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

    Jean-Claude Van Damme proves that if you're ever going to perform an epic split between two Volvo trucks you should do it to an Enya anthem.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      YouTube tells me Chuck Norris was driving.

      Both trucks.

  23. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    HOPE-A-DOPE IS ON THE ROPES.

  24. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    A bill in the Scottish parliament would allow supposedly terminally ill patients to off themselves with a physician-prescribed poison, and finish themselves off with the aid of "licensed facilitators." The British Medical Association opposes the bill, which would put doctors in the role of killers.

    http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/ne.....oU5tCf9ypo

    1. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

      You should stick to the child euthanasia stuff which at least brings up the issue of consent.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

        The issue of professional ethics is another issue. It's one thing to leave suicide to the adults concerned, and their "facilitators," but it's another thing to grant a role in the killing process to physicians. There should be a firewall between these two functions.

        Most physicians already have that rule re executions. Even if you're fan of the death penalty, that doesn't mean Dr. Welby should be doing it.

        1. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

          That's for individual doctors not me to decide.

          1. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

            Would you want to have a doctor who is accustomed to killing people?

            1. PD Scott   11 years ago

              Like this guy?

            2. playa manhattan   11 years ago

              If I were terminally ill and wanted to die, then yes, that is exactly the kind of doctor I would want to have.

      2. Boisfeuras   11 years ago

        I think granting the power to kill to doctors in a socialist healthcare system is a pretty obvious and huge moral hazard, regardless of one's position on euthanasia.

  25. Coeus   11 years ago

    Marcotte rides again:

    In a sense, it's just another example of the hard right tendency to assume that you're not a real American if you don't belong to the 30-ish percent that holds, as Rick Perlstein puts it, the belief that liberalism is "the ideology that steals from hard-working, taxpaying whites and gives the spoils to indolent, grasping blacks" and that they're here to save America from the supposed dangers of, to be blunt, democracy.

    Not that you need to bother, since Rafael Cruz is pretty blunt about his racism:

    Evangelical pastor Rafael Cruz, father of tea party star Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), called black and Hispanic voters "uninformed" and "deceived" during a speech to conservative activists in February.
    After attending a panel on minority outreach at the FreedomWorks grassroots summit, Cruz, a Cuban-American, born-again Christian, spoke at the conference. He noted that a previous speaker "mentioned something about Hispanics being uninformed or deceived."
    "Well, the same thing is true of the black population," Cruz said.

    I'm wondering how she manages to reconcile those two thoughts.

    1. Fatty Bolger   11 years ago

      Must be one of those white Hispanics.

    2. John   11 years ago

      And I wonder if she realizes that the idea of people being deceived and voting against their real interests is pretty much one of the left's most sacred ideas.

      1. PD Scott   11 years ago

        That's only if they vote differently than what the Left thinks is the correct way. The Left believes they never deceive anyone and their motives are pure as the driven snow.

      2. Coeus   11 years ago

        exactly. That's what the first example is about.

  26. Fatty Bolger   11 years ago

    EU Regulations: "Dictatorship of the Bureaucrats"?

    The European Union has quietly approved a ban on large vacuum cleaners in an effort to "re-educate" spendthrift citizens who consume too much energy.

    European bureaucrats have also imposed bans or restrictions on thousands of other consumer products, including bananas, clothes dryers, cosmetics, cucumbers, fruit jam, laptop computers, laundry detergents, light bulbs, olive oil, plastic bags, refrigerators, showerheads, television sets, tobacco, toilets, toys, urinals and wine cooling cabinets.

    The most recent ban?approved by the European Parliament on October 8?involves chocolate candy cigarettes because they "appeal to minors and consequently form a potential gateway to using tobacco products."

    The European Union and its supporters say the bans are necessary to improve the energy efficiency, environmental friendliness and health standards of the 28-member bloc.

    But critics say the seemingly endless number of bans, prohibitions, restrictions, regulations and edicts being enacted by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels?many of which are being justified by eco-related concerns?smacks of paternalism. They claim it is over-regulation, and an unacceptable intrusion into the private lives of 500 million EU citizens, who should be allowed to make their own decisions.

    1. Hillary's Clitdong   11 years ago

      The E.U. government is going to be like the U.S. federal government, only this time every constituent state is already further to the left than California.

    2. paranoid android   11 years ago

      But critics say the seemingly endless number of bans, prohibitions, restrictions, regulations and edicts being enacted by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels?many of which are being justified by eco-related concerns?smacks of paternalism.

      You don't fucking say.

    3. Bobarian   11 years ago

      " bananas, cucumbers, laptop computers, showerheads, toys, olive oil, television sets, fruit jam, urinals and wine cooling cabinets..."

      THINGS PEOPLE USE TO MASTURBATE!!?!

      1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

        You left out clothes dryers, and those are definitely masturbatory aids for the gals.

        1. Bobarian   11 years ago

          Now that I'm reviewing, I also left out plastic bags to go with the olive oil.

          Oh, and never forget large vacuums...

          Mom started hiding the vacuum after she came home early once.

      2. playa manhattan   11 years ago

        What about sheep?

        1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

          I don't think the Scots are beholden to EU regulatory bans are they?

      3. playa manhattan   11 years ago

        *raises hand*

        Can someone explain the fruit jam and wine cabinet to me? It's, uh, for a friend...

      4. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

        Urinals? Really?

    4. OldMexican   11 years ago

      But critics say the seemingly endless number of bans, prohibitions, restrictions, regulations and edicts being enacted by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels ? many of which are being justified by eco-related concerns ? smacks of paternalism.

      Oh, those European critics are always so proper and polite. I would have said that the endless number of prohibitions, regulations and rules by unelected bureaucrats smacks of fucking fascism.

  27. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Today near Denver, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will do something it says it has never done before: destroy six tons of ivory to highlight a booming illegal trade contributing to the slaughter of tens of thousands of elephants every year.

    By reducing the supply of ivory, they will render all remaining ivory valueless!

    1. db   11 years ago

      It's not libertarians' fault that we are so often reduced to the caricature of the Libertarian Econ 101 Facepalm.

  28. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    Washington State Insurance Commissioner: "In the interest of keeping the consumer protections we have enacted and ensuring that we keep health insurance costs down for all consumers, we are staying the course...We will not be allowing insurance companies to extend their policies. I believe this is in the best interest of the health insurance market in Washington."

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....y-started/

  29. Coeus   11 years ago

    The mask continues to slip:

    Lots of proggies in the comments talking about how great McCain is. Can we just split into statist and freedom parties already and get this over with?

    1. Winston   11 years ago

      I didn't know McCain ran Reason.

    2. Somalian Road Corporation   11 years ago

      One of the worst aspects of McCain's senatorial career (for me, at least) is listening to all the fucking party-line Republicans around here defend his worthless Vietnamese ace ass. I try pointing out that change his party affiliation and state of residence and nobody would blink, but, nooooo...

      Sometimes I get a laugh when I say that Barry Goldwater's corpse would do a far better job than McCain could ever dream of, though.

      1. Corning   11 years ago

        That is not fair. McCain's corpse could do a far better job then McCain can.

    3. SweatingGin   11 years ago

      "Can we just split into statist and freedom parties already and get this over with?"

      I used to be all about that... but there'd be like 5% in the Freedom Party. They'd have us into camps about 10 minutes later.

      1. Coeus   11 years ago

        More like 30 percent. With most of the guns.

  30. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Miss Universe says transgender women shouldn't be allowed to compete with natural women

    The newly crowned Miss Universe seems to think transgender beauty queens don't have a rightful place in the Miss Universe pageant.
    [...]
    "Do you think that transgender people should be able to compete in international pageants?" HuffPost Live host Ahmed Shihab-Eldin asked.

    "They should have their own pageant, I think, and maybe they can realize in this pageant, Miss Universe, or the other pageants [were] made for women," she said. "They are... they have the opportunity, but I think that they have to compete with the same... the same team. Right?"

    So, she thinks transgender beauty queens should be able to compete, but only in certain pageants.

    When further pressed about whether a transgender participant should be disqualified, Isler joked: "It's not my decision. I would like to have the power to make all of the decisions. But, as a human being, you have to [have the opportunity] to realize... to make your dreams come true."

    What's the word? Cis-privilege?

    1. paranoid android   11 years ago

      Better question: do the transgender girls really want to compete with the naturals? I can't see that ending in a self-esteem boost for the Ts in the vast majority of cases.

      1. Damned Fool   11 years ago

        That was my first thought.

        "Wow, what a firm jaw she has."

        1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

          I'll just leave this here.

          1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

            Appropriate

          2. Corning   11 years ago

            Why is this show less then the sum of its parts?

            So many good jokes and skits yet as a whole is just kind of bleh.

      2. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

        And if one does legitimately win (with no pc bonus) then more power to her.

        1. paranoid android   11 years ago

          Oh, for sure. Maybe one already has won and we just don't know!

          Though I wonder, do any of these pageants have rules about how much plastic surgery a contestant can have?

          1. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

            That would be a legitimate reason to say no. Still, it's not like these women are presenting their "natural" selves whether they've had plastic surgery or not.

          2. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

            Some quick googling shows that there are no restrictions on cosmetic surgery. I don't really understand what would be "unfair" about it considering a transgender woman would almost certainly be starting at a disadvantage.

    2. Winston   11 years ago

      Where's Scott Shackford on Beauty Pageant Equality?

    3. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

      The question is whether a trans guy feels like a natural woman.

  31. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    President of National Association of Insurance Commissioners:

    "[We] ware concerned by the President's announcement today that the federal government would use its "enforcement discretion" to delay enforcement of the ACA's market reforms in 2014 for plans that are currently in effect. This decision continues different rules for different policies and threatens to undermine the new market, and may lead to higher premiums and market disruptions in 2014 and beyond.

    "In addition, it is unclear how, as a practical matter, the changes proposed today by the President can be put into effect. In many states, cancellation notices have already gone out to policyholders and rates and plans have already been approved for 2014. Changing the rules through administrative action at this late date creates uncertainty and may not address the underlying issues. We look forward to learning more details of this policy change and about how the administration proposes that regulators and insurers make this work for all consumers."

    1. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

      http://washingtonexaminer.com/.....le/2539180

  32. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Introducing the Wine Bra: Smuggle booze and get bigger boobs!

    Drinks at shows are super overpriced. And most venues don't bother to stock the good stuff -- they rarely have that lovely Argentine Malbec we're craving. What to do?
    Enter the Wine Rack. It's basically like a flask mixed with a Wonderbra. It holds a full bottle of wine -- or the equivalent of two bottles of beer or twenty shots. It comes with a straw and it's supposedly very discreet, even as it increases your chest by two cup sizes.

    Something to get the wife or girlfriend for Christmas.

  33. Damned Fool   11 years ago

    So I was on the Order of the Stick forums following the latest update (yeah, I know, Internet forums, but I don't play D&D so I need other people's rules knowledge for insight). Anyway, I found this little gem in someone's signature. Apparently classical liberalism is chaotic neutral and we here are straight up chaotic evil but socialists are lawful good and our commie friends come in at a respectable lawful neutral.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Leftists will pretty much ruin anything.

    2. hamilton   11 years ago

      Well, fuck, now I have to switch over to worshiping Demogorgon and get rid of my +5 Holy Avenger.

      1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

        Worshiping Lloth is more my style, but if we are fighting against the lawful good Angels of Socialism, no matter our chaote nature, the alliance will be strong, as it is built of Hate itself.

        Yeah, the system with the highest body count is merely lawful neutral. That's some great historical perspective you got their kid.

    3. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

      If I remember correctly from The Fifth Element, supporting Broken Windows policies makes one chaotic evil, no?

    4. Somalian Road Corporation   11 years ago

      That reminds me of another stupid snarky image that was all over Facebook and whatnot during the 2012 election. Eventually it got reposted by somebody that I knew should know better and I responded: "Robb Stark doesn't torture people. Obama does."

      Unfortunately it profited nobody because enlightened self-described progressives only care about such things when they can be used as a wedge issue against their enemies, and the Right People are in charge now.

      1. Gray Ghost   11 years ago

        "Robb Stark doesn't torture people. Obama does."

        Awesome. I never think of comebacks like that when I need to.

    5. Andrew S.   11 years ago

      Wait, Nazis are lawful evil and we're chaotic evil?

      I mean, at worst we're lawful evil. I'd probably go with chaotic neutral.

      1. paranoid android   11 years ago

        Aren't chaotic neutrals capricious jerks who will backstab anyone and everyone for the hell of it? I think Chaotic Good fits the best by far. Neutrals tend to be more ends-justify-the-means-y.

        1. Damned Fool   11 years ago

          CN means indifference to rules and group opinion, and that you do what you want within whatever limited moral code you possess. Think Jack Sparrow: dishonest as fuck, but doesn't kill if he thinks he can avoid it and likes to talk his way out of situations rather than fight. Also, in a deleted scene explaining his origin in the third Pirates movie, he apparently started his career by freeing some slaves he was supposed to transport. CNs may have moral constraints but they're not likely to go out of their way to help you out like a CG would.

          1. John   11 years ago

            Pirates could be either CN or CE depending on how nasty they actually are.

      2. Damned Fool   11 years ago

        I'd say the ancaps are CN and the minarchists and constitutionalists are TN. The stronger constitutionalists (follow for its own sake) may be LN.

        BTW, can anyone read the ones with the American flag or the rose? I can't make it out.

        1. John   11 years ago

          I would say

          Lawful Good - Theocrats
          Lawful Neutral - Some form of Pagans
          Lawful Evil - Communists

          Neutral Good - Classical Liberals
          Neutral - Objectivists
          Neutral Evil - Nazis

          Chaotic Good - Libertarians
          Chaotic Neutral - Ancaps
          Chaotic Evil - Cult leaders or smaller Pagan sexts?

          1. Irish   11 years ago

            Lawful Good - Theocrats

            Uh...I think the "witches" that got burned at Salem and the people currently living in Saudi Arabia might disagree with you here, John.

            1. Corning   11 years ago

              Actually witches are chaotic evil. It is ok for lawful good people to burn chaotic evil witches.

              Saudi Arabia is a weird one. In the Forgotten Realms packs Zakhara, which most resemble Arabia, the theocracy worship Demons which are Chaotic Evil. No idea why.

    6. Andrew S.   11 years ago

      Or maybe chaotic good.

    7. Corning   11 years ago

      Classical liberalism would be Chaotic good.

      Libertarians are also chaotic good.

      Epi is chaotic evil.

      Socialists and communists can be as individuals lawful good lawful evil and lawful neutral.

      All socialist and communist governments are lawful evil.

      His big mistake is that if classical liberals and libertarians are not good then who the fuck can be chaotic good?

      Also obviously the Joker would be chaotic evil...the joker is no libertarian.

      Anyway the alignment system in D&D is fucked anyway. Great white sharks are Chaotic evil when they should just be neutral just like any natural non-sentient creature.

      The main point of all this is that epi is evil and everyone should know that.

      1. hamilton   11 years ago

        Epi is an Otyugh.

    8. Gray Ghost   11 years ago

      You're shitting me. I love that comic and read the forum for it from time to time. Which clown there thought that ridiculous .gif was worth immortalizing?

    9. Coeus   11 years ago

      I would consider myself chaotic good, but I'm consciously trying for chaotic neutral. No good deed goes unpunished, in my experience.

  34. waffles   11 years ago

    Looks like Mister Harding doesn't give a fuck.

  35. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Female flash mob descends on Katz's Deli to recreate orgasm scene

    I'll have what they're having.

  36. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

    Teacher suggests threesome with students

    A female teacher, who suggested a threesome with two gay male students, has been charged with serious misconduct.[...]

    The teacher, whose name was suppressed, invited a family friend's son to board with her, after she split from her husband.

    The boarder, who she knew was going to be a year 13 student at the school where she taught, moved in with her in 2010 before the school year started.

    They communicated over Skype and text messaging, when she said things such as: "Oh I love you and care about you, and I'll see you after school".

    After he moved in, she said she hugged and kissed him frequently.[...]

    Because the only television in the house was in her room, the whole family would often watch from her bed.

    On one occasion, her boarder and his boyfriend were watching television, and she made a comment about the three of them engaging in a threesome.

    Again, she said this was a result of her was treating him as her own child, and there was nothing romantic or sexual involved.[...]

    "I would like to continue teaching," she said.

    "My CV, ERO reports and appraisals show that I am a highly-effective classroom practitioner."

    She said she had a great depth of knowledge and skill to contribute to the education sector.

    Somebody tell me this is satire...

    1. Damned Fool   11 years ago

      On one occasion, her boarder and his boyfriend were watching television, and she made a comment about the three of them engaging in a threesome.

      Again, she said this was a result of her was treating him as her own child

      Um...
      Yeah...
      About that...

    2. paranoid android   11 years ago

      On one occasion, her boarder and his boyfriend were watching television, and she made a comment about the three of them engaging in a threesome.

      Again, she said this was a result of her was treating him as her own child, and there was nothing romantic or sexual involved.

      Yeah, you know, something about the juxtaposition of these two sentences strikes me as a bit off...

    3. Killazontherun   11 years ago

      I am stymied for something half clever and full witted to say. Thought up several approaches, they all fell short. Good job, Jesse, because in the immortal words of Nikki, I just can't even . . .

    4. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Sounds more like frivolous misconduct to me.

      1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

        I think you're right. As bizarre as that situation and her rationale is, I wouldn't throw the book at her without other extenuating circumstances.

  37. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    NPR says the Republicans are relieved to have this health-care rollout disaster to take the public's attention away from the horror of the Shutdownpocalypse.

    Hopefully, the public will take another look at this shutdown - maybe delaying Ocare wasn't such a bad idea after all.

    1. John   11 years ago

      In other news, Admiral Nimitz relieved to have Midway take the public's attention off of Pearle Harbor.

      1. Bobarian   11 years ago

        I think it's more like members of the 101st being happy to see lead elements of the 4th AD at Bastogne.

        1. Restoras   11 years ago

          I think the 101st was just wondering what took those fuckers so long to show up...

  38. John   11 years ago

    http://www.sfgate.com/business.....977288.php

    The insanity of the ethanol mandate.

    1. Winston   11 years ago

      Tom Friedman will be happy.

    2. Winston   11 years ago

      Isn't a prog environmentalist a contradiction in terms? Of course considering their idea of "progress"...

      1. John   11 years ago

        They are just insane.

    3. BigT   11 years ago

      More where that came from.

      The failure so far of cellulosic fuel is central to the debate over corn-based ethanol, a centerpiece of America's green-energy strategy. Ethanol from corn has proven far more damaging to the environment than the government predicted, and cellulosic fuel hasn't emerged as a replacement.

      "A lot of people were willing to go with corn ethanol because it's a bridge product," said Silvia Secchi, an agricultural economist at Southern Illinois University.

      But until significant cellulosic fuel materializes, she said, "It's a bridge to nowhere."

  39. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    Even NPR is covering the way insurance companies were whipsawed and how doing a 180 is not necessarily feasible.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Again, the simple story wins. The simple story is the law still makes those things illegal. The complex story is "yeah but Obama really won't enforce that law, for now".

      I think this actually will make things worse for Congressional Dems.

  40. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    Debbie Whatshername Schlitz says it was always the Dems' intention to let people keep their policies.

    1. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

      Whoa, the NPR interviewer is really pressing DWS on this.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

        So Obama myzled us when he said what he really meant was "if I like your policy, you can keep it"?

      2. #   11 years ago

        How so?

        1. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

          Like, are democrats still going to run on ocare?

  41. John   11 years ago

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....ocall.html

    Have some Jennifer Lawrence side boob. I hate the bob hair cut. But man does she have a rack.

    1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

      She's pretty and has a nice body, I don't know why some people give her shit for it.

      I like short hair on girls but I'mm not sure if the bob works for her.

      1. John   11 years ago

        I like short hair too. But it doesn't work. And she is adorable and has a great body. I don't get the hate directed at her. She is five times as hot as Emma Watson.

      2. OldMexican   11 years ago

        Re: The Rt. Hob.Serious Man, Visc.

        I like short hair on girls but I'mm not sure if the bob works for her.

        No, it doesn't. She looks like a soccer mom. She looks old. Her long locks is what made me feel like a dirty old man when looking at her, but now I just feel like I'm at the park with my kids looking at some other kid's mom.

        1. John   11 years ago

          but now I just feel like I'm at the park with my kids looking at some other kid's mom

          You say that like it is a bad thing.

          1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

            How does the saying go? 8 to 80, blind, crippled, or crazy . . .

            Not all that picky, I like the milfs strolling the park every bit as much as the homecoming queen.

      3. Corning   11 years ago

        I don't know why some people give her shit for it.

        Ren?e Zellweger is getting old and Hollywood needed a replacement.

    2. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      The bob cut reminds you of your pedo-boy fixation.

      1. John   11 years ago

        yeah sure it does. God you are a weirdo.

        1. Weigel's Cock Ring   11 years ago

          It was a long, long day for us on JournoList Junior trying to stratege around our Obamessiah's freefall from grace with our buddies Krugie, Ezra, and Sadbeard.

          As you can tell, we haven't come up with anything intelligent to say yet.

    3. Killazontherun   11 years ago

      Still cute, but why do women do that?!?! Most men have no love for short hair as only exceptionally symmetrical beauties like Morena Baccarin can really pull it off but merely politely tolerate it.

    4. Killazontherun   11 years ago

      From the comments:

      saddenedbytheworld, Sidmouth, 1 hour ago

      Definitely NOT flattering - side boobs always look droopy.

      What's wrong with people? Rejecting the wonder of side boob is just fucking un-American.

      1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

        When he hears the joyful chirp of baby chicks he would rather hear the crunch of their bones when he smashes them.

        1. John   11 years ago

          Even a monster like Warty wouldn't reject side boob.

      2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

        It's a UK paper, so...

        1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

          Un-American in the universal sense. Sheesh, I thought you guys were too smart to need something so obvious explained to you.

      3. Warty   11 years ago

        Are women ever able to tell what looks good? Sideboob not flattering. Hah.

      4. Corning   11 years ago

        What's wrong with people?

        There is no filter on the comments, Women and gay men comment as well...

        Nothing wrong with them...they just do see with the same eyes straight men do.

        1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

          Gay guys I know find women attractive, as do other women, given they are called the fairer sex for a good reason, gays and straight women just don't want to fuck them.

          1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

            Like the co-worker who was stuck being my chaperone at a titty bar one evening when I asked him, 'you liked that?'

            'I'm Gay, I'm not dead.'

          2. Corning   11 years ago

            gays and straight women just don't want to fuck them.

            I contend that there is a vast chasm between finding someone platonicly attractive and wanting to fuck them.

            It is more then a "just" difference.

            1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

              You are looking for something carved in stone. Humans aren't that deep, 'just' is the tenuous situation of all flesh.

  42. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Capitalism: Spirit Airlines offers low-fare to Toronto and no they aren't smoking crack to offer such a bargain!

    For many of us, this is an outlandish story. (Though as Clinton Yates pointed out, news of a crack-smoking mayor doesn't entertain everyone.) But for Spirit Airlines, this news is a chance to offer a topical promotion for cheap flights.
    Visitors to the airline's Web site Thursday were greeted with a short animated video displaying the words "WE'RE NOT SMOKING CRACK" alongside a promotion offering discounted flights to the Toronto area*. (The video also included the words "THIS FARE SALE IS REAL.")

    Update: As my colleague Caitlin Dewey points out, the promotion says flights are "to the Toronto area (Niagara Falls Airport)" and other spots. But the Niagara Falls Airport is actually near Buffalo, N.Y., about 88 miles from downtown Toronto. So while the deals may be using Toronto as the hook to get attention (which clearly worked, as this post exists), these flights won't actually deliver you to Toronto.

    The same airline also had an Incognito joke in an advertisement.

    1. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

      "Our marketing dept doesn't smoke crack...only our pilots do that"

  43. Coeus   11 years ago

    Feminist once again takes men's money for granted.

    Too long to summarize, but amazingly, there are dissenters in the comments.

    1. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

      Prudence lives up to her name.

      If I was ingo divorce, id tell the silly eoman to leave her husband for a hard working landscaper and find true happiness, while her former husband has to settle for some young coed. That should teach him!

    2. OldMexican   11 years ago

      he spends the week dicking around (gym, squash, books, movies, etc.). It's making me crazy with resentment, especially when I come home from a hard day at work. He tells me I should just quit if I don't like it, and that I shouldn't worry about being dependent because he's set up a trust fund for me and our son.

      Oh, great. Besides being a bum, he's a rich bum who keeps himself fit for his woman. Double whammy. Awful.

    3. Thane is a cosmotarian!   11 years ago

      This doesn't change even if the spouse working 60 hours doesn't necessarily have to but is doing it because ze is trying to get promoted or is working on a work assignment ze really loves.

  44. OldMexican   11 years ago

    From the 24/7 News links, so no hat tip:

    "Colorado Regulators Trying to Determine Marijuana Prices"

    Colorado regulators have begun surveying marijuana businesses about the price of pot, in an effort to implement a new excise tax that voters passed earlier this month.

    The tax places a 15 percent levy on the wholesale price of recreational marijuana when it moves between the grower and the seller.

    The challenge, though, is that Colorado's forthcoming recreational marijuana industry won't have a true wholesale market for at least the first nine months. Instead, marijuana businesses must initially grow almost everything they sell ? meaning the wholesale transactions that will be subject to the excise tax are really just pot transfers between two parts of the same business in which no money is exchanged.

    The fact that both Coloradoans and the regulators they enable are CLUELESS about markets makes for some very entertaining comedy. So they want to tax a wholesale market that doesn't exist yet because there's still very little capital investment, with no concern for the negative incentive for investment that such a tax creates. Talk about killing the goose that hasn't even laid a single golden egg YET.

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      I'm pretty sure the black market is not about to disappear where weed is 'legalized'.

    2. Restoras   11 years ago

      Colorado is a good example of what happens when progtards leave a place they've ruined and start to ruin another place. Same can probably be said of New Hampshire.

  45. Eduard van Haalen   11 years ago

    CBS didn't invite Dan Rather to its JFK assassination 50th anniversary memorial. I don't understand - Rather was famous for covering that story. It's almost as if CBS is embarrassed by him for some reason and wants to avoid associating with him!

    http://www.nationalreview.com/.....ling-beard

    1. paranoid android   11 years ago

      I've always found it so bizarre that in contrast to virtually all other famous leaders, who are typically honored on their respective birthdays (at least in America, I imagine it is also the case most other places), JFK only gets talked about on the anniversary of his death.

      1. Restoras   11 years ago

        It lets the traumatized boomers relive the tragedy and their loss of innocence. Yes, they are that dickish.

  46. Coeus   11 years ago

    Black face paint. A poll:

    What do Americans think about dressing in blackface or as a racial stereotype for halloween? A YouGov survey shows that a plurality of Americans narrowly believe it's acceptable to dress in blackface by a 43-37 margin, and are split on dressing as a racial stereotype. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the racial and partisan divides are stark.

  47. db   11 years ago

    The Obamacare "fix" is going to fail. It basically consists of the Administration saying it will withhold prosecution of anyone selling a plan that is illegal under tge new law if it was legal under the old law. "Just trust us." Any lawyer for an insurance company who doesn't advise his client to run screaming for the exits at that prospect needs to have his head examined.

    I'm sure "the President said we could do it" is an affirmative defense nowadays. /eyeroll

    1. Restoras   11 years ago

      Given the capricious and arbitrary nature of this particular King's reign, you'd be crazy to beleive him. Best to wait it out.

      Also, didn't we kick the Brits out in part because of arbitrary and capricious authoritarian rule?

  48. Coeus   11 years ago

    The rending of garments and the knashing of teeth in the fark comments about Obama's announcement is epic. Go forth, and find your favorite.

    1. Coeus   11 years ago

      skozlaw
      2013-11-14 01:32:31 PM
      This is so farking stupid. A couple million people, some unknown number of whom are getting better deals now anyway and won't keep their shiatty plan even if they can, couldn't be assed in three and a half years to make any attempt to understand the basics of the law or even call their insurer to check on their plan's status to make it sure it qualifies... so now we have to kowtow to them with bullshiat exceptions.

      Farkin' A....

      sabreWulf07
      2013-11-14 01:32:51 PM
      dead: You mean people actually making decisions for themselves? We can't have that!

      It's 1955 and you're headed to the grocery store, you get to make a decision for yourself: apples or oranges?

      Which one did you go with? Apples? Good for you! You made your own choice as an informed consumer and engaged in private commerce without government getting between you, the grocer and the orchard owner.

      The apples are dripping in DDT of course, but you made that decision all by yourself, didn't you? You don't need government for anything!

    2. Coeus   11 years ago

      SpectroBoy
      2013-11-14 01:39:30 PM

      That is in fact the decision here.

      Under insured people who are "making decisions for themselves" are basically making the decision that they will simply freeload from the rest of us if they get seriously ill.

      I suppose a burglar who break in to your house is also someone "making a decision for himself", but it is illegal.

    3. Killazontherun   11 years ago


      dj_bigbird: How can he do this? I thought the ACA was passed by Congress and signed into law by him. How can the President arbitrarily change a law because he doesn't like it?

      Depending on who you listen to, Obama did it all himself and it a complete dictator

      you know, on the days he's not a stuffed-suit know-nothing.

      Idiot thinks there is a contradiction between someone being a stuff suit know nothing and a dictator. Did a decade of Hugo Chavez teach these people anything?

    4. Coeus   11 years ago

      whidbey: Listen, assholes. Drop this farking attack on the President. He is not God, and it's not going to kill you to get a plan that's in like with the ACA. God this farking country is full of petty whiners.

      sabreWulf07: 1derful: Requiring a woman who are post-menopausal to pay for maternity coverage was a shiatty idea.

      I feel the exact same way about having a policy that covers insulin. I don't need that shiat and frankly diabetes is a lifestyle choice that I don't approve of.

      And my favorite so far:

      asquian [TotalFark]
      2013-11-14 02:06:10 PM
      Wow. A politician admitting responsibility, and negotiating to fix a problem. I can see why so many people are losing their minds, after years of publicized GOP and TP instanity, no one knows how to cope with someone who's willing to actually take responsibility.

      1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

        Wait, wait, I got one better --

        Chewb1zz
        2013-11-14 01:22:23 PM

        cameroncrazy1984: My only question is how can this be possible? The insurance companies already dropped the noncompliant policies.

        Like I mentioned in a previous thread, this now puts it on the insurance companies. They can reinstate the plans, which will cost them money. Or they can keep them in the canceled pile, admitting that they canceled the plans not because of ACA but because they wanted more money. Can't have it both ways cause it's now definitely not ACA's fault they were canceled.

        Not Obama's fault people look after their own interest first. They had three years to reform themselves and learn to the serve the public instead of seeking profits. Now Obama has put the onerous of burden on them to live up to his high standards, and if they don't the people will see right through them.

        Where is the central casting these people come out of?

        1. Irish   11 years ago

          Now Obama has put the onerous of burden on them to live up to his high standards, and if they don't the people will see right through them.

          'Onerous of burden' is a phrase that makes no sense. 'Onerous' means overly burdensome. So he's basically saying 'Obama has put the overly burdensome of burden on them.'

          If he replaced the entire three word phrase with 'onus' it would make sense. As it stands now, I'm not entirely sure what he's trying to say.

          People should really learn the words they're trying to use before they show off and end up looking like pretentious assholes.

          1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

            Agreed. It's a redundant phrase that bugs the crap out of me too.

  49. Killazontherun   11 years ago

    And, why are those people having a problem spelling 'shit'? It's not 'shiat' or, even 'shite' which is alright in context, but 'shit'.

    1. Coeus   11 years ago

      fark auto-filter

      1. Killazontherun   11 years ago

        They ban 'shit'? Holy crap, what kind of pussy would post at a site that bans the most representational word of the English language?

  50. JidaKida   11 years ago

    Rol lthat beautiful bean footage dude.

    http://www.Privacy-Web.tk

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 4:57 PM

Is Shiloh Hendrix Really the End of Cancel Culture?

Robby Soave | 5.8.2025 4:10 PM

Good Riddance to Ed Martin, Trump's Failed Pick for U.S. Attorney for D.C.

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.8.2025 3:55 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Already Raising Car Prices and Hurting Automakers

Joe Lancaster | 5.8.2025 2:35 PM

Trump's Antitrust Enforcer Says 'Big Is Bad'

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 2:19 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!

Notifications