OPCW Destroys Syrian Chemical Weapons Equipment, Still No Sign War Will End Soon


The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which won the Nobel Peace Prize earlier this month, has said that Syria's declared chemical weapons equipment has been destroyed ahead of schedule.
Although the equipment used for producing and filling chemical weapons has been destroyed, the weapons themselves remain intact but have been placed under a seal. The Assad regime has until mid-2014 to destroy the weapons.
According to the BBC, there are two main way chemical weapons can be destroyed, by either incinerating them or by adding water and "a product like caustic soda" to the weapons' toxic chemicals, thereby neutralizing them. A graphic from the BBC illustrating this process is below:

The OPCW deserves praise for completing their goal of destroying Syria's chemical weapons equipment ahead of schedule in what must be a difficult and dangerous situation. However, while there is certainly progress being made in having Syria's chemical weapons destroyed there are no signs that the war in Syria is going to be ending anytime soon.
The anticipated Geneva 2 peace conference is facing delay thanks to differences between the U.S. and Russia concerning rebel representation. Time reported yesterday that neither Assad nor opposition leaders have agreed to attend the conference. The diversity of Assad's opposition means that even if rebel representatives do attend Geneva 2 under conditions agreed to by the U.S. and Russia there will remain many rebels who will reject whatever diplomatic proposals the talks produce.
This diplomatic mess comes amid news of more violent spillover into Lebanon, a confirmed polio outbreak in northeastern Syria, and starvation being used as a tactic by Assad's forces. As happy as some may be that the OPCW has destroyed Syria's declared chemical weapons equipment the fact remains that chemical weapons are responsible for a small fraction of the casualties in the war in Syria and the OPCW's mission will not significantly change the horrific levels of barbarism seen in that war-torn country.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The OPCW deserves praise for completing their goal of destroying Syria's chemical weapons equipment
You can't possibly believe that Syria's chemical weapons equipment has been destroyed.
Some of it, sure. All of it, as claimed? No friggin' way.
Notice they are saying equipment, not the chemicals themselves.
Yeah, this is some of the most laughable B.S. I've ever seen.
The notion that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (whoever the fuck they are) really has any idea of what's going on in Syria just obliterates every boundary of credulity.
The qualifier I heard was "declared" chemical weapons equipment.
What RC said. I don't even think they got rid of all of the production equipment this fast, never mind all of the BM-21 rockets filled with GB you know they've got to have stashed somewhere... IIRC it took the U.S. nearly a decade to get rid of its CW stockpile, and we're still not finished yet.
The Assad regime has until mid-2014 to destroy the weapons.
Such destruction can only mean one thing: Economic boom! (That's right, I said boom.)
Maybe we can get them to do the US chemical weapons destruction. We had been burning them and got rid of most but some sites with the help of some politicians wanted a different way so they are spending billions developing a way to chemically inert the weapons instead of burning them.
This also means we are in violation of the chemical weapons ban since we were suppose to have destroyed it all a couple of years ago. And probably would have if we had used the proven burning method rather then coming up with a new way to do it.
Still No Sign War Will End Soon
As long as they're killing people in the acceptable ways, everything's ok.
They'll just send the rest to Israel for disposal using rockets for quickest possible delivery.