Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Graham Threatens To Block Obama Nominees, Texas Abortion Restrictions Ruled Unconstitutional, Shaq Endorses Christie: P.M. Links

Matthew Feeney | 10.28.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Secretary of Defense / Foter.com / CC BY
(Secretary of Defense / Foter.com / CC BY)
Credit: United States Senate/wikimedia
  • Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says that he will block votes on all of President Obama's latest nominees until the Obama administration releases more information about survivors of last year's attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
  • Ohio will be switching one of the drugs it uses for executions after the European manufacturer of pentobarbital banned the sale of the drug for use in executions.
  • Israel plans to release 26 Palestinian prisoners later this week.
  • President Obama has said that we can trust the new FBI director to balance law enforcement and civil liberties. 
  • A federal judge has ruled that new abortion restrictions passed by Texan lawmakers are unconstitutional.
  • Shaquille O'Neal has endorsed New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.
  • Penn State will pay $59.7 million to 26 young men sexually abused by former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. 

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Teacher in India Suspended For Having Specially-Abled Student Give Her Foot Massage

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (287)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says that he will block votes on all of President Obama's latest nominees until...

    I take it Lindsey's up for re-election.

    1. Hyperion   12 years ago

      He's gonna get primaried and OH BOY IS THIS GONNA BE GOOD!

    2. Almanian!   12 years ago

      This is so very brave of Senator Shitstain.

      What a cocksucker. Hope he gets primaried, the useless fuck.

      1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

        Watch out for the deals he makes between the moment he gets primaried and the one where he steps down. Guarantee you, we will all get fucked over due to his butthurt spite.

      2. Tonio   12 years ago

        Could you please stop using c********* as an insult?

        1. Almanian!   12 years ago

          crabapple? corndogger? That's not what I said - I'm confused.

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            He makes a good point though. Can you think of anyone who deserves more plaudits than givers of oral sex? Make today a hug a cocksucker or cunning linguist day.

            1. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

              or cunning linguist day.

              I'm not hugging HM no matter how much gets offered.

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                I'm sure he'll be deeply disappointed. Hug a cunning linguist day is his favorite holiday.

                1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

                  But the hug is very awkward.

              2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                The Black man handshake plus hug with three slaps on the back is acceptable.

                1. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

                  Oh, hell, that's no problem, then. What's the calendar date again?

        2. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

          Seriously? Need some aloe for that butthurt? It's a word.

          1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbZhpf3sQxQ

          2. Tonio   12 years ago

            Seriously. I made a simple request. I don't see where that constitutes butt-hurt.

        3. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          This is why there are no gay libertarians.

        4. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

          In the case of Senator Graham, it's just a statement of fact. He sucks cocks. Literally.

        5. Gbob   12 years ago

          I have my cock sucked daily. I even sucked a cock before. I feel like I have every right to use the word, cocksucker. It's my cocksucking word, and if you don't like it, then suck my cock.

          1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

            That's a lot of cocks!

          2. Rich   12 years ago

            "May you never have your blah blahed again!"

          3. Tonio   12 years ago

            No freebies for assholes, sorry Gbob.

      3. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        Sweargen!

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          Yes, Woo.

    3. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      Does Lindsey Graham look like E.T.?

      He certainly looks like Jerry Jones's love child.

      1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        He looks like a punchable Keebler Elf.

        1. Swiss Servator, Yodelriffic!   12 years ago

          Comment of the Day!

  2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    President Obama has said that we can trust the new FBI director to balance law enforcement and civil liberties.

    Balance, of course, using those super special top secret Obama scales.

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      90/10 is a form of balance, no?

      1. CE   12 years ago

        The Feds were never supposed to "balance" civil liberties and law enforcement. The were supposed to obey the law themselves and not violate any civil liberties in the process, and investigate counterfeiting, piracy and treason. Everything else was up to the states.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      President Obama has said that we can trust the new FBI director to balance law enforcement and civil liberties.

      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!111!1!!

      1. Entropy Void   12 years ago

        ... and you get to keep your health insurance plan and doctor, too!

    3. Gene   12 years ago

      I bet every quarter of weed he sold when he was in school was light.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        -1

    4. a better weapon   12 years ago

      He doesn't even know what the FBI is currently up to, how could he possibly know what they will be up to?

      1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

        Because Obama is a really smart guy who's super smart.

        1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

          Also, we can totally trust him!

        2. Entropy Void   12 years ago

          Toppest of all Top Men! Why, he is gonna singlehandedly fix that website that the RethugliKKKans screwed up in 30 days AND give every one in the world a cell phone!!1111!1

  3. gaijin   12 years ago

    Sort of funny. Seems like a lot of potential gold in tech error messages.

    Error 404 Bumpersticker

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      *Please note that I in no way endorse the solicitation being made.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Too late. I already donated to them on your recommendation.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Ohio will be switching one of the drugs it uses for executions after the European manufacturer of pentobarbital banned the sale of the drug for use in executions.

    Death by Huey Lewis.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      That would be some bad news

      1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

        You are walking on a thin line.

        1. Almanian!   12 years ago

          He's hot and cold

          1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

            Look, you crack me up with comments like this, but bad is bad.

        2. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

          That pun was terrible. But I guess we're stuck with you.

          1. Gray Ghost   12 years ago

            They want a new drug, that'll kill them heart and soul.

          2. gaijin   12 years ago

            I ain't perfect.

          3. CE   12 years ago

            And happy about it.

    2. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

      Bravo, Fist. Bravo.

    3. Bobarian   12 years ago

      Cruel and Unusual.

      Golf Clap!!

    4. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      You underestimate the power of love. It just might save your life!

    5. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      You Crack Me Up

    6. CE   12 years ago

      Convict: If this is it, please let me know.

  5. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

    Israel plans to release 26 Palestinian prisoners later this week.

    Can we get Jon Goldberg's opinion on this please? It REALLY matters.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      No.

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        What could go wrong with invoking the latest Jew-hating incarnation of American?

  6. Derpetologist   12 years ago

    No answer from Marcotte yet:

    http://platedlizard.blogspot.c.....e-yet.html

    OT: http://platedlizard.blogspot.c.....se-he.html

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      Thanks for the update.

      I'd meant to comment before - it's a sign of her intellectual bankruptcy that she'll only respond to critiques from well-read sources. Valid points are valid points, no matter who raises them.

    2. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

      Also, thanks for (previously) linking to a video by Karen Straughan. Her analytical abilities are impressive, even if I don't agree with every thing she says.

  7. rts   12 years ago

    We could fix our economy by giving every man, woman and child ?6,000 in cash

    QE of ?375bn amounts to around ?6,000 per man, woman and child in the UK. So why not electronically add this to the current accounts of every member of the public? Why not give the QE money directly to ordinary people to spend, save or pay off their debts?

    Futurama did it.

    Bonus misunderstanding of Friedman.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      What I don't get about these schemes is why there advocates always think so small. If 6K pounds is good, shouldn't 60,000 be great?

      1. rts   12 years ago

        If the minimum wage were $100 / hr, we'd all be rich!

      2. CE   12 years ago

        Give everyone 6 million and we can all retire.

        1. Lord at War   12 years ago

          Not enough!

          Despite the fact that I will have earned about $2.5 million during my life, I am not allowed to have an an insurance plan with a $6 million life-time limit.

  8. tarran   12 years ago

    Some of you might have suffered from the Anyclips ad in the upper right corner randomly deciding to unmute itself and play movie trailers at a loud volume.

    The incompetents and or assholes responsible for this work for Ybrant Digital marketing, (apparent motto "we put the K in Quality").

    Here is the solution to permanently get rid of it. Tell your computer to ignore any attempt to get data from the offending advertisement server:

    1) Follow the instructions in the links below to open the hosts file for editing:

    Windows
    Mac
    Linux: RTFM

    2) Enter the following snippet as the last line in the file (whitespace are tabs):

    127.0.0.1 tag.ybrant.hiro.tv

    3) Save the file.

    The benefit is, of course, that if enough people do this, Google will boot Ybrant from Reason's ad rotation (no clicks mean advertisers get fired).

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      apparent motto "we put the K in Quality"

      I laughed out loud.

      1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        That's an excellent line and is totally stolen.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I'm getting an IMG ad from "comparecards.com" that I must have gotten someplace else, since I only have cached images set to load here.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        That is, I'm getting that ad in the upper right; I'm not getting a Flash ad there.

        I'm also getting an ad from Tennis Express, but that's not surprising since I'm a tennis fan. Google knows I've visited a tennis forum recently....

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      I had put *.hiro.tv in the restricted sites in IE. I don't know if it worked or if coincidentally I stopped getting those ads in the rotation.

    4. MP   12 years ago

      AdBlock. 'nuff said.

      1. Juice   12 years ago

        I used to not care about ads but lately they've been just obnoxious and I couldn't take it anymore and finally installed Adblock a few months ago. It really is the way to go.

    5. Tonio   12 years ago

      Easier: Leave speakers muted at all times since there are many annoying things on the web.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        I listen to podcasts most of the time that I have my computer on.

  9. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Never before seen original Star Wars bloopers and outtakes

    1. font_of_stupidity   12 years ago

      Can't view from work, but I'll bet there's one in the Cantina where Han Solo shoots Greedo without Greedo getting off a single shot. How hilarious! Imagine, a trigger-happy spice runner just shooting preemptively! Ha ha ha!

    2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      It's weird seeing Peter Cushing break down laughing.

      And it must have sucked to be a stormtrooper extra

    3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      I'VE SEEN THESE BEFORE.

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        How many Bothans died to get you that footage?

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          Not enough.

  10. rts   12 years ago

    B.C. liquor law review website closes in 4 days

    The Liquor Policy Review consultation process, which launched in September, will end on Thursday.

    Dozens of people and organizations have made submissions since the website opened, including the Vancouver Canucks, who are asking for the ability to serve hard liquor at concessions.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I remember the bitching three years ago when the women's hockey team won the gold medal, and they celebrated with a huge bottle of Molson at center ice.

      1. Almanian!   12 years ago

        What a laugh - IT'S THE LAND OF BOB AND DOUG, EH? TAKE OFF!

    2. Jerry on the boat   12 years ago

      ...including the Vancouver Canucks, who are asking for the ability to serve hard liquor at concessions.

      What could possibly go wrong?

      1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        That happened without hard liquor, they must figure they can't go any lower.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    President Obama has said that we can trust the new FBI director to balance law enforcement and civil liberties.

    He has the guy's phone records and email messages to prove it.

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Snap!

  12. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    UN to create asteroid defense group

    The General Assembly last week gave the green light to an asteroid defense plan drawn up by the former astronauts at the Association of Space Explorers, Scientific American reports. The plan calls for member nations to join forces in an "International Asteroid Warning Group" committed to sounding the alarm if a dangerous rock is spotted. A spacecraft would then be launched to knock the asteroid off course.

    The ASE also wants the U.N. to run a practice deflection mission, to make sure the method actually works.

    Of course the UN will maintain its peace-keeping policies and no action against the asteroid can be taken unless the asteroid shoots first.

    1. gaijin   12 years ago

      A spacecraft would then be launched to knock the asteroid off course.

      Something tells me this is the full text of the group's plan.

      1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

        "And Bruce Willis will stay behind to blow up the asteroid, while Ben Affleck will get to come back to Earth and bang Liv Tyler some more."

        1. Bobarian   12 years ago

          Liv Tyler, as portrayed by Cartman's hand.

      2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

        ......and here comes dozens of Armageddon jokes.

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          Wow, two even came in before I could post the prediction.

          1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

            No one's joking about banging Liv Tyler.

        2. CE   12 years ago

          We want to be permanently exempt from income taxes.

    2. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Why not just train drillers to be astronauts?

      1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

        Why not just send Warty to the asteroid?

        1. a better weapon   12 years ago

          No way, he needs to stay here!

          I'm convinced Warty is the only reason the asteroids HAVEN'T struck us yet. He repulses even the most massive asteroids away from our orbit.

        2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

          Because that's just what he wants us to do. When the asteroid enters the atmosphere and burns up, Warty's remains will rain down on all of us. He will enter the water supply, and then, at long last, Warty will be in all of us!

          1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

            I though he already has been.

          2. Swiss Servator, Yodelriffic!   12 years ago

            Now I have an image of Warty riding the meteor to Earth ala the last bomb in Dr. Strangelove.

      2. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        Why not just train drillers to be astronauts?

        I'm an idea man, Chuck.

        *Speaks into recorder...feed tuna fish mayonnaise*

        1. CE   12 years ago

          As long as it's artisanal.

    3. Rasilio   12 years ago

      Their first action will be to issue a sternly worded letter to any asteroids found to be in objectionable orbits

  13. Ted S.   12 years ago

    Seen in the sidebar here, linking to 24/7:

    Teacher in India Suspended For Having Specially-Abled Student Give Her Foot Massage

    I hope those abilities are special!

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      As long as the teacher isn't in to shrimping it's probably harmless.

    2. Bobarian   12 years ago

      Kid's name was Tony Rocky-Horror.

      Marcelus was pissed.

      1. Anomalous   12 years ago

        I didn't see any mention of him getting thrown off a building.

      2. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

        Shit yeah. He's got his technique down and everything, he don't be ticklin' or nothin'.

  14. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

    Sen. Graham should just come out of the closet already. It's 2013, now. No one cares,and I'm sure he'd be happier.

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      Please, no. You guys can keep him.

  15. Jordan   12 years ago

    President Obama has said that we can trust the new FBI director to balance law enforcement and civil liberties.

    "If you like your current civil liberties, you can keep them."

    1. Tonio   12 years ago

      ^This

  16. rts   12 years ago

    Reduce working week to 30 hours, say economists

    Cutting the hours we work each week to 30 instead of 40 would improve our wellbeing, our family life, friendships and communities, they say.

    Combined with a range of new career breaks, it could also lower carbon emissions, it was argued.

    1. Bam!   12 years ago

      Another benefit of ObamaCare.

    2. Hyperion   12 years ago

      We can also all work at home, every day, after we no longer have a job.

      WIN/WIN!

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Almost any policy, no matter how wacky, will be given a respectful hearing if it's presented as reducing carbon admissions.

    4. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

      Nothing is stopping people from working 30 hours a week right now, if that's what they want to do, and somebody is willing to pay them for it.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        Eating things that happen to wander into your backyard, because you can't afford to buy food not only reduces carbon, it's also quick and convienient.

        1. Almanian!   12 years ago

          So this is the REAL lesson of Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman? Zimmerman was just trying to get a quick dinner?

          *mind blown*

      2. font_of_stupidity   12 years ago

        You MONSTER!!!

    5. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: rts

      Cutting the hours we work each week to 30 instead of 40 would improve our wellbeing, our family life, friendships and communities, they [the tenured bastards with no worry in life] say.

      Easy for them to say that.

    6. a better weapon   12 years ago

      I don't see how lowering hours and increasing FTEs reduces carbon emmissions.

      Now you have 6 employees commuting in beaters instead of 3 in Priuses (what's the plural for Prius anyways?)

      1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        what's the plural for Prius anyways

        Pricks.

      2. a better weapon   12 years ago

        Not increasing FTEs but number of employees to fulfill the duties of current FTEs*

      3. Banjos   12 years ago

        "what's the plural for Prius anyways?"

        smug alert

      4. CE   12 years ago

        Prii.

    7. Medical Physics Guy   12 years ago

      70s flashback!!!

    8. CE   12 years ago

      40 hour workweeks? That would be awesome. Some of us hit that by Wednesday.

  17. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Christine Pelosi: Halloween is not about hate; don't wear blackface as a costume

    Halloween costumes reveal as much as they disguise. So when white partygoers pose as shooter George Zimmerman pointing two fingers gun-style at a blackface, bloodstained Trayvon Martin over a laughing lady leprechaun for Halloween, it is time once again to remember that Halloween is no excuse for hate.
    [...]
    First, the blackface. White people still need to educate each other that blackface has no place in civilized society. Blackface is not "traditional" or "historic" or "makeup" for Halloween or any day of the year. Wearing blackface is as tasteless as waving a confederate flag and rebel yelling the black First Family in the White House -- and its defense including by friends of the tasteless trio is equally revolting. Simply put: blackface is unacceptable. Just don't do it. For those who say it's not about race, a thought exercise: what if a black man had dressed in "whiteface" as a white murder victim of a black defendant? Yes, you can imagine the FOX-fueled false equivalence hysteria from here.

    The irony is that without hate this woman wouldn't have a career harping about stuff.

    1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      Added bonus:

      Fifth, Halloween dressing up doesn't mean dressing without conscience. Yes you are still you on Halloween -- and if you are around kids, you are a role model for them. Children will look at your costume choices to see the world you imagine for them. Costumes steeped in white male privilege reinforce the racist and sexist stereotypes we are trying to overcome.

      Gee, now I kinda want to dress up and assert my White-Hispanic Male privilege. Maybe I can be the Fonz again like last year.

      1. Jordan   12 years ago

        Why do you hate jukeboxes?

        1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

          Jukeboxes need to check their machine privilege!

        2. New West Republic   12 years ago

          Remember. Machines: They're full of kids.

      2. B.P.   12 years ago

        "Okay everyone, for the next six months we will use the word 'privilege' hundreds of times a day until it has lost all meaning. Pass it on."

    2. Bam!   12 years ago

      I'm a cat not a costume.

      1. Jordan   12 years ago

        Other fine examples.

      2. Almanian!   12 years ago

        That's on the Twitter right now...

      3. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Burglar cats

        1. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          That was a pretty good job by Matthews. He might have a career in acting after football.

    3. Coeus   12 years ago

      For those who say it's not about race, a thought exercise: what if a black man had dressed in "whiteface" as a white murder victim of a black defendant?

      Bad costume choice. No one would be able to nail it down to specifics.

      1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

        Dude. It's obviously an OJ reference. Retro is in.

    4. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      As someone who is probably related to the Irish somewhere in the orgiastic melting pot that is American history, I'm offended that there was a woman dressed as a leprechaun. Some of my ancestors may have once cared about the existence of lebrechauns and frivolously dressing as one diminishes my historical cultural heritage as an immigrant...or something.

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        "orgiastic melting pot that is American history"

        Niiiice.

        1. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

          Be a good name for a fondue joint.

    5. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

      -For those who say it's not about race, a thought exercise: what if a black man had dressed in "whiteface" as a white murder victim of a black defendant?

      Quite possibly the worst argument for why blackface is tasteless and racist (and I think it usually is) I have ever seen. The reason blackface is so has pretty much everything to do with historical practice and the context of race relations in the US, so a 'white face' analogy is about the worst one can make.

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        That, and why should anyone give two shits what Fox News would going say about it?

        I wouldn't wear blackface, but what people do for fun is their own business.

        1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

          The Fox comment was one of several silly but probably obligatory liberal one liners the author felt compelled to include. Tiresome claptrap.

      2. LilDebbie   12 years ago

        Had a whole family of kids show up at my door in whiteface one year, and you know what?

        It was friggin' adorable.

    6. Banjos   12 years ago

      So... we all should be wearing black unitards while doing an interpretive dance to Philp Glass?

    7. Cooter   12 years ago

      what if a black man had dressed in "whiteface"

      A black mime? I'm down with that.

    8. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      Thank you Christine, for letting us all know what is and isn't acceptable in your world. I'll take your issue under advisement.

      Now please accept my advice to you...

      ...stop breathing.

  18. PD Scott   12 years ago

    Triumph the Insult Comic Dog goes to the Great American Beer Festival in Denver.

  19. Coeus   12 years ago

    Feminists seem to be bound and determined to push the socons and libertatians back into a voting block:

    Purity Culture as Rape Culture: Why the Theological Is Political

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: Coeus,

      Purity culture and rape culture are two sides of the same coin. Prior to marriage, women are instructed that they must say no to sex at every turn, and if they do not they are responsible for the consequences. This method of approach ? "always no" ? creates situations in which women are not equipped to fully understand what consent looks like or what a healthy sexual encounter is.

      "Hey, you have to try anything once!"

      It's like with smoking. If you do not do it once, then how can you later know how to say "no" or what peer-pressure looks like? Right?

      Oh, sex is not like smoking. I see. But one still chooses to not smoke, right? So how does this idea that "abstinence is rape" fits with free choice?

  20. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    UK prof accuses evangelical Christians of failing to stand up for persecute Christians in the Middle East, blames evangelical support for Israel:

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/a.....tians.html

    1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      stand up for *persecuted*

  21. Coeus   12 years ago

    Epic troll response:

    I was getting ready for a pre-Halloween party on Saturday night when I received a text message. Mid-fake blood application, I looked down and saw the message was from an 859 area code, a number I didn't immediately recognize. But after a moment it registered this was a number I had called ? it was listed on HalloweenParty13.com, purveyors of that sick 'Anna Rexia' costume we blew the whistle on last week.
    The message included a photo of an overweight woman wearing the controversial costume, along with the message "Happy Halloween from HalloweenParty13.com." Very classy stuff:

  22. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Afrobeat band gig cancelled because the band is 'too white'

    Shokazoba's cancellation from the Hampshire Halloween event Friday night at Hampshire College, after one band member said they were criticized of being "too white" to play Afrobeat music, is reverberating on social media.

    Shokazoba keyboard player Jason Moses said on Saturday that the entire incident has upset the band, which he said was the target of an online campaign by approximately 30 people - a campaign that led to the band's ultimate cancellation from the annual event.

    Moses said the firestorm started when someone posted an inflammatory comment online about Hampshire College hiring an all-white band to play Afrobeat music for the event. He said the band is not all white, and race should not be an issue anyway.

    "It's not important to us. Music and art has the opportunity to transcend all that," Moses.

    The decision to cancel the band was made by the Hype Committee, which puts on Hampshire Halloween.

    The Hype Committee wrote on its Facebook page on Oct. 24: "Due to concerned students voicing their opinions about the band Shokazoba, we held community dialogue to hear what individuals had to say. As a result of the dialogue, and discomfort expressed by members of the community in person as well as by email, Facebook, and other means, we have removed Shokazoba from the lineup for Hampshire Halloween."

    1. font_of_stupidity   12 years ago

      Hooray, tolerance!

  23. PD Scott   12 years ago

    Something for everyone: The E! Fashion Police Halloween Costume Reveal

    1. PD Scott   12 years ago

      Whoops, full clip here.

      1. PD Scott   12 years ago

        Actually it looks like there is no one full clip. Go to their main site and I think it autoplays.

        I give up.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Fuck autoplaying clips.

          1. Almanian!   12 years ago

            We call them autoplaying MAGAZINES, Ted.

            YOU'RE WELCOME

            1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

              Assault video!

              1. Ted S.   12 years ago

                Are assault videos anything like crush videos?

  24. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

    White Ribbon Against Pornography Week

    WHEREAS, women are exploited, degraded, subjected to verbal and physical abuse, and exposed to sexually transmitted diseases in the production of hardcore pornography; and

    WHEREAS, pornography presents youth with a distorted, debased and often violent image of human sexuality, devoid of love, responsibility and commitment; and

    WHEREAS, children molest other children in imitation of what they see in pornography; and

    WHEREAS, addiction to pornography prevents, damages and destroys marriages;

    WHEREAS, addiction to pornography contributes to sexual violence against women and contributes to the demand for women and children trafficked into prostitution; and

    WHEREAS, addiction to pornography contributes to on-the-job sexual harassment and to a decline in worker productivity; and

    WHEREAS, for many individuals, both young and old, there is a progression from viewing adult pornography to viewing child pornography; and

    NOW THEREFORE, I (WE)[Governor/Mayor/Legislative body]________________________,
    do hereby proclaim October 30 through November 6, 2011, as WHITE RIBBON AGAINST
    PORNOGRAPHY WEEK in (State/City/County) _______________________________and call upon all
    citizens to wear or display white ribbons as a sign of their commitment to community standards of decency
    and their support for enforcement of the laws against obscene materials.

    http://pornharms.com/beaware/w.....n_2013.pdf

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      HETEROSEXIST claptrap! Men are degraded and abused in porn ALL THE TIME.

      Why does porn harms not care about the men?

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        White "ribbon".

        1. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

          Well, pearl necklace was already taken.

        2. Teenage Girl   12 years ago

          Eewww!!

      2. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

        I often wonder about that. A common complaint about pornography is that it 'objectifies' women. Can anyone be more objectified than the men in porn? Their penises are all that matters there.

        1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          Eh these people argue to a conclusion, the arguments don't really matter. I've oft repeated the story that when someone went on a tirade about porn objectifying women, I smiled and said "mine doesn't" and was told that gay porn objectifies women by saying they are unnecessary (I was dumbfounded and had no decent response). The actual argument to get there could not matter less to these people.

          1. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

            (I was dumbfounded and had no decent response)

            I would have suggested "You are a fucking shmuck."

          2. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

            no decent response

            I think "I wasn't aware it was possible to be that dumb and still function" would have been a good response.

    2. Jordan   12 years ago

      A white ribbon, eh? Is that what the kids call it these days?

      1. Warty   12 years ago

        GODDAMMIT FUCK YOU

    3. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

      Jesus that's stupid. Sounds like the only people who are obsessed with porn are the organizers of this pledge/movement.

    4. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

      Why not a blue ribbon?

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        Why not blue *balls*?

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Blue ribbons are for hipsters.

    5. Entropy Void   12 years ago

      Can I wear a black ribbon to show how stupid I think this all is?

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        Black ribbon meanings according to wikipedia:

        terrorist attacks in Turkey; a sign of mourning for those lost in the terrorist attacks
        Wiccan/Pagan rights and awareness
        9/11 - This ribbon is a sign of mourning for those lost in the 11 September attack
        mourning and remembrance of the Virginia Tech massacre
        melanoma awareness
        black lung awareness
        transgender hate crime awareness
        awareness for suicide, bulimia, anorexia, self-harm, etc.
        sleep apnea awareness

    6. CE   12 years ago

      Wait, they're complaining that it prevents marriage? I thought they hated marriage, since it institutionalizes male privilege.

  25. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I got a letter from Blue Cross notifying me my policy will be dropped, but they will happily move me into one fifty per cent more expensive.

    Yay, Obamacare!

    1. Almanian!   12 years ago

      Good think you didn't like your old policy! WHEW! Close one!

    2. Jordan   12 years ago

      You must work for Home Depot!

    3. John   12 years ago

      Doesn't that make you want to run out and vote Democrat? Don't you blame the mean and evil insurance company?

    4. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      Racist.

    5. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      P Brooks, you are suffering a severe case of False Consciousness.

      Comrade Obama's glorious new healthcare plan has liberated you from the chains of your old insurance plan and given you the freedom to choose a plan that has more 'options' than you had before.

    6. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

      -but they will happily move me into one fifty per cent more expensive.

      I think you forgot to offset the value of the good feeling that you now can get from knowing that you are paying more so other people can now get 'free' poorly managed government care.

    7. CE   12 years ago

      Putting the "Aff" in "Affordable".

    8. Juice   12 years ago

      Only 50%? You lucky bastard.

  26. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Good think you didn't like your old policy! WHEW! Close one!

    Silly me. I had no idea how much I hated it.

    It probably wasn't really even insurance. Just an agreement to pay for extraordinary health care expenses.

    1. Almanian!   12 years ago

      I blame Bush Blue Cross

  27. John   12 years ago

    http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/.....y-reality/

    Patti Davis mugged by reality but quickly reeducated.

    1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      That one's a treat!

      LOL

    2. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      Barack Obama turned her health insurance into piece of fruit!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ku80H97rsRE

      Watching this part of it go down is more than just a little entertaining.

  28. John Thacker   12 years ago

    A federal judge has ruled that new abortion restrictions passed by Texan lawmakers are unconstitutional.

    Sort of. Judge didn't rule on the clinic regulations, the 20 week limit. Judge ruled that the RU486 ban could not be applied in cases where it would endanger the life of the mother to have a legal surgical abortion instead. Makes sense, but a lot more to the new law than that.

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

      Did they rule on the other provisions at all?

      1. #   12 years ago

        Nope.

  29. John   12 years ago

    There is no sugar coating it, some of those going to the camps might not like it there.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/.....64860.html

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      After some throat clearing, Carney said, "So it's true there are existing health care plans on the individual market that do not meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the Affordable Care Act Fuck you, that's why."

  30. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

    "President Obama has said that we can trust the new FBI director to balance law enforcement and civil liberties."

    The only thing that would make me start to trust the new FBI director would be if he immediately held a press conference and said that President Obama should not be trusted.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      "After a startled silence by all in attendance, the newly-sworn-in Director shouted, 'April Fool!', and the crowd broke into appreciative, but relieved, laughter."

    2. CE   12 years ago

      The only thing that would make me start to trust the new FBI director would be if he immediately held a press conference and said that he was arresting President Obama and former President Bush and calling for a grand jury to indict them.

  31. John   12 years ago

    http://theweek.com/article/ind.....een-hotels

    No one cares that a hotel is "green".

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      As with everything else, customers care more about their own green than how "green" are the rooms.

    2. MJGreen   12 years ago

      "Sustainability" is another word that I've come to really, really hate.

      1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

        "Sustainability" is another word that I've come to really, really hate.

        Then you might like this out today from the Cato Institute.

      2. John   12 years ago

        Me too

      3. PD Scott   12 years ago

        Make sure it's a sustainable hate. You don't want to burn out on it too soon, it will be around for a while.

      4. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

        I'm actually okay with it, since I like to point out that massive government overspending is totally unsustainable.

  32. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Dear Prudence: Help! My fiancee insists on being in my family's portrait

    I'm about to get married and am caught in an argument between my fianc?e and my parents. This will be the first time in over five years that our whole family will be together. My parents want to take a picture of just them, me, and my siblings, and a family photo obviously means a lot to them. My fianc?e heard this and became immediately offended. She says it's rude to exclude her on the day she "joins the family" and any family photo should therefore include her in it. We're not talking about taking an hour for a separate family photo shoot; my parents simply want one photograph of themselves and their children. I don't understand why my fianc?e is so annoyed and now she's even more angry because I'm not supporting "her side." Should I back up my fianc?e on principle, even if I disagree with her?

    There's a nice preview of marriage with a self-centered person.

    1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      If she's still his fiancee, it's not too late!

      1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

        If he's dumb to enough to propose to this woman, it's too late. Some men just need to go bankrupt twice or be struck 2 or 3 thousand times in the nuts before they'll learn.

    2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Kill it (the relationship) with fire!

      Alternately take a photo with the kids and their significant others to placate bridezilla and then don't hang it.

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Take multiple photographs with various family groupings. With digital photography, is this so fucking hard?

      1. trshmnstr   12 years ago

        Yes, because bridezillas are one step away from being toddlers, which are a half step away from being shit-flinging baboons.

    4. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      Should I back up my fianc?e on principle, even if I disagree with her?

      That's a little thing called 'setting the tone.' It's not such a little thing, really. It is everything that comes after. She's pushing this to get a head start on setting the tone, and, unfortunately for this schmuck, he is still convinced the grifter is his little snugglebunnies.

      Americans tend to take the family in law thing a little too literally. It's a legal arrangement between extended parties, not a perverse reversal of biology ('I did not marry my own sister, so if you could quit calling me 'son' I would appreciate that' -- conversation I had with my first father-in-law). They want their children in one picture with them, she is not their child, so there is no reason she would have a say in the matter, except to establish her dominance.

      1. trshmnstr   12 years ago

        Amen. As much as my inlaws may want me to call them mom or dad (i don't think they do, but if they do), ain't happening. I only call my biological parents "mom" and "dad" because that's what i've called them for the last 20+ years, and habits are hard to break.

        1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          My dad had many faults but he was the only man on the planet capable of handing the myriad gene pool that comprised my awesome assembly down to me. That these men would try to make that claim as their own is lowly and pathetic and beneath the dignity I would expect of one who made such a fine product as I, myself, would marry.

    5. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      She's not even completely in the family yet and she's offended? That takes some nerve. She should respect the parents wishes. If she was excluded from a photo that included non-spouse significant others it would be one thing.

  33. Derpetologist   12 years ago

    My thoughts on libertarian overlap with conservatives/republicans:

    http://platedlizard.blogspot.c.....-with.html

    Yeah, I know it's blogwhoring. What can I say? It's fun to watch the numbers go up. Remember- if I get enough views, maybe Marcotte will respond.

    1. Banjos   12 years ago

      "What can I say?"

      You can apologize for using this forum to post your shit, or you can put in a bid for our new Baby Naming Auction!

      All proceeds will be donated to a libertarian charity/cause of the winner's choosing.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        the name can be whatever you choose unless it is obscene.

        *** scratches chin ***

        Can it be a *long* name?

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Bo Schembechler is not obscene.

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   12 years ago

          Don't. Even. Think. It.

        2. BakedPenguin   12 years ago

          Now that is quality trolling.

  34. John   12 years ago

    The Libertarian Jesus

    I told you to feed the poor...Not create laws that steal from people to do it.

    http://danieljmitchell.wordpre.....ian-jesus/

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      That was funny. I like Daniel Mitchel.

    2. Juice   12 years ago

      Funny, but too bad about the misplaced comma.

  35. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    5 dead in Tienanmen Square after Jeep crashes and catches fire

    Five people are dead after a jeep plowed into a crowded part of Tiananmen Square and caught fire Monday, authorities said.
    The crash temporarily blocked off a busy area in the heart of the Chinese capital as rescuers and police rushed to the scene.
    Police said the crash happened around noon local time in front of the Tiananmen Rostrum, a structure that stands at the entrance to the Forbidden City bearing a giant portrait of Mao Zedong.
    The vehicle hit the guardrail of the Jinshui Bridge over the moat of the Forbidden City before it burst into flames, the state-run news agency Xinhua reported.
    The driver of the jeep and two passengers were killed, Beijing police said in a statement. The other two fatalities were tourists -- a Filipino woman and a Chinese man, according to state media reports. At least 38 people were injured, state media said. Eleven injured people, a mixture of tourists and police officers, have been taken to the hospital, Xinhua said.

    1. Bam!   12 years ago

      You know who else died in Tiananmen Square?

      1. Swiss Servator, Yodelriffic!   12 years ago

        The Goddess of Liberty?

  36. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

    David Burge
    ?@iowahawkblog
    Feel good story of the century: woman loses Congressional seat for supporting Obamacare, gets huge rate hike:
    Obamacare jacks up her insurance

    Sue Klinkhamer has a problem.

    It's called Obamacare.

    And the irony of her situation is not lost on her. In a recent email addressed to her former boss, Illinois Congressman Bill Foster, and other Democratic colleagues, she wrote:

    "I spent two years defending Obamacare. I had constituents scream at me, spit at me and call me names that I can't put in print. The congressman was not re-elected in 2010 mainly because of the anti-Obamacare anger. When the congressman was not re-elected, I also (along with the rest of our staff) lost my job. I was upset that because of the health care issue, I didn't have a job anymore but still defended Obamacare because it would make health care available to everyone at, what I assumed, would be an affordable price. I have now learned that I was wrong. Very wrong."

    For Klinkhamer, 60, President Obama's oft-repeated words ring in her ears: "If you like your health plan, you will keep it."

    Well, possibly not.

    1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

      So she supported it vociferously despite having no idea how it actually functioned.

      1. John   12 years ago

        None of them had any idea. It was just a big brand. Obamacare was really the embodiment of Obamaism itself.

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          Obamacare was really the embodiment of Obamaism itself.

          For some reason I read this the first time as Onanism.
          And then I realized it is pretty much the same thing.

      2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        So she supported it vociferously despite having no idea how it actually functioned.

        No, she supported it despite numerous and unavoidable warnings about how it would function.

    2. B.P.   12 years ago

      I'd like a witness corroboration of the "spit at" part.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        I'll be happy to spit at her if you hold the camera.

    3. Rasilio   12 years ago

      Klinkhamer suggests renaming the Affordable Care Act.

      "Just call it," she said dryly, "the Available Care Act."

      She won't even be calling it that when she see's how difficult it is to actually get in to see a medical professional now that 30 million extra people have "insurance" and start trying to get their monies worth out of it.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        The Theoretically Available Care Act?

    4. Juice   12 years ago

      I don't think it could get anymore delicious than that.

  37. Coeus   12 years ago

    Thinkprogress tripples down on the Ohio State muffdiving incident.

    The students assumed the notes were removed by people who didn't think any crime had occurred. Because the assault happened in a crowd of bystanders who thought it was consensual, because both the alleged victim and the attacker were drunk, and because the incident involved the victim receiving oral sex, it has caused doubt and controversy on campus.
    When the students returned to re-post the notes, they were stopped by a local police officer, Ohio University's independent student paper, The Post, reports. He accused the students of vandalism.
    "He proceeded to tell us that what we were doing was tearing the town apart," student Emily Harper recounted to The Post. "He told us that he knew the facts of the case because he was the person who filed the initial report."
    Harper filed a verbal complaint with the police station after they spoke with the officer, and the police chief there told The Post, "I'm comfortable in saying that we're going to address her concerns."
    The accusation that supporting a rape victim can "tear the town apart," as described by the police officer who took down the sticky notes, evokes other rape cases that have cropped up in recent months.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Thinkprogress tripples down on the Ohio State muffdiving incident.

      Poor Sloopy.

      And how do you tripple down on anything?

      1. Coeus   12 years ago

        This is their third article talking about the "rape", and how horrible the people are who doubt that a rape occurred.

    2. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zFg2qByF4E

    3. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      Following their drunk =/= consent theory I'm still having trouble figuring out which one is supposed to be the victim.

      1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        Obviously the woman who chose to get drunk with that guy and then chose to get fingerbanged on camera by that guy and then chose to get a little cunnilingus on camera from that guy is the victim. Consent means never having any regrets about bad choices you've made. The guy, on the other hand, is a rapist, along with every other male on the planet. Except maybe Obama. Or Bill Clinton.

        1. Coeus   12 years ago

          I recall a similar occurrence a few months ago. The feminist complaints were legion. That time, it was a woman giving head to a guy at a public concert. First complaint was that people were calling the giver a slut, something they assured us would not be the case were the sexes reversed, which is blatantly untrue (see the video of the ohio state to hear guys calling the guy a slut).

          Followed by concern that the poor head giver was being raped.

  38. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

    Plot thickens: Mystery ObamaCare covergirl erased from website

    The mystery of the ObamaCare covergirl took yet another strange turn over the weekend, when her smiling face was replaced by a far less intriguing quartet of icons.

    The smiling brunette touched off a frenzied hunt, especially after White House officials refused to divulge her name. As frustration with the beleaguered Healthcare.gov website mounted, she became known on the Internet as "Glitch Girl."

    Sometime on Sunday, her visage was replaced by the helpful icons, which show the four ways people can learn about President Obama's signature health law ? by talking on the phone, going to the website (that they are presumably already on), writing a letter or chatting with friends.

    For now, the ObamaCare covergirl, whose identity was sought in vain by dozens of media outlets, remains a secret. It's not clear why the site was stripped of a human face, but it is possible misguided vitriol on the web prompted the move for her own protection ? whoever she is. Tweets, digitally-altered copycat sites and blogposts were becoming downright cruel toward a woman who may have simply long ago signed a release that allowed her to become the new face of futility.

    1. John   12 years ago

      Why the hate? She is cute.

      1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

        She's average.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Which is cute. I didn't say she was gorgeous. Regardless Mad Scientist may be onto something. She is so perfectly racially ambiguous, there is something creepy and unreal about her.

        2. Coeus   12 years ago

          She's average.

          Maybe for 30 years ago. If she's not 30 lbs overweight, she ain't average. God I miss Europe.

    2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      I'll wager $10 the girl doesn't exist at all. They took a hispanic, an asian, and a generic white face and photoshopped them all together to get that perfect blend of under-privileged diversity.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Her racial ambiguity is almost creepy.

        1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

          *shrugs* She just looks run-of-the-mill lightly complexed Latina to me.

          1. Swiss Servator, Yodelriffic!   12 years ago

            Your eye, HM, I trust.

          2. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

            Yeah I probably see 5 women who look like her every day in Houston.

      2. CE   12 years ago

        It was a stock photo. They don't know who she is.

  39. Coeus   12 years ago

    These people are beyond delusional:

    The conversation is spilling out of the queer and feminist circles that it used to be exclusive to and is coming into the mainstream. That has to be a good thing, and it's funny that the gay marriage debate laid the groundwork to question the existence of marriage itself.

    I'm sure that it has nothing at all to do with all the legal and financial barriers that feminism has put up.

    1. John   12 years ago

      funny that the gay marriage debate laid the groundwork to question the existence of marriage itself.

      Isn't that what all of the SOCONs claimed was the real goal all along? And they were told by all right thinking people that was the crazy?

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        Some (including gay radicals and many libertarians) wanted the dissolution of state marriage, it was explicit in the old GLF stuff. A more conservative/assimilation strain wanted the expansion of marriage to incorporate gay relationships, and a conservative/reactionary strain wanted to keep things just as they had been for thousands of years (except not really because divorce, romantic marriage, women owning property, monogamy, etc).

        Gay marriage may have brought the discussion to the fore, but it's a discussion that was had when women became legally able to own property outside of marriage, when the US Gov decided the Mormons couldn't have plural marriage and all through the late '60s and the '70s. It also hasn't explicitly ended "marriage" as a thing, so the SOCONs still aren't right.

        1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

          The Married Women's Property Acts simply extended to the poor and middle classes a privilege which already existed for women from wealthy families, who could afford the fees to set up trusts free from hubby's control. It wasn't technically the creation of a new right, but making an existing right affordable to the non-wealthy.

          And I don't see how enforcing the laws against polygamy refutes the SoCons.

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            My point, EvH, is that pearl-clutching SOCONs have opined that marriage will come to an end at historical points when the terms of what society accepts as "marriage" have come up.

            Also I'd argue that having daddy set up a trust fund outside of my husband's control and being allowed to own property outright as a legal adult are very different things, but we may disagree on that.

            1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

              Pearl-clutching SoCons warned about the effects of divorce and single motherhood. Were they wrong?

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                I don't think divorce and single-parenthood are bad things in-and-of-themselves. I think that the downward pull on society is a product of government incentives toward cradle to grave dependence on the state.

                1. Azathoth!!   12 years ago

                  Pearl-clutching SoCons warned about the effects of divorce and single motherhood. Were they wrong?

                  I don't think divorce and single-parenthood are bad things in-and-of-themselves

                  No.

      2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        Either crazy or lying. Those were the options. Marcotte gets to say it because she's on the right side.

      3. Calidissident   12 years ago

        Just because a group of batshit crazy feminists say something on the Internet doesn't mean that the general public takes it seriously

  40. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Weep for America: High school cheerleader car wash deemed in violation of environmental laws

    It's hard to wave your spirit fingers when the city shuts down the cheerleading squad's fundraising car wash to protect the environment.

    This is what happened to Lincoln High School cheerleaders trying to raise money to attend a national competition in April. The San Jose Mercury reports that local environmental officials warned the high school cheerleaders that their car wash violated the city's water discharge laws.

    "We had a visit from the city of San Jose Environmental Services Department who said that the car washes at Hoover [Middle School] are in violation of water discharge laws, therefore we had to cancel this and all future car washes," said an email that was sent out to neighborhood email lists on Oct. 18.

    "Anything that is not storm water or rain water is considered a pollutant," said Jennie Loft, acting communications manager for San Jose's Environmental Services Department. "If it goes into a storm drain, that pollutant will harm wildlife and habitats in the creeks. Water goes directly from the storm drains into our creeks."

    1. a better weapon   12 years ago

      And then they came for the middle school cheerleaders, and I said nothing.

    2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      When I lived aboard my sailboat, some county environmental weenie came along and made the marina remove the spigots from the parking lot, for fear someone might wash their car, and forever contaminate the whole earth with some soap. The funny part is, just 200 feet away, nearly all boat sinks and showers drain through a through-hull directly into the water, quite legally. So guess where all the dish washing and shower soap goes?

  41. OldMexican   12 years ago

    Penn State will pay $59.7 million to 26 young men sexually abused by former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

    It pays to be sexually abused!

    What? Too soon?

    1. Swiss Servator, Yodelriffic!   12 years ago

      Probably.

    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

      Lol I was thinking the same thing.

  42. Killazontherun   12 years ago

    When you hear a college kid spout, 'I'm gonna go into environmental law!', isolate him from others, tie him to a tree and leave his tagged for Warty. You will save us all from at least once future social menace advancing his misbegotten cause while on the public payroll dole.

    1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      isolate him from others, tie him to a tree and leave his sorry ass tagged for Warty.

    2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      If he protests, just tell him, "Look, what Warty does in his natural habitat is a natural thing. Naturally, you're frightened of the outcome, and that's perfectly natural, but I assure you, no synthetic fibers were used to manufacture the restraints on your ankles or wrists."

  43. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    ""Dem Party is F****d." That was the subject line of an email sent to me Sunday by a senior Democratic consultant with strong ties to the White House and Capitol Hill. The body of the email contained a link to [a] Los Angeles Times story about Obamacare "sticker shock:"...

    "Also of interest to the Democratic consultant: A Josh Barro column on Obama's promise that "if you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan." It was never a reasonable pledge, Barro argues, and it's being proven false. He called this "a good thing" because "a lot of existing health plans were bad." Reforming the nation's health care system "was necessarily going to have to change a lot of people's health plans," Barro wrote.

    "The Democratic consultant said none of this is news to him, but he wonders why Obama wasn't honest with Americans. He predicted surprise and outrage over higher costs and lesser coverage. "We will own this problem forever," the Democrat wrote."

    http://www.nationaljournal.com.....e-20131028

    Perhaps they could tell us up front if a promise they're making isn't meant to be taken seriously.

    1. Bobarian   12 years ago

      They're politicians, no promise they make is meant to be taken seriously.

  44. Coeus   12 years ago

    Imagine that, a southern baptist school is southern baptist.

    While that's a valiant goal, the re-wording of the conduct code actually has the potential to make Baylor's official approach to human sexuality more problematic. If university officials approve the change, the term "homosexual acts" will be replaced with the phrase "non-marital consensual deviate sexual intercourse." Not only does that new phrase specifically label homosexual relationships as "deviate," but it also expands the definition of negative sexual activity to include all sex outside of marriage.

    1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      "Not only does that new phrase specifically label homosexual relationships as "deviate," but it also expands the definition of negative sexual activity to include all sex outside of marriage."

      It is a specifically general phrase.

  45. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Benedict XVI, Antonin Scalia, or Pope Francis?

    ""There are some priests who, when they read this Gospel passage, this and others, say: 'But, Jesus healed a person with a mental illness'. They do not read this, no? It is true that at that time, they could confuse epilepsy with demonic possession; but it is also true that there was the devil! And we do not have the right to simplify the matter, as if to say: 'All of these (people) were not possessed; they were mentally ill'. No! The presence of the devil is on the first page of the Bible, and the Bible ends as well with the presence of the devil, with the victory of God over the devil."

    "For this reason, he warned, "we should not be na?ve". The [speaker] observed that the Lord gave us certain criteria to "discern" the presence of evil and to follow "the Christian way when there are temptations". One of the criteria is "not to follow the victory of Jesus" only "halfway".

    ""Either you are with me, says the Lord, or you are against me," the [speaker] said. Jesus, he added, came to destroy the devil, "to give us the freedom" from "the enslavement the devil has over us". And, he cautioned, this is not "exaggerating".

    ""On this point," he said, "there are no nuances. There is a battle and a battle where salvation is at play, eternal salvation; eternal salvation" of us all."

    http://en.radiovaticana.va/new.....en1-736378

    1. CE   12 years ago

      Three popes walked into a bar. It knocked off all their hats.

  46. Len Bias   12 years ago

    "President Obama has said that we can trust the new FBI director to balance law enforcement and civil liberties."

    By "balance," he means ignore the latter.

    Is there anyone who takes statements like that from him seriously anymore?

    1. BigT   12 years ago

      Why do civil liberties need to be balanced? They are absolute.

  47. Coeus   12 years ago

    Why isn't think progress calling this racist?

    "I will not yield to this monkey court or whatever it is," Pallone said in response to Republican interruptions. "Why are we going down this path?" he asked. "Because you are trying to scare people so they don't apply and so therefore the legislation gets delayed or the Affordable Care Act gets defunded or it's repealed. That's all it is, hoping people won't apply."

    A monkey court convened about Obamacare? Shouldn't they be fainting and clutching the pearls about now?

  48. B.P.   12 years ago

    I finally listened to that Russell Brand diatribe after the 10,000th prompt on Facebook. Holy shit. Morons of the world, unite.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!