DARE Officer in Connecticut Fired for Texting 11-Year-Old Girl, Several Others
Police criminal investigation found no criminal wrongdoing, but the Department of Children & Families is still investigation


Police officers can be brought into schools to replace teachers in disciplinary actions, from violently break up water balloon fights to interrogating third graders. They can be there undercover, sometimes to try to push drugs, or they can be there because of the long-standing but ineffective anti-drug education program DARE. And in Avon, Connecticut, one DARE officer has been fired for his off- and after-hours contact with children. The local Patch reports:
Police officials objected to the tone and frequently late hours of… [the now former Avon police officer Todd Akerley] texting and online interactions with at least eight current or former DARE students investigators interviewed, ages 11 to 14, including the girl from the complaint, and "at least 80 other pre or early teens on Instagram."
Many of the conversations, mostly with females, happened "during the late evening hours, some past midnight," police said.
Investigations into his actions began when on May 23 when a doctor at Connecticut Children's Medical Center made an urgent phone call to Avon Police Chief Mark Rinaldo. The woman reported "disturbing text messages with sexual content" that Akerley allegedly sent to an Avon student in the DARE program.
As someone serving on the Greater Hartford Multidisciplinary Child Abuse Team, she was required to report the incident to DCF [Department of Children and Families]. Rinaldo previously told the Hartford Courant that the department is awaiting the findings of a DCF investigation.
Despite the ongoing DCF investigation, a criminal investigation by police found no actual wrongdoing by the officer. "[T]here was and never will be a time when I would go over and actually do what I had written via text," Akerley wrote in his defense in a memo to his superiors. At least one parent commended Akerley's commitment according to the internal affairs report. If it saved "even one kid, then he felt that it was a useful tool," the parent was quoted as saying. The department apparently released nearly 1,200 pages of internal affairs reports on Akerley to the media.
More Reason on police in schools here.
UPDATE:
Akerley e-mailed Reason today, April 14, 2014:
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing this letter asking for your consideration in removing "DARE officer in Connecticut fired for texting 11-year old girl, several others", posted on October 17, 2013 at 1:08 PM from your site and from any search engine.
In October of 2013, my Department began termination proceedings against me, not because I had done anything criminally or sexually wrong, but because it allegedly violated Town policy. As a result of the Department's decision to begin termination proceedings, I resigned from the department. The current availability of this article on the website, however, continues to cause damage to my reputation. I am a father who is trying to provide for his family and move on from this unfortunate situation. With the continued availability of this article effects my ability to obtain a job. It is for this reason that I respectfully request that your website remove this article from posting and search engines.
Thank you for your consideration,
Todd Akerley
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Dunphy?
too much neck
"[T]here was and never will be a time when I would go over and actually do what I had written via text," Akerley wrote in his defense
Alrighty, then.
The department apparently released nearly 1,200 pages of internal affairs reports on Akerley to the media.
"What part of 'internal affairs' do you not understand?!"
It took them accumulating 1200 pages of reports on this cretinous piece of shit to terminate him?
^^This^^ is why qualified immunity and pubsec unions need to be abolished. These fuckers should all be at-will employees.
"[T]here was and never will be a time when I would go over and actually do what I had written via text," Akerley wrote in his defense
I'll have to remember this defense the next time I text an 11-year-old to ask her whether she'd like to taste my dick.
Yeah, you wonder what he wrote that he had to give assurances he wouldn't actually do it.
Eww.
Holy shit, a high school friend of mine is a teacher at Avon. I should email him and ask him about this.
"[T]here was and never will be a time when I would go over and actually do what I had written via text," Akerley wrote in his defense in a memo to his superiors.
Wait...what? That's a defense?
If it stands up, I wonder if every person ever convicted of conspiracy will be released.
"Your honor, I swear I never intended to act on my plan to kill that person or rob that bank."
Yeah, right.
Well, actually, if you never did anything to further the conspiracy, that would be right. It requires intent + overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Tell that to the kid who sat in a cell for months because he said he was gonna "shoot up a school full of kids and eat their still-beating hearts" while playing a video game. Because if "making terroristic threats" isn't a conspiracy crime, I don't know what is.
"Making terroristic threats" is just that, making threats. Not saying it makes sense, but it's an actual thoughtcrime. I assume that's why they invented it, because conspiracy charges are just too hard to make stick.
One rule for us little people and another for our betters.
There's also solicitation to consider.
The Weathermen have been using that defense since the 1970s. "We never intended to hurt anybody, we only hurt and killed our own people." When someone actually got hurt or killed, they just skipped sending a communiqu? about fire bombings, or failed attempts by snipers.
They even kept "avenging" the incarceration of Sam Grossman (Melville)after his confession, conviction, and death at Attica prison. His bombings injured plenty of people. Somehow, he is not in their club anymore.
It works with the their fellow travelers press, but it should never work with a judge.
"[T]here was and never will be a time when I would go over and actually do what I had written via text,"
The truthfulness of his texts no doubt match the truthfulness of his other reports.
The guy's defense is that he's a pathological liar.
the case for Dunphy grows stronger.
still, needs more surf board.
Then again, DARE is nothing but a program of bald-faced lies.
Perhaps he could claim that police work made him insane.
Ooh, like HAL 9000 - just less murdery and more molesty.
If it saved "even one kid, then he felt that it was a useful tool," the parent was quoted as saying.
Talk about your useful tools.
Goddammit! Skunked by 60 seconds.
Yeah I'll do that.
Sure DARE saved a few kids, and ruined 5x more than it saved.
"That stopped clock is totally worth it, it's right twice a day. We need to budget for 718 more just like it."
I'm sure the cop was trying to make use of his tool.
Well, you know, that parent might run over a child some day, so taking away his driver's license might save even one kid, therefore it's totally worth it. I expect him to surrender his lecnse immediately.
If it saved "even one kid, then he felt that it was a useful tool," the parent was quoted as saying.
The parent here sounds like a tool, albeit a pretty useless one.
When will they finally admit that DARE is nothing but a cop dating service for pederasts and rapists?
Dating
Agency for
Rapists in
Enforcement
Deviant
Assholes
Real
Ephebophiles
If these kids are smoking cop pole they won't have time to smoke grass, crack, or Krokodil infused banana peels.
He did it for the children!
And pray for the poor child caught in the act of smoking the pig's pole. She, or he, will be tazed and charged with assaulting the pig's penis.
She, or he, was not unresponsive.
Dickless
Authoritarians
Reducing
Enjoyment
Will they be recruiting Roman Polanski to produce their promotional videos now?
ur a perv kthxbai
in vino veritas
Here we go again, all the libertine-arians crying about how evil people who try to stop kids from destroying their lives with drugs are.
...crying about how evil people who try to stop kids from destroying their lives with drugs are.
Admittedly, it is much harder for 11 year olds to smoke the devil's lettuce when they've got a 50 year old man's wee wee in their mouth, but surely even the most ardent drug warrior could see how this might not be optimal, yes?
Yeah. Poor, poor Officer Overlyfriendly should be allowed to use his official capacity to hit on preteens in the name of "drugs are bad, mmkay."
I think Chris Hansen was given that exact same excuse on every episode of "To Catch a Predator" but since this particular perp is a member of the tubby blue line he gets a pass?
"[T]here was and never will be a time when I would go over and actually do what I had written via text,"
Holy fucking shit. What the hell did he write in the texts???
"Baby, you should consider joining the Libertarian Party"
http://static4.fjcdn.com/comme.....f612c7.jpg
Shit, SF'd the link
http://i41.tinypic.com/168hb1y.jpg
I can make some suggestions.
How about: "Instead of putting a joint between your lips, may I suggest my throbbing uncircumcised member?
Ooh, what kind of self-respecting man wouldn't get circumcised?
The kind of man who doesn't appreciate having someone attack Mr. Happy with a scalpel.
... and here goes this thread...
(I myself fall into the anti-circumcision crowd)
Please, no. It was a joke and all of you men out there with a turtleneck on your dick can relax. I meant no offense.
Lol, it was a joke based on the huge circumcision threads that pop up (cwutididthar?) on here.
I should clarify, I'm only against compulsory circumcision of children. When you're old enough for informed consent, lop away.
Oh, people use the internet to talk about circumcision being clean and healthy while uncurcumcised penises are all nasty and covered with smegma? I didn't know that.
Well then forget I brought it up.
A guy who sells mayo to look down on smegma- hilarious.
Agreed. Let's cut down on this thread before it gets too big to handle.
Yes, we need to nip it in the bud.
That's only for Muslims.
That kind of talk isn't kosher bro. Cut it out.
"Looks like a wallet"
"Just rub it a little bit and it turns into a briefcase"
"[T]here was and never will be a time when I would go over and actually do what I had written via text,"
I believe him.
I'm certain he would go over and actually do what he had written physically.
I'm starting to realize Bad Lieutenant was a documentary.
I would actually be really scared if my daughter (s/wife, etc) were getting harassed by a cop. You know you can't go to the police chief. I guess I would call up my town council representative.
The safer play is to just move to a different municipality. Because even if you're in the right and your buddy on the city council gets the cop fired, the thick blue wall will destroy your life for "ruining a career of an otherwise fine officer".
That would definitely be in the works, especially since Pennsylvania is such a spaghetti bowl of shit little municipalities that it wouldn't affect anything to do so.
Despite the ongoing DCF investigation, a criminal investigation by police found no actual wrongdoing by the officers.
Wait, this actually works? Text away, as long as you don't actually do anything physical? Who here wants to test this by sexting middle schoolers?
Who here wants to test this by sexting middle schoolers?
Paging Warty. Mr. Warty, please pick up the white courtesy phone. Mr. Warty, please.
Warty has a very, very different definition of 'sexting' than normal humans do.
OK, can someone educate me on this Warty meme? Thank you!
Unfortunately, no one can be told what The Warty is. You have to see it for yourself.
And risk poking my eye out? No thanks.
Go into your basement at night, pull down your pants and underwear, get on your knees, and you shall know Warty.
Warty would never go for something that easy.
Meme? You wish!
We can't tell you because too many details might seriously endanger your sanity...
So he's some kind of Lovecraft monster?
Lovecraft is dirtier than I thought.
You were warned.
You were too kind. That one was relatively tame.
Am I the only one that considers this art?
It was magnificent; he could crush a cinder block with his new futurecock and it played its own theme music at cervix rattling volume.
I know Jesse, it WAS one of the relatively tame tales, but I don't want to be held responsible for creating another Shriek.
That's fair, I wouldn't want that kind of responsibility on my head either.
OK, can someone educate me on this Warty meme? Thank you!
He doesn't know about the Warty meme.
/rob schneider derisive snicker
Think of a medusa of penises. Cut one off and two more appear. The only way you can destroy The Warty is to starve it. Unfortunately, there is always a McDonalds open somewhere.
Wouldn't that be a hydra of penises? Medusa was a Gorgon, IIRC.
doh. [hangs head in shame for fucking up the joke]
On the other hand, the Warty could be a gorgon:
Hair made out of venomous (trouser) snakes- check.
Too hideous to behold- check.
That could explain the Gorgonzola smell emanating from Cleveland.
Texting tweens is more a STEVE SMITH thing than a Warty thing.
STEVE SMITH HATE SMARTPHONE! STEVE SMITH NEED REAL BUTTONS TO PUSH! STEVE SMITH GO BACK TO BLACKBERRY BUSH AND RAPE APPLE TREE!
I stand corrected.
They need to be more specific: what's a useful tool? The DARE program? The officer's text messages to underage girls? The officer's penis? I find all of those to be highly doubtful. Especially the last one.
If the officer wanted to fuck kids why didn't he pursue a career in juvenile corrections?
A male juvenile corrections officer is only allowed to work with boys. This guy wanted to bang young girls. I think.
I used to work at this place frequented by young people, and one girl who was very sexually mature used to flirt with me a lot. One day I asked her her age. Twelve. That's right. She was twelve years old. Ho. Lee. Fuk. I was floored. I mean, in my day they didn't start looking like that until at least fifteen. Twelve.
Anyway, from then on I avoided her as much as I could without being rude.
This guy's a creep. That's all there is to it.
Maybe she was an underdeveloped 18 years old LEO.
No. She acted her age. She just didn't look it.
Good thing you didn't offend her! In Georgia, all that is required to get a conviction of child molestation is an accusation.
I was accused by a family member because I tried to interfere in the coke-snorting and booze-swilling life of his mother.
Good thing his lies were so outrageous and numerous as it gave my lawyer plenty of places to break him down on the stand.
When the DA saw she was going to lose, I was offered a trial-ending plea of 2 counts of misdemeanor assault which I took. Even though it appeared I would win, it was a sure thing.
I took a small bite of a shit sandwich to ensure I would not end up in prison for what would effectively been a life's sentence.
Thing is, the cops did not do their duty to protect the innocent as they did a half-assed and indifferent investigation to protect me!
Why work when you can get paid for getting fat on gobbled doughnuts and swilled coffee?
There are people in jail and on sex offenders lists for texting one 17 year old.
I mean regular people. Not of the Enforcer Caste.
"[I]t was a useful tool."
This cop is a tool! D.A.R.E. is as much a fraud as Head Start. Neither has been shown to be effective after many studies. Both programs have admirable goals but ineffective processes driven by assumptions and not science.