Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: NSA Gathering Email, IM Contacts Worldwide, Reid Says Talks With McConnell Have Made "Tremendous Progress," Teens Suspended For Wearing Confederate Flags

Matthew Feeney | 10.15.2013 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | NSA/Wikimedia
(NSA/Wikimedia)
Credit: National Security Agency/wikimedia
  • The Washington Post is reporting that the NSA has been collecting contacts from email address books and instant messaging accounts from around the world.
  • Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says that talks with Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on ending the current fiscal stalemate have made "tremendous progress."
  • Two teens have been suspended from Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington after wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month.
  • An alleged pirate kingpin has been arrested after being lured to Belgium from Somalia to participate in a fake documentary.
  • Inspectors working on destroying Syria's chemical weapons are facing numerous challenges including tight deadlines and a dangerous security situation.
  • The second dry ice explosion in two days has been reported at LAX.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. Have a news tip? Send it to us!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Jerry Brown Vetoes Bill Banning Warrantless Searches of E-Mails in California

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (419)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The second dry ice explosion in two days has been reported at LAX.

    I blame 90's rap musician names.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      Investigators, however, aren't considering the blast to be connected to any terror plot.

      Thank God!

      But -- why does anyone *need* dry ice?

      1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

        I bought carbon credits, I want them delivered in actual carbon.

      2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        I'm pretty sure it was AR-15 assault ice, at that.

        1. WTF   12 years ago

          It wasn't assault ice unless it had the shoulder thing that goes up.

        2. Snark Plissken   12 years ago

          Did they specify how many bullets and clips of dry ice there were?

          1. PM   12 years ago

            I believe it was an assault magazine drum clip.

      3. mr simple   12 years ago

        Dry ice, aka assault ice, can only be used to hurt children. Therefore, ban it.

      4. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

        Dry ice bomb

        Guys at ground zero of dry ice bomb explosions, laughing

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Those dry ice explosions are truly sublime.

      1. GILMORE   12 years ago

        they're a real gas!

        1. pan fried wylie   12 years ago

          Ideally.

      2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        WOW...I mean, just...wow

      3. Emmerson Biggins   12 years ago

        I'll admit I wasn't gonna get it with out the follow ups. Well done.

  2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    FIST!

    1. WTF   12 years ago

      Missed it by that much!

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        that's what she said.

  3. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    An alleged pirate kingpin has been arrested after being lured to Belgium from Somalia to participate in a fake documentary.

    Is there anything Tom Hanks can't do well?

    1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      Produce insulin, apparently.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        I laughed. Does that make me a type 2 bad person?

        1. pan fried wylie   12 years ago

          If you resisted laughing at that joke, yes. If you would've died had you not laughed at it, you'd be a type 1.

          1. Rich   12 years ago

            Nice. 😎

      2. Live Free or Diet   12 years ago

        Produce insulin, apparently.

        Funny, but inaccurate.
        Type 2 diabetes isn't a lack of insulin production, it's a resistance to insulin's action. Type 2 diabetics often produce much more insulin than non-diabetics.

        1. pan fried wylie   12 years ago

          Live Free of Diet is a type 3 bad person, aka "A Real Blast At Parties."

    2. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

      Marketing tie in?

    3. CE   12 years ago

      If only Bush and Obama could be lured to Belgium and tried for their war crimes.

  4. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

    Physicist: There was no Fukushima nuclear disaster

    From the comments, a couple Navy Nukes weigh in:

    Matt Cash:

    No one is immune from the hysteria.

    I was stationed in Japan onboard the USS George Washington (in the reactor department) when the tsunami hit Fukushima. Our sensors are extremely sensitive, and the dust was able to set them off. Naturally, almost everyone not-nuclear trained started to panic about the potential contamination, which lead to the option of a mass evac from base. Of course, all of the nuclear trained workers just rolled their eyes and expected a massive influx of work to quell fears and start cleanup.

    It was NOT fun.

    David McFarland:

    Essentially, being "in the plume," meant "DON'T LICK THE GROUND," and you'd be fine. Even if you did, you'd pretty much have to eat the dust on a regular basis to have an effect - that effect being you might set off a radiac. To get blood or blood effects, the first signs of radiation sickness, you'd have to have gone to extreme measures and it'd have to be quite intentional. It was actually to the point that it couldn't be guaranteed it wasn't coming from the Chinese Coal Plants, who regularly spew out trace amounts of uranium and other harmful elements and contaminate far more than Fukushima ever has.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      Very interesting article. Thanks.

    2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      Firstly let us get something clear. There was no Fukushima nuclear disaster. Total number of people killed by nuclear radiation at Fukushima was zero. Total injured by radiation was zero. Total private property damaged by radiation?.zero. There was no nuclear disaster. What there was, was a major media feeding frenzy fuelled by the rather remote possibility that there may have been a major radiation leak.

      At the time, there was media frenzy that "reactors at Fukushima may suffer a core meltdown." Dire warnings were issued. Well the reactors did suffer a core meltdown. What happened? Nothing.

      Certainly from the 'disaster' perspective there was a financial disaster for the owners of the Fukushima plant.

      1. robc   12 years ago

        The statistical number of extra cancer deaths due to the radiation release from Three Mile Island was approximately zero point five.

        The stress from worrying about it, on the other hand....

      2. Root Boy   12 years ago

        You are really harshing ZeroHedge's mellow, plus I'm sure a lot of left wing sites are twisting their panties over three eyed fish.

    3. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

      I know some guys who were stationed on Guam when it happened. Some local NR reps went to Japan to help somehow. Apparently they tracked some contamination back to the boats on Guam, which made things difficult for everyone.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        So they detected some level of radiation? That is the great thing about radiation, it is very very easily detected down to incredibly low levels.

        I guarantee you that any "contamination" they detected was not even remotely a danger to anybody.

        People living around Fukushima should have been allowed back to their homes over 2 years ago. The only reason they are not is due to ridiculous radiation level standards promoted by an irrational fear of low level radiation.

        1. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

          Never said it was dangerous, but the engine rooms I'm talking about are normally quite clean as far as contamination goes. We're talking about levels that took a normally quiet radiac and pegged it during the normal survey - and that's after walking around for days before being measured (and thus depositing it everywhere). The difficulty I was talking about mostly was paperwork-oriented.

          And you look like a fool with the scare quotes, that's the technical term for it.

          1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

            The paperwork issue tends to be the biggest issue that power plants have to deal when anything is detected. I understand what you mean. It provides non-trivial economic headaches for utilities with detections reports that are not reality based safety issues.

            The scare quotes? I use quotes because most of the time people use contamination for anything from a Bq of detected radiation up to something actual dangerous. It has become an almost meaningless word in conversation.

            1. Randian filtered me, I WIN!   12 years ago

              "I use quotes because" you have an agenda.

              Admittedly, it's to inform, and remove the stigma of radiation, but as eh said, you still look like a hyper partisan asshole and a fool when you use them.

              Do you get that? That you look like a whacko too when you do what whackos do?

    4. CE   12 years ago

      Let me guess -- the guys in the reactor department faced more nuclear contamination daily than the plume exposed them to.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says that talks with Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on ending the current fiscal stalemate have made "tremendous progress."

    Tremendous progress in sowing the seeds of our next fiscal stalemate.

  6. a better weapon   12 years ago

    Two teens have been suspended from Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington after wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month.

    Easy solution: Just wear a rainbow colored version of the ol' Stars and Bars

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      Awesome. Quick -- "patent" that!

      1. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

        Already done.
        http://burndownblog.files.word.....ainbow.jpg

        1. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

          Awsome. There's a Gay Gadsen Flag:
          http://www.1000flags.co.uk/ekm.....8[ekm].gif

          1. Rich   12 years ago

            Fabulous!

          2. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

            I've been using a rainbow Gadsden flag as my Facebook avatar for some time.

    2. WTF   12 years ago

      What possible problem could there be with a government entity banning a type of expression based on political viewpoint?

      1. CE   12 years ago

        None. It's for the children. And to prevent hate. Also, zero tolerance and to stop cyber bullying.

    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Well, that's an easy lawsuit.

    4. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month

      But remember, the Confederate Flag is ONLY about southern cultural heritage and should in no way be treated as an expression of intolerance. I mean it would be crazy to think that's what the people wearing it mean.

      1. DesigNate   12 years ago

        Yeah, cause collectivizing everyone that might wear or have a Confederate Battle Flag is totally productive and not the wrong thing to do at all.

      2. Randian filtered me, I WIN!   12 years ago

        "But remember, the Confederate Flag is ONLY about southern cultural heritage "

        That's is exactly what your post shows, yes.

      3. CE   12 years ago

        I thought it meant they wanted out of this perpetual Union and rule from DC.

      4. Redmanfms   12 years ago

        Ahem

        PROG BULLSHIT.

        That is all.

  7. Jordan   12 years ago

    Jerry Brown lets us down one last time:

    California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) vetoed a state online privacy bill that would have protected residents' electronic communications accounts from warrantless access by law enforcement agencies.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      No, no, Californians have no problem with government doing anything it wants with their information, just so long as it doesn't shares its with nasssssty corporationssss.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    ...the NSA has been collecting contacts from email address books and instant messaging accounts from around the world.

    And selling them to Nigerian princes.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      (Speaking of the 90's...)

      1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

        Is this the official declaration of your television show starring Reason commenters designed to compete with VH1's I Love The... series?

        1. CE   12 years ago

          No, that's Behind the Comments.

          He started out as a run-of-the-mill conservative Republican. Then came the unexpected success, drugs, the inevitable infighting, and finally, wild anarchistic screeds with lots of capital letters and brackets.

          But now, older and wiser, he just mocks Obama and Boehner.

  9. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    What Does the Average American Man Look Like Compared to Other Countries?

    The Dutch have some of the world's best healthcare, particularly at the stages of life that really make a difference for how tall we end up -- prenatal and the early years of childhood.

    Second, they spread the health around. The most well-off Americans are tall, but less-privileged groups across all races bring down the average.

    Our waistbands drag us down, as well. By eating so much, we produce too much growth hormone, too early in our lives. And so we stop growing earlier than the Dutch, who eat lots of protein like milk and cheese, but not too much.

    ahh... I'm 100% Dutch and tall... all with good ol' Americun healthcare.

    1. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

      If diet has that much to do with it, then the only solution is single-payer food care.

    2. WTF   12 years ago

      You Sugarfreed the link.

      1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

        so I did
        http://www.mydeals.com/blog/wh.....tries/post

    3. mr simple   12 years ago

      Intentions trump genetics; don't mess with the narrative.

    4. Fluffy   12 years ago

      So let me get this straight.

      Even though people hailing from the general vicinity of the Netherlands have had a reputation for hugeness that goes back to Tacitus' time...

      And even though the US population contains large numbers of persons who are predisposed to shortness by their ethnicity...

      ...Dutch people are taller than Americans because of single payer health care.

      Fuck you.

      1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        TEAM FLUFFY

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        I'm tall and Scot-German--all on American healthcare.

        1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

          6'3 and no healthcare growing up. Methinkgs its ignoring factors for the sake of their policy goal.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            I'm merely 6'2. Clearly lost an inch due to American healthcare.

      3. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html

        According to WHO, France, Italy and San Marino have the toppest systems. Netherlands 17th - so if that makes you feel better about single payer.

        Here in Canada, we're not that much healthier and we have single payer.

        I don't know what to make of anything anymore.

    5. Griffin3   12 years ago

      Heredity. How does it work?

    6. Steve G   12 years ago

      I'd really love to see the research that formed their conclusion that 'eating so much' resulted in shortness. By that logic North Koreans should be taller than South Koreans. Would have been nice to see them dig into the content of the diet since there's far more evidence of grains affecting height than excess calories.

    7. CE   12 years ago

      The Dutch are taller because they are more free. Freedom is always equated to health and physical and mental well being. When the scurvy-ridden Europeans arrived in North America, they were shocked at how tall the natives were.

  10. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    Two teens have been suspended from Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington after wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month.

    Take that, confederate kids, you've just been emancipated from the slavery of school.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Two teens have been suspended from Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington after wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month.

    The south's latently homosexual boner shall rise again.

    1. wareagle   12 years ago

      what part of the south is Washington state located in?

      1. Ebriosa   12 years ago

        South Canada.

  12. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Two teens have been suspended from Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington after wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month.

    Free speech is not actually, you know, free.

    1. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

      Right not to be offended!

      1. WTF   12 years ago

        But what if some students were offended by the rainbow flag?

        1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

          Anyone offended by the rainbow flag is intolerant and should be punished.

          1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

            I don't tolerate the tolerent.

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Actually, it's the right of the Confederate flag kids to get a nice settlement that we won't hear about. Their lawsuit is a slam dunk.

        1. PM   12 years ago

          On what grounds? Courts have ruled that schools have basically unlimited leeway to determine dress codes at their whim and pleasure; the right to free speech isn't unlimited in schools; etc.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            It's viewpoint discrimination, and it is illegal if they don't apply these sorts of restrictions evenly.

          2. BigT   12 years ago

            Not so fast, cowboy. The school can censor based on written dress codes only, not arbitrarily on the political nature of the content.

  13. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    One in a million, doc. One in a million.

    Henan man gets 28cm wooden handle inserted into anus after jumping onto it (Warning: Graphic content)

    In a fate we wouldn't wish upon even our worst enemy, a man in Henan province got the wooden handle of an iron rake stuck into his anus after accidentally jumping over a fence and onto it.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      "Rectum? Damn near killed 'im!"

    2. WTF   12 years ago

      "I swear to God, Doc, it was the wierdest accident!"

    3. The DerpRider   12 years ago

      Fusilli..er Cedar Jerry?

  14. a better weapon   12 years ago

    The Washington Post is reporting that the NSA has been collecting contacts from email address books and instant messaging accounts from around the world.

    I was under the impression that the NSA already had everyone's contact. There was a time when these revelations would have been shocking, but my assumptions are way ahead of whats now coming out.

    1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

      I'm just hoping they'll do a better job of keeping in touch with them. It'll relieve some guilt of mine.

      1. Root Boy   12 years ago

        I hope they can re-organize my gmail contacts, I think I have three versions of everybody I ever called or emailed due to Google's vacuuming skills.

        1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

          DO NOT DOWNLOAD/USE FULLCONTACT!!!
          It will asspolode everything you have ever done to clean up your contacts.

    2. Bam!   12 years ago

      Jokes on them: Libertarians don't have any friends.

      1. PD Scott   12 years ago

        That just makes us seem suspicious - obviously we're hiding our true contacts, no one can be that a-/anti-social. We must be organized into cells intent on nefarious anti-governmental activities like sabotaging Obamacare exchanges.

  15. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    93-year-old Ore. man crashes into 2 homes, says he will still drive

    "My foot slipped off the brake and got stuck between the brake pedal and throttle," he said.

    His car went right through a vacant mobile home and came to rest inside a mobile home that wasn't vacant. Denny Long just missed getting hit while he was sitting in his chair.

    "It was like a bomb blowing up," he said. "The only good thing was that my grand kids weren't here. They were supposed to be here yesterday."

  16. Rich   12 years ago

    The NSA's director, Gen. Keith B. Alexander, has defended "bulk" collection as an essential counterterrorism and foreign intelligence tool, saying, "You need the haystack to find the needle."

    You know, if we *must* go with this analogy -- "If you have a powerful enough magnet you don't need the haystack."

    1. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

      Yes, my wife loves it when, just as she's about to start a sewing project, I dump a stack of hay over her needles.

    2. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      "We're looking for bone needles, nonmetallic devices and such... DON'T TAKE OUR FUNDING!"

    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Except that they don't have a right to my haystack or needles without a warrant, which they can't get unless they have probable cause that I'm committing a crime.

      1. PD Scott   12 years ago

        The poison gas phosgene reputedly smells like freshly mown grass or hay? your haystack needs to be investigated to make sure you're not making WMDs. And as for needles, my God, man, they're *dangerous*, being all pointy and sharp. Clearly anyone with needles and a haystack is a dangerous madman? or completely innocent. Only careful investigation will reveal which it is at this time. Repeated investigation is required - the price of freedom is eternal vigilance, after all.

  17. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Scotland and the American Revolution

    From the presence of Scots in congress, to the influence of common sense moral philosophy (Paine's phrase was not coincidental), to the still-debated influence of the 1320 Declaration of Arbroath on the 1776 Declaration of Independence, Scots were, and are, credited with a disproportionate impact on American independence.[1] One thing missing from Fleming's excellent article, however, is the inconvenient truth that eighteenth-century Scots largely disavowed the American Revolution. In both Scotland and America, the overwhelming majority of Scots rejected colonial theories about the rights of Englishmen and remained loyal to the British crown.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      In both Scotland and America, the overwhelming majority of Scots rejected colonial theories about the rights of Englishmen and remained loyal to the British crown.

      That explains a lot, considering that Scotland is dominated by lunatic proglodytes now.

      1. Root Boy   12 years ago

        Yeah, doesn't Scotland have the (or one of the) highest rates of welfare in the western world? Bunch of badass picts are now a bunch of poofters.

        1. KDN   12 years ago

          Colonised by wankers.

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            +1 Trainspotting

          2. sloopyinca   12 years ago

            +1 dose of smack.

        2. robc   12 years ago

          As of late 90s, Scottish were 1.7% of US households and 9.3% of US millionaire households.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Germans, on the other hand, were 19.5% and 17.3%, respectively.

          2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Those numbers have to be a little suspect, anyway. How many people of Scottish or German descent have recent immigrants as ancestors? I've read that a very large number of Americans have German blood.

            1. robc   12 years ago

              Self-designation of ancestry, according to footnote on table.

              So they may not have any RECENT ancestry.

              Although the group with the best ratio is probably mostly recent: Russian at 1.1% and 6.4%.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                Russian mob money is still money.

                The Scottish lines I know anything about both go back in the U.S. to before the Revolutionary War (one back to the late 1600s). One of the German lines (again, the one I know anything about) goes back to the early 1800s.

                Whatever the case, I certainly don't think of myself as anything other than American and would answer that way in a survey, unless it asked specifically where most of my ancestors came from.

                1. robc   12 years ago

                  Im only seeing the table, so looks like they asked "ancestry group/ethnic origin" so might not have accepted "mutt".

                  1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

                    WELSH FOR THE WIN BITCHES!!!

                    1. BuSab Agent   12 years ago

                      I lived in Wales for four years. Let me tell you of your ancestors. They are really, really short, however they like to sing, fight, and drink...generally simultaneously.

                    2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

                      Cardiff castle is evidence of this...JESUS CHRIST A HAND RAIL WOULDN'T KILL YOU!

                    3. BuSab Agent   12 years ago

                      The lack of handrails is a Darwinian method to eliminate the English tourists.

        3. CE   12 years ago

          But true Scotsmen all.

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        True, but if we're comparing with revolutionary times, I fear we're not doing any better in the comparison. If the Founders were alive today, they'd be seeking an injunction on our use of the name, United States of America.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          Back then it was the united States of America.

    2. Raven Nation   12 years ago

      Yeah, well, you know it was the Irish who saved civilization...

      http://www.amazon.com/How-Iris.....vilization

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        Raven Nation,

        You do realize that "scholarly" work and theory is mostly exaggerated if not somewhat overblown, right?

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

          Wow. That was one piece of bad writing on my part. Anyway, the spirit of the argument remains.

          Speaking of which, where's Tony?

    3. robc   12 years ago

      Scots largely disavowed the American Revolution

      Tell that to:

      Edward Rutledge
      William Hooper
      George Ross
      Matthew Thornton
      Thomas McKean
      George Taylor
      James Wilson
      Phillip Livingston
      and, of course, John Witherspoon.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Yeah, um, I'm descended from Scots that weren't loyalists. It might have something to do with where those Scots lived, I guess.

        1. robc   12 years ago

          Those 9 were spread across most of the colonies.

          Off the top of my head, Rutledge was SC, McKean was DE, Wilson was PA, Livingston was NY, and Witherspoon was NJ.

          We have mid Atlantic and South covered, and Im pretty sure 1 or 2 are from New England.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Hooper was NC, Thornton was NH. Taylor and Ross were PA with Wilson.

            So the 9 Scot signers covered 7 states.

      2. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

        So if the claim is that a group of thousands "largely" opposed something, your comeback is a list of people you can count on both hands?

        1. robc   12 years ago

          Considering only 56 people signed the Declaration, 9 is a significant fucking percentage.

          Unless you have some sort of weird argument that all of the pro-revolution Scotsmen were signers, Ive going to assume the were representative of their people.

          1. Seamus   12 years ago

            It's a significant fucking percentage of signers of the Declaration, but it's a pretty fucking insignificant percentage of Scotsmen, which is what we were talking about.

            (I'm not even bothering to put the rabbit in the hat by arguing that no true Scotsman supported the American Revolution.)

            1. Seamus   12 years ago

              After all, 100% of the signers of the Declaration were supporters of the American Revolution, which tells you exactly nothing about how widely supported the Revolution among the population at large. (Well, I suppose it tells you that at least 56 people supported the Revolution, which is slightly more than "exactly nothing.")

            2. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

              I'm disappointed. All this talk about the Scottish and no one said, "if it's not Scottish, it's crrrap!"

              Anyway, I think there's something to the notion that there are a "disproportionate" amount of significant Scottish figures in history.

          2. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

            The proposition is not "A lot of Scotsmen supported the Declaration," it was "A lot of Scotsmen did not support the Declaration." Given the conventional wisdom is that only as much as a third of colonials supported independence it seems like a stretch to say that a body that voted unanimously for independence was representative of the people.

            At any rate it seems just as fallacious to say that those men were there representing their ethnicity. To even be there you had to be of a mind to oppose the king in the first place, so you're really just cherry-picking here.

            1. robc   12 years ago

              Given the conventional wisdom is that only as much as a third of colonials supported independence

              Well yeah, and Im assuming that every demographic was roughly in that percentage, so to be a considerable supporter, you needed roughly that amount.

              And ancestry of signers is probably a decent measure of ancestry of supporters.

              I think the Scot colonists were probably MORE supportive of the revolution than the English colonists. Which still means a minority of the Scots, but its a relative measure, not an absolute one.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                It's not like the Scottish were fond of the English at that time. Or most other times.

              2. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

                Again, the claim FTA is that

                In both Scotland and America, the overwhelming majority of Scots rejected colonial theories about the rights of Englishmen and remained loyal to the British crown.

                Your assumptions and hypotheses make sense to a certain degree, but the article claims actual evidence here:

                Scottish emigrants, more often than not, became Loyalists and participated in large numbers in the armed provincial regiments. The most sophisticated retort to the Declaration of Independence, The Rights of Great Britain Asserted Against the Claims of America: being an Answer to the Declaration of the General Congress, was penned by James Macpherson, a Scottish member of parliament who, in addition to his well-known fabrications of Gaelic poetry, also wrote for the North government.

                I'm not equipped to assess this claim but it needs to be answered, and "look as these 16% of Declaration signers" doesn't do it.

                1. robc   12 years ago

                  English emigrants, more often than not, became Loyalists.

                  If you define Loyalist as "not a supporter of the revolution", that is clearly true for both groups.

                  We both agree that roughly only 1/3 of colonists were supporters of the revolution. If only 1/6 of Scots were supporters, I will buy that statement, if its in the 25-35% range, meh, no different than the English.

                  From trying to google around, the one impression I get is that the Scots had a lesser percentage of "indifferent" colonists.

                  Ive always heard the overall as 1/3 revolutionary, 1/3 loyalist, 1/3 didnt care.

                  The Scots also seem to have had a reputation for switching sides depending on who was winning.

                  1. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

                    You're neglecting the "signed up for the army" part of the evidence above. I'd take that as a stronger indicator than a phone poll.

                    Again, I don't know the specific nature of the evidence but I think it makes a stronger case than your rebuttal, mostly because your rebuttals haven't answered it. Nor am I invested in the notion that one of my ethnicities was heavily into the Revolution. I'm just commenting on your rigor here.

                2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  What did they do, poll the Scots? I'm dubious about claims of "more often than not" that aren't backed by reasons why they're saying that. Not like there were polls or registration booths for Loyalists.

                  Not being defensive here--doesn't bother me whether Scots were for or against the Revolution and whatever Scottishness I have is hopelessly diluted. Just sounds a little fishy to me.

                  1. robc   12 years ago

                    Same here.

                    Im not of any Scot descent, as far as I know, I just dont buy the storyline.

                    The only evidence I seem to get is that the Scots were possibly more fickle.

                    There were two areas of strong Scot loyalist resistance, upstate NY and Cape Fear.

                    1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

                      The only evidence I seem to get is that the Scots were possibly more fickle.

                      I'm pretty sure the Scots were more freckled.

        2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          It's a statistical sample. Sort of. A little nonrandom, but hey, they're all dead and stuff.

    4. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      Trainspotting!

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        Sorry. Hadn't 'spotted' someone - Restoras - mentioned it. Still...

  18. KDN   12 years ago

    Chevron's landmark lawsuit exposes 'greenmail'

    Chevron is suing lawyer Steven Donziger and a number of activist environmental groups in a civil-racketeering suit, claiming that his landmark $19 billion award against the oil company in an Ecuadorean court was the product of a criminal conspiracy.

    Ironically, much of the company's evidence comes from footage shot for "Crude," an award-winning pro-Donziger documentary that premiered with much publicity at the Sundance Film Festival.

    But he had good intentions!

    1. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Chevron got a court order for more than 500 hours of footage from "Crude" that never made it into the documentary.

      They show Donziger full of contempt for the country he says he cares about, openly boasting about how corrupt Ecuador's judicial system is and planning to intimidate the judge because "the only language . . . this judge is going to understand is one of pressure, intimidation and humiliation."

      The filmmaker even recorded the lawyers lamenting that no pollution had spread from the original drilling sites and "right now all the reports are saying . . . nothing has spread anywhere at all" and how this lack of pollution was a serious problem.

      I really look forward to seeing that footage, actually.

      1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

        I fear I don't have 500 hours to spend, will you fill us in on the highlights?

        1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

          I fear I don't have 500 hours to spend,

          So you won't be going to see the second Hobbit installment later this fall?

          1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

            That's just how long they spent on the endings!

      2. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

        The filmmaker even recorded the lawyers lamenting that no pollution had spread from the original drilling sites and "right now all the reports are saying . . . nothing has spread anywhere at all" and how this lack of pollution was a serious problem.

        The mask slips once again. This is the problem with watermelons: they can barely hide their disappointment when the earth isn't doomed, and the environment turns out to not to be in grave danger. They would rather be right than see the earth not be as fucked up as they predict it will be.

  19. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    House Conservatives Revolt

    In a few minutes, House Republicans will meet in the Capitol's basement. The chief topic of conversation: the emerging Senate deal. But before the meeting even begins, House conservatives are bashing it behind the scenes, and they're pushing the leadership to reject the compromise. A flurry of phone calls and meetings last night and early this morning led the consensus among the approximatley 50 Republicans who form the House GOP's right flank. They're furious with Senate Republicans for working with Democrats to craft what one leading Tea Party congressman calls a "mushy piece of s?t." Another House conservative warns, "If Boehner backs this, as is, he's in trouble."

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Look for AM redneck radio to fully back the Tea Party Congressmen - giving them full cover for their extortion.

      This is going down to the wire and Boehner is going away soon.

      1. WTF   12 years ago

        BUSHPIGS!!111!!!!CHRISTFAGS!!11!!!!

      2. Root Boy   12 years ago

        We can only hope.

      3. CE   12 years ago

        Extortion? The debt ceiling law is settled law, passed by both houses and signed by the president. Why should it be changed without any accompanying compromises?

    2. robc   12 years ago

      "If Boehner backs this, as is, he's in trouble."

      I wonder who has been saying this for the last two weeks here on H&R?

      Boehner is playing for his job right now.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Well, you and I for sure. I actually think I got it from John.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          It's fairly obvious, since Boehner on his own would never have done this. It's a good sign of positive change in the GOP, in any case.

          He's not going to hold that job after the next election--that's my prediction--and not because the GOP doesn't control the House.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            He MIGHT, if he can hold strong now.

            If he caves, he is toast.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Oh, he'll cave. And I think the new representatives coming in for the GOP in 2014 will be less Boehner-tolerant, in any event.

  20. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Carpenter cuts own penis after fight with wife

    Jun Suico, chairman of Barangay Tabok, said Federico Ilustrico, 46, a carpenter, cut his own penis using a shaving blade before noon on Sunday.

    Suico said that Ilustrico has been having several verbal tussles with his wife, whom she suspects of having a lover.

    He said that right after the couple's fight, the man rushed to the back of their house and cut his own manhood with the blade.

    That will show her!

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      Without RTFA, Ima say alcohol was involved.

  21. SugarFree   12 years ago

    Jezebel body snarks a poor, helpless dog.

    Check out the massive butthurt in the comments when someone calls them out about all their standard excuses for being ham planets.

    popmollyimsweatULaura Beck271L
    Wow a dog lost weight through diet and exercise? What is this witchcraft?
    Yesterday 11:53pm

    lolololllalUpopmollyimsweat341L
    I HAVE A GENETIC CONDITION! I'M GENETICALLY PREDISPOSED TO NOT CONTROL MY PORTIONS AND EAT POORLY AND AT ALL HOURS OF THE DAY WAAAWAAAWAAA.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      Excellent.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Awesome.

    3. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      thisisthinprivilege.tumblr.com

      If you want something that makes Jezebel look intelligent on this subject, read that.

      * DISCLAIMER: I HOLD NO RESPONSIBILITY TO DAMAGE DONE TO YOUR PHONE, TABLET, LAPTOP AND/OR MONITOR FROM THROWING AND/OR PUNCHING AS A RESULT OF READING THE ABOVE LINK.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        These people really have an overinflated sense of how much other people give a shit if they are fat. Yeah, that grocery store shelf stocker really cares about what kind of yougurt you prefer.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Oh look, there's my dick. I can see it without a mirror. Am I flaunting my thin privilege?

    4. mr simple   12 years ago

      The writing on that site is so shitty. Even on articles where I could maybe see their point, I can't get through the overly sarcastic in a bad way vomiting of words and mixed metaphors by a 12 year old style writing. Aren't there any adults who can serve as editors in that organization?

      1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        I think that's a decent device that should be used sparingly. But Jezebel uses it in literally every article. "Like ZOMG YOU GUIZE SRSLY the fratdud Brohams said RAPE is TOTES kewl"

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          thisisthinprivilege writing is even worse. It's like they invented some sort of passive-aggressive second-person omniscience grammerweapon.

        2. mr simple   12 years ago

          I agree. I would never suggest that sarcasm and other mocking tones weren't viable and useful rhetorical devices. They're just all so bad at it, like you said, and all of their writers sound exactly the same.

    5. trshmnstr   12 years ago

      Aw, Obie. I know what it's like. Even though you're a product of your environment and you're happy the way you are, sometimes you have to do it for you. You must feel so much better now that you can live the life you were meant to live. (Just in case anyone has any doubts, I am projecting all my human emotions and experience upon this beautiful dog.)

      This crapola doesn't even compute. At least the admits to being a master of porkjection.

      1. trshmnstr   12 years ago

        Gosh, I took a friggin break from clicking Jez links, because reading their comments drove me to ranting... Can't... resist... the... urge!

  22. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    You need the haystack to find the needle.

    Translation:

    "We know you're guilty of SOMETHING, we just don't know what. Yet."

  23. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

    Why we're creating a 'chickenosaurus'

  24. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Crovitz: ObamaCare's Serious Complications
    For the IRS alone, implementing the law involves 47 different statutory provisions.

    The Government Accountability Office last year calculated that for the IRS alone, implementing ObamaCare would be a "massive undertaking that involves 47 different statutory provisions and extensive coordination." Among them: "disclosure of taxpayer information for determining subsidy eligibility," "drug manufacturer tax" and "high-cost health plan tax." Senate staffers created a mind-boggling graphic showing ObamaCare's various agencies and regulators, which can be viewed at http://1.usa.gov/acamess.

    Ironically, President Obama's former top regulator is among the best known proponents of less complexity. Cass Sunstein, who oversaw regulations for the White House in 2009-12, is the author of "Simpler: The Future of Government," published earlier this year.

    1. Raven Nation   12 years ago

      In case of doubt, the IRS will be right.

      1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        i find it difficult to believe they see this as a bug instead of a feature. Simpler regulation means it is easier to digest and oppose on principle. Complex regulation can be enforced arbitrarily and is difficult to dismantle for fear of competing interests within.

  25. Brett L   12 years ago

    Has this roundup of the Obamacare fail been posted yet? Because it is full of awesome. I eagerly await the apologies from toadying statists now that every naysayer's expressed doubt has come true. Well, the doctor shortages, not yet. But only because the plans are so expensive.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      The result is a parody of an alternate, free-market model of reform. Rather than demand that consumers buy comprehensive insurance, the alternate model would have emphasized catastrophic coverage with high deductibles, which before ObamaCare were low-cost options for healthier consumers who wanted to indemnify themselves against unexpected major costs. Removing insurers from routine maintenance care would have restored price signals and competition to the family-practice market, which would have provided incentives for doctors to re-enter it. Consumers could then have used their HSAs, which are discouraged in the ACA system, to cover their own routine maintenance, and insurers could have returned to their proper role: Indemnifying people against major loss, not acting as wellness managers. That role properly belongs to patients and their physicians, not insurers and certainly not the government.

      Thanks to the ACA, we have the worst of both worlds. Some consumers now have to pay enormous premiums for coverage they can't access until they pay enormous out-of-pocket expenses first, while insurers have to cover even more risk, and providers have to deal with even more red tape. When voters start paying through the nose in this system, they will soon recognize that the administration's ideas of reform are as workable in real life as their ObamaCare exchange website.

      MARKET BASED!

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        Yes, unfortunately the ACA was the only market-based system proposed that broke the back of the cartel.

        The GOP was too stupid to propose anything reasonable at all besides the idiotic bromide of "sell acrost state lines!".

        Now as flawed as the thing is it can be altered to scrape off the government stench.

        1. Jordan   12 years ago

          Nothing cartel-like about companies who don't have to compete across state lines and have to offer identical products.

          Of course, your illiberal definition of cartel is that they were allowed to discriminate in who they sell products to. Because Real Classical Liberals don't believe in freedom of association.

          1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            The limited Open Enrollment period protected the insurers from the dreaded "they is all gonna wait til they get sick!" phenomena.

            1. Jordan   12 years ago

              What does this have to do with my comment?

              1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

                nothing. It's PB's way of "arguing".

              2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

                You referenced insurers who "discriminate".

                I presume you meant based on pre-existing conditions and not race or sex. In that case the OE period prevents someone with a sudden sickness from suddenly enrolling based on a fast diagnosis of say, cancer.

                1. Jordan   12 years ago

                  I presume you meant based on pre-existing conditions and not race or sex. In that case the OE period prevents someone with a sudden sickness from suddenly enrolling based on a fast diagnosis of say, cancer.

                  Which has fuckall to do with my comment, because they still can't refuse people with pre-existing conditions during open enrollment.

                  1. Jordan   12 years ago

                    Just come out and say it: you believe in a right to healthcare and you don't believe in freedom of association.

                  2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

                    Which has fuckall to do with my comment, because they still can't refuse people with pre-existing conditions during open enrollment.

                    And the cartel saw high cholesterol or being female as a reason not to insure.

                    That is one thing cartels do - block entry into a market. Or collude on prices. It was not working given the way insurers exchange information with each other.

                    1. Jordan   12 years ago

                      And the cartel saw high cholesterol or being female as a reason not to insure.

                      And?

                      It was not working given the way insurers exchange information with each other.

                      So we can add freedom of speech to the list of freedoms you don't believe in.

                    2. wareagle   12 years ago

                      That is one thing cartels do - block entry into a market.

                      and who is the cartel's chief enabler in blocking, say, company X from selling in a given state?

                    3. Juice   12 years ago

                      And the cartel saw high cholesterol or being female as a reason not to insure.

                      You could still get a policy, just not one that covered high cholesterol. "Being female" is just hyperbole.

                    4. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

                      PB Believe in slavery. Ultimately that is what his view of health care is. He wants to tell doctors what to do under penalty of law.

          2. tarran   12 years ago

            Jordan,

            Why are you interacting with it?

            It's the Internet equivalent of a homeless guy screaming at a wall.

            If you ignore it, it will go back to screaming at a wall. But by interacting with it, you are encouraging it, because to a mind destroyed by years of having alcohol as its sole source of nutrition, the only thing better than screaming at a wall is when the wall screams back.

            1. Jordan   12 years ago

              I do it all for the lurkers. I remain hopeful that there are some lurkers who might otherwise be sympathetic to this lunatic's views but are not yet beyond saving like him.

              1. tarran   12 years ago

                Any lurker who is persuadable by the incoherent drivel that Shrike gibbers out daily is mentally ill. They'll follow anyone who can count to potato.

                It's literally not worth your time.

              2. Restoras   12 years ago

                True story. The other day I was walking to get lunch in Manhattan, and some homeless guy politely asked me for a dollar. I politely declined. Then he spit at me, whereupon I turned and said, Fuck you, get a job. Said homeless guy then went raving on about my mother this, my mother that, I'magunna fuck you up, etc. etc.

                I knew it was stupid, but I did it anyway and kinda enjoyed it.

                This is exactly like engaging with Shriek and Tony.

          3. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            OTOH, you do say "freedom of association" so you may condone race-based discrimination.

            "Hey, we only insure whiate people!"

            1. Jordan   12 years ago

              OTOH, you do say "freedom of association" so you may condone race-based discrimination.

              Haha. I'll remember this next time you complain about someone on here tarring you as a racist.

              No, I don't condone racial discrimination anymore than I condone being a progressive. I just don't think either should be illegal because I'm not a fascist like you.

              1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

                Once again, Palin "proves" his classical liberal credentials!

            2. GILMORE   12 years ago

              of course thats what he meant... see because = not like Teh Obamacares? YOU IS TEH RACISMS AND HATES THE CRIPPLES AND OLD PEOPLES AND POOR HATER JUST LIKE HATING THE HOMELESS AND HE WANTS THEM ALL TO DIE. because there is no middle ground.

        2. GILMORE   12 years ago

          I DOONT UNDERSTAND... BUSH NOT MAKE TEH BAD LAW SHRIKE?? ME THOUGHT BAD LAW IS TEH TEATHUGLICONS ALWAYS

        3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

          Yes, unfortunately the ACA was the only market-based system proposed that broke the back of the cartel.

          ACA is all about creating a healthcare cartel you disingenuous piece of shit.

          Slap a Blue Eagle Logo on it.

          1. GILMORE   12 years ago

            Blue Eagle??

            BLUE FALCON!!

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-4A2JkwpAY

            "Because Buddies Can't Fuck Themselves"

    2. 2ndClassProle   12 years ago

      I had pretty good insurance until ACA kicked in several years ago.

      10 dollars a week 1000 a year with 2500 deductible

      then with requirements(pre-existing conditions, 26 for a kid)

      20 dollars a week with 1000yr to spend with 2500 deductible

      2013 went down on weekly payment of 15 dollars a week with 500yr to spend with 3500 deductible

      I am apprehensive with upcoming enrollment in Nov.

      1. Juice   12 years ago

        If you're young and healthy you're about to get fucked in the ass.

  26. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

    Sorry John,

    5 Reasons Fat People Are Evil

    5 Reasons Fat Girls Don't Deserve Love

    1. kinnath   12 years ago

      unfunny

    2. wwhorton   12 years ago

      Plus, in the second one the guy mistakenly substituted "flower" for "flour", which, in my book, is a capital offense. If you're gonna write an big ol' blog post talking shit and implying that you're a badass, your grammar and spelling had better be goddamn flawless.

    3. Zeb   12 years ago

      Yeah, that's just being an asshole for no reason. The counterpoint in idiocy to the "thin privilege" morons.
      If you are OK with being fat, then be OK with being fat. If you don't want to fuck fat girls, then don't fuck fat girls.

  27. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Deer With Basketball Stuck In Horns Spotted In Bethel Park

    "They can be very playful, we've seen them running around trees, and doing all kinds of playful acts. He was probably was just playing and pushing that ball around."

    Kovac says it appears the ball is deflating, so they aren't worried about it being stuck there too long.

    He didn't call the game commission because it won't impede the deer's feeding ability.

    1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      It can't be stuck for too long, the only Deer in PA are whitetails, and they shed their antlers eventually. It will either deflate or come off then.

    2. PD Scott   12 years ago

      Maybe he's a hardcore Milwaukee Bucks fan.

  28. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Rogue kangaroo creating havoc at Bundaberg airport

    A rogue bull kangaroo is creating havoc with aeroplanes landing at Bundaberg airport in south-eastern Queensland, with authorities preparing to shoot the animal.

    The large Eastern Grey kangaroo has been hopping around the airport for two months, menacing landing aircraft and evading attempts to catch it.

    The buck kangaroo began living at the airport with a couple of females, eating the grass growing on several patches of lawn adjacent to hangars and airport sheds.

    The females have now been lured out through a fence, but a dog catcher failed to trap the male and already one attempt to shoot the animal has failed.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Jesus. You have all these fucking aircraft and you can't shoot a fucking 'roo?

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        It's smaller than a womprat!

      2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        And these guys are supposedly exempt from the aussie ban because they can handle firearms properly.

    2. wwhorton   12 years ago

      Sorry, but doesn't the comparative size mean that a kangaroo can never actually "menace" a 747?

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        It could grip by the husk!

      2. PD Scott   12 years ago

        About like the 6'6" 300lb probation cop last week who shot the 12lb Jack Russell terrier that was "menacing" him.

        Unless the 'roo jumped in front of an engine intake during take-off...

        That could be bad, or at least very, very messy.

  29. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    Third Party Would Keep Democrats In Power Indefinitely

    When Tea Partiers behold a Republican Party so eager to surrender, and that doesn't even know "what we would insist upon," they can't be blamed for considering flying the coop.

    And when Gallup's monthly tracking poll finds only 28% of Americans happy with the GOP ? the lowest for either party since 1992, when they first asked the question ? no one should be surprised at the media stirring up the idea of a centrist third party being formed by anti-Tea Party Republicans.

    But in spite of the old political joke that those in the middle of the road end up getting run down by a truck, the biggest victim of a third party ? whether it be oriented toward the right or the middle ? is going to be the right, and possibly for a very long time.

    The last third party movement, for instance, gave us Bill Clinton.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      We really need the single transferrable vote, not first past the post.

      Of course, STV is a problem when you have as many elections on one day as we do in the US.

      1. robc   12 years ago

        STV is a problem when you have as many elections on one day

        ???

      2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        Dude...Approval voting is BY FAR the best and easiest understood system AND it is zero cost impact to county clerks. It is used in a limited capacity already and eliminates the wasted vote argument.

    2. Metazoan   12 years ago

      A centrist third party? I'm assuming this is the media definition of centrist, which is, "mildly apply the brakes on the left-wing agenda." What's the point?

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        We have two centrist parties now from an economic/tax perspective.

        Haggling about a top rate +/- 3 points from a top marginal rate of 35% is definitely centrist. Both parties support $3.5 trillion spending with a hundred billion as well.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

          "Within" $100 billion rather.

          Also both parties lavish us with new social programs like Medicare Welfare Part D.

          I know - BOOOOSH.

          Since I broke politesse here I will save someone the trouble.

        2. Andrew S.   12 years ago

          We have two leftist parties from a spending perspective, and one leftist and one slightly more centrist party from a tax perspective.

          Otherwise, that post is a rare moment of half-intelligence from you. Good job.

          1. OldMexican   12 years ago

            Re: Andrew S.

            Otherwise, that post is a rare moment of half-intelligence from you. Good job.

            No kidding. When I read what the Buttwipe wrote, I suddenly became paranoid and looked outside the window for signs of falling frogs, or meteorites.

            1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

              the blood moon rises

          2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

            Half-intelligence? Can't you do math? He got half right on TAX and zero right on SPENDING.

            That's quarter-intelligence. By accident.

          3. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

            Blind squirrel. Acorn.

    3. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

      The last third party movement, for instance, gave us Bill Clinton.

      Uh, no. The last meaningful third party movement was in Florida in 2000. Instead of voting for their fellow traveler in the Democrat party, tens of thousands of the Greens voted for Nader and Bush ultimately won.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        Pat Buchanan got almost as many far right votes as Ralph Nader got on the Left.

      2. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

        What about 1980? Anderson took 7% of Carter's vote from independents (though I'm sure a few percentage points were from New England Republicans.)

        Or, George Wallace in 1968, who took 14 points away from Humphrey.

        It just depends on the third party movement. Going back further in history, the Republican Party was formed as a third party since the Whigs couldn't muster the will to oppose slavery.

    4. Rasilio   12 years ago

      "When Ross Perot ran on an anti-deficit platform in 1992, he got 19% and nearly 20 million votes. Clinton's margin of victory against President George H.W. Bush was less than 6 million votes, winning 43% to 37.5%."

      The unsupported assertion here is that the majority of Perot voters would have voted for Bush had Perot not been running.

      It is equally likely that significant numbers of Perot voters were voting "anyone but Bush" and would therefore have voted Clinton or just not voted.

      Had the Perot support vote split 10% Bush, 5% Clinton, 4% abstain or vote other 3rd party then Clinton would still have won the popular vote 48% - 47.5%

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        I don't believe Clinton would have gotten many of the Perot votes, but the number of abstains would have likely been much higher.

        I voted for that jug-eared fuck, but would have rather died than vote for Willy.

      2. CE   12 years ago

        I was a Perot voter in 1992. I would have voted Libertarian if he weren't running.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          An anecdote, sure, but we all know that the plural of anecdote = data.

  30. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Ironically, President Obama's former top regulator is among the best known proponents of less complexity. Cass Sunstein, who oversaw regulations for the White House in 2009-12, is the author of "Simpler: The Future of Government," published earlier this year.

    "Ironic."

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      11,588,500 Words: Obamacare Regs 30x as Long as Law

      Ironically, the words have been counted without anyone having read them.

      1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

        You think that's bad? Try dealing with the tax code vs the tax regs. The code is bad enough. The regs never seem to end.

        1. Elspeth Flashman   12 years ago

          But I thought the regs were more helpful, because they have examples & explanations.

      2. Rasilio   12 years ago

        Well if you read them for 8 hours a day it'd only take you about a year and a half to get through them all

        1. PD Scott   12 years ago

          So, about enough time for you to get signed up through the exchanges?

        2. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

          By the time you had completed reading them, they would have changed and you'd have to start all over again.

      3. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

        Ironically, the words have been counted without anyone having read them.

        A word count program was literally the first thing we learned in a perl class I took in college.

  31. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    72-Year-Old Man Survives in Wilderness by Eating Squirrels

    On Sept. 24, Penaflor became separated from his hunting buddy in heavy fog. He stepped into a crevice and hurt his knee. "After that, all went dead ? I passed out, I don't know [for] how long," he told CNN. When Penaflor woke up, he was lost. In an effort to save energy, Penaflor said rather than trying to take down big game like deer, he survived on algae, a snake, three squirrels, and water from a creek. He made a fire of dry leaves and kept it going day and night until rescue crews could find him.

    1. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

      The creek saved him, not the squirrels. Most people don't realize that you can survive a very long time without food, as long as you have shelter from the elements and a source of water.

      1. OldMexican   12 years ago

        Re: Fatty Bolger,

        The creek saved him, not the squirrels. Most people don't realize that you can survive a very long time without food, as long as you have shelter from the elements and a source of water.

        Yes, but without some source of nourishment, your body starts to consume itself, leading to a state of emaciation which lowers your chances of getting out alive. Indeed, water is essencial and without a nearby source, you're screwed; but without food, you will not have the energy to help you perform the necessary actions for survival, like gathering firewood.

        1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

          Though true, it takes about a week with no food to get to that point. Any more than about 2.5 or 3 days without water and you die.

          1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

            So there was this show/study that took 8 normal people and gave them skins and nothing else...dropped them in Canada (during summer ) and monitored them. The show was AWESOME. Ultimately 2 (i think if i remember) girls dropped out and left. The rest finally did bring down a caribou...WITH AN ATL ATL!!! One of the guys was a life long hunter and he sat down and cried like a baby after killing it. Anyway, they were talking about energy budgets and how important it was to to maintain sustenance...bugs, moss, some plants and roots, a rabbit.

            Long and shot of it, subsistence living sucks ass.

        2. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

          He very likely would have survived 19 days even without any food, as long as he had a water source and shelter. Ghandi was about the same age when he went on a hunger strike, and he survived longer with no food, even though he drank very little water.

          But I guess the headline "72-Year-Old Man Survives in Wilderness by Drinking From Nearby Creek" doesn't have the same ring to it.

          (Just to be clear, I'm not minimizing what he went through, just pointing out how most people have their priorities backwards when it comes to survival situations - and articles like this don't help.)

  32. Brett L   12 years ago

    New techniques to replace my liver and/or pancreas. Which is good.

    1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      "Why a liver is nothing but a bag of marshmallows" /obscure Mad Magazine reference

    2. SugarFree   12 years ago

      Excellent. I'll take three new pancreases.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        So, serious question, if you got a new pancreas grown, would it produce insulin in large enough amounts this time? I seem to remember you being a lot of Type I and a little of Type II.

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          Not really. The autoimmune effect that killed my pancreas would destroy the new one as well.* And I'm not sure it would be much use to TII because they produce plenty of insulin, they just can't use it properly.

          *Unless getting shot is what prompted my pancreas to crap out. Both my parents had unusual presentation of TI as well.

          1. Troy muy grande boner   12 years ago

            I thought it was a virus from those Thailand teenage prostitutes from your bi-monthly visit that did your pancreas in. That and you have more girth than Warty's penis after viewing a Monica Sweetheart video.

          2. Brett L   12 years ago

            I hear fecal transplants are the new rage for fighting auto-immune diseases. You should steal some healthy shit and start self-injecting (into your colon, not your blood. Shit in the blood is never healthy).

            1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

              I have been mailing him a fresh one on a daily basis. I didn't know he could actually do anything with it.

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Hold out for robot pancreas.

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          "I will eat and digest you all with my system of mighty organs!"

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Imagine, insulin on demand!

            1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

              I know people who already have that with an external pump. It can be imporved.

  33. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

    The Final Insult in the Bush-Cheney Marriage

    In March 2007, Libby, who had served as Dick Cheney's chief of staff, was convicted of lying to federal officials who were investigating the leak of the identity of a C.I.A. officer. For the past two months Cheney had been pushing the president to grant Libby a full pardon before they left office. He would not let it go. Cheney brought it up again and again, first before Thanksgiving, then again around Christmas and finally throughout January 2009 as they prepared for the transition to the incoming Obama administration. His lobbying was so intense that the president made clear to his aides that he did not want to talk with Cheney about it anymore.

    Troubled by the decision hanging over him, Bush had asked the White House lawyers to re-examine the case to see if a pardon was justified. Fred Fielding, the White House counsel, and his deputy, William Burck, pored over trial transcripts and studied evidence that Libby's lawyers had raised in his defense. Their conclusion was that the jury had ample reason to find Libby guilty.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Even Bush finally realized Cheney was wrong about everything. Too bad it was in the final stage of his presidency after his legacy was irrevocably soiled.

      1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        Bush went full fascist progtard with TARP.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          With Obama and McCain both fully backing him on TARP.

  34. Rich   12 years ago

    Immigrant-rights protesters have chained themselves in front of an detention facility

    "Undocumented ? unafraid," the protesters chanted

    "Thanks for making out job easy," the Arizona police chanted.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      *our*

    2. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      Look, we have a mind-numbingly twisted and arcane procedure you have to follow if you want to be the kind of immigrant who gets to protest. If you're here to earn sub-minimum wage doing crap jobs, you gotta be quiet about it and not upset the townies.

    3. CE   12 years ago

      Shouldn't that be "a detention facility"?

  35. Brett L   12 years ago

    I stopped reading Powerline a while ago, but I do like the pic.

  36. Jordan   12 years ago

    You'll never be as badass as the Soviet surgeon who removed his own appendix in Antarctica. I imagine him as Peter Stormare.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Wow. Yeah, he must be Putin's real father.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Wasn't that a House episode?

  37. Brett L   12 years ago

    Graphene, soon to keep the bubbles in your beer longer.

    1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      Look, when we asked for better carbonation, there was an understanding that there was going to be oxygen bonded to that carbon...

      (And if the link worked I might be able to RTFA)

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        Shit. I lost it.

        1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

          what you have a history proof NSA clean computer?

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        I hope there's more than one oxygen atom bonded to that carbon atom!

        1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

          Monoxide Beer would be interesting as a new article, and outside of the brewery, there would be few places where it could release enough CO to hurt people.

      3. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        Nitrogen is better anyway.

  38. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Was this necessary? Police officer sprays handcuffed football fan in the face with pepper spray from just inches away

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....l-fan.html

    1. Metazoan   12 years ago

      STOP RESISTING

  39. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Need some help? Kate Beckinsale teeters down stairs in heels while carrying large shopping bag

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/uss.....g-bag.html

    1. CE   12 years ago

      I would help her with that.

  40. Ted S.   12 years ago

    I didn't see this in either the AM or PM Links yesterday:

    Who the hell stole my Gumby sculpture?

    [WARNING: Link includes a photo that should have been scaled down to thumbnail size, but wasn't]

    WEST SAUGERTIES, N.Y. -- Gumby is missing from a Saugerties' lawn, and the owners are a little bent out of shape about it.

    Bob Malkin and Barbara Pokras say the 7-foot-tall, 50-pound sculpture modeled after of the friendly clay television figure was stolen from their property on Burnett Road early Sunday.

    [...]

    His wife said they had a lot of company over the weekend, and some of their guests heard voices early on Sunday.

    "There was some laughing, a male and a female voice and our dog barked," Pokras said.

    The couple reported the incident to the Saugerties police and are offering a $100 reward for information leading to the safe return of Gumby.

    "Who knows? Maybe it was a prank. I really can't say. All I know is we woke up, and he wasn't there and we miss Gumby," Pokras said.

    Probably stolen by Prema Toys< for trademark infringement.

    1. Fluffy   12 years ago

      I think a Gumby statue constitutes an attactive nuisance and whoever stole it should due the Pokras' if they were injured while committing this crime.

      I don't see how we can expect Saugerties area youth to NOT steal a 7 foot statue of Gumby.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        According to the article, the people of Saugerties like the statue.

        1. Fluffy   12 years ago

          Not as much as some college kids like a 7 foot statue of Gumby in their frat house.

        2. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

          So much so that they wanted it for themselves.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      I'm Gumby, dammit.

      1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        You're Pokey dude. You can't deny it.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          I'm Gumby, dammit.

  41. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Yahoo Mail users furious over Marissa Mayer's redesign that wiped away key features and left interface looking like a 'Gmail knock-off' (except useless)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....ckoff.html
    It sucks so bad I'm thinking of ditching it.

    1. CE   12 years ago

      The utter destruction of all that used to be good about Yahoo is almost complete.

  42. Rich   12 years ago

    Amaze project aims to take 3D printing 'into metal age'

    Tungsten alloy components that can withstand temperatures of 3,000C were unveiled

    Pretty, um, cool.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Fuck yeah.

    2. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

      But the metal age was like three or four ages ago!

      1. OldMexican   12 years ago

        Re: Cascadian Ephor Xenocles,

        But the metal age was like three or four ages ago!

        You just don't want to abandon your forge, do you?

  43. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Rasher of bacon a day can harm a man's fertility: Half portion of processed meat 'significantly harms sperm quality'

    Men who ate half a portion of processed meat a day had 5.5 per cent 'normal' shaped sperm cells, compared to 7.2 per cent who ate less
    Red meat is thought to contain high levels of pesticides and other substances that can interfere with hormones
    The findings add to the growing evidence that a couple's chances of conceiving is governed by lifestyle ? smoking, alcohol and stress have a detrimental effect

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/hea.....ility.html

    I smell bullshit.

    1. Lady Bertrum   12 years ago

      correlation vs. causation?

      Was diet controlled for other variables?

      1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

        Meat is murder! Don't you know that? It must be bad because it must!

        1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

          Can't you hear the carrot scream? Ripped from the comforting busom of the soil, waterboarded and carved up alive. I cannot bear to feed upon such torment. Now those Hogs, they totally had it coming.

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            And hogs taste better too.

          2. The DerpRider   12 years ago

            I shall take a flayed carrot as my coat of arms.

          3. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

            The Carrots are screaming!

            1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

              tell me this is a link to Tool?

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I think if you ate that much bacon, your shit would smell like pigs.

      1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        I eat 4 pieces or so every day.

    3. William of Purple   12 years ago

      "Give me all the bacon and eggs that you have"

    4. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

      The findings add to the growing evidence that a couple's chances of conceiving is governed by lifestyle ? smoking, alcohol and stress have a detrimental effect

      Of course I smoked both cigarettes and weed and ate metric cowtons of meat, and it took all of 2 fucks to get my wife pregnant 2 times after we made the decision to have children.

      1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        Ahh the old "we have time, lets plan that trip to Napa." "AHH SHIT!"

    5. Zeb   12 years ago

      If there is an effect, it must be very small. There seems to be no shortage of children born to parents who drink and smoke and eat highly processed food.

  44. pan fried wylie   12 years ago

    What's that picture of a casino gotta do with the NSA?

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      "Seven, come 9/11!"

      1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        nice

  45. Mokers   12 years ago

    http://www.npr.org/2013/10/15/.....ht-to-stay

    Palo Alto, liberal haven, might actually let a private land owner sell his land as he sees fit. Perhaps the trailer park residents threatened the town with a tractor pull?

    1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

      well, the latest PHDs tell you how to deal with TRAKTOR PULLZ

  46. Lady Bertrum   12 years ago

    Two teens have been suspended from Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington after wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month.

    Public education is child abuse.

    1. Matrix   12 years ago

      I have been saying that for years

  47. Protagoronus   12 years ago

    Not one mention of rent control. The article briefly mentions regulations that keep supply low, then non-sequiturs into a bunch of collectivist "we should" statements with no understanding of how the world works.

    http://www.theatlanticcities.c.....xodus/7205

  48. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

    I see Anonymous has decided to go full retard and brand a guy a rapist on very little evidence: http://www.kansascity.com/2013.....boils.html

    1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      Meh. This is more or less equivalent to the Steubenville case, and the guy almost assuredly is a rapist who got away thanks to status and political connections. Without those he'd be in prison right now.

      The prosecutor, especially, in that case is a special kind of scumbag.

      1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        That's a lot of assumptions you're making.

        Explain this timeline:
        1. Girls meet with guys at 1 AM
        2. Girls and guys drive to his home
        3. Girl drinks so much at guys home she blacks out
        4. Girl and guy have sex / a rape occurs
        5. Guys drop girl off at home at 2 AM

        You're telling me they met up, drove to his house, she drank so much she blacked out, they had sex, got dressed, dragged her out to the car, drove her back home and dropped her off in the course of 1 hour?

        Who blacks out in 15-20 minutes flat?

        1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

          Sounds like my last date with your mom.

          1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

            Niiiice.

            High five.

          2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

            that was my first date with his mom. So who got sloppy seconds?

        2. Andrew S.   12 years ago

          I'm not sure about the accuracy of that timeline, but she was likely tipsy before they met up; he just sealed the deal with additional alcohol. I'm not of the drunk sex = rape idea, because that's ridiculous. But passed out drunk? Yeah, that's rape.

          (I've gotten far more pissed off about these kind of stories since I had a daughter.)

          1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

            The timeline is confirmed by the KC Star and the girl's interview on NPR.

            I get pissed off that a man is branded a rapist by an internet lynch mob on scant evidence. I don't want to see my *son* at the end of one of these things someday.

            But like I said, plug-in "football" and "small town" and it's all scumbag this and rapist that.

          2. Rasilio   12 years ago

            Important question.

            was he drinking too?

            If he was how does her being drunk absolve her of responsibility for her actions but not absolve him of his?

            1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

              That's what I want to know too.

              If this were a 14-year-old drunk male and a 17-year-old drunk female, we wouldn't hear a peep out of the Social Justice creeps who populate Anonymous and the rest of the clown show.

            2. Zeb   12 years ago

              It's important only if she was not, in fact, unconscious. Fucking someone who is passed out drunk is definitely rape.
              The whole drunk sex is rape thing is terrible. Even putting aside the fact that it is almost exclusively applied to the man (if they are both drunk that would make it mutual rape, which doesn't make a lot of sense), it ignores the obvious fact that people of both sexes often go out drinking with the intention of finding someone to have sex with and see alcohol as a social lubricant that can help make that happen.

            3. Calidissident   12 years ago

              I agree with this in general, when a girl is conscious enough to be aware of what is going on, but if she was passed out, then it's not even a question of whether a rape occurred. (I don't know enough about the case to make a judgment on whether or not it was rape. Although between the confession of the other guy, the political connections, the house burning down, etc. it seems pretty shady at the very least).

              1. Rasilio   12 years ago

                Except she willingly met them at 1am, got into the car with them, and either drank a hell of a lot of alcohol in the next few minutes and passed out or was already drunk at the time.

                It is entirely likely that she verbally consented prior to passing out and possibly may not have passed out until sometime after the sex occurred.

                Yes, if she was simply passed out drunk and the guys had sex with her that is rape but assuming the timeline posted above is true that does not seem to be the case here.

                Also, as far as the other guys admission, exactly what did he confess to and under what circumstances.

                I am not saying that this case was not rape, but from the evidence posted so far you are not even up to preponderance of the evidence forget beyond reasonable doubt.

      2. Andrew S.   12 years ago

        (Plus whatever the rape, he dumped a passed out drunk 14 year old on a porch outside in 30 degree weather. He deserves to be nailed to the wall for that alone)

        1. OldMexican   12 years ago

          Re: Andrew S.

          (Plus whatever the rape, he dumped a passed out drunk 14 year old on a porch outside in 30 degree weather. He deserves to be nailed to the wall for that alone)

          Who lets a 14-year-old whatever drink to the point of stupor?

          1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

            She was probably already drunk when she got there. Which, I'll note, is a fact that is downplayed and underreported.

          2. Zeb   12 years ago

            Who lets a 14-year-old whatever drink to the point of stupor?

            Other teenagers. It happens quite a lot. Have you always been old or do teens not drink in Mexico?

      3. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        This is more or less equivalent to the Steubenville case,

        Right...it can't be equivalent to Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Genarlow Winslow, the Duke Lacrosse case...because those things never happened?

        1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

          So all public rape accusations are phony because those were, right?

          1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

            Nope, just pointing out that you leaped to the conclusion that this is Steubenville 2.0. It's fascinating how you can mention "small-town", "football" and "rape" and the same raggedy caricatures are going to come out of the woodwork each and every time. It's like half of America thinks Friday Night Lights was a documentary.

            1. Andrew S.   12 years ago

              I said status, not football. Less to do with his football player status, more to do with political connections.

              1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

                That's still just an assumption.

                I wouldn't have taken it to trial. She couldn't even testify to anything.

                1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                  His buddy admitted to raping the other girl and he wasn't taken to trial either, so there is something going on behind the scenes.

                  With a sealed police report and evidence, it's hard to judge what occurred.

            2. creech   12 years ago

              The book was a documentary. I knew a football coach in Odessa who coached many of the boys mentioned. He said the book was embarrassingly accurate.

  49. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    The last third party movement, for instance, gave us Bill Clinton.

    All things considered...

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Its funny how they don't talk about how it also gave us the lowest spending and lower taxes and fewer people on the government teat.

      1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

        Well said. Perot had issues, but it seems he helped bring spending and debt forward as major issues of focus.

        I am also not sure his candidacy 'gave us' Bill Clinton (or that Bill Clinton was appreciably worse than George Bush the Elder).

        1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

          Bush the elder would have been worse - especially since there's no way in hell that the phants take congress in 1994 with Bush as pres.

      2. CE   12 years ago

        Because he actually cut military spending. At least the planned increases thereof.

    2. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      I'd take a repeat of the Clinton years many times over the two guys who followed him. At least when it comes to spending levels.

      1. CE   12 years ago

        Unfortunately when the Dems brag on Clinton, they never agree to go back to Clinton-era spending, which was half what spending is now.

  50. Andrew S.   12 years ago

    Things that will not get you suspended if you're a police officer: Most of you have been here long enough to know this is a very long list.

    Things that will get you suspended if you're a police officer: Filling out a few joke comment cards

  51. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    Did the NSA collect the alt-text, too?

    1. Protagoronus   12 years ago

      alt-textes:

      "all the facebook we stole turned us blue"

      "thumping bass"

      "time to double down... the fourth amendment was quaint, let's try smashing the eighth"

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      They do not collect it. They take it.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        They like to use the IRS definitions.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          I saw Gravity last weekend. Pretty decent, and the effects are nuts. I caught some technical errors on my own, and I'm sure you'd catch more, but I thought it was reasonably well done.

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            I plan on seeing it at some point, but first I need to find a night without any big sports events or dates (or go on enough dates with one girl that a movie isn't an awful waste of time).

            I noticed in the trailer that the debris cloud made some noise as it was approaching. Did they do sound in space (or just when they were actually touching something that was hit)?

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I don't remember any sound in space in this one, though I could've missed it.

              For once, I think seeing it in 3-D is a good idea. We did it because that was the only one showing at our theater, but the effect is quite good. Might be a good IMAX film as well.

              1. Snark Plissken   12 years ago

                I always like to add my own sounds to movies with silent space scenes.

                2001 is way better with me say *pew* *pew* even if there's no actual space lasers. My genius is not appreciated by my fellow theatre-goers, I'm afraid.

            2. OldMexican   12 years ago

              Re: Auric Demonocles,

              I noticed in the trailer that the debris cloud made some noise as it was approaching.

              No, there's no actual sound. The director does use ominous-sounding music to cue in some of the events, like for instance, the debris field.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                I'd say that they tried to be reasonably accurate while still retaining some dramatic tension at the sacrifice of a little realism. It looks great, though. That alone is worth the price of admission.

                1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                  Music in space I am fine with, after all that makes as much sense as music in a battlefield. I don't like "whoosh" noises in space.

                  I am going on a second date with an engineer tomorrow. Maybe I can turn a 3rd into seeing the movie.

            3. robc   12 years ago

              Im going to see it a week from Friday.

              Apparently we have had enough dates that it isnt an awful waste of time.

              1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

                Movies are great with a girlfriend or friend, but they are an awful way to get to know someone new.

                1. robc   12 years ago

                  Exactly.

                  Date 7 for us, so we are past the "exactly who are you anyway" stage.

                  1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

                    My second date was the circus...ended up being prescient for my life. But in a good way.

  52. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    "It should be more clear than ever, from the outlines of this "deal", that America is now a racket run exclusively for the benefit of the Ruling Class and its loyal foot soldiers. We mustn't inconvenience federal employees ? not a single member of that titanic army of non-essential personnel will lose his job, and they'll all receive full back pay, unlike you unemployed private-sector boobs whose livelihood and independence were a small price to pay for the glories of ObamaCare and Obamanomics. The private-sector workforce dies in silence, while the tiniest cut to the finger of the almighty State produces blood-curdling howls of agony.

    "The minimal fiscal discipline imposed by the sequester will be erased, an unions will get another of those very special carve-outs from the Affordable Care Act monstrosity, which is entirely concerned with amassing government power and dispensing privileges, not improving health care. This "deal" is an act of submission from the American people to the aristocracy. Obama just dispatched his shock troops to barricade the Flight 93 memorial. How fitting that a monument to ordinary heroes rising in defiance against totalitarian evil should be the scene of the final indignity visited upon unruly serfs by their spiteful monarch!"

    http://www.humanevents.com/201.....-in-sight/

    1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      Yeah this 'deal' is worse than nothing - they might as well just pass the CR and DC like nothing happened.

      Fuck McConnel.

      1. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

        soooo...Pray he doesn't alter it further?

    2. Root Boy   12 years ago

      Said it before. Fuck those feds. I, and many friends were sucking wind during the recession and I didn't get back pay while the feds get raises and free BJs from the press.

      Let them feel some pain for once.

  53. William of Purple   12 years ago

    BOB Costas is a leprechaun.

  54. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    Priest challenges exclusion from military facility:

    "The Thomas More Law Center announced yesterday that it has filed a suit on behalf of Catholic priest Fr. Ray Leonard, who is a civilian under contract with the Department of Defense to provide Catholic religious services at a naval submarine base. The suit was also filed on behalf of one of Leonard's congregants."

    http://religionclause.blogspot.....tract.html

    1. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

      If he wants to minister to military so badly he can put on a uniform like a lot of priests I've known. Otherwise he can minister off-base in the mean time. Nobody would stop him from working out a deal with a local church to hold some services, or from performing Mass for small groups of sailors in their homes, or from doing it in a park near the base. Of all the shutdown stories this is the weakest in my opinion. It's not illegal for him to minister to sailors, he's simply being denied access to base the way any employee on furlough would be.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        "If he wants to minister to military so badly he can put on a uniform like a lot of priests I've known."

        That's not the law - they allow priests who aren't soldiers to minister on a "contract" basis. Now they're banning these "contract" priests from ministering even voluntarily.

        I must be missing the part where banning priests from military facilities saves money.

        Is is possible that you're simply reacting to what you see as the ickiness of religion?

        1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

          As I understand it, furloughed employees are prevented from volunteering their time because legal interpretations, long preceding the shutdown, have stated it may incur some obligation to pay them for it when the shutdown is resolved.

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Except that it has already been determined that they will be paid when it is resolved, so that isnt an issue.

            1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

              Has it been determined? How?

              1. robc   12 years ago

                Has it been determined? How?

                House passed a bill guaranteeing back pay on 10/5.

                10 days ago.

                I dont know if the Senate has ignored it or not, but both common sense and history suggest that it will happen.

                Do you think the Senate wont pass it? And the Prez wont sign it?

            2. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

              Bo is still flogging the party line that the media would be totes in the Pres's grill but-for the silly Republicans?

              Oh lordy.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

                What is more interesting than your continuing deranged stalking of me is that in your derangement you posted this comment in the wrong subthread (none of my comments here have been about media deflection, that conversation is with Sevo elsewhere on the thread).

                1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

                  Squirrel problem.

                  Where do you get this ridiculous notion I'm stalking you? Geez, get over yourself.

                  1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

                    I see, you just wondered into this subthread to make a comment critical of my comments...on another subthread.

                    Perhaps I can get over myself, but when will get over me?

                    1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

                      Squirrel problems, for the SECOND TIME. How did you pass law school without being able to read?

                    2. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

                      Of course, 'squirrel problems.' Obsession can make one quite 'squirrely' indeed.

            3. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

              Not for contractors.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

                Not for contractors, yes, but also I assume robc is talking about the fact that the House passed a bill for backpay. Of course current House passed bills are not final, and so no reputable legal advice would sensibly rest on them as if they were.

                1. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

                  Since the bill only deals with civil service employees it is not relevant for this discussion, which is about a contractor.

        2. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

          They aren't being treated differently here. If you're on furlough you don't come to work. The law prohibits you from doing your job voluntarily during a furlough. Same goes for services contracts. If the funding isn't there for the contract you don't do the job. It's likely there was a clause in his contract allowing the government to terminate it for convenience or otherwise shorten the period of performance. It's part of doing business with the government.

          This story gets play because of the religious angle and of the tendency of certain people to seek persecution. There's no persecution here. A service your people can already get off base for free is not vital by any stretch of the imagination.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

            SoCons cry persecution on a level matched only by progressives.

          2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

            If you see below, the sailors are often too busy to go off base, especially since they are not assigned cars like their Congressional masters. That's why there's a chapel on the base in the first place, duh!

            You seem to assume that a priest simply is a government worker. A contract priest "works" for the Church - the govt gives him a stipend for serving soldiers and sailors who lack access to chaplains. The govt's own acts limit sailor's access to the civilian services of their religion, so the courts have (perhaps wrongly) allowed govt to affirmatively provide soldiers and sailors with access to their religion. But this doesn't mean the govt gets to prevent priests from volunteering to serve their flock.

            IMO it would be better not to have govt pay ministers for soldiers, but since it's done under the rationale of religious freedom, they can't use the fact of paying ministers as an excuse to prevent ministers from volunteering their services.

            I think you're so hung up on religion being icky that you're unwilling to allow for the reality of religious persecution.

        3. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

          Here are a few of the things alleged in the complaint:

          "The submarine base is remotely located. The closest Catholic Church is off base in the town of St. Mary's. This is roughly eight miles away from the Naval Base....

          "The doors to the Kings Bay Chapel were locked on October 4, 2013, with theHoly Eucharist, Holy water, Catholic hymn books, and vessels all locked inside. Father Leonardand his parishioners, including Fred Naylor, were prohibited from entering.

          "The Department of Defense placed a sign outside of the Kings Bay Chapel statingthat due to the government shutdown, there will be no Catholic Services until further notice.

          "The Kings Bay Chapel remains open to other faiths and is being used for their religious services. The Department of Defense has allowed the Protestant community to continue their services in the chapel during the government shutdown, without threat of penalty.

          [numbering of paragraphs omitted]

          http://www.scribd.com/doc/1761.....-Complaint

          1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

            Also, " Many of Father Leonard's parishioners live and work on the Naval Base and donot own a car or have access to other transportation. This makes a sixteen mile journey to andfrom church imp
            ossible for many of Fr. Leonard's
            parishioners, particularly sailors who are notgiven enough break time to walk sixteen miles and attend the Mass service."

          2. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

            That last paragraph is the only one that to my mind gives the suit a leg to stand on, and, unless there are some other important facts introduced (remember a complaint is only one side's story), it seems pretty terrible to me, I will grant you.

          3. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

            None of these complaints speaks to anything I said. Again, if your government work is not funded then you don't do it. After a certain point this is unenforceable; who can really stop you from working on a presentation at home, for instance? But they are following the law with respect to excluding an unfunded contractor from working in a government facility. There's no case there. Nor can he claim he's being discriminated against. Other chaplains are able to do their services because they are actually in the military. They don't exclude Catholic priests; they just haven't been signing up at sufficient rates.

            None of those sailors has a priest underway (submarines don't bring chaplains along, just lay leaders taken from the crew), so it's not like they don't go without for half the year anyway. Frankly, having to drive eight miles to go to church is a pretty weak sort of martyrdom.

            1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

              I didn't say martyrdom, you did. It's fairly weak to allege submariners are denied priests while underwater, therefore they should be denied priests while on land.

              "having to drive eight miles to go to church"

              I said many of them don't have govt-assigned cars, they have govt-assigned submarines, which aren't very useful for driving to church. And they are extremely busy and the very reason they have a chapel on the base is because it would be impractical to go to the civilian church.

              "priests...just haven't been signing up at sufficient rates"

              Then why is this case being filed at all, if not because the priest signed up to minister on the base for free* but was not allowed to do so.

              *Of course, he's supported by the Church, I mean free to the taxpayers/bondholders.

              1. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

                I never said that they should be deprived of the chance to worship, just that one of the consequences of their service is that they often are. It's what they signed up for. If it's so all-fired important to them they can go the extra mile for this brief period.

                This case came about because for various reasons with varying degrees of legitimacy you can't do volunteer work for the government. For non-military personnel every hour has to be accounted for, even if you're "exempt" under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Military chaplains are paid for under the recently-passed Pay Our Military Act. Contractor and civil-service personnel are not. It's just that simple. He had the chance to join up, put on a uniform and draw a fat paycheck in exchange for his ministry to sailors. He chose not to go that route. There's nothing wrong with that, but that choice has consequences.

                Sometimes you have to suffer a little for what you believe in. Making alternate accommodations for a little while isn't all that much to suffer.

                1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                  This is about government power, and whether the government can put a priest in prison for volunteering to perform Mass on a military base without charge to taxpayers and bondholders. If the Pay Our Military Act doesn't let priests volunteer for such service, then which prevails, the Act or the First Amendment?

                  Even under the Obama Administration's limited First Amendment as mere "freedom of worship," their behavior is wrong.
                  When you find yourself arguing that a minister of religion can only perform his functions if he's a govt employee, then you may have lost sight of your libertarian principles - perhaps because religious is icky to you?

                  1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                    And I agree that priests ought to suffer more for their faith - they should to onto the military bases to celebrate Mass - if the govt arrests them the govt can explain to a jury why it's so important to criminalize Mass. They better get a jury of Ian Paisleys, or they'll have trouble getting a conviction.

                    So, yes, there should be more self-sacrifice.

    2. Zeb   12 years ago

      It is a pretty obnoxious and unnecessary thing to do. Why not just let the priest come and do his thing. But I don't think that the religious freedom angle is a very strong one. Having the right to practice you religion doesn't oblige anyone to provide you the venue to do so.
      And people in the military have their other first amendment rights limited all the time. If that is OK, then so it limiting when and where they can practice their religion.

  55. Sevo   12 years ago

    "The Washington Post is reporting that the NSA has been collecting contacts from email address books and instant messaging accounts from around the world."

    But this is nothing to worry about 'cause rethuglicans and gov't shutdown!

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      See, you don't understand what's going on here. You haven't written [insert loved one] in a while. The NSA will identify key family members and friends, key dates (like the anniversary of that time you got so drunk your brother had to drag you in the house after you'd been dumped in the front yard), and send out letters and e-mails in your name. Later, they'll also run your social media pages.

    2. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

      Well, Sevo, this is one reason I have long cited for opposing the GOP strategy that le to shutdown: it has taken the focus off of things like the NSA scandal, which I think was hurting Obama where it counts-with his base.

      1. robc   12 years ago

        Everyone who was going to change their opinion of Obama due to the NSA scandal had already done it.

        1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

          Well, then let us and everyone else ignore it, including new disclosures, eh?

          1. robc   12 years ago

            Who is ignoring it? There can be more than one news story at a time.

            1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

              Sure robc, no story has ever taken eyes off another. Everyone reads the entire paper, every day.

              1. robc   12 years ago

                Whats a paper?

              2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                I don't think the scandals have gone away. Who expected the media to focus on them day in, day out? There are lawsuits beginning to happen, and I'm sure Congress will continue to investigate that and other scandals.

                It'll take years for anything big to happen, if it does.

                1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

                  Stories can take eyes off of other stories, especially when they are featured more and more prominently. Everyone seems to recognize this at times. People will say that this or that official released this or that story to upstage or deflect attention from another. I am betting at some time in your life you have said so as well, it is just that now you have to deny it because it might undermine a previous stance taken.

                  The revelations about the NSA continue to come out, new violations were released today. Guess what? On most paper's front page and websites those revelations were under and smaller than shut down headlines. If you want to pretend that does not matter because everyone reads everything, fine, but I still contend that is not true.

                  1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    You're not addressing my point. My point is that the scandals never were going to displace all other news. That never happens for extended periods. They'll wax and wane as evidence is gathered. None of the major scandals have been forgotten and are all still being investigated (or even litigated).

  56. Seamus   12 years ago

    Two teens have been suspended from Tahoma High School in Maple Valley, Washington after wearing Confederate flags as clothing in response to a fellow student wearing a rainbow flag to mark LGBT History Month.

    Some Maple Valley, Washington, school administrators are about to learn a lesson about Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District and its progeny.

  57. William of Purple   12 years ago

    The replies to this Obama tweet will be something else.

    http://twitter.com/BarackObama.....2844803072

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      First one I saw:

      narwhal ?@riffymalik 3m

      @BarackObama yeah you say that to all the muslims you kill with your drones

    2. SugarFree   12 years ago

      "Michelle and I extend our best wishes for a joyous Eid al-Adha to Muslims around the world." ?President Obama

      "If it is his twitter feed then why is he quoting himself?"
      -SugarFree

      1. Cascadian Ephor Xenocles   12 years ago

        That's to let you know it's actually him and not his Twitter lackeys, which is normally the case.

      2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        He needed to make sure that the "President" part was included to satisfy his ego.

      3. CE   12 years ago

        I thought he shut down his Twit feed because of the shutdown.

  58. OldMexican   12 years ago

    Re: Palin's Buttwipe,

    Yes, unfortunately the ACA was the only market-based system proposed that broke the back of the cartel.

    There's nothing that says "market" more than "government-run."

    The GOP was too stupid to propose anything reasonable at all besides
    the idiotic bromide[???] of "sell acrost [sic] state lines!".

    God forbid people sell things across state lines. It would mean chaos. Dogs fucking cats and shit.

    1. GILMORE   12 years ago

      ""the ACA was the only market-based system""

      That forced participants to create products that no one wanted, and forced 'customers'* to buy them or else face a penalty. WHEEE MARKETS!!

      *can you call anyone a 'customer' when they have no choice as to whether to use a service? (oh, sorry = they can be penalized if they don't. FREEDOMS!) I got irritated when the NYC subway started referring to people as 'customers' as opposed to 'passengers'... because = what? I might have taken the OTHER subway? Given that the same motherfuckers run the bus system too, its not like there's any escaping them...

    2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      Apparently proposing "free market" is "stupid" to shit-for-brains like shreek.

  59. Guy LaGuy   12 years ago

    Crises can make ideas feel urgent. For some young intellectuals, nothing is more urgent than rethinking capitalism

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Maybe they should read Wealth of Nations like Newton's Principia. Adam Smith didn't really like capitalists, but he very accurately described much of the most efficient way of allocating scarce resources that have alternate uses. If you ignore scarcity and valuation problems, its like ignoring gravity and inertia in ballistics problems.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        One thing that always strikes me is how some conservatives are ex-Marxists. Not socialists, not progressives, open, full-blown Marxists. Like (working from memory here) David Horowitz or Thomas Sowell. What's weird is that people absorb that without much thought, whereas if they'd said they were ex-Nazis, people would freak the fuck out.

        1. Zeb   12 years ago

          Well, if you can ignore history or convince yourself that the actual Communist regimes weren't real Marxists, Marxism is a lot less obviously evil than Nazism.

    2. DesigNate   12 years ago

      You're the worst character ever Guy.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Overruling Trump's Tariffs Should Be an Easy Decision for SCOTUS

Damon Root | 6.5.2025 7:00 AM

What Ronald Reagan's Fusionist Politics Teach Us About Liberty, Virtue, and Their Limits

Stephanie Slade | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Not Permitted

Charles Oliver | 6.5.2025 4:00 AM

The 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Add $2.4 Trillion to the Deficit

Eric Boehm | 6.4.2025 5:05 PM

Anti-Israel Violence Does Not Justify Censorship of Pro-Palestinian Speech

Robby Soave | 6.4.2025 4:31 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!