Even After Bankruptcy Reorganization, Vallejo, Calif., Struggles with Pensions

Before Stockton and San Bernardino and Detroit, there was Vallejo, California. The port city, northeast of San Francisco, filed for bankruptcy in 2008, having racked up a deficit in the millions. It made all sorts of cuts, slashing jobs, health benefits -- pretty much anywhere it could. But it didn't touch employee pension costs, and now the city is discovering they pretty much have nothing else left. Tim Reid notes at Reuters:
Less than two years after exiting bankruptcy, the city of Vallejo, California, is again facing a budget crisis as soaring pension costs, which were left untouched in the bankruptcy reorganization, eat up an ever-growing share of tax revenues.
Vallejo's plight, so soon after bankruptcy, is an object lesson for three U.S. cities going through that process today - Detroit, Stockton and San Bernardino, California - because it shows the importance of dealing with pension obligations as part of a financial restructuring, experts say.
The Vallejo experience may be particularly relevant to Stockton, which is further along in its bankruptcy case than Detroit and San Bernardino and has signaled its intention to leave pension payments intact.
Reid reports that the city now finds itself with a growing operational deficit yet again. Their payment obligations to the state's public employee retirement program have gone from $11 million in 2011 to a current tab of $15 million, consuming 18 percent of the city's general fund.
Read the whole story here.
Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7.
Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and Reason articles. You can get the widgets here. If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"We realized we did not have the time or the money to take on a giant behemoth like Calpers," said Stephanie Gomes, Vallejo's vice mayor."
As I recall, it was simply that the Vallejo politicos were all dems, elected (and owned) by the unions and they were simply not about to get un-elected by fixing what was wrong.
I wish there were some way to make them personally responsible for their actions.
There must be some TeapubliKKKan Ubstrukshunizum somewhere to blame, right?
When my job brought me into federal buildings, I noticed that the workers there would greet each other with an odd fingered salute. Some would hold up a few fingers while another would hold up fewer fingers with a broad smirk. Took a while, but I finally learned what the salute was. It was how many years until they got their pension.