Sen. Durbin Asks: Are You Now Or Have You Ever Been Chummy With Conservative Lawmakers?

On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights will hold a hearing nominally devoted to "stand your ground" laws. The laws were briefly the focus of a media furor during and after the trial of George Zimmerman, even though they played no role in his successful defense after his shooting of Trayvon Martin. What the hell—it was an opportunity to slap at the concept of self-defense, for people who like to do such things. But even the subcommittee's chairman, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-a state that looks honest only by comparison to Rhode Island), doesn't seem all that interested in the laws. Instead, he's spent the last couple of months grilling organizations and companies about their relationships with an association of conservative state lawmakers and vowing to publicize such associations during the hearing.
Last month, Darcy Olsen, the president of Arizona's Goldwater Institute, wrote, "Earlier this week, U.S. Sen Dick Durbin (D-Ill) contacted the Goldwater Institute to inquire about the private organization's relationship to the American Legislative Exchange Council--most notably, whether the Institute has supported ALEC in the past or endorsed the group's "Stand Your Ground" model legislation." She helpfully posted Durbin's letter online (PDF), which reads, in part:
I ask that you please reply to this letter by answering yes or no in response to the two questions below. Please feel free to provide additional information explaining your yes or no response.
1. Has Goldwater Institute served as a member of ALEC or provided any funding to ALEC in 2013?
2. Does Goldwater Institute support the "stand your ground" legislation that was adopted as a national model and promoted by ALEC?
Please provide a response to this letter by September 1, 2013. Note that I am sending similar letters to other organizations that have been identified as ALEC funders at some point between 2005 and today. In September, I plan to convene a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights to examine "stand your ground" laws, and I intend to include the responses to my letters in the hearing record. Therefore, please know that your response will be publicly available.
Olsen took the opportunity to have a little fun with Durbin. "Have You No Sense of Decency?" she asked, echoing the famous rejoinder to Sen. Joe McCarthy.
Tiger Joyce, president of the American Tort Reform Association also invoked "not-so-faint echoes of the late Senator Joseph McCarthy" in a piece at Forbes on a similar letter received by ATRA inquiring into the group's relationship with ALEC.
The American Legislative Exchange Council has been a thorn in the side of left-of-center types for years, since it links conservative legislators with policy experts and business leaders. That allows legislation to be crafted once and then be introduced in multiple states by sympathetic lawmakers—often very quickly. Whether that legislation enables good idea or bad ideas is left to the observer (it can be a mixed bag from a libertarian perspective, but generally pro-freedom on economic issues), but ALEC has been very effective at generating and disseminating model legislation.
Political organizations like the Goldwater Institute and ATRA are unlikely to be intimidated by Durbin's tactics—Olsen and Joyce seem to relish the fight—but the businesses that provide resources to ALEC may not appreciate such attention. Linking them to ALEC and to controversial legislation (theoretically "controversial"—the public never seemed that upset and Floridians support the law as is) has the potential to drive at least some of them out of the spotlight, and reduce the organization's resources.
The Chicago Tribune in Durbin's own state editorialized that Durbin had cooked up an "enemies list" and pointed out that "while the letter acknowledges that recipients have a right to participate in policy debates, Durbin's intent is transparent: Renounce ALEC, and quit donating money, or I'll shame you but good."
The editorial continued, "it would be more than wrong for a U.S. senator to use the power of his high federal office as a cudgel against his enemies."
So far, Durbin's effort appears to have misfired. The "controversial" law to which he's trying to tie ALEC doesn't appear to have held the public's attention, and ALEC gained the media's sympathy. The group may even benefit, since real victimization by a powerful politician is one of the best rallying tools there is.
Keep an eye on the hearing next week and see just what sort of wacky shenanigans Durbin has in mind.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Have You No Sense of Decency?" she asked, echoing the famous rejoinder to Sen. Joe McCarthy.
I can't wait to hear that read into the record.
The editorial continued, "it would be more than wrong for a U.S. senator to use the power of his high federal office as a cudgel against his enemies.",/i
Yeah! You should wait until you're duly elected President for that!
verdammt close tags!
I got a bumper sticker from zazzle which is a close tag for "government". It will be interesting to see if anyone understands it.
The editorial continued, "it would be more than wrong for a U.S. senator to use the power of his high federal office as a cudgel against his enemies."
What's the point of having power (and a gavel) if you can't use it to crush your enemies?
This reminds me of something that was going on before we almost nuked Syria. What was it again? Something taxing.
Was it Trayvon? I remember something about me murdering Trayvon or something.
Yeah, something like that. White people taxing Obama's son to death because he wanted to register Democrat?
Officer Friendly: Alright you two, back to the porn thread and no more of this foolishness. Wouldn't be in your best interests to remember anything anyway.
Yeah, I think I voter suppressed him to death. Wasn't that it?
Was it when they fired that guy at the Men's Wearhouse? Maybe Obama's son was sartorially wounded?
I thought it was that Trayvon was on his way to get a state-issued ID to vote but he was forced to walk to the courthouse to obtain a copy of his birth certificate because the buses stopped running after the sequester. He came across the Klansmen-organized abortion protesters who lynched him because he couldn't call for help because the banksters conspired to not give him the credit he needed to get a cellphone that worked because he was black.
Thanks for the trigger warning, dick.
I remember now! Some Hispanic guy at the IRS murdered some black kid because he was Republican!
No, no, Pro L. Some Hispanic guy armed by the ATF murdered a bunch of people because they were, umm, there.
Oh, right. He was the one who shouted "Long life the pope!" and shot all of those people.
I hate agreeing with a pus merchant.
Pretty sure it had something to do with Sandy Hook.
Wait a second, wait a second. It was something with three letters. Fuck, what was it? I want to say it was something to do with government, but that can't be right.
Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights
Um, why do we need a subcommittee on the Constitution? Shouldn't the Senate's sole fucking purpose be to pass laws in accordance with the Constitution?
And furthermore, what do the other assignments of the committee have to do with the Constitution? From what I've seen, what passes for civil rights and human rights have gotten them so far away from the Constitution that they shouldn't even be mentioned in the same motherfucking sentence.
And in closing, fuck Dick Durbin in the ass with a baseball bat. He's a piece of shit.
That's the subcommittee that needs to read any legislation generated by Pelosi - somebody has to check it.
If that's the case, they could start by flipping over the flyleaf and actually reading the content of the bill.
Dick!
*shakes head*
Show Dick some respect!
Are you or are you not related to Deanna Durbin?
With enemies like these, who needs friends? I thought lefties hate guns, but their penchant for shooting themselves in the foot on questions of gun control legislation is borderline fetishistic. Hitching their collective wagons to the Zimmerman trial (Obama's "Trayvon could be my son" being the highlight) did more to discredit the effort to repudiate self-defense generally or SYG specifically than an army of Constitutional scholars and flyover-state senators.
Tail Gunner Dick has a nice ring to it.
Based on my Facebook wall, ALEC is now one of the major Emmanuel Goldsteins for progs. Why, they write proposals for legislation! And sometimes they become state laws! Something must be done to stop them!