Survey Says: Obama, Reid and Boehner Should Charter a Boat and Tackle Assad Themselves


It's a bit like watching a train wreck to see the Obama administration and its congressional allies wriggle and squirm over a red line on chemical weapons the president insists he didn't actually draw, even though he did, and accidentally create apossible diplomatic solution that will confine the Assad regime to slaughtering its domestic enemies with good, old-fashioned weapons instead of nasty gas. (Whew! Glad that's settled!) But if it's a train wreck we're watching, at least most of us agree that we want no part of it. Polling shows Americans continue to view the drumbeat for war as an inside-the-Beltway fetish, oppose indulging any such thing, and are appalled by the Obama administration's let's-blow-something-up-just-because excuse for a foreign policy.
Reason-Rupe polling finds that a plurality of 47 percent of Americans say the "political establishment in Washington D.C." is more likely to favor military action than is the public at large—17 percent somehow got the impression that their neighbors are more warlike than John Kerry or Rep. Pete King, and 30 percent think it's even-steven.
As for actually indulging in military action… Seventy-four percent of Americans call airstrikes against Syria "unwise." That is, as we know, the course of action President Obama is pushing as the means to convince the Assad regime to stop slaughtering its people the wrong way, and will presumably still be peddling during this evening's speech.
Not surprisingly, the president's overall foreign policy gets a big thumbs-down from the public at large, with 58 percent disapproving—there's been a huge swing just in the past month, ever since Syria became the designated replacement for Iraq Afghanistan as a military test range.
As Alexander Burns and John F. Harris write for Politico, "Barack Obama's unsteady handling of the Syria crisis has been an avert-your-gaze moment in the history of the modern presidency." That's a fair point, though there's plenty of gaze-averting to share with congressional leaders, from both political parties, including House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who have backed yet another war with a country that poses no threat to the United States. (A special shout-out to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for going straight for the Godwin by invoking Auschwitz.)
The president and his cross-aisle congressional buddies seem dead-set on military action that nobody else wants. Maybe they should charter a boat on their own and go toss some rocks at the Syrian coast.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How long before another Tuccille gets Tulpafied?
*thread
Victory! Nothing to see here. Move along
*sigh*
buffoonery on parade.
I want another poll by Emily.
There can never be enough Polls. Or commentary about Polls. Or commentary about the commentary about Polls.
A poll needs to be conducted to see how many Reasnoids like polls.
NEEDZ MOAR POALZ
How about a separate H&R article for each poll question?
Lou: Tonight His Honor is, uh, "polling the electorate".
VOTE QUIMBY!
But I won't argue with more Emily.
Stop. Please stop. I'll tell you anything you want to know. Just please make the polling stop.
Hugh, if President Obama came to your door and offered to abdicate, would you accept? What's your political affiliation?"
If that was actually the plan, then I'd be 100% for this war.
Isn't this the plot for Navy Seals 2?
No, no, Iron Eagle 3.
Ooh, Navy Seals!
I am disappoint THIS didn't get a shoutout in the flurry of polls.
"the vast majority of U.S. citizens strongly approve of sending Congress to Syria"
74% of Americans: "Release the unwise on them mooslim bastahds!"
I've heard anecdotal evidence that people are against war with Syria. If only there were a way to describe numerically the prevalence of this viewpoint.
74% of Americans call polls "family feud"
The Danger Zone!
You know, this actually sounds like a plan; L Ron Hubbard did shell Mexico in World War II - an unbelievably small military action - and they stayed out of the Axis camp, so it's not like it hasn't worked before.
I thought the great volcano of Xenu was in Hawaii? Man, I was way off.
Well, when the Reason-Rupe people called me, I did say Obama, Reid and Boehner could go do something to themselves, but it wasn't charter a boat.
Was it, "build a pillow fort?"
After years of polls showing 75% of Americans swooning every time Obama wipes his ass, it is refreshing to think that finally they have woken up to the fact that the man's completely wrong about something.
He was wiping back to front.
http://lifehacker.com/5805108/.....uld-i-wipe