U.K. Intelligence Destroyed Newspaper's Hard Drives, Says The Guardian's Editor
Even after they were told the data was backed up around the world
During one of these meetings I asked directly whether the government would move to close down the Guardian's reporting through a legal route – by going to court to force the surrender of the material on which we were working. The official confirmed that, in the absence of handover or destruction, this was indeed the government's intention. Prior restraint, near impossible in the US, was now explicitly and imminently on the table in the UK. But my experience over WikiLeaks – the thumb drive and the first amendment – had already prepared me for this moment. I explained to the man from Whitehall about the nature of international collaborations and the way in which, these days, media organisations could take advantage of the most permissive legal environments. Bluntly, we did not have to do our reporting from London. Already most of the NSA stories were being reported and edited out of New York. And had it occurred to him that Greenwald lived in Brazil?
The man was unmoved. And so one of the more bizarre moments in the Guardian's long history occurred – with two GCHQ security experts overseeing the destruction of hard drives in the Guardian's basement just to make sure there was nothing in the mangled bits of metal which could possibly be of any interest to passing Chinese agents. "We can call off the black helicopters," joked one as we swept up the remains of a MacBook Pro.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
..."just to make sure there was nothing in the mangled bits of metal which could possibly be of any interest to passing Chinese agents."...
They'll be here all week! Tell your friends and please tip the wait-staff generously!
Backup! You can never backup too often!
The Brit idiots who did this either:
1) Are dumb enough to presume Snowden and the Guardian didn't have copies elsewhere.
2) Were acting as that high-school hall monitor we all remember and reported back that they 'did as charged!'.
Regardless, they swatted at fruit flies and hoped that was enough.
Or they were fucking with them to show that they could fuck with them and nothing would come of it, to suggest that things could easily escalate from there.
So government says it's okay for government officials to destroy private property. Did they pay for the items destroyed?
Lord Acton was right, Absolute power corrupts absolutely...
my classmate's step-sister makes $65/hour on the internet. She has been laid off for 10 months but last month her pay was $19462 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more here.... http://WWW.CNN13.COM
Diane66 has you beat...