In California, government officials are pursuing a murky deal to "solve" the housing crisis by marrying government power with private enrichment. As Steven Greenhut explains, those officials would use eminent domain — i.e., the power to take property by force, upon the payment of "fair compensation" to the owner — to wrest control of hundreds of mortgages held by private-equity firms. They're not taking the actual property, mind you, but grabbing the notes held by those who financed the homes. Advocates see it as a way to halt foreclosures, but critics rightly point out that the deal is financed on the backs of taxpayers and is an abuse of government power to boot.
Thank you for supporting us during our webathon!
Reason is supported by:
The Inspector General Report Is a Huge Blow to the FBI's Credibility. Why Is It Being Treated Like Vindication?
The government's surveillance of Carter Page might not have been improperly motivated, but it was still seriously flawed.
A Professor Tried to End a Flirty Email Exchange With a Young Woman. Then She Threatened to Blackmail Him.
When the grad student threatened to publicize their embarrassing correspondence, he reported her. But the university decided he was the villain.
No, but that's not stopping a litigious vegan from making his case.
Plus: Provocative reindeer cause trouble for beer label, Law & Order's sex work fantasy, and more...