College Republicans Deemed Security Threats, Barred from Obama Speech

Citing safety concerns, Pres. Obama's staff barred a group of College Republicans from attending the president's speech at the University of Central Missouri earlier this week.
Security insisted that prohibiting the young Republicans from participating in the event was not done as a matter of politics, but out of concern for the well-being of the president. According to the College Fix:
The students, some of whom donned Tea Party T-Shirts and others who wore patriotic or Republican-inspired clothing, had protested the president earlier in the day on campus, but had put away their signs and said they were ready to simply listen to Obama when security shut them down – and even told them to leave the vicinity and stay several hundred yards away from the rec center.
James Staab, a political science professor at Central Missouri, lauded President Obama's visit as "an attempt to go public, directly to the American people." The student Republicans insisted that they were deliberately singled-out of the crowd, and denied entrance despite having tickets. Additionally, the students stood in line outside the university's recreation center, where the speech was to take place, for two hours before they received the bad news.
Courtney Scott, the state treasurer of the Republican student organization, was dismayed about how the situation played out. "A lot of us traveled several hours to watch the speech," said Scott. "We were very disappointed not to be able to attend."
The potential security threats had been staging a protest of the event earlier in the day. The College Fix asserts that "the students' protest earlier in the day was a peaceful one, consisting of holding political speech signs and talking to passersby throughout the morning." Furthermore, the College Republicans were restricted to the campus's free speech zone, "not anywhere near the rec center," and out of "eyesight or earshot of people who were waiting in line."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We want to have open dialogue.. in an echo chamber and without descent.
Surely, Old Boy, you meant "dissent"?
No. He means no descent from the high altar to speak to infidels.
But not with the public-public.
"Security insisted that prohibiting the young Republicans from participating in the event was not done as a matter of politics,"
Yeah, and that's just rain on your leg.
I think I know the reason why they were kept out. All together, now:
Fuck you, that's why.
Yeah, pretty much.
And...Because they're all RRRAAACIISSSTS!!
And... "Bush did it too!"
What, Bush didn't do it too? Ah, well, Bush would have done it if he was as smart as Obama.
/sarc
Bush actually required that rally attendees sign 'Loyalty Oaths' to the GOP/Cheney.
Can you get your copy out of the frame and scan it for everybody?
Not sure if that's true, but in any case, this wasn't a political rally for the president, it was a goddamn speech.
Why is this even news? Disagreeing with the anointed one is obviously the product of a deranged and dangerous mind. Why, they might even fail to applaud wildly and kiss his ring!
Amazing that someone can be as divisive and polarizing as this piece of crap Block Yomomma yet be so cowardly and thin-skinned at the same time.
Well, there are precedents....Stalin, Hitler, Bush II....
Don't forget the brothers Johnson.
What do you have against Band-Aids?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EvWkUuALGg
Hey, hey, Obama is the messiah. We gotta keep him from being crucified by the mob.
/ honest prog
not done as a matter of politics, but out of concern for the well-being of the president.
A distinction without a difference.
Especially when it's done BASED ON their politics. No other reason other than their being Republicans and peacefully demonstrating. TOTALLY not political at all, see?
A gold medal winner in mental gymnastics...
Conservatives will have a fit over this (rightfully), but completely ignore the fundamental idiocy of presidential speeches.
...and completely ignore that such things also routinely happened to protestors at places where Bush was giving a speech. Something tells me I'll be seeing a lot fewer articles about how this is the final proof that America is a fascist state this time, though.
Political opponents designated as a security threat and banished to the free speech zone. Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!
Most transparent. Administration. Ever.
"Most transparent. Administration. Ever."
Many see right through their bullshit canard
How do people, especially at a college, even say those words without realizing how retarded they sound?
When the only people you really deal with are your idiot peers and idiot profs, it's pretty easy. I managed to alienate half my dorm floor by being an open libertarian during an election.
Only half?
To the members of the Great Unicorn Rider's entourage, dissenting ideas (and those who hold them) are obviously dangerous.
Those kids should be happy they were only classified as a security threat, and not as enemy combatants.
Especially with Obama droning from the podium.
Nice.
Paranoia strikes deep and creeps into the heart of the Nixonbama Administration.
Enemies lists, total surveillance.
If you're lucky, you just end up getting targeted by the I.R.S. If you're unlucky, you end up dead.
I've said this before, but it is just as appropriate here:
Princeps legibus solutus est.
As I have said before, Obama is amazing at using speeches as a tool for convincing people who already agree with him.
I dont think Jumping Jack Falsh is going to like that.
http://www.Only-Anon.tk
You lost me there, Anonobot... I'm trying to search for deeper meaning, but...
Jack Falsh is a well known supporter of the Taliban.
I think Anonbot meant to comment at the Syria thread -- "its jsut a gas gas gas dude!"
Well, I thought I was in the Burka Avenger thread.
I don't see the problem with this. Countering the narrative is hazardous to the president.
Eschew the Amalgamation!
Furthermore, the College Republicans were restricted to the campus's free speech zone
BOOOOOSH made them do that.
Ah college Republicans. I guess somebody has to keep Brooks Brothers and white racial resentment in business.
Tony| 7.26.13 @ 7:03PM |#
"Ah college Republicans. I guess somebody has to keep Brooks Brothers and white racial resentment in business."
Ah, shithead. I guess someone has to keep beating on strawmen.
Yeah, all those ancap Lloyd Blankfien's and Jamie Dimon's of the world who hate the state and the black man equally. So much so that they made one president.
Of course, being a black racial resentment monger means never having to wear a nice suit. Obama is well known for buying Bill Clinton's $200 used slacks and undies from Goodwill. Because the left is like, totally into charity.
In the post-racial, post-partisan, post-reason America, dissent can not, will not, be tolerated.
Bear in mind, this is Missouri, where our state police consider that people displaying the Gadsden flag are possible terrorists.
And my county sheriff wanted to form an Obama truth squad, that would arrest people who criticized the president because they clearly must be lying. He later backtracked, but only reluctantly.
So only the super smart and super intelligent LIBERAL ARTS STUDENTS were allowed to attend?!
"but out of concern for the well-being of the president."
Yeah, because college republicans are known for being insane, feces and tampon throwing hooligans who see violence as a means to an end. That is exactly what I picture when I imagine "college republicans", not buttoned down financial analysts-in-training who go to church every sunday.
I'm reminded of this article
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....03180.html
"Though the study's authors acknowledge that students choosing to study economics may already be right-leaning, they found that economics courses are correlated with GOP affiliation"
Dems say they're afraid of guns, but they're really afraid of economics.
The comments...the idiocy burns.
Be careful not to mistake GOP affiliation for any indication of economic literacy or free market advocacy since in academic economics a guy like Ben Bernanke is considered to be a radical anarchist and Paul Krugman represents a pretty level-headed moderate.
The Democrats want to serve as the GOP's pallbearers, so they can let them down for the last time.