Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Snowden Seeks Asylum in Russia, DOJ Adds More Restrictions on Journalist Searches, Too Sexy for Iowa: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 7.12.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Right Said Fred
(Right Said Fred)
  • I'm too sexy for this alt-text.
    Source: Right Said Fred

    Edward Snowden will seek asylum, at least temporarily, in Russia. Fortunately he's already there.

  • Try not to be too attractive in Iowa. The state's supreme court has upheld its ruling that employees may be terminated if bosses worry they just can't keep their hands off them due to "the sexy."
  • The Department of Justice will significantly scale back the way it handles searches of journalists' records in order to track down leaks. The department says they'll stop referring to journalists as "co-conspirators" in order to justify searches and will toughen requirements that media outlets be informed in advance of the search so they can challenge subpoenas in court.
  • The Department of Agriculture has helped solve one of America's most pressing problems: The shattering of baseball bats during Major League Baseball games. Phew!
  • Police arrested a 12-year-old in Detroit for breaking into a bank in the middle of the night. Detroit still has banks? Do they still have money in them?
  • Eliot Spitzer has submitted petition signatures to run for New York City comptroller.

Did you write about liberty between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013? Reason welcomes you to enter this year's Bastiat Prize for Journalism, with a total prize purse of $16,000.

Have a news tip for us? Send it to: 24_7@reason.com.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Sheriff Defends DUI Stop

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Politics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (349)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The Department of Justice will significantly scale back the way it handles searches of journalists' records in order to track down leaks.

    Well, at least they'll say they will.

    1. Episiarch   12 years ago

      They've been so honest up to this point, I think we can trust them.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        I looked the DOJ in the eye and "was able to get a sense of its soul." They're okay, really.

        1. Tonio   12 years ago

          When you stare into the abyss, PL....

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            No, no, they have good hearts.

            1. Swiss Servator - past LTC(ret)   12 years ago

              Da!

              /Putin

  2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Try not to be too attractive in Iowa. The state's supreme court has upheld its ruling that employees may be terminated if bosses worry they just can't keep their hands off them due to "the sexy."

    At least the majority of Jezzies don't have to worry about that.

    1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

      Majority?

    2. Andrew S.   12 years ago

      Check your outside beauty privilege.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        But I can't!!!

        1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

          We'll get you a Harrison Bergeron style mask.

          1. Episiarch   12 years ago

            What if I'm allergic to latex?

            1. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

              I'll alert Warty.

    3. Brett L   12 years ago

      I, for one, am enjoying the shit out of this entirely foreseeable consequence of sexual harrassment suits.

      1. Coeus   12 years ago

        We just need one more law, then it would be perfect.

    4. CE   12 years ago

      At least the Iowa Supreme Court defended the freedom of employers to fire who they want to, if only in this one case.

      1. cavalier973   12 years ago

        But where does it end?

        Also, what if an employer lies, and tells his cross-eyed haint of a secretary that she's too irresistible to keep around?

  3. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    I had no idea that Estelle Costanza was so political.

  4. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

    The state's supreme court has upheld its ruling that employees may be terminated if bosses worry they just can't keep their hands off them due to "the sexy."

    That's good, though, right?

    1. alan_s   12 years ago

      As far as I'm concerned. People should have the right to terminate anybody they want to for any reason. The fact that this is even contestable in court is the sad part.

      1. fish_remote   12 years ago

        What about Us?

  5. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The Department of Agriculture has helped solve one of America's most pressing problems: The shattering of baseball bats during Major League Baseball games.

    Aluminum?

    1. CE   12 years ago

      Yeah, but then you get the shattering of pitchers' faces when a line drive nails them.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        That's not the Agriculture's problem.

  6. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    The Department of Agriculture has helped solve one of America's most pressing problems: The shattering of baseball bats during Major League Baseball games. Phew!

    Solution: BAN IT.

  7. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

    Cyclist pedals for his life trying to out race wolf in Yukon

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I imagine those wolves don't want to be outed.

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      Racist wolves?

    3. Warty   12 years ago

      I don't think I'd be willing to bike in the Yukon without at least a .357 revolver. Too much shit that would love for me to be dead. Carrying a pistol in the wilderness has to be legal in Canada, right?

      1. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

        has to be legal in Canada, right?

        ahahahaha

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        My tiger friend has got the sled
        And I have packed a snack.
        We're all set for the trip ahead.
        We're never coming back!

        We're abandoning this life we've led!
        So long, Mom and Pop!
        We're sick of doing what you've said,
        And now it's going to stop!

        We're going where it snows all year,
        Where life can have real meaning.
        A place where we won't have to hear,
        "Your room could stand some cleaning."

        The Yukon is the place for us!
        That's where we want to live.
        Up there we'll get to yell and cuss
        And act real primitive.

        We'll never have to go to school,
        Forced into submission,
        By monstrous crabby teachers who'll
        Make us learn addition.

        We'll never have to clean a plate
        Of veggie glops and goos.
        Messily we'll masticate
        Using any fork we choose!

        The timber wolves will be our friends.
        We'll stay up late and howl,
        At the moon, till nighttime ends,
        Before going on the prowl.

        Oh, what a life! We cannot wait,
        To be in that arctic land,
        Where we'll be masters of our fate,
        And lead a life that's grand!

        No more of parental rules!
        We're heading for some snow!
        Good riddance to those grown-up ghouls!
        We're leaving! Yukon Ho!

    4. CE   12 years ago

      He should have just smashed his water bottle and taped it to his hands to fight off the wolf, like Ra's Al Ghul would have done.

      1. Coeus   12 years ago

        He didn't have that particular set of skills, acquired over a long career.

  8. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

    Guess where else Germans left a mark?

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      On a cheeseburger?

    2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      On my bedpost?

    3. CE   12 years ago

      Belgium? Poland? France?

    4. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      On sitcom history?

  9. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Mon Dieu: At least 6 people have been killed and 26 injured in train wreck just outside of Paris.

    1. a better weapon   12 years ago

      Trains are the future! Mass transportation will save us all most of us.

    2. Brandon   12 years ago

      Market failure. Increase the involved agencies' funding.

    3. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Ayn Rand celebrated all six of those deaths.

      1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        The fuck?

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          There's a passage in Atlas Shrugged where one of the trains gets trapped in a tunnel killing the passengers, and Rand goes into detail about each passenger and why they deserved to die.

          1. DesigNate   12 years ago

            That hardly qualifies as celebrating.

  10. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Police arrested a 12-year-old in Detroit for breaking into a bank in the middle of the night.

    Maybe he was looking for toilet paper.

    1. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

      Leave Detroit alone, they livin' in Mad Max times now.

      1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

        Serve the booze and shush it, Moe!

  11. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

    Do you agree?
    John Goodman's top 5 performances

    1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      Walter Sobchak should be all five of them.

    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

      How can they not have Barton Fink on there?

      Also, it appears I need to see Matinee as that looks awesome. John Goodman playing William Castle? I'm there.

      1. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

        How can they not have Barton Fink on there?

        I know, right!

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          I mean, it's the Coen Bros movie that was made for him.

      2. kinnath   12 years ago

        Matinee is a fine movie.

      3. Ska   12 years ago

        Barton Fink was my first thought.

    3. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      Replace King Ralph with Barton Fink.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Edward Snowden will seek asylum, at least temporarily, in Russia.

    So he's a Russian spy instead of (or in addition to) a Chinese spy!

  13. Rich   12 years ago

    The court said such firings do not count as illegal sex discrimination because they are motivated by feelings, not gender.

    "Sorry, Zelda, Ima have to let you go. I feel you're just too ugly."

  14. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    VIDEO GAMES AND THE INTERNET ARE SCARY

  15. MJGreen   12 years ago

    Aww, that's nice of the DOJ...

  16. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

    Try not to be too attractive in Iowa.

    This has never been a problem.

    1. DesigNate   12 years ago

      Except the handful of Playboy Centerfolds that hail from there.

    2. kinnath   12 years ago

      It may be rare, buy Iowa does produce a few beautiful women.

    3. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      Yes, Hugh is never too attractive in any state.

  17. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

    O HAI GUYS HERE IS MORE INFO ON THE TAR SANDS HEALING WALK IF YOU WANTED TO KNOW

  18. Bobarian   12 years ago

    Alt text that refernces itself is better than nothing, but only microscopically so.

    1. a better weapon   12 years ago

      No worse form of attention whoring than creating self aware alt-text, amirite?

  19. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    Origin of "demisexuality"

    1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

      What's the origin of people not having a motherfucking clue what prefixes actually mean?

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        Demigoddamn!

      2. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

        Demi Moore?

      3. Coeus   12 years ago

        Replacing of latin with gender studies in the curriculum.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      "Demisexuality"??

      1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

        Demisexual: You are only sexually attracted to a person once you have an emotional relationship to them. Friendzone 101.

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          Um, thanks?

          I would have thought "lithromantic" meant having an attraction to rocks.

          1. Ska   12 years ago

            Or to printing.

        2. MythicalLibertarianWoman   12 years ago

          I like the "skoliosexual" one. That sounds like a person who is only attracted to someone who had scoliosis.

        3. Coeus   12 years ago

          hehe.

          Genderescent (plural: genderessence): Non-white trans people. According to some blogs, "no, white people do not ever get to use this." So... yeah. Racism.

      2. Jerry on the boat   12 years ago

        Apparently these people only have sexual intercourse when they slug down an expensive bottle of French wine first.

        1. Warrren   12 years ago

          I drink the wine and then fuck the bottle. I'm self-sufficient that way.

          1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

            Oenosexual?

            1. Warrren   12 years ago

              I'm vintage.

    3. Warrren   12 years ago

      I'm semi-dextrous.

    4. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

      TL;DR

      1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

        Short version: some teenager on a role-playing forum made it up to describe her character.

        1. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

          Oh. Hey, thanks. I was really more turned off by the format than the length.

        2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          In other words, a slightly less stupid origin than is the case for most of the feminist lexicon.

  20. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Evidently, Marcotte is now a PUA. To wit:

    Tsarnaev's supporters insist that they have purely intellectual reasons for supporting the young man accused of causing three deaths and 14 amputations. They believe the government set him up. But they sure do spend a lot of time sharing pictures of him on Tumblr, squealing over any behavior of his that can be construed as "cute," and clucking maternally over his well being.

    [...]

    So what's in it for the women? I think the answer is in the fantasy many women have of loving a dangerous man who then, by virtue of this love, eventually reveals a gentleness he doesn't show the rest of the world. It's the old "my love tamed the dangerous beast" fairy tale of romance novels and Disney movies.

    It's a race to the bottom when it comes to feminist and PUA regard for women.

    1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      Link: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_.....emale.html

    2. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      So what's in it for the women? I think the answer is in the fantasy many women have of loving a dangerous man who then, by virtue of this love, eventually reveals a gentleness he doesn't show the rest of the world.

      A good inspiration for the title of my next newsletter.

      "YOU DON'T KNOW HIM LIKE I DO" AND "I CAN CHANGE HIM": 12 Ridiculous things that women believe and how you can exploit them.

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        Alternate titles...

        She Fell Down the Stairs: A Guide To Creating Your Very Own Lifetime TV-Approved Marriage In 12 Easy Steps

        Denial and What It Can Do For Your Love Life

      2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        Could we all just watch Not Without My Daughter instead?

        1. NeonCat   12 years ago

          No, we have to watch Mother, May I Sleep With Danger? since it has the most awesome title ever.

          1. Ted S.   12 years ago

            Oh Dad, Poor Dad, Mamma's Hung You in the Closet and I'm Feeling So Sad

            1. NeonCat   12 years ago

              Okay, M,MISWD is the most awesome Lifetime movie title ever.

          2. Ted S.   12 years ago

            Can Heironymus Merkin Ever Forget Mercy Humppe and Find True Happiness?

        2. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

          Why is that whore outside with her head uncovered? And where is her male relative to supervise her?

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            I think that's the end when she finds the US consulate. I wanted to find a screen grab with her holding her daughter and the giant fucking US Flag in the background symbolizing her salvation, but google images was being uncooperative.

    3. Rasilio   12 years ago

      " It's the old "my love tamed the dangerous beast" fairy tale of romance novels and Disney movies."

      You know the stupidest friggin part of this. Marcotte has never actually watched the movie. If she had she would have realized that the Beast fell in love with Belle first and changed his entire nature to appear more attractive to her and only then did she start to recognize him.

      I mean really Disney's Beauty and the Beast is ridiculously over the top feminist move ever fucking made, it's central message is...

      Boys, the only way to get a girl is to stop acting like yourself and change everything about your personality to be what ever it is that she wants and really your life is empty and worthless without a girl

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        It's ridiculous to conflate the common princess fantasy with the sickness behind the Tsarnaev fan club.

        The princess fantasy (and it is a fantasy, don't get me wrong) is to be loved and have everyone make you feel special and unique. It isn't to get beat by an abuser. Marcotte and other feminists want to pretend that something more insidious is at play because they want to believe that the patriarchy is programming women at an early age to be their playthings. When it comes down to it, believing that women en masse are yearning for an abusive fantasy (and that without being steeped in feminist bullcrap, they'll continue on that course) is every bit as demeaning as anything a PUA has had to say on the subject.

    4. Coeus   12 years ago

      Hybristophilia "is a paraphilia of the predatory type in which sexual arousal, facilitation, and attainment of orgasm are responsive to and contingent upon being with a partner known to have committed an outrage,cheating, lying, known infidelities or crime, such as rape, murder, or armed robbery." The term is derived from the Greek word ???????? hubrizein, meaning "to commit an outrage against someone" (ultimately dereived from ????? hubris "hubris"), and philo, meaning "having a strong affinity/preference for".[1] In popular culture, this phenomenon is also known as "Bonnie and Clyde Syndrome".

      Other psychologists, such as Leon F. Seltzer, has offered explanations based on evolutionary psychology. Serial killers, in his view, are cases of alpha males that tend to attract women. This is because such males were good at protecting women and their offspring in our evolutionary history. Women nowadays may consciously realize that it is unwise to date a serial killer, but they are nevertheless attracted to them, as he notes "as a therapist I've encountered many women who bemoaned their vulnerability toward dominant men who, consciously, they recognized were all wrong for them."[3] As evidence of women's preference for dominant men, he refers to the book A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the World's Largest Experiment Reveals about Human Desire by Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam.

      1. Warrren   12 years ago

        Pubis hubris?

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        Bah.

        Some subset of women =/= all or most women

        As I see it, PUAs and feminists both have a vested interest in asserting their theories of how females develop and thus find ways to "prove" their cases by finding some subset of society (in this case, obsession with a serial killer) to unreasonably argue their points about society at large by analogy.

        There's no real reason why Disney movies have anything to do with serial killer obsession -- but for Amanduh, any port in a storm is good when it comes to "proving" that women are unclean unless they've been baptized in the feminist movement.

        1. Coeus   12 years ago

          Actually, hybristophillia is at one end of the spectrum of desire. Much like ebophilia is at one end of the desire spectrum for men. Almost every mental condition in the history of humanity exists on a spectrum that includes what we would consider "normal".

          The disney movies are not a part of this phenomena, as you demonstrated (quite well) up thread.

          1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

            Almost every mental condition in the history of humanity exists on a spectrum that includes what we would consider "normal".

            That's admissible as far as it goes, but taking from this statement the lesson that, say, Chris Brown is the ultimate "alpha" or that acceptable behavior at the right and left of the Bell Curve translates to level of desire in the middle is a bad lesson to draw. I'm sure you'll agree with me that a well-adjusted female, if she is on some level attracted to behavior of men like Tsarnaev, is nonetheless repulsed by (and rejects) said behavior on a rational level and that it is unreasonable to thus characterize her as "wanting" it. It's also unethical to conflate biological capacity for enjoyment with consent.

            There are certain nature/nurture arguments that PUAs cultivate to an unreasonable extent.

            1. Coeus   12 years ago

              Agreed on all counts.

              1. Coeus   12 years ago

                I'm sure you'll agree with me that a well-adjusted female, if she is on some level attracted to behavior of men like Tsarnaev, is nonetheless repulsed by (and rejects) said behavior on a rational level and that it is unreasonable to thus characterize her as "wanting" it.

                Though I will add that, as I age, I see rationality going further and further out of style, among both sexes.

  21. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Bipartisanship: Learjet Lizzie Warren and Colonel Tigh submit Senate bill to restore Glass-Steagall Act.

    The latest political threat to Wall Street came from an unlikely pair this week: Elizabeth Warren, the liberal first-term Democratic senator from Massachusetts, and John McCain, the veteran Republican senator from Arizona defeated in the 2008 presidential election.
    Ms Warren and Mr McCain teamed up with two others to introduce a bill in the upper chamber that would restore some provisions of Glass-Steagall, the Depression-era legislation separating commercial from investment banking that was repealed in 1999.

    The move is not quite triggering panic among the big banks, since many lobbyists believe there is not sufficient support for the legislation to advance in Congress and Obama administration officials are also known to be sceptical.

    1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

      Learjet Lizzie Warren and Colonel Tigh submit Senate bill to restore Glass-Steagall Act

      ...how dare you!

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        IT'S IN THE FRAKKIN' SHIP!!!

    2. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      I can't move my arm so well, li'l squaw; you'll have to shake it a bit for me first to get it started.

    3. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      sceptical

      America fought a war so we would be free from incorrect POME spellings like "sceptical."

  22. Rich   12 years ago

    Breaking: Z jury has a question.

    1. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

      is it "can we have Chinese for lunch, I'm sick of Subway?"

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        Is it "what is a 'defendant'"?

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          They synchronized their periods already?

  23. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

    WARNING WARNING: UNLICENSED ASPHALT REPAIR

    1. DJF   12 years ago

      Hopefully he does it better then my city workers, they seem to like turning potholes into speed bumps. They can't seem to figure out that too much is just as bad as too little.

  24. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    Best app ever

  25. np   12 years ago

    Big Brother around the world:
    http://www.dailymotion.com/vid.....ex_redband

    in Germany:
    http://www.dailymotion.com/vid.....er_redband

    (NSFW; just click the green button)

    1. np   12 years ago

      Cristina Del Basso who apparently became famous after her stint on Big Brother Italy:
      http://www.dailymotion.com/vid.....age-ca_fun

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        Jesus, those tits are egregiously fake.

    2. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

      Man We're prudes in N.America

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        Children must never be exposed to women's breasts! Moobs are okay, but women's breasts are the gateway to Hell!

        1. fish_remote   12 years ago

          Moobs are okay.....

          Charles Schumer approves.

          1. Coeus   12 years ago

            This comment must be a figment of my imagination. We all know that male politicians never get comments on their looks.

            1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

              Clearly I haven't done a good enough job of objectifying Aaron Schock around here.

              Consider his looks commented on.

              1. Coeus   12 years ago

                Not bad, but he could use some bigger pecs.

                1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                  He also needs to butch up his wardrobe.

                  1. Coeus   12 years ago

                    He also needs to butch up his wardrobe.

                    I once saw two homeless guys blowing each other in a city park. And that was the gayest thing I'd ever seen...

                    Until today.

              2. Irish   12 years ago

                I'm normally a straight man, but I might make an exception for Aaron Schock.

                1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                  I'm normally a straight man, but I might make an exception for Aaron Schock.

                  Funny that, he's a straight man too, but I don't think anybody would be surprised if he went gay for you too.

                  1. Coeus   12 years ago

                    Funny that, he's a straight man too,

                    Unless that picture was taken on Halloween, or he's a silent member of Outkast, I ain't buying it.

  26. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Another Deep Thought from Matt Yglesias:

    But at the end of the day we, as a society, need to decide whether we are OK with measures that will reduce the amount of financial problems by, in part, reducing the amount of credit that's available to people[...]

    if you reimposed some kind of usury laws limiting credit card interest rates, some people would be unable to get a credit card and they'd be upset. But in both cases, I think ultimately you'd do more good than harm, just as the past 30 years worth of anti-smoking regulations have done a lot to improve public health even while annoying people.

    Eliminating credit for no reason. Any other ideas from medieval economies we should be implementing, Matty? Something restricting Jews to their own ghettos in Imperial cities, perhaps?

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Carbon taxes are really sumptuary laws.

    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

      This is what makes SadBeard so amazing. He just proposed medieval-style usury law, and I guarantee you he has no idea.

      For those that were defending SadBeard as not necessarily being stupid...yes he is. He's really fucking stupid. Because you have to be incredibly stupid to be that unaware.

      1. hamilton   12 years ago

        I kinda think he's just contracted some awful disease or something that's eating his brain. I seem to remember reading his stuff once upon a time and thinking, well that's a well-thought-out argument, even though I can refute it.

        His latest stuff is just mind numbing, and the tweets are such pools of stupid that I get mad when libertarian columnists retweet them even for the purposes of argument.

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        I remember one article where he argued in favor of outlawing currency as Fed Reserve policy. Outlawing currency.

        You've gotta be huffing some serious glue to think that one up.

    3. a better weapon   12 years ago

      How do you suppose he squares this with CRA and access to housing financing for low income families?

      That face... so punchable.

    4. Warrren   12 years ago

      Barter it up bitches!

    5. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      The people who smoke cigarettes aren't confused about the health risks. People are aware that they ought to find more time to exercise. Nobody is exactly being tricked into thinking that eating doughnuts is good for you. But it's tempting. Just like consumer credit is tempting, even if you know that over the long run you will enjoy more consumer goods and higher living standards if you avoid it.

      And yet, more and more laws are passed to make it harder for people voluntarily smoke, to buy evil and delicious foods without being subject to calorie counts and "nutrition facts", or indulging in cheap credit (following the lead of our wonderful federal government).

      It's almost as if some people in the country are trying to control citizens' behavior.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        Oh, there are people who want to tempt you with "cheap" credit, if it's in the form of student loans.

        Somehow, I have a feeling that's not what they had in mind.

    6. Irish   12 years ago

      We should just convert the United States to Orthodox Catholicism. That way, no one would use credit because it is against Jesus, and the only bankers would be Jews who don't have to obey the dictates of the Pope.

      It would be just like that other wonderful period of economic growth, the 1200s.

    7. Irish   12 years ago

      I just realized what's most hilarious about this. Yglesias doesn't like individuals taking out credit that they can't afford, but his entire economic philosophy is based on government taking out credit that it can't afford.

      How does he not see the problem here?

      1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

        It's all part of the magic that happens when you go from the individual to the collective. Just like with the Walmart thing.

    8. MJGreen   12 years ago

      Translation: "Will you be OK making other peoples' lives worse because you don't expect this to affect you?"

      "...PS we don't care what you think, we'll do it or not do it regardless."

    9. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

      some people would be unable to get a credit card and they'd be upset suing.

    10. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      Something restricting Jews to their own ghettos in Imperial cities, perhaps?

      Well, that did go hand-in-hand with anti-usury laws, now that you mention it.

    11. Juice   12 years ago

      Yup, extending credit is just like smoking cigarettes.

  27. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    For the first time in years, scientists get a true color image of an exosolar planet.

    The alien planet's blue color was pinned down using observations from the Hubble Space Telescope. Although the planet might be the same color as Earth from space, scientists think that HD 189733b is a "hot Jupiter" ? a gas giant planet that orbits very close to its star. It takes 2.2 Earth days for the planet to travel fully around its sun.
    [...]
    The exoplanet's weather is less than ideal. Its atmosphere is more than 1,832 degrees Fahrenheit (1,000 degrees Celsius) and the planet rains glass sideways in 4,350 mile per hour (7,000 km/h) winds, according to Hubble officials.

    I say we invade like those aliens who were averse to water invaded Earth in 'Signs'.

    1. Episiarch   12 years ago

      Will they be able to stop us with some sort of sports implement too?

    2. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

      It takes 2.2 Earth days for the planet to travel fully around its sun.

      That seems insanely fast.

  28. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

    What are people in Egypt protesting?

    Ask a person who is there: Hernando de Soto:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new.....-most.html

    1. CE   12 years ago

      No fountain of youth in the desert?

    2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      Egypt could really use a Pinochet or an Ataturk.

  29. Outlaw   12 years ago

    http://now.msn.com/police-offi.....n-st-louis

    Good dog!

    1. Outlaw   12 years ago

      Also, paging sloopy. Think you oughta take a look at this one.

      It's Christmas in July.

    2. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

      Wowzers

    3. Episiarch   12 years ago

      Oh my that's rich.

    4. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      Awesome.

      Neither officer knew if the dog had been wounded, since it quickly ran away. Although it's lucky that the officer wasn't seriously wounded, his partner might need to spend some time working on his aim.

      Um, why can't they just shoot a rubber bullet at it or something since obviously loud noises and projectiles can scare a dog away without the need to kill it?

    5. Knarf Yenrab (prev. An0nB0t)   12 years ago

      In recognition of the dog/Balko/testicles relationship central to Reason.com's identity, I move that we term all future dog-positive stories such as this one "Outlaw nutrubs."

      "I was having a shitty day until I visited Reason, but then an outlaw nutrub gave me back my mojo."

      1. Warrren   12 years ago

        Yes. A 1000 times yes!

      2. DesigNate   12 years ago

        Seconded.

    6. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

      Easily the best news story of the week.

  30. Archduke Trousersenthusiast   12 years ago

    Grid Girls from around the world

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      Noice. Needs moar asians though.

    2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

      What's a grid girl?

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Tron hookers.

        1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

          TRON: Legacy was a terrible movie.

        2. Episiarch   12 years ago

          Olivia Wilde?!?

          1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

            Is she a hooker? How much?

            1. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

              Yeah, but you can't afford her.

              1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                Maybe she'll take orphans in lieu of cash?

  31. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    I can't really improve upon the title for shock value, so I won't try:

    Blocking Walmart is a Favor To Competing Businesses

    The logic that consumer sovereignty should be the trump here can be contested. Tom Slee took this precise example as the centerpiece of his rather good book No One Makes You Shop at Walmart: The Surprising Deceptions of Individual Choice. Perhaps as individuals, DC residents would prefer the superior price/service mix offered by Walmart to that offered by competing firms, but as a collective we might have aesthetic or ethical reasons for wanting to bolster Walmart's competitors.

    Freedom Is Slavery, War Is Peace... you know the drill.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      I like how they don't even pretend that they aren't legislating to help favored businesses.

    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

      as a collective

      Fuck you, scumbag.

    3. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

      The real shock is how not-insane the comments are.

      1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

        Couldn't you at least list the author so I wouldn't have give that fascist Yglesias a fucking click?

    4. Irish   12 years ago

      If we wanted that as a collective then you wouldn't have to pass a law forcing us to do that. We'd just kind of do it ourselves.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        A collective without force? What the hell are you talking about? The whole point of a collective is force!

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Remember that bit where I said someone (don't recall who) would join the Borg even if it turned out they only took volunteers? Matt's one of those.

    5. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      but as a collective we might have aesthetic or ethical reasons for wanting to bolster Walmart's competitors.

      Submit to the hive, drone! The hive is life! The hive is love! The hive is all!

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        I love Big Queen?

        1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

          I prefer Killer Queen.

    6. New West Republic   12 years ago

      At least he's willing to admit to lefty ban-boners are sometimes engorged by aesthetic concerns. I mean, fuck people who can't afford good taste, right?

  32. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

    I say we invade like those aliens who were averse to water invaded Earth in 'Signs'.

    "OK men, we have the technology to navigate interstellar space, but we decided to use crop circles instead. Now strip naked, put down your weapons, and walk around slowly to conquer that planet full of a material that dissolves your exposed flesh but is harmless to the armed, clothed people we're conquering!!!"

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      If and when aliens finally visit, I think we're in for a shock with the gigantic technological advantages they'll have (regardless of their benevolence or lack thereof). I doubt seriously they'd be the least bit vulnerable to anything we can do.

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

        Even if we unleash Warty?

      2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

        Why do you doubt that? Our soldiers have gigantic technological advantages over neolithic savages, yet they will still die if you hit them with a big rock hard enough.

        We may not be able to exploit that vulnerability sufficiently to prevail against them, but the idea they'll be completely invulnerable is unlikely.

        Of course, invading a planet to begin with really makes no sense. Given how common planets are now, why waste the effort of a military invansion of an occupied planet when there's an almost innumerable supply of uninhabited ones you could take without resistance?

        Just in our own solar system, for example, pretty much any resource you can get on earth is available on mars, and all we could do to stop you is sullenly give you the stink eye from millions of miles away.

        1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

          Actually, that would be an interesting idea for a book. Instellar locust type aliens show up and begin strip mining mars while completely ignoring the earth. Focus on how humans suffer irrational rage at 1) not being able to stop it, 2) being ignored, 3) having to admit they're not really being negatively impacted by even though it's emotionally humiliating.

          1. Episiarch   12 years ago

            I like this idea.

          2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Yeah, I like this. I saw something a little like this concept in of all things a book featuring science fiction art (Spacecraft, 2000-2100 A.D.: Terran Trade Authority Handbook. They tied together all of the images with a backstory.

            Anyway, one of them had a planet with mysterious aliens that came and went without any acknowledgement at all of the humans on the world.

          3. db   12 years ago

            How do we know that Mars hasn't already been strip mined by aliens (or ancient humans)?

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              It has. That's what happened to the atmosphere and the water. Venus' inhabitants suffered from runaway AGW.

              Or not.

            2. The Bearded Hobbit   12 years ago

              Who says it hasn't?

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.....oe_on_Mars

              ... Hobbit

          4. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

            Already been written:

            "The Jupiter Theft"

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfQgOxnUEtc

            1. Juice   12 years ago

              Reading a synopsis, it sounds pretty fucking good. Going on half.com to look for a copy.

        2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          While I'm sure it's possible that a interstellar civilization could not have total superiority to us, technologically, I have a feeling that won't be the case if it actually happens.

          1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

            I'm not arguing they won't be technologically superior. I'm arguing your assertion that "technologically superior" == "completely invulnerable".

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              If they can get here, the likelihood is that they would be far beyond us technologically speaking. Yes, I can come up with scenarios where they might be vulnerable to us, but is that likely if they have a massive technological advantage?

      3. Rasilio   12 years ago

        I have seen exactly 1 plausible alien invasion story that had us on equal enough footing to where the war made sense. That was in Niven and Pournelle's Footfall where the aliens did not have FTL technology (they used a generation ship to get here) and had some severe gaps in their knowledge of sciences because they were the 2nd intelligent species to evolve on the planet after the first killed itself off in some sort of environmental catastrophy, this lead to them developing very quickly in areas where their predecessors left behind usable information but left them blind to areas which we had investigated and even there when we finally won it was only because we had a better understanding of their psychology than they had of ours.

        Outside of that, if aliens ever did want to invade our world it is highly likely we would all be dead before we ever realized what had happened

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          Plus, they were elephants, so they never forget. To kill!

          1. Virginian   12 years ago

            There was one where the key to FTL and gravity is incredibly easy to discover, but humanity missed it. Which means the aliens invade with muzzeloading cannon and muskets. Which obviously ends poorly for them.

            1. Juice   12 years ago

              It's called The Road Not Taken.
              http://pastebin.com/aJQfubrK

              Also there is The High Crusade where medieval knights are visited by aliens and easily vanquish them, take their starship and eventually establish a galactic empire based on feudalism. A few hundred years into the future they return to Earth where humans are shocked to find out that armor-clad knights rule the galaxy.

        2. Calidissident   12 years ago

          Hypothetically, there could be a situation where the aliens were advanced but no so advanced that they could kill us all without effort, terraform whatever planet they want, go anywhere in the galaxy or universe in a reasonable amount of time, etc. Let's say their home planet is fairly close by, so that FTL travel isn't necessary. I could see a situation where a group of aliens on that planet might want to flee their home planet for whatever reason (political/religious oppression, economic opportunity, etc.) and head to Earth to colonize. Still might be some difficulties to be worked out in this scenario, but roughly speaking, I think it's plausible

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            It only works without FTL. With it, there's just too much awful for us to contend with. Like FTL objects used as weapons.

            1. Calidissident   12 years ago

              Agreed. Although given that our current understanding of physics leads to the conclusion that FTL is impossible it's not at all an absurd premise for a story.

              I suppose another "realistic" scenario would be one where the aliens, again, have advanced but not super-advanced weaponry, can't just destroy the planet with nukes or something equivalent, and for whatever reason (small home planet, the way they breed, etc.) have a small population, and so despite having a technological advantage, they're massively outnumbered to the point where it's an even match.

              But I feel like in every alien invasion scenario, it always comes down to some special "trick" (computer virus in Independence Day, pathogens in War of the Worlds, etc.) as to why the aliens fail

              1. Coeus   12 years ago

                There's a whole series of stories, can't remember who made them, about Earth being invaded by a much more technologically advanced species. But they were so stupid, we took the planet back in a year or two. And then the rest of the galaxy.

            2. db   12 years ago

              Any relativistic weapon used against a habitable plant is going to render it pretty much uninhabitable. Unless the goal is to mine the planet (at which point, why not just go after Mars as Mr. Dragon points out above), they're not very useful in conquest.

              1. Coeus   12 years ago

                What if they want slaves? Or just to neutralize a possible threat, but not willing to go all the way with genocide?

                1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                  What if they want slaves?

                  Why come all the way across the galaxy to get slaves when they could just make their own? Slave that would probably be much better anyways having grown up in the culture and can do anything the owners are likely to think of them doing?

                  Or just to neutralize a possible threat, but not willing to go all the way with genocide?

                  For the same reason the DOD isn't organizing military campaigns to the amazon to neutralize army ants.

                  1. Coeus   12 years ago

                    Why come all the way across the galaxy to get slaves when they could just make their own?

                    Biological science limitations? Religious doctrine? Why go all the way to Africa, when you can just use your own?

                    For the same reason the DOD isn't organizing military campaigns to the amazon to neutralize army ants.

                    Lemme tell you about a little place called "Africa".

                    1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                      Africa wasn't invaded for the purposes of taking slaves. The slaves were taken by people native to the region and traded to people showing up from outside.

                    2. Coeus   12 years ago

                      Africa wasn't invaded for the purposes of taking slaves.

                      True, but the traders damn sure made the long trip back to get more.

                      And the point about Africom still stands.

                  2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    I recall a Superman novel I read as a kid (released with the Christopher Reeve movie but not a novelization) that talked about aliens coming to Earth and stealing Xerox machines. Apparently, we were supposed to be the best at making copiers in this part of the galaxy.

                2. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

                  Then 550 years after they enslave us, they can engage in debates about whether the war between the planets was about slavery or the right to sip mint juleps on a wrap around porch.

          2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

            Even then there's no reason to invade earth. If they have the technology to come here at sub light speeds, they apparently have the ability to sustain a livable environment even in deep space for years, if not decades, at a time. That being the case you again have to wonder why they don't just take mars without resistance instead of wasting resources fighting us for earth.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Now I agree with this. If they can make it here, there's little reason to invade. Definitely not for resources, which are available elsewhere much more easily.

              Might kill us off, I suppose, but that's a different matter. Hopefully, no one would bother at this point, bottled up as we are on Earth.

            2. Calidissident   12 years ago

              "If they have the technology to come here at sub light speeds, they apparently have the ability to sustain a livable environment even in deep space for years, if not decades, at a time."

              What if they can only live through cyrogenic sleep? Also, who wants to live their entire existence on a space ship? Maybe, they don't NEED to colonize Earth, but then again, Europeans didn't need to colonize the Americas, Africa, or Asia. Also, Mars isn't habitable, and just because they have interstellar travel doesn't necessarily mean they can terraform a planet.

              1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                Europeans didn't need to colonize the Americas, Africa, or Asia.

                Yes they did. Because there wasn't an equivalent unoccupied continent they could occupy instead. If every planet in the universe is occupied by sentient races, then yeah, a space faring species will start fighting for more of them. But the vast majority of planets are likely empty.

                Yes, fighting for more resources makes sense when all the resources have already been claimed. Fighting for resources when there's plenty of unclaimed resources does not.

                Also, Mars isn't habitable

                Given we know nothing about alien biology, Mars is just as likely to be habitable to them as Earth is.

    2. Calidissident   12 years ago

      You just got Shamalayned!

    3. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      They also can't open pantry doors or break down a boarded up window/door even though they are supposed to be like super strong and stuff.

  33. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Blocking Walmart is a Favor To Competing Businesses

    No shit. Is there anybody not employed by MSNBC who even bothers to pretend this is untrue?

    1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      I didn't know the purpose of government was to grant favors.

      1. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

        What else is it good for?

    2. Juice   12 years ago

      Actually, the TV was on when I got home (and the woman was cooking) and I got there right at "Let me Finish" on Hardball (with a guest host). The guest host was arguing against the anti-Wal Mart law and for all the right reasons. I was shocked.

  34. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    This is just awesome: Huffington Post in apoplectic fit over the fact that Texas State Troopers were confiscating tampons, maxi pads and other projectiles at the State Capitol while permitting open carry.

    State troopers are confiscating tampons, maxi pads and other potential projectiles from those who are entering the Texas capitol to watch the debate and vote on a controversial anti-abortion bill. Guns, however, which are typically permitted in the state capitol, are still being allowed.

    Which is more icky: a gun or a used tampon?

    1. np   12 years ago

      How about a gun that fires used tampons?

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Stay out of my fucking dreams.

    2. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

      They weren't used.

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        Oh I know, I'm just saying. In the comments and on Twitter some people were (hopefully facetiously) suggesting just that though.

        1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

          It does seem a bit troubling that according to the guards this is their normal rules--so what, you can never go watch the legislature in session while you have your period? Because you might throw a tampon at someone? That doesn't seem right.

          1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

            so what, you can never go watch the legislature in session while you have your period

            Sounds appropriate

          2. Episiarch   12 years ago

            God, nicole, let me mansplain this to you. There is a danger of bears being present in the capitol, and this is merely a precautionary measure.

            1. Ted S.   12 years ago

              Jesse's not going to be happy if you shoot the bears.

              1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                Quite; that's for him to...ahem...do.

            2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

              I'm confused why you'd shoot a bear instead of tame it with a bottomless mimosas brunch.

          3. A Serious Man   12 years ago

            It is a dumb rule.

          4. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            Wait, they let women into the capitol building in Texas? I would never have guessed.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              Someone needs to cook the representatives' dinner, rub their feet, and walk around in mini-skirts while the men, drunk at the end of a hard day's work, leer and make lewd comments.

              You clearly don't know much about how they do things in the Texas State Capitol, Jesse.

            2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

              Duh, it's not like they would have the maids, cooks, nannies and typists wait outside.

          5. Warrren   12 years ago

            I wonder if there is a convenient place to smuggle a tampon.

    3. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      Positive law derpage:

      You have a legal right to carry a gun in the capitol. However, there is no law allowing you to carry a tampon in the state capitol, therefore it is right and proper to ensure the smooth function of the legislative process by confiscating these unregulated potential projectiles.

      /positive law derpage

    4. Coeus   12 years ago

      Open carry?

    5. db   12 years ago

      Fucking bioweapons.

  35. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Guess who wrote this:

    Permit me an impertinent question (or three).

    Suppose a small group of extremely wealthy people sought to systematically destroy the U.S. government by (1) finding and bankrolling new candidates pledged to shrinking and dismembering it; (2) intimidating or bribing many current senators and representatives to block all proposed legislation, prevent the appointment of presidential nominees, eliminate funds to implement and enforce laws, and threaten to default on the nation's debt; (3) taking over state governments in order to redistrict, gerrymander, require voter IDs, purge voter rolls, and otherwise suppress the votes of the majority in federal elections; (4) running a vast PR campaign designed to convince the American public of certain big lies, such as climate change is a hoax, and (5) buying up the media so the public cannot know the truth.

    Would you call this treason?

    If not, what would you call it?

    And what would you do about it?

    1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

      A statist?

      1. CatoTheElder   12 years ago

        You have to be more specific.

        Hint: he's also a dwarf.

    2. Irish   12 years ago

      Whoever it is seems to be arguing that anyone who disagrees with them politically is guilty of treason, the penalty of which is death.

      They are arguing for the death of their political opponents.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        They are also arguing that even if this is done through legal, democratic methods, if you want to shrink the state you are committing treason.

        Reich is a psychopath.

        1. Irish   12 years ago

          He also apparently believes that the right controls the media, which is just absolutely hysterical.

      2. Warrren   12 years ago

        Hmm, I guess I'll keep my guns then.

    3. Irish   12 years ago

      And Marcotte.

      1. Knarf Yenrab (prev. An0nB0t)   12 years ago

        Goddamn it. Give us the source before we lose precious seconds reading that sociopath's dreck.

        1. Knarf Yenrab (prev. An0nB0t)   12 years ago

          And that should be directed to ASM. Blargh

      2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        Nope, not Marcotte. The writing isn't bad enough.

        1. Irish   12 years ago

          Robert Reich

    4. hamilton   12 years ago

      That jackass Reich. I've seen the damn thing on enough of my FB friends' pages to know.

      1. Irish   12 years ago

        Yes! I got it on my second try!

        Of course it's Reich. His entire Schtick is to claim that anyone who disagrees with him is

        A) a Nazi
        B) a Communist
        C) a commienazi
        D) Joseph McCarthy
        E) treasonous.

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          You'd think a guy with the last name Reich might tread lightly on Nazi and hypernationalist critiques of others...

          1. Irish   12 years ago

            You'd also think that someone who claims all of his opponents are guilty of treason and sedition would be a little less quick to bring Joseph McCarthy into the conversation.

            1. Episiarch   12 years ago

              It's interesting watching the statist mouthpieces become less and less self-aware every day. They're turning into robots who are programmed to promote the state and nothing more.

    5. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      Aaron Sorkin?

      Nah, not enough walk-and-talk banter.

    6. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Matty Yglesias?

    7. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      Link:
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....82032.html

    8. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      "If not, what would you call it?"

      The delusions of a depraved paranoid mind.

      I am sure there is good pharmacological help for such people.

  36. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Little One has spoken, and thus it is so!

    I wrote recently about the factors driving CEO pay seem driven more by convention than any concrete reality[...] For another example of that which has nothing to do with anyone being overpaid, check out this Wall Street Journal story about "Stung by Falling Prices, Mining Companies Take Ax to CEO Pay" and ask yourself what kind of sense that makes.

    What the flying fuck would you know about it, Matty? You have never worked in a job where your performance affected your compensation or continued employment, and you live in a city where the people employed are likewise unencumbered.

  37. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    For another example of that which has nothing to do with anyone being overpaid, check out this Wall Street Journal story about "Stung by Falling Prices, Mining Companies Take Ax to CEO Pay" and ask yourself what kind of sense that makes.

    I cannot even make sense of that sentence.

    1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

      Click through and all will be Mattysplained to you...if you dare. (seriously, it's bad)

  38. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Local San Francisco news station erroneously reports--on live television--the supposed names of the Asiana pilots: "Sum Ting Wong," "Wi Tu Lo," "Ho Lee Fuk," and "Bang Ding Ow."

    For the last time! Anything you put on that teleprompter Burgundy will read!

    1. Warrren   12 years ago

      Hung Lo was not available for comment.

      1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

        Yu Phun Ni approved that broadcast. I guess his career as a producer is over.

      2. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

        I used to work with a guy named Hung Cao.

        1. Tejicano   12 years ago

          There was a girl at my school with the last name Kakisaka. As pronounced in Japanese the "i" is silent so it sounds pretty much like "cocksucker".

          We convinced her to pronounce it the way somebody from Omaha would say it.

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      A Serious Man| 7.12.13 @ 5:11PM |#
      "Local San Francisco news station erroneously reports--on live television--the supposed names of the Asiana pilots: "Sum Ting Wong," "Wi Tu Lo," "Ho Lee Fuk," and "Bang Ding Ow.""

      Yes, she's blonde.

  39. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    I Was Wrong Before. This Is The Best Drug Store In The World.

    Thanks Matt, but I'm not sure I want my cocaine cut with fingernail trimmings or whatever they put in your batch.

    1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

      I have bought Knob Creek bourbon (pictured) from that very Walgreen's.

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        How much?

        1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

          Two bottles. I don't remember why I was buying booze downtown. I may just have been excited about them having it, since it was my first visit to the store (it's about a year old now) and I too was overcome by its awesomeness.

          1. Episiarch   12 years ago

            He means the price, nicole. Are you drunk already?

            1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

              The price is in the photo! I didn't get it! I mean it's $30 whenever MattY went there but who knows what I paid a year ago.

              1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                So, drunk and stoned. You really are the worst. Wait, I'd actually love to be drunk and stoned right now. You're even more the worst!

              2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

                $30? It's like $40 at my local grocery store. I've only tried it once and I really liked it.

                1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

                  I always have it stocked, and I don't think I usually pay more than $35. But I never get it from my shit Dominick's, I don't think they carry it.

                  1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

                    I don't know enough about whiskey to know what is the best quality for price.

                    1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

                      I don't drink it, so I really couldn't say.

            2. Irish   12 years ago

              It was probably super expensive given the sales/liquor taxes in Chicago. I only buy booze when I'm across the county line. Buying alcohol in Cook County is the worst.

              1. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

                Booze prices actually don't seem that bad to me here since they don't seem to vary much between here and Indiana, unlike cigarettes.

              2. Episiarch   12 years ago

                No, buying hard alcohol in Washington State is the worst. There is a 20.5% tax plus a tax on volume, so X dollars per liter. A ten dollar 750ml bottle of cheap rum ends up being $16. A $24 750ml bottle of gin ends up being over $32. It's fucking ridiculous. But at least it's privatized.

                1. Irish   12 years ago

                  A $24 750ml bottle of gin ends up being over $32.

                  This makes me sad.

                  1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                    It makes me angry.

                    1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

                      Be angry at yourself for living in Washington.

                    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

                      Weed is legal, dude. I actually should have put some in my pocket for happy hour later. Oh well, I'll just get legally stoned on my huge deck after.

                2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Whoa. I can buy booze at Sam's. At a discount.

            3. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              Nicole paid the iron price, Epi. She takes what is hers by right.

              1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                She does not sew?

                1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

                  She rapes and reaves from the Stony Shores to the Reach?

                  1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                    She mostly rapes, but she's been known to reave on occasion.

                    1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

                      Hopefully in that order.

                2. Nikkis enthusiastic dissent   12 years ago

                  It's true...and I will kill for fashion, so yeah.

                3. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                  You're probably bedecked like a whore right now, aren't you, Epi?

                  Tell me, did you take your Han Shot First t-shirt from the body of a corpse you made, or did you buy it in a market?

                  1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                    I am no coward! I beat up a nerd and took it from him! I have paid the iron price!

    2. Irish   12 years ago

      He made a follow up to that abortion of an article? Does he not even realize when he's being mocked?

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        If Matty Y restricted himself to writing about things he realizes, he wouldn't have a career.

    3. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      WHAT ABOUT THE ORGANIC BURRITOS!?

      1. Warrren   12 years ago

        Organic tofu burritos!

  40. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Let me help you, Yglesias:

    But at the end of the day we, as a society, need to decide whether we are OK with measures that will reduce the amount of financial problems economic opportunity by, in part, reducing the amount of credit that's available to people[...]

  41. NeonCat   12 years ago

    I guess I was wrong about Batman.

  42. Coeus   12 years ago

    Further updates on the acedemic who was excommunicated for his CAGW heresy.

  43. Hyperion   12 years ago

    Late to da party, but, Snowden has always only had one choice, for the forseeable future anyway, and that's Russia. The Latin American banana Republic dictators will sell him out for one easy payment of corrupto bucks from the Obamney regime. He's smart enough to know that. Putin doesn't need any of Obamas stash, and he's the only one with ballz (or nukes) enough to piss off Murika. So there you go.

  44. Thane-kin   12 years ago

    jesse, do you check your hotmail account?

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      I do.

      1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

        So, you're ignoring me then

        *runs away sobbing*

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          He's not ignoring you, he's waiting for you to get desperate enough to send dick pics so he knows if you're worth his time.

          Jesse is a master baiter; he knows how the game is played.

          1. Episiarch   12 years ago

            Dude, what the hell kind of wingman are you? Don't expose jesse's game!

          2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

            master baiter

            ic what you did thar

          3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            Jesus TiT, it doesn't work as well when they know the rules!

            Actually, Thane, you were auto-swept into my spam folder. Replying now.

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              I'm sorry, I panicked!

              1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                TiT is such a boob.

                1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                  I'm really more of an ass man-- Oh I get it

                  1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

                    http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr.....qhv4l8.jpg

            2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

              I was swept into Warty's giant, gaping spam folder as well. It may be time for a less-sketchy email provider.

              1. Warrren   12 years ago

                I read that as sperm folder...

  45. Coeus   12 years ago

    Io9 finally drops all pretense that they are about sci-fi and are not Jezebel lite.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Sci-fi extra lite at best, with pointless feminist bullshit thrown in. And fucking Dr. Who all the time. Jesus.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        If you read io9, you deserve what you get.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          I read the comments once. I think I burned my brain.

          1. Episiarch   12 years ago

            I was merely talking about the articles. If you read the comments, you are either an idiot, certifiably insane, a masochist of the highest order, or some kind of superman from the future who has high-tech idiot filters installed in his neural net.

            I'm thinking you're not the guy from the future, so that leaves...?

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              No, I'm from the future. Proof? Look at the date stamp.

              1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                Who is going to win the Superbowl this year? I have some bets to place.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Sorry, dude, I'm only a minute and some change in the future.

                  1. Episiarch   12 years ago

                    Then you are of no further use to me.

                    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                      Yeah, I screwed up. They said I could go five hundred years or 1:45 ahead. Who knew?

                    2. Warrren   12 years ago

                      I have a thyme machine you can borrow.

    2. Thane-kin   12 years ago

      a guy who still has tenure at a major research institution

      Somebody doesn't know what tenure is

    3. Warrren   12 years ago

      So they're saying evopsych is right up there with Wymyn's studies?

    4. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      I don't buy everything that evo-psych is trying to sell, but if you're forcing me to make a choice between a flawed and overhyped movement based on empirical reality, and one based purely on BS pseudo-Marxist theories of false consciousness?

      That's not even a choice.

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        They write books about how rape is a natural part of human evolution.

        How is this controversial? It's a fact that mammals in a state of nature reproduce without seeking consent.

        This is all part of his and many other evopsych researchers' project to prove that humans haven't changed much since we were roaming east Africa 100,000 years ago.

        Specious claim. Evo psych researchers outline *some* areas where humans have not changed significantly and attempt to argue based on empirical factors.

        1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

          It's controversial because morons will try to use EP to prescribe or proscribe certain behaviors via naturalistic fallacy, so other morons assume that anytime EP says something is natural, they are saying it is right.

        2. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

          This is all part of his and many other evopsych researchers' project to prove that humans haven't changed much since we were roaming east Africa 100,000 years ago.

          This is exactly wrong. Evopsych/sociobiology types are criticized for believing in recent human evolution. Here's Steven Jay Gould, founder of the Sociobiology Study Group, Marxist, liar, and idiot:

          "There has been no biological change in humans in 40,000 or 50,000 years. Everything we call culture and civilization we've built with the same body and brain."

          1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

            To clarify, the Sociobiology Study Group was about harassing sociobiologists, not studying sociobiology.

    5. Thane-kin   12 years ago

      alurin

      The tone of this article associates the field of evolutionary psychology with a few "douchebags". I don't think that's fair. There are plenty of serious, intellectually rigorous evolutionary psychologists who are not just trying to put a scientific stamp on their own narrow asshole belief system. It's an important scientific field (disclaimer: not my field). Miller is an asshole, period.

      It's furthermore not really fair to lump in Stapel, who is a social psychologist. Which brings up the additional point that scientific misconduct (a la Stapel and Hauser) is a whole different class of offense from Miller's (unless of course someone is making up data to say that men evolved on Mars, etc.). If you want to write an article about people who use "science" as a thin veil over their prejudices, fine. But be careful about the breadth of your brush.

      Today 2:06pm

  46. Coeus   12 years ago

    Bay area news station pranked.

    Bay Area Fox affiliate KTVU purportedly learned the names of the flight crew of Asiana flight 214, which crashed last Saturday at San Francisco International Airport, killing two. These?"Sum Ting Wong," "Wi Tu Lo," "Ho Lee Fuk," and "Bang Ding Ow"?are not their names. The newscaster's credulous reading puts it over the top.

    1. Coeus   12 years ago

      dammit, missed serious posting it upthread.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        Hey, Coeus, have you heard about the Cleveland Browns fan?

        1. Warrren   12 years ago

          They have just the one? What a let down.

          1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

            He's the only one we've been hearing about. And yes, I see what you did there.

        2. Coeus   12 years ago

          I had to google to get the joke Warren made, so yes.

  47. Warrren   12 years ago

    We don't need another hero.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!