Customs and Border Patrol May Deploy Weaponized Drones
"Non-lethal," but still ...
A Customs & Border Protection (CPB) report, released in response to EFF's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the agency, shows CBP has considered adding weapons to its domestic Predator drones.
The report, titled "Concept of Operations for CBP's Predator B Unmanned Aircraft System" and submitted to Congress on June 29, 2010 shows that, not only is the agency planning to sharply increase the number of Predator drones it flies and the amount of surveillance it conducts by 2016 (detailed further in a separate blog post tomorrow), but it has considered equipping its Predators with "non-lethal weapons designed to immobilize" targets of interest.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
like Barry replied I am blown away that a single mom can earn $5578 in four weeks on the internet. have you read this site http://www.Fly31.com
Ok, either the bots are getting smarter, this is a HUGE coincidence, or this poster is trolling. I'm honestly not sure which it is.
Great catch!
Karen Black
The only shocking thing about this story is that it took this long to happen.
Yes, it could be a _shocking_ experience. And when one is used to immobilize and someone dies, say by drowning for one, what then? Since they weren't a citizen, who cares? And if a citizen of this fine republic, sovereign immunity?
Ex-military here so these are definitely issues I understand (friendly fire) what's involved _especially_ when it comes to distant operations.