Obama Gives Possibility of Approval for Keystone Pipeline
If it doesn't "significantly" increase carbon pollution
In his speech today at Georgetown, President Obama said that the Keystone XL pipeline would only be approved if it "does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution."
That word "exacerbate" would appear to leave a lot of wiggle room. It means to aggravate, to sharpen, or to make a bad problem worse. The anti-Keystone crowd naturally thinks that the pipeline, or anything that aids in the transport of oil sands crude would exacerbate carbon emissions. But that's not what the State Department found. In March, in its draft environmental impact review, State determined that Keystone XL would have a small impact on greenhouse gas emissions, simply because in the absence of Keystone the oil sands would get to market some other way — by one of the many other pipelines that already move oil sands south into the U.S. or west to the Pacific, or by train. (WaPo's Brad Plumer had this deft analysis at the time.)
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?