Syria

Analyst Says Rebel Group Fighting Assad is Best Equipped Al Qaeda Affiliate in the World

|

Wikimedia

According to a private sector analyst informal assessments conducted by intelligence agencies from the U.S. and the Middle East the jihadist group Jabhat al-Nusra, which is currently fighting in Syria against the Assad regime and has been labeled by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization, is the best equipped Al Qaeda affiliate in the world.

From CNN:

Concern about the Syrian al Qaeda-affiliated group Jabhat al-Nusra, also known as the al-Nusra Front, is at an all-time high, according to the analyst, with as many as 10,000 fighters and supporters inside Syria. The United States has designated al-Nusra Front as a terrorist group with links to al Qaeda in Iraq.

That assessment is shared by some Middle Eastern intelligence agencies that have long believed the United States is underestimating the Sunni-backed al Qaeda movement in the country, according to a Middle East source. It is also believed that Iran is running training camps inside Syria for Hezbollah and that other Iranian militia fighters are coming into the country to fight for the regime.

The analyst has been part of recent discussions with the U.S. intelligence community, which is urgently working to understand what is going on inside the war-ravaged country and is consulting outside experts. The analyst, who declined to be named because of the sensitive nature of the information, stressed that all assessments about Syria are approximate at best because of the lack of U.S. personnel on the ground.

Even if, as the CNN story reports, the assessment is approximate it should concern policymakers that Jabhat al-Nusra is at the very least a well armed and dedicated jihadist group that is seeking to topple the Assad regime.

The presence of jihadists among Assad's opposition has been one of the arguments made against arming rebels in Syria. However, British Foreign Secretary William Hague does not think that if weapons were sent to rebels in Syria that they would fall into the hands of Jabhat al-Nusra. Hague backs up this claim by saying that there is no evidence that the non-lethal aid the U.K. has been sending moderate rebels in Syria has ended up in the hands of extremists like Jabhat al-Nusra, which is hardly the most reassuring of reasons to think that extremists won't pursue heavy weaponry were it provided to some of Assad's opposition.

NEXT: Pentagon Announces Schedule for Entry of Women into Combat Roles

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Shouldn’t Senator McCain be arrested for meeting with Al Qaeda on foreign soil? Couldn’t Obama have called in a drone stroke while he was there, according to McCain himself?

    1. Just make sure Lindsey is standing alongside him when the drone hits.

  2. Huh. Let’s compare and contrast, shall we?

    all assessments about Syria are approximate at best because of the lack of U.S. personnel on the ground.

    versus

    there is no evidence that the non-lethal aid the U.K. has been sending moderate rebels in Syria has ended up in the hands of extremists like Jabhat al-Nusra

    Hmm. One of these people sounds like he has a clue, and one sounds like he is desperately engaged in wishful thinking. Which is which?

    1. there is no evidence that the non-lethal aid the U.K. has been sending moderate rebels in Syria has ended up in the hands of extremists like Jabhat al-Nusra

      Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

      Not that things like logical fallacies matter to them. There’s no evidence, so therefore it doesn’t happen. Just like abuses of the NSA programs.

  3. Maybe this news will shrink McCain’s War Priapism.

    1. I wouldn’t count on it. It’s been over four decades, and he still hasn’t gotten in touch with his doctor.

  4. I have a plan on how to defeat the terrorist. Let’s arm them to the teeth. What? Someone in government already thought of that? Damn.

  5. At this point I just want both sides to lose. Maybe the NSA can get some sigint that we can feed to each side to keep them going at each other for as long as possible. Let’s make the a quagmire for both the Al Qaeda jihadis and the Iranians.

  6. Best equiped, schmest equiped. They don’t have airpower or decent comand and control systems. They’re doomed to fail. If the Syrian military were even the least bit competent, this all would have been over months ago.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.