Time to Wag the Dog? United States Says Assad Has Used Chemical Weapons in Syria

U.S. officials have said previously they believed that the Syrian government had used chemical weapons on rebel forces trying to overthrow President Bashar Assad but were still investigating the matter. Today, not very long after a House Judiciary Committee about the National Security Agency's secret surveillance program and the pretty bad reaction to it, the White House announced that its fears are now certainties.
Via USA Today:
U.S. and European officials have determined that the Syrian government has deployed chemical weapons against rebels, the White House has confirmed.
The White House notified lawmakers on Thursday that they have determined chemical weapons have been used.
The White House previously acknowledged that chemical weapons had been likely deployed, but they needed further confirmation. Obama had called thepotential use of chemical weapons by Syrian President Bashar Assad a "red line" that would spur further action by the U.S.
The president "has said the use of chemical weapons would change his calculus and it has," said Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes.
What timing!
Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7.
Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and Reason articles. You can get the widgets here. If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We'll find those WMD this time, by jolly.
Obama lies, more will die.
Bush lied, forcing Obama to kill more people
Here we go again.
Would Obama send American troops to slaughter tens of thousands of Syrians, and be slaughtered by Syrians, and would he give military support to rebels who are currently executing teenagers for blasphemy, all to distract from the scandals that plague his administration?
He wouldn't even lose a second of sleep.
So, basically the US will officially be on the State Department's list of nations that sponsor terrorism.
I didn't get the program; who are the good guys here?
WTF? My comment was deleted again?
You've angered the squirrels, Alex. There's no hope for you now.
The FReeper crowd will not only be expecting that Assad's WMD will be found, but also Saddam's. Some folks over there still insist that Saddam's WMD were loaded on trucks and driven to Syria.
Bubba says 'send 'em in!'
There are excellent reasons for us not to arm the rebels in Syria.
I think there are some good reasons to arm the rebels in Syria, too, but Assad having used chemical weapons isn't one of them.
So using guns to kill people is a-ok, but as soon as you use chemical weapons, you've gone to far? Seens legit.
Do we really care who wins? All we should care about is the non-combatants.
Station a hospital ship off-shore and help with the wounded. (same thing we should have done on Libya)
This makes a lot of sense wow.
http://www.AnonStuff.tk